--%>

price discriminate

A monopolist selling several di erent products can sometimes "price discriminate" by bundling her products together. Here's an example. Suppose the U of C is planning to o er a series of two concerts. The rst program in the series consists of music by Chopin; the second, music by Stravinsky. There are four types of patrons with the following reservation prices (willingness to pay) for the concerts:

 Romantic Type: $40 for Chopin, $20 for Stravinsky  Modern Type $20 for Chopin $40 for Stravinsky

 Chopin Lover $45 for Chopin $5 for Stravinsky

 Stravinsky Lover $5 for Chopin $45 for Stravinsky

Suppose for simplicity that there is only one individual of each type and everyone can be accom-

modated at either performance. Also suppose the U of C does not know any individual's given

type.

(a) Suppose rst that separate tickets are o ered for the two concerts. What is the pro t

maximizing price per ticket?

(b) Suppose that only a single ticket for the series is o ered. What is the pro t maximizing

price for a series ticket? Have pro ts increased? What is the intuition for this result?

(c) Can you nd a more pro table alternative?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Contestable markets and purely

    Contestable markets and purely competitive markets are related in that both: (w) consist of large numbers of firms. (x) consist of firms who are price takers. (y) are characterized by easy entry. (z) are characterized by large economies of scale.

  • Q : NOT price discriminate by monopoly Into

    Into equilibrium, a monopoly which does NOT price discriminate will tend to produce: (w) the socially optimal rate of output. (x) a level of output where price exceeds marginal social cost. (y) lower output at lower prices than a competitive market. (

  • Q : Maximizing profit by hiring labor The

    The firm maximizes profit by hiring the labor at a point where labor’s: (i) Marginal physical product equal its average physical product. (ii) Marginal revenue product equivalents its marginal resource cost. (iii) Rate of exploitation is maximum. (iv) Wage rate

  • Q : Oligopoly and Economic Welfare Assume

    Assume that P = MSB and the firms in an oligopoly are in equilibrium where P>MC. This follows that: (1) P=MSC. (2) MSB>MSC. (3) MSB<MSC. (4) oligopolists will gain zero economic profit. (5) the minimum point on the LRATC curve will achieved i

  • Q : Synonym for the economists term utility

    I have a problem in economics on Synonym for the economist’s term utility. Please help me in the following question. The reasonably close by synonym for the economist’s term utility is: (1) Consumption. (2) Marginalism. (3) Discontentment. (4) Satisfaction

  • Q : Experience of mill for constant cost

    When generic lumber processing is a constant cost industry, within the long run this lumber mill is probable to experience a: (i) a severe shrinking of economic profit to zero. (ii) a decline within the price of 2×4s to about $2.40 apiece. (iii)

  • Q : Tourist’s use of natural resources What

    What are your views about tourist’s use of natural resources?

  • Q : Define multiplier Multiplier : It is

    Multiplier: It is the number by which change in investment should be multiple in order to find out the resultant change in income and output.

  • Q : More willing to hold less cash and more

    When households become more willing to hold less cash and more stocks or bonds, in that case the: (1) level of Aggregate Demand increases. (2) present value of future income falls. (3) interest rate falls. (4) stock market will crash.

  • Q : Monopolistically-competitive market

    When numerous new firms enter a monopolistically-competitive market, in that case the demand curves facing the firms previously in that market will: (1) shift to the left and turn into more price elastic. (2) become straighter and less income elastic.