--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Predictable outcome droughts in market adjustments

The predictable outcome of the 2001 to 2002 droughts within the U.S. farm belt was to: (w) raise the price and quantity of farm goods sold. (x) stimulate exports of U.S. wheat. (y) reduce the supplies, and increase the prices of farm goods. (z) boost demands and prices for farm goods.

Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for above economics problems.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Case of fuel efficient machinery in

    If the soybean market begins in equilibrium on S0D0, and in that case farm machinery becomes more fuel efficient, the market changes to: (1) S0D1. (2) S1D2. (3) S1D0. (4) S2D1

    		•
  • Q : Economic models assumptions regarding

    Economic models based upon assumptions such that singles pursue their own self interests aspect that: (i) Generally predict better than models which assume humanitarian motives. (ii) Yield dubious outcomes for economics. (iii) Distort the economy with

    		•
  • Q : Explain about the NO economic reform NO

    NO economic reform could probably: (w) remove scarcity. (x) decrease the average costs of production. (y) abolish equality in income distribution. (z) increase wages for most workers. How can I solve my eco

    		•
  • Q : Define illustration of a positive

    An illustration of a positive scientific statement would be: (w) vegetarians are healthier than people who gorge on candy and fried chicken. (x) people shouldn't be greedy. (y) justice needs ratification of an Equal Rights Amendment. (z) men mustn't b

    		•
  • Q : Positive declaration in positive

    When a mother tells her young child that thunder is caused by the angels bowling up in heaven, scientists would classify her statement as most clearly: (w) a normative statement. (x) a positive statement. (y) microeconomics in place of macroeconomics. (z) scientifical

    		•
  • Q : Better off and worse off condition in

    When an economic change creates one person better off and a thousand persons worse off, this is: (w) good for society. (x) bad for society. (y) neither good nor bad for society. (z) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

    		•
  • Q : Existence problem regarding each and

    Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for existence problem regarding every society. Every society should answer questions regarding “How?, for Whom? and What?” due to the exist

    		•
  • Q : Scaring people of a commodity or service

    Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for given problem that when are people of a commodity or service scarce: (1) gain from having this obtainable, (2) Wish more than the amount freely obtainable, (3) Say no to p

    		•
  • Q : Problem of macroeconomics in economics

    Can anybody advise me the proper explanation for given problem regarding macroeconomics in Economics generally. In macroeconomics, where we examine all things like the: (w) problems of What, How, and For Whom. (x)

    		•
  • Q : Calculate the net investment of machines

    Freddy's Fabulous Faux Frisbee Factory consists of fifty rapid frisbee forming machines. In recent year Freddy bought new fifteen rapid frisbee forming machines as well as retired five of them, all they are resulting within: (1) Net investment of 10 machines. (2) Gros

    		•