--%>

price discriminate

A monopolist selling several di erent products can sometimes "price discriminate" by bundling her products together. Here's an example. Suppose the U of C is planning to o er a series of two concerts. The rst program in the series consists of music by Chopin; the second, music by Stravinsky. There are four types of patrons with the following reservation prices (willingness to pay) for the concerts:

 Romantic Type: $40 for Chopin, $20 for Stravinsky  Modern Type $20 for Chopin $40 for Stravinsky

 Chopin Lover $45 for Chopin $5 for Stravinsky

 Stravinsky Lover $5 for Chopin $45 for Stravinsky

Suppose for simplicity that there is only one individual of each type and everyone can be accom-

modated at either performance. Also suppose the U of C does not know any individual's given

type.

(a) Suppose rst that separate tickets are o ered for the two concerts. What is the pro t

maximizing price per ticket?

(b) Suppose that only a single ticket for the series is o ered. What is the pro t maximizing

price for a series ticket? Have pro ts increased? What is the intuition for this result?

(c) Can you nd a more pro table alternative?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem regarding Substitution effect

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. John freshly learned that a hotdog-and-fries combo is accessible at a local mall for similar price as a slice of pizza at Gino’s, where he routinely ate lunch. He starts buying hotdogs m

  • Q : Price increment for higher total revenue

    A price increase for Pixie’s cheesy fried grits by P1 to P2 would yield higher total as: (w) revenue because demand is price elastic. (x) supply since demand is unitarily elastic. (y) revenue since demand is price inelastic. (z) use of the

  • Q : Derived Demand for Labor in competition

    The faddish popularity of Atkins and South Beach diets both, and both of that advise dieters to eat more meat and to decrease the intake of starchy carbohydrates, most likely decreased incomes most sharply for: (1) grocery store clerks. (2) cattle ran

  • Q : Problem related to Profits and Losses

    Economists generally suppose that the firms behave rationally to make the most of: (1) Employment. (2) The community’s economic welfare. (3) Workers’ satisfaction. (4) Gains. Can someone please help me in finding out th

  • Q : Slope of ray by origin in price

    The slope of the ray by the origin which is tangent to point b equivalents to: (w) the reciprocal of the price elasticity of demand. (x) P / Q. (y) 0a / 0c. (z) the price elasticity of supply.

    Q : Imperfect competition-Market power of

    As MRP < VMP in imperfect competition whenever firms encompass market power as sellers then: (i) MPPL = VMP. (ii) The price of output surpasses MFC. (iii) Monopolistic exploitation becomes essential to get profit. (iv) Imperfect competition can’t reach the eq

  • Q : Problem on Monopolistic Competition

    When fifty fast-food restaurants belonging to fourteen various chains are strung along an eight mile stretch of highway, it is an illustration of: (1) a primitive cartel. (2) pure competition. (3) monopolistic competition. (4) an oligopoly.

    Q : Propensity to consume Propensity to

    Propensity to consume: This exhibits the level of consumption at various levels of income in the economy.

  • Q : Entry of new firm in monopolistic

    Entry of new firms within a monopolistically competitive market: (1) is preventable. (2) may decrease the established firm’s production costs. (3) increases the established firm’s profits. (4) shrinks demand for a successful firm’s p

  • Q : Difference among change in

    The difference between change in supply and change in quantity supplied is as follows: (1) The change in quantity supplied is caused just by the change in the price of good, whereas a change in supply takes place whenever the ceteris paribus suppositi