--%>

Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large

Why the Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large? Okun's Law posits not a 1-to-1 relation but a 2.5-to-1 relationship between real GDP growth and the unemployment rate. That is, a one percentage-point fall in the unemployment rate is associated not with a 1 but a 2.5 percent boost in the level of production. Why is this Okun's Law coefficient so large? Why isn't it the case that a one percentage point fall in unemployment produces a one percent rise in output, or even less? One answer is that the unemployment rate, as officially measured, does not count discouraged workers. In a recession, the number of people at work falls, the number of people looking for work rises, and the number of people who are not looking for work because they doubt they could find jobs--but would be working if business conditions were better--rises. Because the conventionally-measured unemployment rate does not include these discouraged workers, more than a 1 percent rise in real GDP is needed to reduce the unemployment rate by 1 percentage point. Moreover, when business returns to normal, firms' initial response is not to hire more employees, but to ask existing employees to work longer hours. So average hours of work per week go up, and the unemployment rate falls by less than one would otherwise expect. Finally, in some industries employing more workers increases production by more than a proportional amount: product design and set-up need to be done only once, no matter how much is produced. Thus businesses which have economies of scale do not need twice as many workers to produce twice as much output.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Average total cost curve in pure

    No firm can ever generate a pure economic profit unless this: (i) possesses some market power or monopoly power. (ii) can adjust both its level of output and the price of its products. (iii) faces a demand curve with a segment above its average total

  • Q : Demand function Normal 0 false false

    Normal 0 false false

  • Q : Disadvantages of mixed economy system

    Tell me what are the disadvantages of mixed economy system?

  • Q : NOT cartelized product in market power

    Products which have NOT been cartelized comprise: (w) oil. (x) bananas. (y) sugar. (z) wheat. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?

  • Q : Product differentiation in market If

    If new soap operas that, although same to the previous ones, all are advertised as original and new, the TV networks are engaging within: (i) bait and switch. (ii) product differentiation. (iii) monopolistic competition. (iv) dynamic game theory. (v)

  • Q : Long-run equilibrium output of

    This monopolistic competitor produces Q0 units and is demonstrated: (w) earning total profit equal to 0PbQ. (x) as a price taker. (y) setting price equal to marginal revenue. (z) in long-run equilibrium.

  • Q : Problem on deadweight loss Assume that

    Assume that the domestic demand for television sets is explained by Q = 40,000 − 180P and that the supply is provided by Q = 20P. When televisions can be freely imported at a price of $160, then how many televisions would be generated in the domestic market? By

  • Q : Function of negative economic profits A

    A function of negative economic profits is to: (w) attract new firms into the industry. (x) keep competition within. (y) signal to other firms to invest their capital into this industry. (z) correct resource allocations by forcing firms generating los

  • Q : Demand for Labor-Monopsony Power When

    When wage discrimination is not probable for the first 40 workers this profit-maximizing organization hires, however it can wage discriminate perfectly whenever hiring all the subsequent workers, it hires a net of: (i) Forty workers at an average salary of $700 per we

  • Q : Perfectly price discrimination

    Babble-On holds world-extensive patents for software which translates any of 314 spoken languages within text, along with automatic audio and text translations within any of the other three-hundred-thirteen languages. This figure illustrates that Babble-On as: (1) is