--%>

price discriminate

A monopolist selling several di erent products can sometimes "price discriminate" by bundling her products together. Here's an example. Suppose the U of C is planning to o er a series of two concerts. The rst program in the series consists of music by Chopin; the second, music by Stravinsky. There are four types of patrons with the following reservation prices (willingness to pay) for the concerts:

 Romantic Type: $40 for Chopin, $20 for Stravinsky  Modern Type $20 for Chopin $40 for Stravinsky

 Chopin Lover $45 for Chopin $5 for Stravinsky

 Stravinsky Lover $5 for Chopin $45 for Stravinsky

Suppose for simplicity that there is only one individual of each type and everyone can be accom-

modated at either performance. Also suppose the U of C does not know any individual's given

type.

(a) Suppose rst that separate tickets are o ered for the two concerts. What is the pro t

maximizing price per ticket?

(b) Suppose that only a single ticket for the series is o ered. What is the pro t maximizing

price for a series ticket? Have pro ts increased? What is the intuition for this result?

(c) Can you nd a more pro table alternative?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Successful strategy of product

    A successful strategy of product differentiation causes: (w) the demand curve to shrink and become more elastic. (x) the demand curve becomes perfectly elastic. (y) prices for close substitutes to equalize. (z) the marginal revenue curve to be below t

  • Q : Calculating economic profit for first

    Assume that the banker is employed at an annual salary of $60,000. She as well has financial assets worth of $40,000 which earns $1,500 per year in interest. She too owns a commercial building that she rents out for $20,000 per year. Now assume that she quits this job

  • Q : Problem regarding Minimum Wage Laws I

    I have a problem in economics on Problem regarding Minimum Wage Laws. Please help me in the following question. The consequence of minimum wage legislation on the teenagers has most likely been: (i) Greater unemployment. (ii) Greater employment. (iii) Full employment.

  • Q : Normal market supply curves I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Normal market supply curves. Please help me in the following question. The actuality that normal market supply curves slope upward is most obviously due to: (i) The lower costs incurred as production rises. (ii) Overti

  • Q : Words of Frank Knight In words of Frank

    In words of Frank Knight, risk, not like uncertainty: (w) is totally unpredictable. (x) is a main source of pure economic profits. (y) may be estimated. (z) cannot be taken into account while firms make decisions regarding production and pricing.

  • Q : Welfare from Poor to Rich “ Welfare by

    “Welfare by the poor to the rich” is best illustrated when: (1) an l8 year old dishwasher pays Social Security taxes to give payments to a 67 year old retired vice president of General Motors. (2) federal highway funds are diverted to a ma

  • Q : Long run equilibrium for purely

    When a purely competitive industry is into long run equilibrium, in that case for the typical firm: (a) P = FC = TC = MC = MR = AR = AC. (b) P = AR = MR = SRMC = SRAC = LRMC = LRAC. (c) pure economic profits reward especially effectiv

  • Q : Tacit collusion by oligopolists Tacit

    Tacit collusion through oligopolists is possible when: (w) agreed to by the government. (x) a price leader is visible. (y) the oligopolists succeed in forming a cartel. (z) very few firms control the market. How ca

  • Q : Union Strategies and the Taft-Hartley

    The union strategy made illegal through the Taft-Hartley Act of 1948 was: (1) Jurisdictional strikes centered on which the unions would symbolize a firm’s staff. (2) Contracts in which the firms agreed to preferentially encourage the union members. (3) ‘Ri

  • Q : Cartel Select the right answer of the

    Select the right answer of the question. We would expect a cartel to achieve: A) both allocative efficiency and productive efficiency. B) allocative efficiency, but not productive efficiency. C) productive efficiency, but not allocative efficiency. D) neither allocati