--%>

Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large

Why the Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large? Okun's Law posits not a 1-to-1 relation but a 2.5-to-1 relationship between real GDP growth and the unemployment rate. That is, a one percentage-point fall in the unemployment rate is associated not with a 1 but a 2.5 percent boost in the level of production. Why is this Okun's Law coefficient so large? Why isn't it the case that a one percentage point fall in unemployment produces a one percent rise in output, or even less? One answer is that the unemployment rate, as officially measured, does not count discouraged workers. In a recession, the number of people at work falls, the number of people looking for work rises, and the number of people who are not looking for work because they doubt they could find jobs--but would be working if business conditions were better--rises. Because the conventionally-measured unemployment rate does not include these discouraged workers, more than a 1 percent rise in real GDP is needed to reduce the unemployment rate by 1 percentage point. Moreover, when business returns to normal, firms' initial response is not to hire more employees, but to ask existing employees to work longer hours. So average hours of work per week go up, and the unemployment rate falls by less than one would otherwise expect. Finally, in some industries employing more workers increases production by more than a proportional amount: product design and set-up need to be done only once, no matter how much is produced. Thus businesses which have economies of scale do not need twice as many workers to produce twice as much output.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Lower rates of return by financial

    Financial assets will create lower rates of return to prospective investors while: (w) they become more liquid. (x) their prices go up. (y) interest rates increase. (z) default risks decrease. Hey

  • Q : Shutdown level of output for a purely

    For a purely competitive firm the shutdown level of output arises where is: (w) total revenue barely covers total fixed costs. (x) market price just equals the minimum of its AVC curve. (y) total revenue equals total cost as (PQ = TFC + TVC). (z) pric

  • Q : Occurrence of the price discrimination

    Price discrimination occurs when a good is: (1) priced by a formula yielding monopoly profit. (2) denied to customers who refuse to pay the going price. (3) sold at different prices not reflecting differences in costs. (4) subject to government price

  • Q : Price takers in product market I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Price takers in product market. Please help me in the following question. Relative to firms which are price takers in product market, and then firms with market power tend to. (1) Hire some workers (2) Pay a lower wage

  • Q : Short-run equilibrium of

    A purely-competitive, short-run equilibrium does NOT need which each firm: (w) produces where MC = MR = P > min(AVC). (x) experiences no excess demand or excess supply. (y) earns only zero economic profit. (z) adjust output hence m

  • Q : Objective of firm in price

    The firm's objective within price discrimination is to: (w) make the community better off economically. (x) make several consumers better off economically. (y) increase revenue and profit. (z) minimize average cost.

    Q : Value of the marginal product of labor

    The Profit-maximizing firms which operate in the competitive resource and output markets adjust the labor inputs till the wage rate equivalents the: (i) Average revenue from the output. (ii) Output price equivalents the average variable cost. (iii) Marginal utility of

  • Q : Kinked Demand by decreasing price In

    In this kinked demand curve model as in given graph, when this firm operated at point a and lowered its price by P2 to P1 and other firms in the industry also lower prices, in that case this firm will move from point a to: (w) po

  • Q : Destitute Percentage of Income The

    The percentage of American families that stay put destitute year after year is around: (w) 1 2%. (x) 3 5%. (y) 5 7%. (z) 8 10%. Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for above Economics problem

  • Q : Prohibition in financial intermediaries

    Financial intermediaries are not: (1) channels linking parties who want to save to parties who want to invest. (2) restricted to serving primarily large savers and investors. (3) more significant in determining the U.S. money supply than all are produ