Opportunity or alternative costs when marrying lover
Can two ever live as inexpensively as one? What is the opportunity or alternative costs when marrying someone you love?
Expert
Within an economic sense, there two can never live as cheaply as one due to the opportunity costs involved. This costs (i.e., the value of the best alternative surrendered while a choice is made being particular) of marrying someone you love take in not being capable to do what you desire to do while you desire to do this, this is, giving up your freedom, that encompasses several things both emotional and physical. It is true for both partners, obviously.
When gross investment is $100 billion whereas $10 billion of capital is worn out, in that case net investment is: (w) $90 billion. (x) $100 billion. (y) $110 billion. (z) not possible to calculate without more information. Q : Maximization of complete value of Maximization of the complete value of output from a fixed amount of resources gives in: (i) Opportunity cost. (ii) Economic efficiency. (iii) Potential profitability. (iv) Comparative benefit. (v) Scarcity. How can I solve my
Maximization of the complete value of output from a fixed amount of resources gives in: (i) Opportunity cost. (ii) Economic efficiency. (iii) Potential profitability. (iv) Comparative benefit. (v) Scarcity. How can I solve my
Deliberately acting in a way which cannot attain a wanted goal is: (w) rational behavior. (x) random behavior. (y) irrational behavior. (z) maximizing behavior. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regard
The fundamental foundations of a capitalist system do not comprise: (1) Supplies and demands. (2) Private property rights. (3) Governmental allocations of non-human resources. (4) Laissez faire policies. (5) Market-determined prices and outputs.
Positive economics is LEAST related with the: (w) allocation of economic resources. (x) conflict of obtainable resources and societal needs. (y) mechanisms by that resources are used to satisfy societal requirements. (z) moral dimensions of social dec
Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding scarcity in economics generally? A good is taken as scarce when people: (w) lack the funds required to make sure their survival. (x) require
Hello guys I want your opinion. Please recommend your view for given Economic Policies and Normative Economics problems. Disagreements in between economists about economic policies most commonly occur from differences within their:
Anything of that people would be better off with less is which from given issue: (1) economic surplus, (2) external cost, (3) economic bad and (4) adverse consequence. Hello guys I need your advice. Please recommend some idea for a
The erroneous analysis that economists seldom agree is LEAST attributable to the fact such that economists are: (w) acquire little media coverage while they agree, when disputes about how economic theory must be translated in policy a
Prices are: (w) used to ration free goods and resources. (x) zero for several scarce goods and resources. (y) the merely efficient way to assign luxury goods. (z) one mechanism for rationing scarce goods and resources. Discover Q & A Leading Solution Library Avail More Than 1452694 Solved problems, classrooms assignments, textbook's solutions, for quick Downloads No hassle, Instant Access Start Discovering 18,76,764 1955584 Asked 3,689 Active Tutors 1452694 Questions Answered Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!! Submit Assignment
18,76,764
1955584 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1452694
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!