--%>

price discriminate

A monopolist selling several di erent products can sometimes "price discriminate" by bundling her products together. Here's an example. Suppose the U of C is planning to o er a series of two concerts. The rst program in the series consists of music by Chopin; the second, music by Stravinsky. There are four types of patrons with the following reservation prices (willingness to pay) for the concerts:

 Romantic Type: $40 for Chopin, $20 for Stravinsky  Modern Type $20 for Chopin $40 for Stravinsky

 Chopin Lover $45 for Chopin $5 for Stravinsky

 Stravinsky Lover $5 for Chopin $45 for Stravinsky

Suppose for simplicity that there is only one individual of each type and everyone can be accom-

modated at either performance. Also suppose the U of C does not know any individual's given

type.

(a) Suppose rst that separate tickets are o ered for the two concerts. What is the pro t

maximizing price per ticket?

(b) Suppose that only a single ticket for the series is o ered. What is the pro t maximizing

price for a series ticket? Have pro ts increased? What is the intuition for this result?

(c) Can you nd a more pro table alternative?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Quantity demanded decrement of elastic

    When the price elasticity of demand for goose grease is 2.5 and a 10% price hike will reasons of quantity demanded to: (w) grow by roughly 2.5%. (x) grow by roughly 25%. (y) fall by roughly 25%. (z) fall by roughly 4%.

    Q : The Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act

    Select the right ans wer of the question. The Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act: 1) exempted American exporters from the Sherman Antitrust Act. 2) provided technological assistance to developing countries. 3) brought about considerable reductions in American trade barri

  • Q : Strategic barriers to entry Extensive

    Extensive national advertising can be a form of: (1) natural barrier. (2) strategic barrier. (3) regulatory barrier. (4) price discrimination. (5) moral hazard. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regard

  • Q : Quantity supply according to Law of

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The law of supply defines that at: (1) Higher prices greater quantities will be supplied. (2) Lower prices greater quantities will be supplied. (3) Lower prices supply shifts to

  • Q : Monopolies over brand name products of

    Several firms have monopolies over brand name products, although face competition from: (w) international cartels. (x) oligopolistic rivals. (y) producers of close substitutes for their products. (z) intra-firm rivalry.

    Q : Profit-maximizing monopolistic

    When price discrimination is not possible this profit-maximizing monopolistic competitor charges a price of $______ as well as produces ___________ units of output: (w) $12 || 5 thousand. (x) $15 || 8 thousand. (y) $16 || 7 thousand.

  • Q : Problem regarding market demand curve

    Hey friends I need your help for illustrated figure in below where for cranberries, the market demand curve is: (i) A. (ii) B. (iii) F. (iv) J. (v) E. 1579_</span></p>
                                        </div>
                                        <!-- /comment-box -->
                                    </li>
   
   </td>
	</tr><tr>
		<td>
       
      <li>
                                        <div class=

    Q : Relatively market power The firm from

    The firm from the given list with relatively the most market power would probably be: (w) General Motors. (x) the world's biggest wheat farm. (y) a gas station in Wayout, Wyoming that has no competitors into 70 miles. (z) the BestBuy in Durham, North

  • Q : Price of a share of corporate stock

    When the price of a share of corporate stock increases, all else identical, there will be reduces in the: (w) overall liquidity of a portfolio which includes the stock.  (x) likelihood that the individual who owns the stock will sell this. (y) ra

  • Q : Influences of Ceteris Paribus The Latin

    The Latin phrase applies to the idea which all other effects on some dependent variable are to be supposed constant if examining the effect of changing a single independent variable is as: (1) Fiat justitia, ruat coelum. (2) Platea unum. (3) Unum paribus. (4) Ceteris