--%>

Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large

Why the Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large? Okun's Law posits not a 1-to-1 relation but a 2.5-to-1 relationship between real GDP growth and the unemployment rate. That is, a one percentage-point fall in the unemployment rate is associated not with a 1 but a 2.5 percent boost in the level of production. Why is this Okun's Law coefficient so large? Why isn't it the case that a one percentage point fall in unemployment produces a one percent rise in output, or even less? One answer is that the unemployment rate, as officially measured, does not count discouraged workers. In a recession, the number of people at work falls, the number of people looking for work rises, and the number of people who are not looking for work because they doubt they could find jobs--but would be working if business conditions were better--rises. Because the conventionally-measured unemployment rate does not include these discouraged workers, more than a 1 percent rise in real GDP is needed to reduce the unemployment rate by 1 percentage point. Moreover, when business returns to normal, firms' initial response is not to hire more employees, but to ask existing employees to work longer hours. So average hours of work per week go up, and the unemployment rate falls by less than one would otherwise expect. Finally, in some industries employing more workers increases production by more than a proportional amount: product design and set-up need to be done only once, no matter how much is produced. Thus businesses which have economies of scale do not need twice as many workers to produce twice as much output.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Changes in market prices and conditions

    The model of pure competitive is intended to produce insights within how: (w) asymmetric information influences the efficiency of exchange. (x) buyers and sellers negotiate to reach contracts for goods and services. (y) markets determine equitable dis

  • Q : Elasticity and profit maximization at

    When a monopolist which does not price discriminate produces output where is demand is unitarily elastic, in that case the firm will: (i) never be capable to maximize profit. (ii) maximize profit only when all costs are fixed. (iii) maximize profit wh

  • Q : Output produces by monopolistic

    This monopolistic competitor generates Q0 output where is: (1) MR = MC. (2) MSB > MSC. (3) average cost is not minimized. (4) P = ATC. (5) All of the above.

    Q : Law of demand is price in the law of

    is price in the law of demand an absolute or relative price

  • Q : Giving wholesale price per dozen by

    When Rose Garden Wholesalers has a typical type cost structure of rose farms within this purely competitive industry, into the long run new competitors would most likely enter the market providing the wholesale price

  • Q : Limit pricing model of strategic

    The assumption essential for the result of the limit pricing model of strategic behavior is: (a) entrant firms price at marginal cost. (b) entry and exit is relatively costless. (c) the incumbent firms will maintain old output levels after entry of a

  • Q : Profit-maximizing to make economic

    This profit-maximizing brickyard of below illustrated figure on the average is, about: (i) making an economic profit of $8 per thousand bricks. (ii) incurring variable costs of $90 per thousand bricks. (iii) suffering an accounting loss of $2 per thou

  • Q : Problem based on type of economy Tell

    Tell me the answer of this question. Economists would describe the U.S. automobile industry as: A) purely competitive. B) an oligopoly. C) monopolistically competitive. D) a pure monopoly.

  • Q : Result of successful product

    One complicated result of successful product differentiation: (1) the demand curve shrinks making this more elastic. (2) the demand curve becomes perfectly elastic. (3) prices do not vary considerably between close substitutes. (4) each marginal reven

  • Q : Percentage of incomes persistently The

    The percentage of American families along with incomes persistently below the poverty line is around: (w) 1 2%. (x) 3 5%. (y) 5 7%. (z) 8 10%. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regardi