--%>

Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large

Why the Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large? Okun's Law posits not a 1-to-1 relation but a 2.5-to-1 relationship between real GDP growth and the unemployment rate. That is, a one percentage-point fall in the unemployment rate is associated not with a 1 but a 2.5 percent boost in the level of production. Why is this Okun's Law coefficient so large? Why isn't it the case that a one percentage point fall in unemployment produces a one percent rise in output, or even less? One answer is that the unemployment rate, as officially measured, does not count discouraged workers. In a recession, the number of people at work falls, the number of people looking for work rises, and the number of people who are not looking for work because they doubt they could find jobs--but would be working if business conditions were better--rises. Because the conventionally-measured unemployment rate does not include these discouraged workers, more than a 1 percent rise in real GDP is needed to reduce the unemployment rate by 1 percentage point. Moreover, when business returns to normal, firms' initial response is not to hire more employees, but to ask existing employees to work longer hours. So average hours of work per week go up, and the unemployment rate falls by less than one would otherwise expect. Finally, in some industries employing more workers increases production by more than a proportional amount: product design and set-up need to be done only once, no matter how much is produced. Thus businesses which have economies of scale do not need twice as many workers to produce twice as much output.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Long-run supply in constant cost

    Within a constant-cost industry: (w) short-run supply is totally elastic. (x) long-run supply is completely elastic. (y) short-run supply is fully inelastic. (z) long-run supply is wholly inelastic. I need a good a

  • Q : Complete equilibrium by distribution of

    When the economy was in a complete equilibrium, in that case the distribution of income would be precisely proportional to the distribution of: (a) taxation. (b) inheritance. (c) luck. (d) wealth.

  • Q : Implication of buyers in market

    Describe the implication of big number of buyers in the perfectly competetive market.

  • Q : Demand when coefficient of price

    When the coefficient of price elasticity for eggs is 0.67, in that case the demand for eggs is: (w) relatively elastic. (x) relatively inelastic. (y) an upward sloping demand. (z) a horizontal demand. I need a good

  • Q : Labor Contracts-Check-off Provisions

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The check-off provision stated as: (1) Was outlawed by Taft Hartley Act. (2) Is illegal in the union shops. (3) Simplifies the union dues collection. (4) Differentiates union shops from the ag

  • Q : Zero elasticity for demand curves When

    When any truly existed, then perfectly inelastic demand curves would include: (i) price elasticities of infinity and be horizontal. (ii) zero elasticity and be horizontal. (iii) a slope of one. (iv) price elasticities of infinity and would be vertical

  • Q : Price elasticity and market power The

    The price elasticity of demand equals one when this firm produces where total revenue is: (i) $72,000 per period. (ii) $80,000 per period. (iii) $96,000 per period. (iv) $100,000 per period. (v) $144,000 per period.

    Q : Purely-competitive output by profit

    Profit is maximized when this purely-competitive brickyard constructs at: (i) point a. (ii) point b. (iii) point c. (iv) point d. (v) point e.

    Q : Needs by marginal revenue equals to

    A monopolist produces where marginal revenue [MR] equals marginal costs [MC] when it needs to maximize: (i) total revenue. (ii) consumer surplus. (iii) profits. (iv) total revenue, producer surplus and profits. (v) job security.

  • Q : Enter an industry by barriers to entry

    Barriers to entry: (w) make this complicated or impossible for new firms to profitably enter an industry. (x) uniformly violate U.S. antitrust statutes. (y) are fundamentally technological instead of economic. (z) stimulate aggressive competition.