--%>

price discriminate

A monopolist selling several di erent products can sometimes "price discriminate" by bundling her products together. Here's an example. Suppose the U of C is planning to o er a series of two concerts. The rst program in the series consists of music by Chopin; the second, music by Stravinsky. There are four types of patrons with the following reservation prices (willingness to pay) for the concerts:

 Romantic Type: $40 for Chopin, $20 for Stravinsky  Modern Type $20 for Chopin $40 for Stravinsky

 Chopin Lover $45 for Chopin $5 for Stravinsky

 Stravinsky Lover $5 for Chopin $45 for Stravinsky

Suppose for simplicity that there is only one individual of each type and everyone can be accom-

modated at either performance. Also suppose the U of C does not know any individual's given

type.

(a) Suppose rst that separate tickets are o ered for the two concerts. What is the pro t

maximizing price per ticket?

(b) Suppose that only a single ticket for the series is o ered. What is the pro t maximizing

price for a series ticket? Have pro ts increased? What is the intuition for this result?

(c) Can you nd a more pro table alternative?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Characteristics of oligopoly in market

    An oligopoly is a form of market structure described by: (w) its large number of sellers. (x) firms' capability to easily enter and exit the industry. (y) conscious interdependence. (z) price taker behavior.

    Q : Disadvantage of sole proprietorships

    The disadvantage of both sole partnerships and proprietorships is that the: (i) Financial resources are generally more restricted than for a corporation. (ii) Income is subject to the double taxation. (iii) Principal-agent troubles are far less simple

  • Q : Shift in market equillibrium Grape

    Grape jelly and Peanut butter are strong complements. Assume that severe mold ruined half of this year’s peanut harvest. When the grape jelly market was primarily in equilibrium on S0D0, then this market would shift to: (a) S1D0. (b) S0D2. (c) S2D0. (d) S2D2. (e

  • Q : Indication by data on poverty Data on

    Data on poverty into the United States indicate which: (w) in absolute numbers, additionally blacks are below the poverty line than whites. (x) in absolute numbers, more whites are below the poverty line than blacks. (y) the poverty rate is lower for

  • Q : Profit Maximization and the Demand for

    Each and every profit-maximizing firm which can cover its variable costs will hire the labor: (1) Just to the point of the diminishing returns. (2) Just to the point where MRP = ARP for the final worker hired. (3) Beyond the point of the diminishing r

  • Q : Critics of the simple limit pricing

    Critics of the straightforward limit pricing strategy argue about that: (w) sunk costs are not important in deterring entry. (x) for limit pricing to work, there should be a credible threat to keep old output levels. (y) this is rational to expect the

  • Q : Problem on greatest monopsony power The

    The Employers would have the maximum monopsony power in dealing with: (i) White collar labor in the metropolitan area. (ii) Unionized workers. (iii) Professional athletes. (iv) Blue collar labor in metropolitan area.

    Q : Substitution effect on supply curves

    One of the reasons for positive relationship among relative price and quantity supplied is the: (1) Technology effect, whereby bigger firms generate at lower average costs than the smaller firms. (2) Substitution effect, whereby firms switch among for

  • Q : Implication of the law of demand The

    The law of demand implies a relationship which: (i) Apply merely in the market economy. (ii) Needs government enforcement to work. (iii) Is negative among price and quantity demanded. (iv) Applies merely whenever scarcity is cured.

  • Q : Law of equal marginal advantage to

    I have a problem in economics on Law of equal marginal advantage to consumer behavior. Please help me in the following question. Pertaining the law of equal marginal benefits to consumer behavior outcomes the principle of: (i) Diminishing the marginal utility. (ii) Ov