--%>

Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large

Why the Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large? Okun's Law posits not a 1-to-1 relation but a 2.5-to-1 relationship between real GDP growth and the unemployment rate. That is, a one percentage-point fall in the unemployment rate is associated not with a 1 but a 2.5 percent boost in the level of production. Why is this Okun's Law coefficient so large? Why isn't it the case that a one percentage point fall in unemployment produces a one percent rise in output, or even less? One answer is that the unemployment rate, as officially measured, does not count discouraged workers. In a recession, the number of people at work falls, the number of people looking for work rises, and the number of people who are not looking for work because they doubt they could find jobs--but would be working if business conditions were better--rises. Because the conventionally-measured unemployment rate does not include these discouraged workers, more than a 1 percent rise in real GDP is needed to reduce the unemployment rate by 1 percentage point. Moreover, when business returns to normal, firms' initial response is not to hire more employees, but to ask existing employees to work longer hours. So average hours of work per week go up, and the unemployment rate falls by less than one would otherwise expect. Finally, in some industries employing more workers increases production by more than a proportional amount: product design and set-up need to be done only once, no matter how much is produced. Thus businesses which have economies of scale do not need twice as many workers to produce twice as much output.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Illustration of complementary goods

    Prices cross elasticity of demand of two between cable TV and VCRs entails that such goods are: (1) complementary goods. (2) substitute goods. (3) negatively associated goods. (4) a luxury and a need, respectively. (5) both inferior goods.

  • Q : Separation of the Economic Functions

    Separation of ownership or stockholders by control (management) into modern giant corporations tends to divide the economic functions of: (w) capitalists. (x) union leaders. (y) entrepreneurship. (z) bureaucrats. I

  • Q : Elasticity of supply when product

    Since the supply of land is fixed, then the: (w) demand for land is absolutely horizontal. (x) supply of land is completely elastic. (y) demand for land is absolutely vertical. (z) supply of land is perfectly inelastic.

    Q : Unitarily elasticity in supply curve At

    At point b, in demonstrated figure the supply curve into this graph is: (w) perfectly elastic. (x) elastic, but not perfectly that why. (y) unitarily elastic. (z) inelastic.

    Q : Microeconomics-Economic factors 1)

    1) Identify and explain the chief economic factors which determine the price of a good or service. Please include how demand and supply interact and elasticity, etc. Also give examples with graphs.

  • Q : Critics of contestability theory

    Critics of contestability theory argue which: (i) easy entry and exit isn't enough to make sure competitive prices. (ii) even though the firms charged a competitive price for their goods, that they would not have the incentive to make the competitive

  • Q : Central bank as lender of last resort

    The central bank performs as lender of last resort. Explain how? Answer: The central bank too acts as lender of last resort for other banks of the country. This mea

  • Q : LEAST dependency Demands for labor

    Demands for labor depend LEAST upon the levels of: (w) labor productivity. (x) technology as well as amounts of other resources employed. (y) demand for final products. (z) trade off among work (creating income) and leisure.

    Q : Theory of production and cost in long

    In the theory of cost and production, the long run is the period: (i) Of 1-year or longer. (ii) Of 5-years or longer. (iii) In which we all are dead. (iv) Permitting the capacity to wholly adjust. Can someone pleas

  • Q : Oligopoly and economic welfare in long

    In an oligopoly, as opposite to monopolistic or pure competition, industry output within the long run is probable to be: (1) lower along with reduced prices. (2) about similar but with higher prices. (3) lower and with higher prices.