--%>

price discriminate

A monopolist selling several di erent products can sometimes "price discriminate" by bundling her products together. Here's an example. Suppose the U of C is planning to o er a series of two concerts. The rst program in the series consists of music by Chopin; the second, music by Stravinsky. There are four types of patrons with the following reservation prices (willingness to pay) for the concerts:

 Romantic Type: $40 for Chopin, $20 for Stravinsky  Modern Type $20 for Chopin $40 for Stravinsky

 Chopin Lover $45 for Chopin $5 for Stravinsky

 Stravinsky Lover $5 for Chopin $45 for Stravinsky

Suppose for simplicity that there is only one individual of each type and everyone can be accom-

modated at either performance. Also suppose the U of C does not know any individual's given

type.

(a) Suppose rst that separate tickets are o ered for the two concerts. What is the pro t

maximizing price per ticket?

(b) Suppose that only a single ticket for the series is o ered. What is the pro t maximizing

price for a series ticket? Have pro ts increased? What is the intuition for this result?

(c) Can you nd a more pro table alternative?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Demand for Labor and Monopsony Power

    When wage discrimination is not likely for the first 40 workers this profit-maximizing firm hires, however it can wage discriminate absolutely whenever hiring all the subsequent workers, it hires a net of: (1) 40 workers at average wage of $700 per week per worker. (2

  • Q : Produce a natural monopoly by market

    Market forces tend to produce a natural monopoly while: (1) decreasing costs are small relative to market demand for output. (2) diseconomies of scale are substantial at low levels of output. (3) economies of scale are substantial relative to market d

  • Q : Total revenue at level of sales and

    HoloIMAGine has patented a holographic technology which makes 3-D photography obtainable to consumers. The level of sales and production at that HoloIMAGine would take in its greatest probable total revenue is: (i) output q3

  • Q : Monopolist in the product market Can

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. For a monopolist in a product market, the value of marginal product of the labor: (i) Equivalents the marginal revenue product of the labor

  • Q : Effects of price rise on Substitution

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The Substitution away from the good is bigger when its price increases the: (1) More close substitutes there are for good. (2) More different utilizations to which the good has been place at t

  • Q : Neoclassical economics One of my

    One of my friends can't find the answer of this question .Give me answer of this question. How are economic theories created in neoclassical economics?

  • Q : Problem on Transaction Costs Higher

    Higher income families are far-off more probable to purchase automatic garage door openers than people with the lower incomes primarily as automatic garage door openers: (1) Save time and give convenience that wealthy people value relatively more. (2) Are status symbo

  • Q : Buyer beware-Laws and Regulations I

    I have a problem in economics on Buyer beware-Laws and Regulations. Please help me in the following question. Caveat emptor signifies: (i) Let the sellers beware. (ii) Sellers are the most excellent judges of the quality of their goods. (iii) Charge w

  • Q : Maximum possible profitable firm A firm

    A firm possessing important market power may suffer by managerial slack [X-inefficiency] and unessential high costs, which implies that, the firm: (i) is likely to be absorbed through a predatory rival. (ii) realizes less than the max

  • Q : Pure competition and monopolistic

    Pure competition and monopolistic competition are: (1) polar opposites on the continuum of market structures. (2) the two market structures in that firms are pure quantity adjusters. (3) both characterized by an absence of barriers to long run entry a