Opportunity or alternative costs when marrying lover
Can two ever live as inexpensively as one? What is the opportunity or alternative costs when marrying someone you love?
Expert
Within an economic sense, there two can never live as cheaply as one due to the opportunity costs involved. This costs (i.e., the value of the best alternative surrendered while a choice is made being particular) of marrying someone you love take in not being capable to do what you desire to do while you desire to do this, this is, giving up your freedom, that encompasses several things both emotional and physical. It is true for both partners, obviously.
Can anybody suggest me the proper description for given problem regarding positive theory in Economics generally. Positive theory which is inaccurate: (w) can be disproved through logic and fact. (x) includes poor
I want it tomorrow night or before, please.
Building blocks for a capitalist system comprise: (i) supplies and demands. (ii) private property rights. (iii) laissez-faire policies. (iv) market-determined prices and outputs. (v) All of the above.I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems
Within broad economic terms "efficiency" needs: (w) an upward move within the production curve. (x) full employment. (y) it being not possible to make someone better off without creating someone else worse off. (z) producing cars with low gas consumption.
Please help me to solve the problem of price that is given below: A raise within the price of bread would: (i) Reasons more wheat to utilize to bake bread. (ii) Encourage more people to eat bread. (iii) Discourage
Government often bases decisions regarding distributions of income and output on: (i) unemployment and Inflation. (ii) Positive economic theories. (iii) Perceptions regarding equity and need. (iv) Market demands and supplies. Can s
A statement which needs no value judgments would be which an optimal distribution of goods is: (w) invariably best for society. (x) better for society than any non-optimal distribution of goods. (y) better for society only when this conforms to the will of the majorit
In words of Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations had given an explanation of work how: (w) dictatorship is more efficient than democracy. (x) economic processes work in a communistic society. (y) real estate investment is a exact path to
If the soybean market begins in equilibrium on S0D0, and in that case farm machinery becomes more fuel efficient, the market changes to: (1) S0D1. (2) S1D2. (3) S1D0. (4) S2D1
When an economic change makes a huge majority of the population worse off and a minute minority better off, the alteration is: (w) good for society because it made some people better off. (x) bad for society since only a few people ar
18,76,764
1950889 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1452610
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!