--%>

Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large

Why the Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large? Okun's Law posits not a 1-to-1 relation but a 2.5-to-1 relationship between real GDP growth and the unemployment rate. That is, a one percentage-point fall in the unemployment rate is associated not with a 1 but a 2.5 percent boost in the level of production. Why is this Okun's Law coefficient so large? Why isn't it the case that a one percentage point fall in unemployment produces a one percent rise in output, or even less? One answer is that the unemployment rate, as officially measured, does not count discouraged workers. In a recession, the number of people at work falls, the number of people looking for work rises, and the number of people who are not looking for work because they doubt they could find jobs--but would be working if business conditions were better--rises. Because the conventionally-measured unemployment rate does not include these discouraged workers, more than a 1 percent rise in real GDP is needed to reduce the unemployment rate by 1 percentage point. Moreover, when business returns to normal, firms' initial response is not to hire more employees, but to ask existing employees to work longer hours. So average hours of work per week go up, and the unemployment rate falls by less than one would otherwise expect. Finally, in some industries employing more workers increases production by more than a proportional amount: product design and set-up need to be done only once, no matter how much is produced. Thus businesses which have economies of scale do not need twice as many workers to produce twice as much output.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Long run economic growth When people

    When people become optimistic about living longer and accordingly save more for their retirement years, in that case the decline into interest rates will tend to: (w) raise capital costs for business firms. (x) decrease investment expenditures. (y) di

  • Q : Relation between Implicit Costs and

    I have a problem in economics on Relation between Implicit Costs and Opportunity costs. Please help me in the following question. The Implicit costs are: (1) Opportunity costs. (2) Always variable costs. (3) Similar as the accounting costs. (4) Similar as the explicit

  • Q : Total revenue for profit-maximizing

    TR (total revenue) for this profit-maximizing pure competitor equivalents area: (i) 0PeQ. (ii) bPec. (iii) aPed. (iv) 0bcQ. (v) 0Pec.

    Q : Market shifting in equilibrium When

    When market begins in equilibrium at point e upon S0D0 and in that case young American families increasingly "inherit" furniture like their baby-boomer parents move within smaller retirement homes, that market will tend to shift in the direction

  • Q : In value planning what matter in

    In the value of planning what still matters in strategic management lies?

  • Q : Monopolistically competition A

    A monopolistically competitive firm: (w) confronts a perfectly elastic demand curve. (x) is a price taker. (y) faces stiff competition from many competitors producing close substitutes for its product. (z) consciously considers potential responses by

  • Q : Variation in price elasticity as price

    The only supply curve which has price elasticity which varies as the price of output increases is within: (w) Panel A. (x) Panel B. (y) Panel C. (z) Panel D.

    Q : Proprietorships and

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The sole proprietorship owned and executed by the lone individual is at a drawback whenever compared to the corporation since it lacks relatively: (i) Flexible legal options reg

  • Q : Annual total costs of production When

    When Prohibition Corporation maximizes profit into its production of St. Valentine’s Day software, there annual total costs of it will be around: (1) $180 million. (2) $140 million. (3) $100 million. (4) $80 million. (5) $40 mil

  • Q : Powerful negative externalities in

    Potentially powerful negative externalities are mainly overwhelmingly a decisive argument against permitting laissez faire policies and supplies to govern the production and market demands and distribution of: (1) avian flu antivirus shots. (2) public