--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Opportunity or alternative costs when marrying lover

Can two ever live as inexpensively as one? What is the opportunity or alternative costs when marrying someone you love?

E

Expert

Verified

Within an economic sense, there two can never live as cheaply as one due to the opportunity costs involved. This costs (i.e., the value of the best alternative surrendered while a choice is made  being particular) of marrying someone you love take in not being capable to do what you desire to do while you desire to do this, this is, giving up your freedom, that encompasses several things  both emotional and physical. It is true for both partners, obviously.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Define cut costs without reducing the

    A firm which could cut costs without reducing the value of its output is experiencing as: (i) Allocative inefficiency. (ii) Productive inefficiency. (iii) Distributive inefficiency. (iv) Technological decline. Can

    		•
  • Q : Problem on Laissez-faire The movement

    The movement towards laissez-faire policies would best be described by a strategy to: (1) Stimulate the domestic production by raising import tariffs. (2) Remove laws to subsidize farming. (3) Guarantee food stamps for fundamental survival. (4) Functi

    		•
  • Q : Effects of bankrupted causing prices to

    A predictable result when a drought bankrupted several watermelon farmers would be as: (w) a decline into the price of watermelons. (x) increased demand since watermelons will be scarcer. (y) reduced supply, causing prices to increase. (z) decreased demand due to high

    		•
  • Q : Problem on Private ownership of property

    I have a problem in economics on Private ownership of property. Please help me in the following question. The hallmarks of ‘pure’ capitalism are illustrated by the: (1) Absence of productive and allocative efficiency. (2) Interaction of th

    		•
  • Q : Explain TANSTAAFL TANSTAAFL is an

    TANSTAAFL is an acronym suggestive of that: (1) Tax agents never observe the awful influences from levies. (2) Tenants and needy must take all assets by landlords. (3) There ain't no all things like a free lunch. (4) Temperance and non satiety togethe

    		•
  • Q : Give an example of Production in

    By using knowledge and/or technology to apply energy to change materials, thereby making the materials more precious is: (w) production. (x) demand. (y) a total cure for scarcity. (z) economically profitable. Can someone clarify/he

    		•
  • Q : Administrative estimations of peoples

    The requirement criterion of distribution usually entails: (1) Greater production incentives than the other systems. (2) Much difficult administrative estimations of people's requirements. (3) Generation of extreme pollution. (4) Dividing national inc

    		•
  • Q : Explain about the term whom in

    The fundamental economic questions are "What?”, “How?”, and “For whom”? When we ask, "For whom?", we need to know who will: (w) produce the goods. (x) consume the goods. (y) get the profits. (z) decide wh

    		•
  • Q : When economists disagree in normative

    Can someone give details with best solution about problem of normative economics... Economists disagree MOST often about regions involving: (i) normative economics, while value judgments are involved. (ii) explanat

    		•
  • Q : Problem relating to the Distributive

    Several parents ask children to write down lists of “things” they would like Santa to carry for Christmas, as well as to rank their “wants” in sequence. While gifts are positively associated to children’s lists, that “wish list&rdqu

    		•