Opportunity or alternative costs when marrying lover
Can two ever live as inexpensively as one? What is the opportunity or alternative costs when marrying someone you love?
Expert
Within an economic sense, there two can never live as cheaply as one due to the opportunity costs involved. This costs (i.e., the value of the best alternative surrendered while a choice is made being particular) of marrying someone you love take in not being capable to do what you desire to do while you desire to do this, this is, giving up your freedom, that encompasses several things both emotional and physical. It is true for both partners, obviously.
When an economic change makes a huge majority of the population worse off and a minute minority better off, the alteration is: (w) good for society because it made some people better off. (x) bad for society since only a few people ar
While people buy something, then its opportunity cost is the: (w) monetary price they paid. (x) enjoyment they get by their purchase. (y) satisfaction they lost by not buying something else. (z) time they should work to pay their bills. Q : Problem regarding the distributive Ted and Willy are eating lunch. Ted has a Snowball and Willy a Ding Dong for dessert. Strongly prefer both Ding Dongs. A required trade of Willy's Ding-Dong for Ted's Snowball would be likely to enhance: (w) distributive efficiency as Fred is better off. (x) allocativ
Ted and Willy are eating lunch. Ted has a Snowball and Willy a Ding Dong for dessert. Strongly prefer both Ding Dongs. A required trade of Willy's Ding-Dong for Ted's Snowball would be likely to enhance: (w) distributive efficiency as Fred is better off. (x) allocativ
Good economic models are: (1) intricate models of all aspects of the actual economy. (2) designed to create economics hard. (3) simplifications of the real world. (4) scientific only when expressed mathematically.
Murderers do more harm than shoplifters; therefore they must be punished proportionally more harshly as per the school of thought developed through: (i) medieval scholar Thomas Aquinas. (ii) Chinese leader Mao Zedong. (iii) lawyer and social reformer Jeremy Bentham. (
A thing is termed as a "good" (as opposite to a "bad") when: (w) its use improves human happiness. (x) its production needs capital and labor. (y) its value to society is restricted. (z) this is a service to people, as housecleaning.<
Assume that Michael Jordan purchases the New Jersey Nets basketball franchise and, expecting an explosion of sales at his car dealerships, he instructs two hundred new extra Toyotas. By an economic perspective, his buy of the Nets franchise is: (w) smart marketing str
Please help me to solve the problem of hypothesis in normative statements in normative economics that is given below: Normative statements would consist of the hypothesis which: (v) Abuse of alcohol lowers GPAs. (w
Beneath an idealized version of the pure capitalism, governments would be least probable to offer: (1) Judicial systems to defend private property rights. (2) National defense. (3) Standardized forms of money. (4) Court systems to implement contracts.
Positive economics is LEAST related with the: (w) allocation of economic resources. (x) conflict of obtainable resources and societal needs. (y) mechanisms by that resources are used to satisfy societal requirements. (z) moral dimensions of social dec
18,76,764
1928551 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1445443
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!