--%>

Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large

Why the Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large? Okun's Law posits not a 1-to-1 relation but a 2.5-to-1 relationship between real GDP growth and the unemployment rate. That is, a one percentage-point fall in the unemployment rate is associated not with a 1 but a 2.5 percent boost in the level of production. Why is this Okun's Law coefficient so large? Why isn't it the case that a one percentage point fall in unemployment produces a one percent rise in output, or even less? One answer is that the unemployment rate, as officially measured, does not count discouraged workers. In a recession, the number of people at work falls, the number of people looking for work rises, and the number of people who are not looking for work because they doubt they could find jobs--but would be working if business conditions were better--rises. Because the conventionally-measured unemployment rate does not include these discouraged workers, more than a 1 percent rise in real GDP is needed to reduce the unemployment rate by 1 percentage point. Moreover, when business returns to normal, firms' initial response is not to hire more employees, but to ask existing employees to work longer hours. So average hours of work per week go up, and the unemployment rate falls by less than one would otherwise expect. Finally, in some industries employing more workers increases production by more than a proportional amount: product design and set-up need to be done only once, no matter how much is produced. Thus businesses which have economies of scale do not need twice as many workers to produce twice as much output.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Equilibrium price of commodity Describe

    Describe why the equilibrium price of commodity is determined at the level of output at which its demand equavalents its supply.

  • Q : Determine free-market equilibrium price

    In the year of 1983, the Reagan Administration introduced a new agricultural program known as the Payment-in-Kind Program. To distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Assume the demand function is QD = 28 - 2P and the supp

  • Q : Price Rigidity Price Rigidity: The

    Price Rigidity: The other significant feature of oligopoly is price rigidity. Price is rigid or sticky at the prevailing level due to the fear of reaction from the rival firms. When an oligo

  • Q : Monopsony power in the market of labor

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question? The firm probable to encompass significant monopsony power in its labor market would be: (v) Big cotton farm in the Texas hiring migrant workers. (w) Textile manufacturer in Hon

  • Q : Gaining more Consumer Surplus I have a

    I have a problem in economics on gaining more Consumer Surplus. Please help me in the following question. Sushi lovers would be most probable to gain more consumer surplus as an outcome of rises in the: (i) Price of the steamed rice. (ii) Supply of sushi. (iii) Income

  • Q : International federal or agreements and

    Consider goods for that various people are willing and capable to pay much more than the costs of production therefore widespread shortages exist. International federal or agreements, state and local laws as well as regulations are probably key factor

  • Q : Effect of minimum wage laws in

    The Minimum wage laws might efficiently raise employment: (i) When the set wage value surpasses labor market equilibrium. (ii) In industries of profoundly exercised monopsony power. (iii) In no condition; higher minimum wage floods the labor supply and lower minimum w

  • Q : Demand function Normal 0 false false

    Normal 0 false false

  • Q : Structure conduct performance paradigm

    From about 1890 till 1970, the “structure-conduct-performance paradigm” dominated theories concerning how firms behave in various kinds of markets. The word “conduct” in this context refers to these things as: (i) decisions by

  • Q : Jurisdictional Strikes The Taft-Hartley

    The Taft-Hartley Act prohibited strikes against a firm over the issue of which of the two or more competing unions would symbolize the firm’s employees. These strikes are termed as: (i) Jurisdictional strikes. (ii) Strategic representation strikes. (iii) Wildcat