--%>

price discriminate

A monopolist selling several di erent products can sometimes "price discriminate" by bundling her products together. Here's an example. Suppose the U of C is planning to o er a series of two concerts. The rst program in the series consists of music by Chopin; the second, music by Stravinsky. There are four types of patrons with the following reservation prices (willingness to pay) for the concerts:

 Romantic Type: $40 for Chopin, $20 for Stravinsky  Modern Type $20 for Chopin $40 for Stravinsky

 Chopin Lover $45 for Chopin $5 for Stravinsky

 Stravinsky Lover $5 for Chopin $45 for Stravinsky

Suppose for simplicity that there is only one individual of each type and everyone can be accom-

modated at either performance. Also suppose the U of C does not know any individual's given

type.

(a) Suppose rst that separate tickets are o ered for the two concerts. What is the pro t

maximizing price per ticket?

(b) Suppose that only a single ticket for the series is o ered. What is the pro t maximizing

price for a series ticket? Have pro ts increased? What is the intuition for this result?

(c) Can you nd a more pro table alternative?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Price increment in elasticity A price

    A price hike $4 to $5 per slice of pizza because of total revenue to: (w) fall. (x) remain constant. (y) rise. (z) this is not possible to tell from such data.

    Q : Provision of employment opportunities

    Government attempts to decrease poverty in the United States have comprised: (1) the provision of employment opportunities. (2) strong reliance on the negative income tax. (3) elimination of all taxes on the poor. (4) rising federal expenditures for m

  • Q : Compute price elasticity At price of

    At price of Rs. 20 the unit quantity demanded is 300 units. Its price downs by 10% its quantity demanded rises by 60 units. Compute price elasticity. Answer: <

  • Q : Analytic time and profit maximization

    Firm A in below illustration of figure maximizes profit and is: (1) demonstrated as operating in the long run. (2) capable of reaping economic profit of P2P1de, since only in the short run. (3) incurring economic losses equivalent to fixed costs of P3

  • Q : Scope of spiral and waterfall approach

    Explain the difference in changing the scope between a spiral approach and a waterfall approach?

  • Q : State Performance of Funds Performance

    Performance of Funds: The performance of funds mainly depends on how much diversification has been taken up by a portfolio manager and also if the company’s fundamentals have been assessed well and no hasty decision has been made on the basis of

  • Q : Internet connection system in Short Run

    The resource most probable to be viewed as the fixed in short run by a firm which operates a cable TV and Internet connection system would be: (1) Unskilled workers who bury the cable. (2) The personal computer (3) Satellite dishes that it has leased to the customers.

  • Q : Numerical problem on Relative Prices

    When the market price of a gallon of gas is similar as the cost of 4 pineapples in dollars, the relative price of the pineapple is: (i) 1/4 of a gallon of gas. (ii) 25 cents. (iii) 4 gallons of gas. (iv) $4.00. Can someone please h

  • Q : Labor Contracts-Agreement of shops I

    I have a problem in economics on Labor Contracts-Shop Agreements. Please help me in the following question. The union leaders would tend to favor the contract clause needing: (1) A sweat shop. (2) An agency shop. (3) A union shop. (4) An open shop.

  • Q : Operation of profit maximizing pure

    This profit-maximizing pure competitor would stop operating within this market into the long run when the price was expected to be persistently less than the price consequent to: (i) point c. (ii) point d. (iii) point e. (iv) point f. (v) point g.