--%>

Predation by charging a low price

Predation by charging a low price is often a successful entry deterrent for all of the given reasons except the concept that low prices: (w) signal low profit. (x) make entry complicated while entry is costly. (y) may signal to a potential entrant which the incumbent is a predator. (z) signal low cost.

Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem of Economics that is given above.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem relating to supply curve Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The supply curve reveals the highest: (i) Stock on hand in inventory. (ii) Gains a firm makes by selling varying quantity of a good. (iii) Quantity of a good which sellers will offer at differ

  • Q : Implication of price discrimination

    Price discrimination implies: (1) charging different prices for identical goods that have identical production costs. (2) paying wages based on race or sex quite than productivity. (3) exploiting the working masses by charging the highest single price

  • Q : Malthusian theory on population What do

    What do you mean by the Malthusian theory on population?

  • Q : Potential advantage of Proprietorships

    Beth and Anna each own a florist shop. After many years of rivalry, they make a decision to team up and make a partnership. The potential advantage of such a union would be that: (1) They can divide up duties and become more proficient. (2) Their partnership profits n

  • Q : Price cut of Substitutes products When

    When a price cut for licorice gummy bears decrease the demand for tuna fish ice-cream, then: (1) Tuna fish ice-cream and licorice gummy bears are the complementary goods. (2) Price hikes for tuna fish ice-cream will decrease the demand for the licorice gummy bears. (3

  • Q : Problem on Ceteris Paribus Can someone

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. Supposing everything to be constant apart from the variables being studied is termed as the: (1) Ceteris paribus assumption. (2) Ex post facto assumption. (3) Post hoc ergo prop

  • Q : Risk-Return-Diversification The below

    The below table presents the three possible states for stocks A and B returns. (a) De

  • Q : Powerful firm confronted by powerful

    The model which examines the limits to bargaining among a powerful firm confronted by the powerful union is: (1) Bilateral monopoly model. (2) Pure monopsony model. (3) Convergence model. (4) Featherbedding model. (5) Keynesian cross model.

    Q : Question on demand and supply Refer to

    Refer to the following diagram. A decrease in supply is illustrated by a: A) move from point x to point y. B) shift from S1 to S2. C) shift from S2 to S1. D) move from point y to point x.

    Q : Determine a price taker from firm Of

    Of the given firms, the probably to be a price taker would be a: (i) sheep herder in a remote part of New Zealand. (ii) local gas and electric company. (iii) sculptor’s agent who contacts potential buyers through the internet. (iv) small town&rs