--%>

Price elasticity of demand for DVD games

In this figure shown below, the price elasticity of demand for DVD games among prices of $30 and $40 is nearest to: (i) 7/6. (ii) 1/2. (iii) 3/7. (iv) 7/3. (v) 1/3.

859_11.jpg

Please someone suggest me the right answer.

   Related Questions in Macroeconomics

  • Q : Difference between

    Elucidate the differences among the frictional, structural, and cyclical forms of unemployment.

  • Q : The Fed can control the Fed funds rate

    Question: Hubbard argues that the Fed can control the Fed funds rate, but the interest rate that is important for the economy is a longer-term real rate of interest.   How much control does the Fed have o

  • Q : Redistribution of Income through budget

    Redistribution of Income: Each and every economy strives to achieve a society, where inequality of income and wealth must be minimum. In order to attain this objective via government budget the government spends adequate money on social security schem

  • Q : Supply factors in economic growth

    Briefly explain the four supply factors in economic growth?

  • Q : What is long run supply curve Please

    Please brief the knowledge what is long run supply?

  • Q : Ideas in which organization is involved

    Ideas in which organization is involved: Talking about the growth of any company. There are basically three type of broad ideas in which management of any organization is involved. These are: 1. Corporate Strategy<

  • Q : Full-employment Define the "

    Define the "full-employment" or "natural" rate of unemployment and give its approximate percentage rate as economists currently define it.

  • Q : Why is tax not a capital receipt

    Illustrate, why is tax not a capital receipt?

  • Q : Macro economics policy (a) Do you think

    (a) Do you think that macroeconomic policy should be designed to achieve a measured unemployment rate of zero? Why or why not should this be the case?

  • Q : Microeconomic and macroeconomic effects

    Predictions which restricting international trade to protect specific industries and “infant” firms would (a) inefficiently decrease aggregate output and employment, (b) raise the market power of the protected firms and their workers, and