--%>

price discriminate

A monopolist selling several di erent products can sometimes "price discriminate" by bundling her products together. Here's an example. Suppose the U of C is planning to o er a series of two concerts. The rst program in the series consists of music by Chopin; the second, music by Stravinsky. There are four types of patrons with the following reservation prices (willingness to pay) for the concerts:

 Romantic Type: $40 for Chopin, $20 for Stravinsky  Modern Type $20 for Chopin $40 for Stravinsky

 Chopin Lover $45 for Chopin $5 for Stravinsky

 Stravinsky Lover $5 for Chopin $45 for Stravinsky

Suppose for simplicity that there is only one individual of each type and everyone can be accom-

modated at either performance. Also suppose the U of C does not know any individual's given

type.

(a) Suppose rst that separate tickets are o ered for the two concerts. What is the pro t

maximizing price per ticket?

(b) Suppose that only a single ticket for the series is o ered. What is the pro t maximizing

price for a series ticket? Have pro ts increased? What is the intuition for this result?

(c) Can you nd a more pro table alternative?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Declines in the international price

    Declines within the international price of oil would be probably to cause the: (w) wages of bicycle factory workers to raise. (x) demand for automobiles to decrease. (y) incomes of geologists and petroleum engineers to fall. (z) price of home insulati

  • Q : Determine a price taker from firm Of

    Of the given firms, the probably to be a price taker would be a: (i) sheep herder in a remote part of New Zealand. (ii) local gas and electric company. (iii) sculptor’s agent who contacts potential buyers through the internet. (iv) small town&rs

  • Q : Price taking and price making The price

    The price makers within a purely competitive market are: (i) auctioneers (ii) buyers. (iii) sellers. (iv) both buyers and sellers. (v) nobody. I need a good answer on the topic of Economics problem

  • Q : For the firm For the firm, the major

    For the firm, the major goal of profit sharing plans is to: force workers to incur some of the business risk. overcome the monopsony problem of having to pay higher wages to attract additional workers. overcome the principal-agent problem by better aligning the workers' interests with

  • Q : Value of multiplier When MPC and MPS

    When MPC and MPS are equivalent then what is the value of multiplier? Answer: MPC = MPS = 1/2 Thus K = 1/MPS = 1/1/2 = 2/1 = 2 [that is, Multiplier K = 2].

  • Q : Elimination of featherbedding Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The labor union goals for members don’t usually comprise: (i) Higher wages. (ii) Better working conditions. (iii) Bigger fringe advantages. (iv) Elimination of feather-bedding.

  • Q : Demand for product when its sales fall

    When a 10% hike in the price of paisley socks causes sales to fall with 20%, the demand for such socks is: (1) perfectly inelastic. (2) relatively inelastic. (3) unitarily elastic. (4) relatively elastic. (5) perfectly elastic. <

  • Q : Yield behaviour conflicting law of

    Which of the given statements, if true, seems most probable to yield behavior which would conflict with the law of demand? (i) People cannot afford to drive as much whenever the price of gasoline goes above $3.00 per gallon. (ii) The greater heroin addicts encompass i

  • Q : Economists statement for sales to a

    When Serena Williams, Cindy Crawford, Hillary Clinton, Katy Couric, Jennifer Lopez, and Ashanti all start wearing Wal-Mart jeans at public appearances, economists would explain any resultant raise in Wal-Mart’s jean sales to the change in: (1) Expectations regar

  • Q : Product differentiation in conduct

    Several market structures may pivot around goods which are heterogeneous, however the only market structure that absolutely needs goods to be differentiated within the minds of consumers of: (1) perfect competition. (2) pure competition. (3) monopolistic competition.