--%>

Opportunity or alternative costs when marrying lover

Can two ever live as inexpensively as one? What is the opportunity or alternative costs when marrying someone you love?

E

Expert

Verified

Within an economic sense, there two can never live as cheaply as one due to the opportunity costs involved. This costs (i.e., the value of the best alternative surrendered while a choice is made  being particular) of marrying someone you love take in not being capable to do what you desire to do while you desire to do this, this is, giving up your freedom, that encompasses several things  both emotional and physical. It is true for both partners, obviously.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Problem regarding the distributive

    Ted and Willy are eating lunch. Ted has a Snowball and Willy a Ding Dong for dessert. Strongly prefer both Ding Dongs. A required trade of Willy's Ding-Dong for Ted's Snowball would be likely to enhance: (w) distributive efficiency as Fred is better off. (x) allocativ

  • Q : Problem on equivalent amounts of goods

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. According to the equivalent share criterion of distribution, individuals must: (i) Share income according to personal requirement. (ii) All produce equivalent shares of output. (iii) Each cons

  • Q : Perceptions about equity and need

    Government often bases decisions regarding distributions of income and output on: (i) unemployment and Inflation. (ii) Positive economic theories. (iii) Perceptions regarding equity and need. (iv) Market demands and supplies. Can s

  • Q : Calculate the net investment of machines

    Freddy's Fabulous Faux Frisbee Factory consists of fifty rapid frisbee forming machines. In recent year Freddy bought new fifteen rapid frisbee forming machines as well as retired five of them, all they are resulting within: (1) Net investment of 10 machines. (2) Gros

  • Q : Efficiently distribution of goods If

    If goods are efficiently distributed in between households, then all family is: (w) sure to lose when any income redistribution arises. (x) treated equitably. (y) and also off as possible without making any other family worse off. (z) able of gaining by a better distr

  • Q : Problem regarding Property Rights Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the following options. Fee simple rights don’t comprise the right to: (1) Demolish your property. (2) Sell your property. (3) Employ your property for your own advantage. (4) Damage another’s propert

  • Q : LEAST relation of study of economics

    Please help me to solve the problem that is given below: The study of economics is LEAST related along with: (w) humanity in its wealth getting and wealth using activities. (x) physiological interpretations of labo

  • Q : Entails of a technical approach to

    A technical approach to economics entail: (1) positive questions since this cannot resolve normative matters. (2) normative questions since this cannot resolve positive matters. (3) positive and normative questions since this can resolve all matters.

  • Q : Find out supply shifted to higher

    This market for clothing started on S0 and D0. Inside this market for clothing,: (w) demand has increased, possibly because of a raise in income. (x) new equilibrium price lies below the original equilibrium price. (y) supply may have transferred

  • Q : Define the root of normative economics

    Value judgments which address what “must be” are at the root of: (1) microeconomics. (2) scarcity economics. (3) normative economics. (4) positive economics. (5) macroeconomics. How can