--%>

Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large

Why the Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large? Okun's Law posits not a 1-to-1 relation but a 2.5-to-1 relationship between real GDP growth and the unemployment rate. That is, a one percentage-point fall in the unemployment rate is associated not with a 1 but a 2.5 percent boost in the level of production. Why is this Okun's Law coefficient so large? Why isn't it the case that a one percentage point fall in unemployment produces a one percent rise in output, or even less? One answer is that the unemployment rate, as officially measured, does not count discouraged workers. In a recession, the number of people at work falls, the number of people looking for work rises, and the number of people who are not looking for work because they doubt they could find jobs--but would be working if business conditions were better--rises. Because the conventionally-measured unemployment rate does not include these discouraged workers, more than a 1 percent rise in real GDP is needed to reduce the unemployment rate by 1 percentage point. Moreover, when business returns to normal, firms' initial response is not to hire more employees, but to ask existing employees to work longer hours. So average hours of work per week go up, and the unemployment rate falls by less than one would otherwise expect. Finally, in some industries employing more workers increases production by more than a proportional amount: product design and set-up need to be done only once, no matter how much is produced. Thus businesses which have economies of scale do not need twice as many workers to produce twice as much output.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Income elasticity of demand Income

    Income elasticity of demand: Income elasticity of demand is the degree of receptiveness of demand to the modification in income.

    Q : Demography of Wealth and Poverty

    Poverty within the United States can be explained most properly by: (w) differences in effort and sacrifice. (x) voluntary choices of low income persons to consume more leisure at the expense of more income. (y) monopsonistic exploitation of labor by

  • Q : Problem on decrease in demand for goods

    For normal luxuries and goods, decreases in income tend to cause the: (i) Market prices to increase. (ii) Raises in quantities demanded. (iii) A reduction in demand for goods. (iv) Demand curves to shift to right. What is the right

  • Q : What is production function Production

    Production function: It is the technological relationship among input and output of a firm and is termed as production function.

  • Q : Expectations and Demand problem The

    The demand for durable consumer good tends to rise if: (1) Supply rises. (2) Aggregate expenses rise. (3) Consumers predict price hikes or scarcities in the future. (3) Consumers predict surpluses in future. Choose the precise answ

  • Q : Goals of the Firm-Maximizing their

    When top executives of the corporation pursue policies which maximize their personal incomes and advantages, the most likely outcome is that: (1) The Corporation will attempt to maximize the net revenue. (2) Stockholders in the corporation will experience the highest

  • Q : Examples of Complementary Goods Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Illustrations of complementary goods would not comprise: (1) Football tickets and rugby tickets. (2) Golf clubs and golf balls. (3) Laundry detergent and washing machines. (4)

  • Q : Neoclassical Production and Costs

    Normal 0 false false

  • Q : Decrement in opportunity costs and

    Opportunity costs and prices tend to be decreased by: (w) competition among speculators and other intermediaries. (x) price floors. (y) the exercise of monopoly power. (z) price ceilings. How can I

  • Q : Bargaining situation of Asymmetric

    Whenever two parties encompass unequal levels of knowledge regarding issues in the bargaining situation: (i) Potential abuses of the asymmetric information exist. (ii) The payoff matrix is invariably asymmetric. (iii) The more knowledgeable negotiator will profit from