--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

price discriminate

A monopolist selling several di erent products can sometimes "price discriminate" by bundling her products together. Here's an example. Suppose the U of C is planning to o er a series of two concerts. The rst program in the series consists of music by Chopin; the second, music by Stravinsky. There are four types of patrons with the following reservation prices (willingness to pay) for the concerts:

 Romantic Type: $40 for Chopin, $20 for Stravinsky  Modern Type $20 for Chopin $40 for Stravinsky

 Chopin Lover $45 for Chopin $5 for Stravinsky

 Stravinsky Lover $5 for Chopin $45 for Stravinsky

Suppose for simplicity that there is only one individual of each type and everyone can be accom-

modated at either performance. Also suppose the U of C does not know any individual's given

type.

(a) Suppose rst that separate tickets are o ered for the two concerts. What is the pro t

maximizing price per ticket?

(b) Suppose that only a single ticket for the series is o ered. What is the pro t maximizing

price for a series ticket? Have pro ts increased? What is the intuition for this result?

(c) Can you nd a more pro table alternative?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Categorizing goods into intermediate

    Describe the basis of categorizing goods into intermediate and final goods. Give appropriate illustrations.

    		•
  • Q : Conscious Interdependence in

    When firms or individuals attempt to personal gains or maximize profits or to minimize losses by trying to predict how other firms or individuals are probable to reaction, decisionmaking involves: (i) parallelism of action. (ii) profit maximization. (

    		•
  • Q : Price mechanism Write down the benefits

    Write down the benefits of leaving the allocation of countries resources to price mechanism?

    		•
  • Q : Output level on marginal revenue and

    When the firm produced at output level q2, this produced where: (w) MR = MC. (x) MR > MC. (y) MR < MC. (z) P < MC.

    Q : Felicific calculation of utilitarianism

    The supposition that a ‘felicific calculation’ gives a proficient guide for fitting punishment to the crime committed is an integral portion of: (1) Gresham’s Law that ‘Bad will drive out Good’. (2) Jeremy Bentham’s utilitarianism.

    		•
  • Q : Ceteris Paribus assumption The ceteris

    The ceteris paribus (all as well constant) assumption is most obviously implicit in the statement of a tailor who states that, “We will vend more suits in the month of May of 2008: (i) Than we sold in the month of May 2003. (ii) Than we sold in

    		•
  • Q : Motivation behind granting patent rights

    Normal 0

  • Q : Supply in the short run and long run

    Supply is too elastic (contain a smaller coefficient) within the long run than in the: (w) short-run in competitive, constant-cost industries. (x) short-run in competitive, increasing-cost industries. (y) market period in virtually all industries. (z) All of the above

    		•
  • Q : Transactions increment and moves in

    Transactions increase and demand prices move below supply prices while a good turns into: (w) subsidized by the government. (x) subject to a high sales tax. (y) more technologically advanced. (z) a complementary by pr

    		•
  • Q : Question on ATC and MC A perfectly

    A perfectly competitive market within the long period: Data         firm A:  ATC = y2   4y + 12 an

    		•