--%>

price discriminate

A monopolist selling several di erent products can sometimes "price discriminate" by bundling her products together. Here's an example. Suppose the U of C is planning to o er a series of two concerts. The rst program in the series consists of music by Chopin; the second, music by Stravinsky. There are four types of patrons with the following reservation prices (willingness to pay) for the concerts:

 Romantic Type: $40 for Chopin, $20 for Stravinsky  Modern Type $20 for Chopin $40 for Stravinsky

 Chopin Lover $45 for Chopin $5 for Stravinsky

 Stravinsky Lover $5 for Chopin $45 for Stravinsky

Suppose for simplicity that there is only one individual of each type and everyone can be accom-

modated at either performance. Also suppose the U of C does not know any individual's given

type.

(a) Suppose rst that separate tickets are o ered for the two concerts. What is the pro t

maximizing price per ticket?

(b) Suppose that only a single ticket for the series is o ered. What is the pro t maximizing

price for a series ticket? Have pro ts increased? What is the intuition for this result?

(c) Can you nd a more pro table alternative?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Objective of firm in price

    The firm's objective within price discrimination is to: (w) make the community better off economically. (x) make several consumers better off economically. (y) increase revenue and profit. (z) minimize average cost.

    Q : In value planning what matter in

    In the value of planning what still matters in strategic management lies?

  • Q : Loss efficiency to society from

    When the equilibrium price of wheat is $50 per ton and the marginal cost of the last ton of wheat generated is $70, there is: (w) an efficiency loss to society from over-production. (x) an efficiency loss to society from underproducti

  • Q : Laws and Regulations-Seller of the good

    The Caveat venditor is an ancient legal doctrine which, when the products are defective or fraudulently symbolized, imposes legal liabilities on: (1) Seller of the good. (2) Government, for failing to save consumers. (3) Resource owner. (4) Buyer, for failing to use d

  • Q : Output level of profit maximizing of

    The profit maximizing competitive firm in illustrated graph will: (i) produce output level q5. (ii) minimize total costs by producing output level q3. (iii) experience fixed costs equal to 0P3fq4. (iv) produce output level q4. (v) inevitably experienc

  • Q : Determine the yearly total revenues

    When the U.S. wheat market as in below demonstrated graph is primarily within equilibrium on S0D0, in that case the yearly total revenues (price × quantity) of wheat farmers will equivalent: (1) 0P4gQ4

  • Q : Competitive firm shuts down in short run

    A competitive firm shuts down within the short run when: (w) this suffers a loss. (x) normal profit = 0. (y) ATC > P. (z) the minimum AVC > P. Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for above Econo

  • Q : How is Economic policy more scientific

    Which of the given LEAST describes the widespread but erroneous view which economists seldom agree: (1) The media focuses upon controversy, not agreement. (2) Political considerations, more than economic logic, find out policies. (3) Some economists may feel obligated

  • Q : Pretax -posttax and transfer

    Refer to the following diagram. If line b represents the pretax and transfer distribution of income in the United States, we would expect the post-tax and transfer distribution to be: A) line a. B) line b, because taxes and transfers have no effect on income distribut

  • Q : Change in total revenue by selling

    Marginal revenue, which is: (w) the change in total revenue from selling an additional unit of output. (x) the change in total revenue from hiring an additional unit of labor. (y) computed as TR/Q. (z) specified by change in Q / change in TR.