--%>

Price discriminate maximizes joint profits

When a successful cartel which cannot price discriminate maximizes the joint profits of its members: (1) the marginal social benefits of additional output exceed the marginal social costs of output. (2) this is impossible for any consumer to gain without another consumer losing. (3) the industry is a decreasing cost industry. (4) each firm has the potential to turn into a natural monopoly. (5) each firm’s supply outweighs the demand for its output.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Wage Discrimination-supply labor curve

    The employer with monopsony power which as well had the capability to wage discriminate perfectly would confront the marginal factor cost of the labor curve: (i) Similar to the supply of labor curve it faces. (ii) Lower than the supply of labor curve it faces. (iii) H

  • Q : Theory of imperfect competition An

    An extensive theory of imperfect competition was initially developed by: (1) John Maynard Keynes. (2) Antoine Augustin Cournot. (3) Joan Robinson. (4) Joseph Schumpeter. (5) Thorstein Veblen. How can I solve my

  • Q : Tax in long run relatively inelastic

    You daily buy author-published books of poetry that are relatively inelastically supplied within the long run. Then government imposes a tax upon books of poetry. Then tax is probable to be borne primarily through: (1) retail book stores. (2) consumer

  • Q : Determine total variable cost of a firm

    This firm’s total variable cost (TVC) equals area as: (w) 0phq2. (x) daef. (y) 0bgq2 minus area daef. (z) obgq2.

    Q : Area below supply curve of resource The

    The area below a resource’s price line although above its supply curve is: (w) consumer surplus. (x) monopoly profit. (y) excess value. (z) economic rent. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for giv

  • Q : Equilibrium for a price maker firm I

    I have a problem in economics on Equilibrium for a price maker firm. Please help me in the following question. In equilibrium, for a price maker firm, the charge of monopolistic exploitation is any difference among: (1) P and MR. (2) P and MC. (3) VMP

  • Q : Human Capital-Specific Training Can

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The costs of investing human capital are most probable to be borne by the employer if the human capital is as: (1) General. (2) Marginal. (3) Generic. (4) Precise. (5) Specific.

  • Q : Profit Maximization in Resource Markets

    I have a problem in economics on Profit Maximization in Resource Markets. Please help me in the following question. To make a decision regarding resource hire, the firm should consider: (1) The price of resource. (2) The productivity (MP) of resource. (3) Output price

  • Q : Destitute Percentage of Income The

    The percentage of American families that stay put destitute year after year is around: (w) 1 2%. (x) 3 5%. (y) 5 7%. (z) 8 10%. Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for above Economics problem

  • Q : Monopsonistic exploitation-labor union

    The labor union contracts, a comparable worth rule, or minimum salary laws might boost up equilibrium employment when a firm has been practicing: (i) Price discrimination. (ii) Monopolistic exploitation. (iii) Feather-bedding. (iv) Blacklisting. (v) Monopsonistic expl