--%>

Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large

Why the Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large? Okun's Law posits not a 1-to-1 relation but a 2.5-to-1 relationship between real GDP growth and the unemployment rate. That is, a one percentage-point fall in the unemployment rate is associated not with a 1 but a 2.5 percent boost in the level of production. Why is this Okun's Law coefficient so large? Why isn't it the case that a one percentage point fall in unemployment produces a one percent rise in output, or even less? One answer is that the unemployment rate, as officially measured, does not count discouraged workers. In a recession, the number of people at work falls, the number of people looking for work rises, and the number of people who are not looking for work because they doubt they could find jobs--but would be working if business conditions were better--rises. Because the conventionally-measured unemployment rate does not include these discouraged workers, more than a 1 percent rise in real GDP is needed to reduce the unemployment rate by 1 percentage point. Moreover, when business returns to normal, firms' initial response is not to hire more employees, but to ask existing employees to work longer hours. So average hours of work per week go up, and the unemployment rate falls by less than one would otherwise expect. Finally, in some industries employing more workers increases production by more than a proportional amount: product design and set-up need to be done only once, no matter how much is produced. Thus businesses which have economies of scale do not need twice as many workers to produce twice as much output.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Industry demand curve identity

    Babble-On maintains world-wide patents for software which translates any of 314 spoken languages within text, along with automatic audio and text translations within any of the other three-hundred-thirteen languages. When Babble-On is a pure monopoly, such firm confro

  • Q : Price elasticity of supply while the

    If John Whittler can sell totem poles for $1,800 at all, he markets 60 yearly, but while the price falls to $600 apiece; in that case he is willing to sell only 24 yearly. His price elasticity of supply is: (w) 0.43. (x) 0.86. (y) 1.62. (z) 2.48.

  • Q : When is price elasticity of demand

    The price elasticity of demand is considered as to be inelastic when the computed value is: (w) less than one although greater than zero. (x) greater than zero. (y) one. (z) zero. Hello guys I want your advice. Ple

  • Q : Rate of return onto investment When the

    When the rate of return on investment equals the interest rate, in that case investment will: (w) rise. (x) fall. (y) not change. (z) Any of the above is possible. Hey friends please give your opin

  • Q : Practicing predatory pricing by a

    This is difficult to convict a company for practicing predatory pricing since: (w) the degree of economic analysis needed is beyond the understanding of most lawyers. (x) this is not illegal to practice predatory pricing. (y) this is frequently hard t

  • Q : Equal Income in Lorenz Curve When all

    When all households have equal incomes, in that case the Lorenz curve would be: (w) zero. (x) a 45 degree line. (y) 1. (z) rectangularly hyperbolic. Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem of E

  • Q : Saving schedule Refer to the given

    Refer to the given figure.Choose the right answer from following. If the relevant saving schedule were constructed: A) saving would be minus $20 billion at the zero level of income. B) aggregate saving would be $60 at the $60 billion level of income. C) its slope woul

  • Q : Discount coupons and trip afforded by

    Relative to people along with lower incomes, and high-income families be likely to shop for groceries less often and use fewer discount coupons, although buy more throughout each trip, since: (w) their superior access to transportatio

  • Q : Reform or revision of the welfare system

    The most important reform / revision of the welfare system within the past half century occurred throughout the administration of President as: (1) Richard Nixon [1971]. (2) Jimmy Carter [1978]. (3) Ronald Reagan [1984]. (4) Bill Clinton [1996]. (5) G

  • Q : Problem on spending shares of national

    The view which big corporations unfailingly capture much stable shares of spending out of national income is: (i) Accepted by almost all the economists. (ii) Contrary to the confirmation of turnover among big over the decades. (iii) The symptom of strong competition.