--%>

price discriminate

A monopolist selling several di erent products can sometimes "price discriminate" by bundling her products together. Here's an example. Suppose the U of C is planning to o er a series of two concerts. The rst program in the series consists of music by Chopin; the second, music by Stravinsky. There are four types of patrons with the following reservation prices (willingness to pay) for the concerts:

 Romantic Type: $40 for Chopin, $20 for Stravinsky  Modern Type $20 for Chopin $40 for Stravinsky

 Chopin Lover $45 for Chopin $5 for Stravinsky

 Stravinsky Lover $5 for Chopin $45 for Stravinsky

Suppose for simplicity that there is only one individual of each type and everyone can be accom-

modated at either performance. Also suppose the U of C does not know any individual's given

type.

(a) Suppose rst that separate tickets are o ered for the two concerts. What is the pro t

maximizing price per ticket?

(b) Suppose that only a single ticket for the series is o ered. What is the pro t maximizing

price for a series ticket? Have pro ts increased? What is the intuition for this result?

(c) Can you nd a more pro table alternative?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Long run economic profits at entry

    Unlike firms within pure competition, several unregulated monopolistic firms can potentially: (w) reap long run economic profits when entry barriers prevent competition. (x) generate only normal profits in the long run. (y) sustain consistent economic

  • Q : Effect of percentage change in price

    Give the answer of following question. When the percentage change in price is greater than the resulting percentage change in quantity demanded: A) a decrease in price will increase total revenue. B) demand may be either elastic or inelastic. C) an increase in price

  • Q : Reliablity with standard economic

    Which of the given behaviors is least reliable with standard economic suppositions regarding consumer behavior? (i) Gustav cannot decide which of three distinct combinations of goods he favors. (ii) Lynn hates pickled herring; however Chris is willing

  • Q : In-Kind Transfer Payments Medicare,

    Medicare, rent subsidies, Medicaid, and food stamps are examples of: (w) transfers in-kind. (x) cash transfers. (y) human capital programs. (z) negative income taxes. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem

  • Q : Accused of predatory pricing in

    Wal-Mart business practices have been criticized like destroying small town America. Therefore argument is that Wal-Mart will build a new store and firstly set prices so low that they ultimately drive off all rival businesses. As per its foes, after their rivals move

  • Q : Constant price elasticities in

    Perfectly inelastic demand curves include constant price elasticities equivalent to zero as well as: (i) cannot exist within the real world across the full range of possible prices. (ii) happen more often than any other type. (iii) are horizontal line

  • Q : Present Value of Future Income The

    The present value of future income is: (w) higher, the higher the interest rate. (x) lower, the higher the interest rate. (y) unaffected by the interest rate. (z) purely objective, and not subjective at all. Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for above Economics pr

  • Q : Economic Rent of Demand Curve When D 0

    When D0 is the initial demand curve for land in this illustrated figure, within equilibrium the economic rent realized through the landowner will be: (1) zero. (2) area Ocef. (3) area cae. (4) area Oaef. (5) a pure economic

  • Q : Instance of Adverse Selection Nutcake

    Nutcake Products hires new staffs devoid of revealing that the rising demand for nutcakes and partial staffing make it not possible for staffs to take their guaranteed 2-week vacations. Nut cake’s shortage of candor is most unambiguously an instance of: (1) Symm

  • Q : Certainty and severity of punishment in

    Rising the certainty and severity of punishment decreases cheating on an examination. This statement signifies: (i) Unrealistic expectations regarding student honesty. (ii) Purely normative visions of behavior. (iii) Misplaced cynicism since this issu