--%>

Powerful negative externalities in public policies

Potentially powerful negative externalities are mainly overwhelmingly a decisive argument against permitting laissez faire policies and supplies to govern the production and market demands and distribution of: (1) avian flu antivirus shots. (2) public education. (3) sewage treatment facilities. (4) atomic weapons. (5) health insurance and health care.

I need a good answer on the topic of externalities problem in Economic. Please give me your suggestion for the same by using above options.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Influences of Ceteris Paribus The Latin

    The Latin phrase applies to the idea which all other effects on some dependent variable are to be supposed constant if examining the effect of changing a single independent variable is as: (1) Fiat justitia, ruat coelum. (2) Platea unum. (3) Unum paribus. (4) Ceteris

  • Q : Right-to-Work Laws-agency shop I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Right-to-Work Laws-agency shop. Please help me in the given question. In states with right-to-work laws, non-union members can’t ‘free-ride’ when the union negotiates a/an: (1) Closed shop. (2) Open shop. (3) Union sh

  • Q : Resource of supply curve The resource

    The resource probably to conform to the supply curve demonstrated in this figure would be: (1) housing. (2) capital. (3) labor. (4) land. (5) entrepreneurship.

    Q : Total revenue of monopolistically

    A particular monopolistically competitive firm’s total revenue is probably to increase when this: (w) increases the prices of its products and consumer demand is elastic. (x) maintains its original price even if all of its compe

  • Q : Transfer payments and progressive tax

    Transfer payments and progressive tax policies are being determinate to: (w) reduce disparities in the distributions of income and wealth. (x) shift the Lorenz curve toward a position of less income equality. (y) have no net effect on income equality

  • Q : Consumer Surplus-Difference in amounts

    Kiley pays $1.00 for the cold Pepsi on a hot afternoon, however would be willing to pay $5.00. The $4.00 difference in such amounts is her: (i) Consumer surplus. (ii) Income effect. (iii) Economic gain. (iv) Marginal utility. (v) Pleasure coefficient.

    Q : Relationship between MPS and multiplier

    Relationship between MPS and multiplier:K=1/1-MPC = 1/MPS or inverse relationship between MPS and the size of multiplier.

  • Q : Problem relating to Changes in Demand

    Airlines considerably decreased the number of flights accessible in the year 2005, as compared to flight availability during the year 2000. Passenger mileage was fall. Economists would be least possible to ascribe the decline in airline ticket sales throughout the ear

  • Q : Depended price on present value The

    The prospects for getting rich by buying assets at prices substantially below their present values are dampened by the: (w) special advantages you have in securing investment information. (x) lack of competition for information regarding profit opport

  • Q : Importance of Store of Value function

    Importance of Store of Value function of money: People save a portion of their earnings for utilization in future. But in what form? Money fulfills this requirement of the people. Money as a store of value signifies that money is an asset and can be s