--%>

price discriminate

A monopolist selling several di erent products can sometimes "price discriminate" by bundling her products together. Here's an example. Suppose the U of C is planning to o er a series of two concerts. The rst program in the series consists of music by Chopin; the second, music by Stravinsky. There are four types of patrons with the following reservation prices (willingness to pay) for the concerts:

 Romantic Type: $40 for Chopin, $20 for Stravinsky  Modern Type $20 for Chopin $40 for Stravinsky

 Chopin Lover $45 for Chopin $5 for Stravinsky

 Stravinsky Lover $5 for Chopin $45 for Stravinsky

Suppose for simplicity that there is only one individual of each type and everyone can be accom-

modated at either performance. Also suppose the U of C does not know any individual's given

type.

(a) Suppose rst that separate tickets are o ered for the two concerts. What is the pro t

maximizing price per ticket?

(b) Suppose that only a single ticket for the series is o ered. What is the pro t maximizing

price for a series ticket? Have pro ts increased? What is the intuition for this result?

(c) Can you nd a more pro table alternative?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Oligopolistic pricing behavior

    Collusive oligopolistic pricing behavior: (1) leads to natural monopoly when only some firms dominate an industry. (2) entails overt agreement among many firms in setting outputs and prices. (3) arises while contestable firms simultaneously raise or l

  • Q : Bond of fixed annual income A bond

    A bond which pays a fixed annual income always is: (w) an eternity. (x) a perpetuity. (y) worthless. (z) infinitely valuable. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Econom

  • Q : Transaction Costs and the Survival of

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The firms can be successful and survive in long run merely when they consistently: (1) Produce positive economic gains. (2) Comply completely with federal regulations. (3) Ignore managerial sl

  • Q : Exploiting the economies of Scope Bobby

    Bobby Lee’s dairy has gainfully expanded beyond butter, fresh milk and cheese, by providing Organizmic Fertilizer, guided by ATV tours for the visitors, and Granny Lee’s Exfoliating Body Yogurt. The Clyde County Business News trumpets that the Bobby Lee ha

  • Q : Labor Force Participation Rates The

    The percentage of a specific population who is either unemployed or employed or is termed as the: (i) Labor force participation rate. (ii) Work-force proportion. (iii) Income-leisure loss curve. (iv) Substitution effect dominance rate. (v) Labor supply.

  • Q : Examples of Human Capital I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Examples of Human Capital. Please help me in the following question. On-the-job training, the college education and leadership skills are all illustrations of (1) Financial capital. (2) Human capital. (3) Economic capi

  • Q : Find average income by relatively

    When market demands for agricultural products are relatively price inelastic and relatively income inelastic both, in that case as per capita income raises, the average income of farmers will: (w) increase while supplies of agricultur

  • Q : Illustrations of monopoly power The

    The best illustrations of monopoly power in the United States are possibly: (w) local public utility companies. (x) state university systems. (y) the national TV networks. (z) national defense firms. Hey friends pl

  • Q : Government and Labor Assume that the

    Assume that the male nurses are salaried more than female nurses for the similar work. When an ‘equal pay for equal work’ law is passed and enforced, this might: (i) Decrease the wages of male nurses. (ii) Not influence the wages of the female nurses. (iii

  • Q : Problem on diminishing returns I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Problem on diminishing returns. Please help me in the following question. The principle of diminishing marginal utility is a contrast of the law of: (1) Comparative consumer benefit. (2) Diminishing returns. (3) Effective explanation.