--%>

Opportunity or alternative costs when marrying lover

Can two ever live as inexpensively as one? What is the opportunity or alternative costs when marrying someone you love?

E

Expert

Verified

Within an economic sense, there two can never live as cheaply as one due to the opportunity costs involved. This costs (i.e., the value of the best alternative surrendered while a choice is made  being particular) of marrying someone you love take in not being capable to do what you desire to do while you desire to do this, this is, giving up your freedom, that encompasses several things  both emotional and physical. It is true for both partners, obviously.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : When is an economic system economically

    An economic system is economically efficient when: (w) economic inequity has been removed. (x) any gains to someone through several possible rearrangement of goods or resources would need losses on the part of someone else. (y) more o

  • Q : Who thought Murderers do more harm than

    Murderers do more harm than shoplifters; therefore they must be punished proportionally more harshly as per the school of thought developed through: (i) medieval scholar Thomas Aquinas. (ii) Chinese leader Mao Zedong. (iii) lawyer and social reformer Jeremy Bentham. (

  • Q : Determination of opportunity cost of

    The opportunity cost of any type of decision is measured through the: (w) market price of career and education opportunities. (x) value of the worst optional choice sacrificed. (y) market price of the resources used in production. (z) value of the best optional choice

  • Q : Changes in relative prices make

    Changes in relative prices make easy allocative efficiency through operating like a rationing mechanism while: (i) Ken and Barbie postpone their wedding since they both lost their jobs throughout a recession. (ii) Political instabilit

  • Q : Better off and worse off condition in

    When an economic change creates one person better off and a thousand persons worse off, this is: (w) good for society. (x) bad for society. (y) neither good nor bad for society. (z) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

  • Q : Circular flow models of markets I have

    I have a problem in economics on Circular flow models of markets. Please help me in the following question. In a simple circular flow model of markets, the eventual ‘owners’ of all labor and non-labor resources are classified as: (i) Emplo

  • Q : Wealthy entrepreneurs by perfectly

    Do you agree along with the adage such that "You cannot find rich working for somebody else"? Should successful entrepreneurs serve others to enrich themselves? Can wage earners acquire great wealth without investing? How may you test the accuracy of your answ

  • Q : Demonstration of scarcity in the U.S.

    By which is scarcity in the U.S. economy demonstrated: (v) The "energy crisis" of the 1970s, (w) Welfare payments to impoverished families, (x) Government budgeting more funding for defence or more for education, (y) Housing shortages in Santa Monica

  • Q : Assignments I want it tomorrow night or

    I want it tomorrow night or before, please.

  • Q : Economic welfare-Production possibility

    Maximizing the community's economic welfare needs production: (i) On production-possibility curve. (ii) Of minimum exports and maximum imports. (iii) Of more consumer durables and fewer services. (iv) Exterior to the production-possibility curve.