--%>

Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large

Why the Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large? Okun's Law posits not a 1-to-1 relation but a 2.5-to-1 relationship between real GDP growth and the unemployment rate. That is, a one percentage-point fall in the unemployment rate is associated not with a 1 but a 2.5 percent boost in the level of production. Why is this Okun's Law coefficient so large? Why isn't it the case that a one percentage point fall in unemployment produces a one percent rise in output, or even less? One answer is that the unemployment rate, as officially measured, does not count discouraged workers. In a recession, the number of people at work falls, the number of people looking for work rises, and the number of people who are not looking for work because they doubt they could find jobs--but would be working if business conditions were better--rises. Because the conventionally-measured unemployment rate does not include these discouraged workers, more than a 1 percent rise in real GDP is needed to reduce the unemployment rate by 1 percentage point. Moreover, when business returns to normal, firms' initial response is not to hire more employees, but to ask existing employees to work longer hours. So average hours of work per week go up, and the unemployment rate falls by less than one would otherwise expect. Finally, in some industries employing more workers increases production by more than a proportional amount: product design and set-up need to be done only once, no matter how much is produced. Thus businesses which have economies of scale do not need twice as many workers to produce twice as much output.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Perfectly elastic supply problem When

    When will a rise in demand entail an increase in the quantity demanded however no change in the price?

  • Q : Problem on Proprietorships Can someone

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The most general legal form of business in United States is: (1) Sole proprietorships. (2) Partnerships. (3) Cooperatives. (4) Corporations.

  • Q : Define price elasticity of supply with

    The supply curve which would best reflect the supply of 1940 a Packard 180 limousine is as: (i) supply curve S1. (ii) supply curve S2. (iii) supply curve S3. (iv) supply curve S4. (v) supply curve S5.

  • Q : What drives market towards their

    What drives market towards their equilibrium?

  • Q : Profit-maximizing unregulated monopoly

    No profit-maximizing unregulated monopoly will function in the inelastic portion of the demand curve this faces since: (w) marginal revenue is negative. (x) total revenues are negative. (y) total revenue falls as less is produced. (z) marginal revenue

  • Q : Stronger Incentives for Productive

    Compared to the requirement and equity standards, the contribution standard of income distribution refers to: (1) generate the weakest incentives for production. (2) best provide for people in poverty. (3) be most compatible along wit

  • Q : Difference between planned and actual

    Differentiate between planned and actual saving and investment. Answer: There is a big difference between (a) planned S and I and (b) Actual saving and investment.<

  • Q : Adjustments in demand When Mad Cow

    When Mad Cow Disease erupted internationally, so what would occur to the demand, price, supply and quantity of hamburgers: (w) demand = fall, price = ???, supply = fall and quantity = fall. (x) demand = fall, price = rise, supply = rise and quantity =

  • Q : Long-run curve of a competitive industry

    Within a competitive industry into the long run: (w) economic profits are common. (x) existing firms wither in growing industries. (y) economic profits induce new firms to enter an industry. (z) accounting profits will be zero for all firms.

  • Q : Destitute Percentage of Income The

    The percentage of American families that stay put destitute year after year is around: (w) 1 2%. (x) 3 5%. (y) 5 7%. (z) 8 10%. Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for above Economics problem