--%>

Positive economic analysis and normative

Which of the given two statements involves positive economic analysis and which normative? How do the two type of analysis differ?
a. Gasoline rationing (allocating to each year to each individual an annual maximum amount of gasoline which can be purchased) is a poor social policy as it interferes along with the workings of the competitive market system.
b. Gasoline rationing is policy under which more people are made worse off than are made better off.

Positive economic analysis explains what is. Normative economic analysis explains what have to be. We know from economic analysis that constraint placed on supply will change the market equilibrium.

  • Statement (a) merges both kind of analysis. Firstly, statement (a) makes positive statement that gasoline rationing "interferes along with the workings of the competitive market system." Secondly, by making the normative statement (that means a value judgment) that gasoline rationing is a "poor social policy," statement (a) confines itself to conclusion derived from positive economic analysis of the policy.
  • Statement (b) is positive because it defines what the effect of gasoline rationing is without making a value judgment regarding the desirability of the rationing policy.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Price discriminate maximizes joint

    When a successful cartel which cannot price discriminate maximizes the joint profits of its members: (1) the marginal social benefits of additional output exceed the marginal social costs of output. (2) this is impossible for any consumer to gain with

  • Q : Technology in supply I have a problem

    I have a problem in economics on Technology in supply. Please help me in the following question. The bumper corn crop caused by the good weather would symbolize a raise in: (i) supply. (ii) Consumer’s tastes for corn. (iii) Demand. (iv) The price of corn. <

  • Q : Earning income under negative income tax

    Under the negative income tax system demonstrated in this figure, a family of four along with earned income of $15,000 yearly would have a net [after-tax] income of: (i) $30,000 per year. (ii) $27,500 per year. (iii) $25,000 per year.

  • Q : Define Indirect taxes Indirect taxes :

    Indirect taxes: Whenever the liability to pay tax is on one person and the burden of that tax falls on another person, it is termed as indirect tax. Illustrations are: sales tax, excise duty, VAT, tax on services and so on.

  • Q : Purchasing ratio maximizing the total

    The consumer who spends income and hence the ratio of MUs of all goods purchased equivalents the ratio of their prices is: (i) Maximizing net utility. (ii) Spending too much. (iii) Beyond the point of diminishing negative utility. (iv) Behaving incompatibly through pu

  • Q : Demand curve facing monopolistically

    The demand curve that facing a monopolistically competitive firm is: (1) perfectly elastic within the short run. (2) perfectly inelastic due to numerous substitutes for its product. (3) less elastic than the demand curve facing a comp

  • Q : Minimum Wage Laws and Monopsony Power

    The Minimum wage laws potentially raise both employment and wages if firms: (i) Have monopsony power in the labor market and don’t wage discriminate. (ii) Practice outsourcing across the international borders as labor costs abroad are lower. (iii) Are pure compe

  • Q : Monopsony power-Purely competitive Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Dissimilar to a purely competitive hirer of labor, the firm with monopsony power can: (i) Both set any wage it wishes and hire as many workers as it desire

  • Q : Cost structure characteristic in purely

    When Cling Peach Orchards has a cost structure characteristic of peach orchards into this purely competitive industry, when the long run new competitors would most likely enter the market providing the wholesale price per bushel of peaches exceeded: (

  • Q : Profit maximization and maximization of

    Give the difference between corporate profit maximization and maximization of shareholder wealth?