--%>

price discriminate

A monopolist selling several di erent products can sometimes "price discriminate" by bundling her products together. Here's an example. Suppose the U of C is planning to o er a series of two concerts. The rst program in the series consists of music by Chopin; the second, music by Stravinsky. There are four types of patrons with the following reservation prices (willingness to pay) for the concerts:

 Romantic Type: $40 for Chopin, $20 for Stravinsky  Modern Type $20 for Chopin $40 for Stravinsky

 Chopin Lover $45 for Chopin $5 for Stravinsky

 Stravinsky Lover $5 for Chopin $45 for Stravinsky

Suppose for simplicity that there is only one individual of each type and everyone can be accom-

modated at either performance. Also suppose the U of C does not know any individual's given

type.

(a) Suppose rst that separate tickets are o ered for the two concerts. What is the pro t

maximizing price per ticket?

(b) Suppose that only a single ticket for the series is o ered. What is the pro t maximizing

price for a series ticket? Have pro ts increased? What is the intuition for this result?

(c) Can you nd a more pro table alternative?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Law of Demand in respect to relative

    I have a problem in economics on Law of Demand in respect to relative price. Please help me in the following question. The law of demand defines that as: (1) Absolute prices rise, quantity demanded raises. (2) Relative prices raise, quantity demanded

  • Q : Resolving principal-agent problems I

    I have a problem in economics on Resolving principal-agent problems. Please help me in the following question. Attempts to resolve the principal-agent problems among stockholders and top corporate managers (that is, CEOs) comprise: (i) Profit-sharing systems for the t

  • Q : Present Value of Future Income The

    The present value of future income is: (w) higher, the higher the interest rate. (x) lower, the higher the interest rate. (y) unaffected by the interest rate. (z) purely objective, and not subjective at all. Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for above Economics pr

  • Q : Question on utility function Assume a

     Assume a consumer with the given utility function: U = 3y1y2 + 5. Suppose y2 = 1, derive the marginal utility schedule for y1. In what direction is it moving?

  • Q : Proprietorships-partnerships and

    The division of U.S. businesses into the categories of proprietorships, partnerships, and corporations is based on: A) generally accepted accounting principles. B) legal considerations. C) the judg-ment of the American Economic Association. D) an executive order of th

  • Q : Characterized purely competitive firm

    For a purely competitive firm long run equilibrium is characterized by: (w) P > MR > MC > ATC. (x) P = MR = MC = minimum LRAC. (y) maximum MC - MR. (z) minimum TR + TC. Can anybody suggest me the proper ex

  • Q : Increases profit of a firm when output

    A firm would raise profits when it: (w) decreased output when MR > MC. (x) expanded output while MR > MC. (y) increased output when MC > MR. (z) shut down since MR = MC. Hello guys I want your advice. Plea

  • Q : Calculating accounting profits The firm

    The firm has $70,000 in implicit costs, and the economic profit of $40,000. This firm’s: (i) Explicit cost equivalent $30,000. (ii) Accounting profits equivalent $110,000. (iii) Normal gain equivalents $40,000. (iv) Explicit costs equivalent $110,000.

  • Q : Average cost per unit of production

    When Prohibition Corporation maximizes profit within its production of St. Valentine’s Day software, there average cost per unit of it produced will be roughly: (i) $4 per copy. (ii) $10 per copy. (iii) $18 per copy. (iv) $24 per copy. (v) $32 per copy.

  • Q : Influence of Demand in the market price

    I have a problem in economics on Influence of Demand in the market price of good. Please help me in the following question. In short run, a demand curve would not shift the following a change in: (i) The size and distribution of national income. (ii)