--%>

Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large

Why the Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large? Okun's Law posits not a 1-to-1 relation but a 2.5-to-1 relationship between real GDP growth and the unemployment rate. That is, a one percentage-point fall in the unemployment rate is associated not with a 1 but a 2.5 percent boost in the level of production. Why is this Okun's Law coefficient so large? Why isn't it the case that a one percentage point fall in unemployment produces a one percent rise in output, or even less? One answer is that the unemployment rate, as officially measured, does not count discouraged workers. In a recession, the number of people at work falls, the number of people looking for work rises, and the number of people who are not looking for work because they doubt they could find jobs--but would be working if business conditions were better--rises. Because the conventionally-measured unemployment rate does not include these discouraged workers, more than a 1 percent rise in real GDP is needed to reduce the unemployment rate by 1 percentage point. Moreover, when business returns to normal, firms' initial response is not to hire more employees, but to ask existing employees to work longer hours. So average hours of work per week go up, and the unemployment rate falls by less than one would otherwise expect. Finally, in some industries employing more workers increases production by more than a proportional amount: product design and set-up need to be done only once, no matter how much is produced. Thus businesses which have economies of scale do not need twice as many workers to produce twice as much output.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Define the term privatization What do

    What do you mean by the term privatization?

  • Q : Deadweight Losses and Taxation Whenever

    Whenever a tax on a good outcome less government revenue than the sum of the losses of producer and consumer surpluses due to tax, economists state that the tax has caused a/an: (1) Administrative loss. (2) Market failure. (3) Economic loss. (4) Bureaucratic loss. (5)

  • Q : Case study on Microeconomics Hello, I

    Hello, I did attach case study on Microeconomics. Regards,

  • Q : Predictable results of unexpected

    Predictable results of unexpected development of demand for a competitively produced good comprise increases and in that case gradual decreases in the: (w) price of the good and the profits of producers. (x) consumer surplus derived from the good. (y)

  • Q : Influence of subsidy on good Assume

    Assume that the market for a good is initially in equilibrium, and then the govt. places a subsidy on good. The probable result would be: (i) Raised production and purchases of good. (ii) That buyers would pay big prices for the good. (iii) Extended scarcity of the go

  • Q : Total sales revenues and price

    If the price falls, there total sales revenues rise, in that case the price elasticity of demand: (1) relatively elastic. (2) relatively inelastic. (3) unitary elastic. (4) zero elastic. (5) inflexibly marginal.

    Q : Problem on law of demand Let think

    Let think about the law of demand. The idea that a big price for a normal good will outcome in less of the good being bought never based logically on the: (i) Income effect. (ii) Demand for the good falling since of the higher price. (iii) Law of redu

  • Q : Absolute value of price elasticity of

    Moving by point a to point b to point c to point d to pint e beside demand curve D, then absolute value of the price elasticity of demand for DVDs video games is: (w) greater at lower prices than at higher prices. (x) constant and equal to minus one.

  • Q : Quantity supplied to relative change in

    The price elasticity of supply approximately measures the ratio of relative as: (w) profit to the amounts firms supply at different prices. (x) price increase necessary to induce a firm to raise output. (y) change within the quantity supplied to a rel

  • Q : Social opportunity cost of resource

    Economic rent is: (w) income received by a factor owner in excess of the social opportunity cost of supplying the resource. (x) the difference between a firm’s revenues and the sum of the fixed and variable costs of production. (y) a form of eco