--%>

price discriminate

A monopolist selling several di erent products can sometimes "price discriminate" by bundling her products together. Here's an example. Suppose the U of C is planning to o er a series of two concerts. The rst program in the series consists of music by Chopin; the second, music by Stravinsky. There are four types of patrons with the following reservation prices (willingness to pay) for the concerts:

 Romantic Type: $40 for Chopin, $20 for Stravinsky  Modern Type $20 for Chopin $40 for Stravinsky

 Chopin Lover $45 for Chopin $5 for Stravinsky

 Stravinsky Lover $5 for Chopin $45 for Stravinsky

Suppose for simplicity that there is only one individual of each type and everyone can be accom-

modated at either performance. Also suppose the U of C does not know any individual's given

type.

(a) Suppose rst that separate tickets are o ered for the two concerts. What is the pro t

maximizing price per ticket?

(b) Suppose that only a single ticket for the series is o ered. What is the pro t maximizing

price for a series ticket? Have pro ts increased? What is the intuition for this result?

(c) Can you nd a more pro table alternative?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Illustration of Substitution Effect

    Sally is very rich that money hardly matters to her, although when the price of JIF chunky peanut butter doubled Sally switched to Peter Pan chunky peanut butter. This alters is an example of the: (1) Income effect. (2) Payback effect. (3) Substitution effect. (4) Pri

  • Q : Purely competitive buyers and sellers

    Purely competitive buyers and sellers are: (w) price-takers. (x) price-makers. (y) powerless to make decisions. (z) quantity-takers. Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for above Econ

  • Q : Effects of deceptive accounting

    Whenever stockholders who made big financial investments in Enron prior to the mid-1990s suffered huge losses during the year 2001-2002 since of deceptive accounting practices and insider trading, they were the victims of problem termed as: (1) Adverse selection (2) M

  • Q : Problem on losing financial investments

     Can someone please help me in finding out the precise answer from the following question. Owners generally can’t lose more than their financial investments when a firm is a: (i) Proprietorship. (ii) Family business. (iii) Partnership. (iv) Corporation.

  • Q : Marginal Productivity Theory of Income

    The income distribution into a market economy is primarily found by differences within: (1) effort and sacrifice alone. (2) resource ownership and resource prices. (3) birth and social standing. (4) Lorenz coefficients. (5) political

  • Q : Tax cutting affect the economy How does

    How does tax cuts affect the economy?

  • Q : Prohibition in Economic Profit Economic

    Economic profits are not: (1) a surplus of revenues over opportunity costs. (2) quite similar to pure economic rents from society’s viewpoint. (3) zero in a purely competitive economy along with no uncertainty and zero transaction costs. (4) dif

  • Q : Explain about supply curve A supply

    A supply curve which is: (i) vertical is perfectly price elastic. (ii) horizontal is perfectly price inelastic. (iii) linear and goes through the origin has a price elasticity of one. (iv) rectangularly hyperbolic is also unitarily elastic. (v) trapez

  • Q : Medium of Exchange function of money

    Medium of Exchange function of money: Money as a medium of exchange signifies money as a means of the payment for exchange of services and goods. The Goods and services are exchanged for money whenever people sell things. Money is exchanged for goods

  • Q : Profit maximization in long run Profit

    Profit maximization within the long run does not need a firm to: (i) produce in accord along with the law of equal marginal advantage. (ii) adjust the resource mix till MPPL/w = MPPK/r. (iii) minimize cost for its selected level of output. (iv) produc