--%>

Opportunity or alternative costs when marrying lover

Can two ever live as inexpensively as one? What is the opportunity or alternative costs when marrying someone you love?

E

Expert

Verified

Within an economic sense, there two can never live as cheaply as one due to the opportunity costs involved. This costs (i.e., the value of the best alternative surrendered while a choice is made  being particular) of marrying someone you love take in not being capable to do what you desire to do while you desire to do this, this is, giving up your freedom, that encompasses several things  both emotional and physical. It is true for both partners, obviously.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Find an analysis of individual

    Analysis of individual households, markets and firms is: (w) macroeconomics. (x) microeconomics. (y) normative economics. (z) positive economics. Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem of Economic tha

  • Q : Weak assumptions

    Philosopher-mathematician Henri Poincaré asserted, “When a phenomenon admits of a total mechanical explanation this will admit of any infinity of others that will account equally well for all of the peculiarities disclosed through the experiment.” O

  • Q : When scientific economic analysis NOT

    Please help me to solve the problem of Normative Economics that is specified below: Scientific economic analysis could NOT be utilized for test if there: (i) higher tax rates cause tax revenues to decrease. (ii) on

  • Q : Perceptions about equity and need

    Government often bases decisions regarding distributions of income and output on: (i) unemployment and Inflation. (ii) Positive economic theories. (iii) Perceptions regarding equity and need. (iv) Market demands and supplies. Can s

  • Q : Punishment to criminals devoid of

    The early philosopher who argued about criminals must be punished proportionally to the harm completed to society, but without consideration of remorse, intent or motive was: (1) John Stuart Mill. (2) Edwin Chadwick. (3) Jeremy Bentham. (4) Adam Smith. (5) Aristotle.<

  • Q : Socialism-ownership of non-human

    Can someone please help me in finding out the right answer from the following question. A faith that most of the nonhuman resources must be owned, not by the private individuals, however instead ‘by everyone’ in common, with the govt. as t

  • Q : Explain the problem of Self Interest in

    As per the view of humans as Homo economics, individuals: (w) can simply achieve states of whole satisfaction. (x) must learn to get by along with what they have. (y) want to maximize personal satisfaction by self-interested behavior. (z) have fewer requirements as th

  • Q : Technological change in extracting

    Can someone help me in determining the right answer from the given options. A good illustration of technological change would be a discovery of a: (i) Pool of oil as big as any in Kuwait merely a bit south of Cleveland. (ii) Tenth planet as big as Neptune circling our

  • Q : Problem regarding the distributive

    Ted and Willy are eating lunch. Ted has a Snowball and Willy a Ding Dong for dessert. Strongly prefer both Ding Dongs. A required trade of Willy's Ding-Dong for Ted's Snowball would be likely to enhance: (w) distributive efficiency as Fred is better off. (x) allocativ

  • Q : Price Specie-Flow Mechanism-early

    The equation ΔMV is equal to ΔPQ while real GDP (which is adjusted for inflation), is fixed is a modern method to distinguish: (w) Adam Smith’s labor theory of value. (x) Francois Quesnay’s circular flow model. (y) Roberto Mich