--%>

Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large

Why the Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large? Okun's Law posits not a 1-to-1 relation but a 2.5-to-1 relationship between real GDP growth and the unemployment rate. That is, a one percentage-point fall in the unemployment rate is associated not with a 1 but a 2.5 percent boost in the level of production. Why is this Okun's Law coefficient so large? Why isn't it the case that a one percentage point fall in unemployment produces a one percent rise in output, or even less? One answer is that the unemployment rate, as officially measured, does not count discouraged workers. In a recession, the number of people at work falls, the number of people looking for work rises, and the number of people who are not looking for work because they doubt they could find jobs--but would be working if business conditions were better--rises. Because the conventionally-measured unemployment rate does not include these discouraged workers, more than a 1 percent rise in real GDP is needed to reduce the unemployment rate by 1 percentage point. Moreover, when business returns to normal, firms' initial response is not to hire more employees, but to ask existing employees to work longer hours. So average hours of work per week go up, and the unemployment rate falls by less than one would otherwise expect. Finally, in some industries employing more workers increases production by more than a proportional amount: product design and set-up need to be done only once, no matter how much is produced. Thus businesses which have economies of scale do not need twice as many workers to produce twice as much output.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem regarding Substitution of goods

    When tuna fish ice cream and licorice gummy bears are substitutes, then: (1) Decline in the price of licorice gummy bears raises the demand for tuna fish ice-cream. (2) The demand for tuna fish ice-cream is independent of price of licorice gummy bears. (3) Consuming m

  • Q : Quantity demanded grows with price cut

    A price elasticity of demand coefficient of 2.5 approximately implies that: (1) quantity demanded rises 1 percent while price rises 2.5 percent. (2) quantity demanded grows 2.5 percent along with a 1 percent price cut. (3) price rises 2.5 percent whil

  • Q : Enterprises capability One of my

    One of my friends can't discover the solution of this question. So he is not capable to complete his assignment. Give answer of this question. Are there any limits or constraints onto the enterprise’s capability to grow and change?

  • Q : Freedom of entry-exit in long run

    Contestable markets and purely competitive markets share the feature of: (w) collusive behavior of huge firms. (x) freedom of entry and exit into the long run. (y) widespread product differentiation. (z) persistent economic profits.

    Q : Elasticity and profit maximization A

    A nondiscriminating monopolist cannot maximize profits through producing where demand: (w) price elastic. (x) price inelastic. (y) above marginal cost. (z) above marginal revenue. Can someone explain/help me with b

  • Q : Minimum Supply Amounts of Resources

    Payments for a resource into excess of the minimum needed to supply specified amounts of the resource are termed as: (1) economic rents. (2) wage premiums. (3) excess profits. (4) surplus values. (5) capitalization.

    Q : Area of Loren Curve This function as in

    This function as in illustrated figure area between A and B is termed as a/an: (1) index of inequality. (2) Lorenz curve. (3) Pareto indicator. (4) Gini coefficient. (5) Marx-Engels curve.

    Q : Net revenue when price is given In the

    In the diagram shown below, net revenue is maximum for Pixie’s cheesy fried grits at a price of: (1) P1. (2) P2. (3) P3. (4) P4. 1466_8.jpg

  • Q : Illustration of long-run adjustment in

    A rising market demand for generic puffy cheese chips produces economic profits and makes a new firm to build a vast modern factory to bake puffy cheese chips. It is an illustration of: (i) monopoly power. (ii) adjustments in the mark

  • Q : Problem on annual implicit cost To

    To begin up his own business, Mitch quit his salaried job and invested $10,000 in savings which had earned him $1,000 per year in interest. He as well employs an apartment as his office that he previously had rented out for $6,500 per year. Which of the following is n