--%>

Opportunity or alternative costs when marrying lover

Can two ever live as inexpensively as one? What is the opportunity or alternative costs when marrying someone you love?

E

Expert

Verified

Within an economic sense, there two can never live as cheaply as one due to the opportunity costs involved. This costs (i.e., the value of the best alternative surrendered while a choice is made  being particular) of marrying someone you love take in not being capable to do what you desire to do while you desire to do this, this is, giving up your freedom, that encompasses several things  both emotional and physical. It is true for both partners, obviously.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Illustration of Positive and Normative

    "Minimum wage rules will reduce service of the workers they are designed to help, but they are desirable because it's more important that 90 percent of the covered workers remain employed at the higher wage than that 10 percent of the covered workers become jobless."

  • Q : Knowing the Property Rights Fee-simple

    Fee-simple property rights comprise the right to: (1) Demolish things you own, sell them, or confer them away.  (2) Duplicate a copyrighted work by paying the small fee. (3) Picnic in such publicly-owned facilities like national parks. (4) Employ

  • Q : Limits of Technological Advances

    Technological advances would not comprise: (i) Native Americans demonstrating Pilgrims how crops grow faster when rotten fish are dropped within with seeds they plant. (ii) pouring coffee through a coffee pot you obtained as a birthday gift. (iii) new

  • Q : When are relative prices serving as

    The behavior on the given list most consistent along with relative prices serving like a rationing device, and not mainly as incentives, would be as: (i) Marcia, a status-seeking social climber that turning down requests of Wayne for dates after seeing small numbers u

  • Q : Nonexistence of economic problems I

    I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion that, when would be Economic problems nonexistent: (v) The world population stopped rising, (w) capitalism were replaced and abolished along with socialism, (x) all human wishe

  • Q : Governmental allocations of non-human

    The fundamental foundations of a capitalist system do not comprise: (1) Supplies and demands. (2) Private property rights. (3) Governmental allocations of non-human resources. (4) Laissez faire policies. (5) Market-determined prices and outputs.

  • Q : Weak assumptions

    Philosopher-mathematician Henri Poincaré asserted, “When a phenomenon admits of a total mechanical explanation this will admit of any infinity of others that will account equally well for all of the peculiarities disclosed through the experiment.” O

  • Q : Closest to a Free Good in economic What

    What would be the closest to a "free good" in economic terms: (i) Local telephone directory assistance, (ii) Air conditioning thrown in when you buy a new car, (iii) Drinking water and (iv) Breathable air of the current atmospheric quality?

  • Q : Explain the problem of Self Interest in

    As per the view of humans as Homo economics, individuals: (w) can simply achieve states of whole satisfaction. (x) must learn to get by along with what they have. (y) want to maximize personal satisfaction by self-interested behavior. (z) have fewer requirements as th

  • Q : Effect of current investment Can

    Can someone help me in determining the right answer from the given options. Expanding the current investment associative to current consumption most directly raises an economy’s rate of: (1) Stagnation. (2) Capital absorption. (3) Economic growt