--%>

Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large

Why the Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large? Okun's Law posits not a 1-to-1 relation but a 2.5-to-1 relationship between real GDP growth and the unemployment rate. That is, a one percentage-point fall in the unemployment rate is associated not with a 1 but a 2.5 percent boost in the level of production. Why is this Okun's Law coefficient so large? Why isn't it the case that a one percentage point fall in unemployment produces a one percent rise in output, or even less? One answer is that the unemployment rate, as officially measured, does not count discouraged workers. In a recession, the number of people at work falls, the number of people looking for work rises, and the number of people who are not looking for work because they doubt they could find jobs--but would be working if business conditions were better--rises. Because the conventionally-measured unemployment rate does not include these discouraged workers, more than a 1 percent rise in real GDP is needed to reduce the unemployment rate by 1 percentage point. Moreover, when business returns to normal, firms' initial response is not to hire more employees, but to ask existing employees to work longer hours. So average hours of work per week go up, and the unemployment rate falls by less than one would otherwise expect. Finally, in some industries employing more workers increases production by more than a proportional amount: product design and set-up need to be done only once, no matter how much is produced. Thus businesses which have economies of scale do not need twice as many workers to produce twice as much output.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : LEAST Liquidity in market The LEAST

    The LEAST liquid of the given assets is: (1) a corporation's capital. (2) savings accounts. (3) cash. (4) U.S. savings bonds. (5) checking accounts. Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem of E

  • Q : Present value of given interest rate An

    An interest rate of 10 percent causes the present value of $1000 acquired one year by now to be: (w) $1000. (x) $1,100. (y) $909.09. (z) $100. Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem of Economi

  • Q : Malthusian theory on population What do

    What do you mean by the Malthusian theory on population?

  • Q : Why indifference curve is convex Why

    Why the indifference curve is convex to origin?

  • Q : Unimportant economies of scale If

    If comparing market structures, when economies of scale are unimportant: (w) the most efficient form of market structure is a pure monopoly. (x) purely competitive industries and price discriminating monopolies are equally efficient. (y) price discrim

  • Q : Problem regarding Substitution of goods

    When tuna fish ice cream and licorice gummy bears are substitutes, then: (1) Decline in the price of licorice gummy bears raises the demand for tuna fish ice-cream. (2) The demand for tuna fish ice-cream is independent of price of licorice gummy bears. (3) Consuming m

  • Q : Hypothetical demands for perfect price

    In this figure demonstrating hypothetical demands for socket sets, there demand curve: (1) D1D1 is perfectly price-inelastic. (2) D2D2 is perfectly price elastic. (3) D3D3

  • Q : Short-run equilibrium of purely

    At the price P1, the given figure of purely competitive cranberry industry is within: (w) long-run equilibrium. (x) short-run equilibrium. (y) market period disequilibrium. (z) short-run disequilibrium. <

  • Q : Meaning of surplus in current price I

    I have a problem in economics on Meaning of surplus in current price. Please help me in the following question. The surplus of potting soil signifies that the current price: (1) Makes an surplus demand. (2) Is above the equilibrium. (3) Surpasses the

  • Q : Market Adjustments in outputs and

    Outputs and average prices for CDs and DVDs both rose throughout 1999 to 2000 (just before file sharing became ordinary), implying such that: (1) supply of prerecorded music should have grown. (2) law of demand does not apply to music. (3) demand for