--%>

Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large

Why the Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large? Okun's Law posits not a 1-to-1 relation but a 2.5-to-1 relationship between real GDP growth and the unemployment rate. That is, a one percentage-point fall in the unemployment rate is associated not with a 1 but a 2.5 percent boost in the level of production. Why is this Okun's Law coefficient so large? Why isn't it the case that a one percentage point fall in unemployment produces a one percent rise in output, or even less? One answer is that the unemployment rate, as officially measured, does not count discouraged workers. In a recession, the number of people at work falls, the number of people looking for work rises, and the number of people who are not looking for work because they doubt they could find jobs--but would be working if business conditions were better--rises. Because the conventionally-measured unemployment rate does not include these discouraged workers, more than a 1 percent rise in real GDP is needed to reduce the unemployment rate by 1 percentage point. Moreover, when business returns to normal, firms' initial response is not to hire more employees, but to ask existing employees to work longer hours. So average hours of work per week go up, and the unemployment rate falls by less than one would otherwise expect. Finally, in some industries employing more workers increases production by more than a proportional amount: product design and set-up need to be done only once, no matter how much is produced. Thus businesses which have economies of scale do not need twice as many workers to produce twice as much output.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Managerial slack or X-inefficiency

    X-inefficiency (also termed as managerial slack): (1) tends to drive up fixed costs. (2) commonly results from firms not being hard pressed through competitors. (3) can absorb much of a monopoly’s potential profit. (4) is a prob

  • Q : LEAST dependency Demands for labor

    Demands for labor depend LEAST upon the levels of: (w) labor productivity. (x) technology as well as amounts of other resources employed. (y) demand for final products. (z) trade off among work (creating income) and leisure.

    Q : Question on utility function Assume a

     Assume a consumer with the given utility function: U = 3y1y2 + 5. Suppose y2 = 1, derive the marginal utility schedule for y1. In what direction is it moving?

  • Q : Total costs incur by profit-maximizing

    Hybrid Roses is the merely florist in 60 miles of Presidio, Texas. When total fixed costs (for example, rent and utilities) are $9 per hour, that profit-maximizing monopolist will incur total costs of around: (w) $20 per hour. (x) $27

  • Q : Elasticity formula when price falls

    When the quantity of SCUBA lessons demanded by Hawaiian tourist’s increases from 800 to 1,000 weekly and if the price drops/falls from $30 to $20 per session, by using the arc elasticity formula, the price elasticity of demand will be: (i) 5.555

  • Q : Market form-product distinguishing In

    In which market form, the products are distinguished. Answer: In Monopolistic competition

  • Q : Purely-competitive and constant-cost

    When this firm is typical into this purely-competitive of constant-cost industry, as in demonstrated figure in long-run equilibrium for cranberries will be attained at a market price of: (i) P1. (ii) P2. (iii) P<

  • Q : Market demand curve of pure monopolist

    A pure monopolist faces as: (w) a perfectly elastic demand for its product because it can't affect market price. (x) a perfectly inelastic demand for its product. (y) the market demand curve for its product. (z) a constant marginal cost curve.

  • Q : A purely competitive industry long-run

    The long-run dynamics of purely competitive industry make sure that:( w) surviving firms make positive economic profits. (x) accounting profits will equal economic profits. (y) accounting profits will be zero. (z) economic profits will be zero. <

  • Q : Market shifting in equilibrium When

    When market begins in equilibrium at point e upon S0D0 and in that case young American families increasingly "inherit" furniture like their baby-boomer parents move within smaller retirement homes, that market will tend to shift in the direction