Perfectly inelastic demand problem
When will an augment in supply entail a raise in price however no change in quantity?
Expert
In case of perfectly inelastic demand, a raise in supply leads to a raise in price although no change in quantity.
In long-run equilibrium, a monopolistically competitive firm is making: (a) economic profits. (b) zero economic profits. (c) negative economic profits. (d) revenues that exceed total costs. Can anybody suggest me t
Law of Diminishing Merginal utility: This states that as consumer consumes more and more units of commodity, the utility derived from each and every successive unit goes on decreasing. According to this law TU increases at decreasing rate and the MU d
The present value of future income is: (w) higher, the higher the interest rate. (x) lower, the higher the interest rate. (y) unaffected by the interest rate. (z) purely objective, and not subjective at all. Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for above Economics pr
Normal 0 false false
When the New York City government only permits landlords to charge $800 a month for a little apartment while equilibrium rent would be $1,500, this has imposed: (w) price floor. (x) regulation which will result in market surpluses. (y) regulation that
Karl Marx's prediction which competition ultimately leads to monopoly is most likely to be valid while: (w) diseconomies of scale discourage competition. (x) there are always constant returns to scale. (y) economies of scale are important relative to
When this firm initially had important market power along with potential long-run economic profit, a likely cause of the firm finally being in a stable equilibrium of an $18 price and output of 5,000 units every day would be: (1
Several market structures may pivot around goods which are heterogeneous, however the only market structure that absolutely needs goods to be differentiated within the minds of consumers of: (1) perfect competition. (2) pure competition. (3) monopolistic competition.
When resource markets are competitive and transaction costs are low, in that case landowners: (1) pass forward completely any land tax. (2) can drive up the rental rate of land by changing its supply. (3) bear the full burden of any t
The LEAST likely outcome, when the federal minimum wage is increased $1 over the equilibrium wage rate, that would be for the: (w) unemployment rate of teenagers and unskilled workers to rise. (x) quantity of unskilled workers supplie
18,76,764
1959155 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1458429
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!