--%>

Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large

Why the Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large? Okun's Law posits not a 1-to-1 relation but a 2.5-to-1 relationship between real GDP growth and the unemployment rate. That is, a one percentage-point fall in the unemployment rate is associated not with a 1 but a 2.5 percent boost in the level of production. Why is this Okun's Law coefficient so large? Why isn't it the case that a one percentage point fall in unemployment produces a one percent rise in output, or even less? One answer is that the unemployment rate, as officially measured, does not count discouraged workers. In a recession, the number of people at work falls, the number of people looking for work rises, and the number of people who are not looking for work because they doubt they could find jobs--but would be working if business conditions were better--rises. Because the conventionally-measured unemployment rate does not include these discouraged workers, more than a 1 percent rise in real GDP is needed to reduce the unemployment rate by 1 percentage point. Moreover, when business returns to normal, firms' initial response is not to hire more employees, but to ask existing employees to work longer hours. So average hours of work per week go up, and the unemployment rate falls by less than one would otherwise expect. Finally, in some industries employing more workers increases production by more than a proportional amount: product design and set-up need to be done only once, no matter how much is produced. Thus businesses which have economies of scale do not need twice as many workers to produce twice as much output.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Set price equal to produce output

    Assume that HoloIMAGine’s patents for holographic technology lapsed, as well as entry of new competitors within this market eroded the demand for HoloIMAGine technology, even though the firm retains several market power since competitors’

  • Q : Absolute and Complete Inequality

    Absolute and complete inequality into the distribution of income or wealth would be reflected within the Lorenz curve demonstrated as: (i) line 0A0'. (ii) line 0B0'. (iii) line 0C0'. (iv) line 0D0'. (v) line 0F0'.

    Q : Equal Income in Lorenz Curve When all

    When all households have equal incomes, in that case the Lorenz curve would be: (w) zero. (x) a 45 degree line. (y) 1. (z) rectangularly hyperbolic. Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem of E

  • Q : Monopsonistic Exploitation-MRP and w

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. In the equilibrium for an organization with power to adjust the wage it pays, the rate of monopsonistic exploitation equivalents any differe

  • Q : Non discriminating firm-monopsony power

    The non discriminating firm with monopsony power in labor market confronts the: (1) Wage rate which consistently surpasses the marginal revenue. (2) MRP less than w. (3) MFC which surpasses w. (4) Monopolistic seller of firm's output. (5) MRP more tha

  • Q : Demands for consumer for resources

    Since demands for resources eventually depend upon consumers’ demands for goods, in that case the demand for labor is: (w) termed as a derived demand. (x) a perfectly elastic demand curve. (y) a perfectly inelastic demand. (z) a horizontal line.

  • Q : Negatively sloped Demand curve When the

    When the demand curve for wheat is negatively sloped, increases in its supply will: (1) Lower the equilibrium price. (2) Increase the equilibrium price. (3) Reduce the equilibrium quantity. (4) Stimulate technological modification.

    Q : Comparative Advantage in opportunity

    The most important declines in opportunity costs of multiple goods for the consumers and greatest rises in the value of net production for all societies everywhere tend to be realized whenever production is organized in accord by: (1) The optimal clas

  • Q : Emergence and development of common

    The economist most intimately identified along with the emergence and early development of common equilibrium analysis was: (w) Adam Smith. (x) Leon Walras. (y) Alfred Marshall. (z) William Stanley Jevons. Can some

  • Q : Shrinking of Production possibilities

    The Production possibilities frontiers are most probable to shrink when: (1) National income becomes less fairly distributed. (2) High-tech agriculture reduces jobs for migrant farm workers. (3) A 3-hour nuclear war blasts technology back to Stone Age