--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

price discriminate

A monopolist selling several di erent products can sometimes "price discriminate" by bundling her products together. Here's an example. Suppose the U of C is planning to o er a series of two concerts. The rst program in the series consists of music by Chopin; the second, music by Stravinsky. There are four types of patrons with the following reservation prices (willingness to pay) for the concerts:

 Romantic Type: $40 for Chopin, $20 for Stravinsky  Modern Type $20 for Chopin $40 for Stravinsky

 Chopin Lover $45 for Chopin $5 for Stravinsky

 Stravinsky Lover $5 for Chopin $45 for Stravinsky

Suppose for simplicity that there is only one individual of each type and everyone can be accom-

modated at either performance. Also suppose the U of C does not know any individual's given

type.

(a) Suppose rst that separate tickets are o ered for the two concerts. What is the pro t

maximizing price per ticket?

(b) Suppose that only a single ticket for the series is o ered. What is the pro t maximizing

price for a series ticket? Have pro ts increased? What is the intuition for this result?

(c) Can you nd a more pro table alternative?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Maximum total revenue for elasticity of

    The elasticity of demand equals one and consumer spending upon Robot Butlers (there is the firm’s total revenue), is at a maximum at a price of as: (1) $20,000. (2) $15,000. (3) $10,000. (4) $5,000. (5) zero.

    Q : Demand for product when its sales fall

    When a 10% hike in the price of paisley socks causes sales to fall with 20%, the demand for such socks is: (1) perfectly inelastic. (2) relatively inelastic. (3) unitarily elastic. (4) relatively elastic. (5) perfectly elastic. <

    		•
  • Q : Examples of Complementary Goods Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Illustrations of complementary goods would not comprise: (1) Football tickets and rugby tickets. (2) Golf clubs and golf balls. (3) Laundry detergent and washing machines. (4)

    		•
  • Q : Income Distribution in Lorenz Curve

    When line 0D0' represents the 1929s U.S. income distribution and line 0B0'shows the 1975 income distribution, in that case the 2005 year’s income distribution would be signified by: (i) line 0A0'. (ii) line 0B0'. (iii) line 0C0'. (iv) line 0D0'.

    		•
  • Q : Long run equilibrium for purely

    When a purely competitive industry is into long run equilibrium, in that case for the typical firm: (a) P = FC = TC = MC = MR = AR = AC. (b) P = AR = MR = SRMC = SRAC = LRMC = LRAC. (c) pure economic profits reward especially effectiv

    		•
  • Q : Strategic barriers to entry Extensive

    Extensive national advertising can be a form of: (1) natural barrier. (2) strategic barrier. (3) regulatory barrier. (4) price discrimination. (5) moral hazard. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regard

    		•
  • Q : Tax and interest rate related problem

    If business taxes are decreased and the real interest rate increases: A) consumption and saving will necessarily increase. B) the level of investment spending might either increase or decrease. C) the level of investment spending will necessarily increase. D) the leve

    		•
  • Q : Problem on Resource Costs Can someone

    Can someone help me in finding out the precise answer from the given options. A raise in the cost of resource inputs would lead to the: (1) Shift of the supply curve to right. (2) Shift of the supply curve to left. (3) Movement upward all along the su

    		•
  • Q : Problem on Complementary Goods From the

    From the viewpoints of auto makers, the weakening of OPEC oil cartel in the year 1990s resulted in a/an: (1) Rise in demand for cars. (2) Reduction in demand for cars. (3) Rise in the supply of cars. (4) Reduction in supply of cars.

    Q : Total utility and marginal utility Can

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The paradox of the value (also termed as the diamond-water paradox) occurs from: (1) High transaction costs. (2) Low transaction costs. (3) Failures to differentiate among the m

    		•