Opportunity or alternative costs when marrying lover
Can two ever live as inexpensively as one? What is the opportunity or alternative costs when marrying someone you love?
Expert
Within an economic sense, there two can never live as cheaply as one due to the opportunity costs involved. This costs (i.e., the value of the best alternative surrendered while a choice is made being particular) of marrying someone you love take in not being capable to do what you desire to do while you desire to do this, this is, giving up your freedom, that encompasses several things both emotional and physical. It is true for both partners, obviously.
Can anybody propose the proper explanation for specified problem regarding Normative Economics. Positive economic analysis might NOT be used to test the idea which higher cigarette taxes would reas
Why do people usually assume that water run on sidewalks and within the street while they water their lawns? Is that wasted water a symbol of inefficiency?
If goods are efficiently distributed in between households, then all family is: (w) sure to lose when any income redistribution arises. (x) treated equitably. (y) and also off as possible without making any other family worse off. (z) able of gaining by a better distr
Define one reason that the purchases of recently issued bonds and stocks: (1) just only increase the value of federal funds. (2) Are not economic investments since they are just alternative forms of people’s financial saving? (3) Reduce the prof
Microeconomics and Macroeconomics address: (w) exactly similar questions. (x) totally different questions. (y) incompatible sets of value judgments. (z) economic matters at somewhat different levels. How can I solv
Desirable items without opportunity costs are termed as: (i) free goods. (ii) economic goods. (iii) capital goods. (iv) financial goods. (v) gifts of nature. Hey friends please give your view for the problem of opportunity
I want it tomorrow night or before, please.
Suggestion of Jeremy Bentham that crime must be punished proportionally to the harm completed to society, but without consideration of intent, remorse or motive.” His proposal would result within more than the optimal amount of crime due to the:
In contrast to free goods, each and every economic goods: (1) Raise happiness. (2) Are taxed. (3) Need large amounts of human labor to generate. (4) Entail opportunity costs? Please help me to solve the problem of
Positive economic analysis would take in testing a theory which raising cigarette taxes would: (1) harm smokers much more than it helped non-smokers. (2) enhance social welfare by reducing smoking from teenagers. (3) boost cigarette prices and decreas
18,76,764
1956771 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1438208
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!