Opportunity or alternative costs when marrying lover
Can two ever live as inexpensively as one? What is the opportunity or alternative costs when marrying someone you love?
Expert
Within an economic sense, there two can never live as cheaply as one due to the opportunity costs involved. This costs (i.e., the value of the best alternative surrendered while a choice is made being particular) of marrying someone you love take in not being capable to do what you desire to do while you desire to do this, this is, giving up your freedom, that encompasses several things both emotional and physical. It is true for both partners, obviously.
Can someone help me in determining the right answer from the given options. Expanding the current investment associative to current consumption most directly raises an economy’s rate of: (1) Stagnation. (2) Capital absorption. (3) Economic growt
I want a good answer on the topic of normative economics. Please give me your opinion that if wealth and income both were redistributed by the richest one to the poorest five percent of the population, conclusion of an economist would be that: (w) soc
Economic efficiency tends to be improved via: (1) Divisions of labor in specialization and production and trade according to comparative advantage. (2) Maximization of the opportunity costs. (3) Understanding macro-economics. (4) Intensive investments
How can determine where would be illustrations of economic “bads” included. Please suggest me the accurate answer: (i) loud stereo systems,. (ii) beautiful sunsets caused through high levels of air pollution, (iii) golf courses built upon abandoned garbage
A new theory evolves within common sense only after this is determined: (1) Helpful through extensive testing. (2) Within conformity along with Newtonian mechanics and Occam's razor. (3) To contain relatively only some exceptions. (4) Acceptable through the Institute
Please help me to solve the problem of Economic Reasoning that is given below: Rational behavior should be: (i) Consistent along with reaching an identified goal. (ii) Ethical behavior. (iii) Good
If goods are efficiently distributed in between households, then all family is: (w) sure to lose when any income redistribution arises. (x) treated equitably. (y) and also off as possible without making any other family worse off. (z) able of gaining by a better distr
I want it tomorrow night or before, please.
TANSTAAFL is an acronym suggestive of that: (1) Tax agents never observe the awful influences from levies. (2) Tenants and needy must take all assets by landlords. (3) There ain't no all things like a free lunch. (4) Temperance and non satiety togethe
Smog is: (w) a good since this gives the air texture. (x) a bad because most people would pay to find rid of this. (y) a free good since you could consume all you desire without having to pay for this. (z) an inefficient utilization of resources. Discover Q & A Leading Solution Library Avail More Than 1439919 Solved problems, classrooms assignments, textbook's solutions, for quick Downloads No hassle, Instant Access Start Discovering 18,76,764 1935550 Asked 3,689 Active Tutors 1439919 Questions Answered Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!! Submit Assignment
18,76,764
1935550 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1439919
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!