--%>

Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large

Why the Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large? Okun's Law posits not a 1-to-1 relation but a 2.5-to-1 relationship between real GDP growth and the unemployment rate. That is, a one percentage-point fall in the unemployment rate is associated not with a 1 but a 2.5 percent boost in the level of production. Why is this Okun's Law coefficient so large? Why isn't it the case that a one percentage point fall in unemployment produces a one percent rise in output, or even less? One answer is that the unemployment rate, as officially measured, does not count discouraged workers. In a recession, the number of people at work falls, the number of people looking for work rises, and the number of people who are not looking for work because they doubt they could find jobs--but would be working if business conditions were better--rises. Because the conventionally-measured unemployment rate does not include these discouraged workers, more than a 1 percent rise in real GDP is needed to reduce the unemployment rate by 1 percentage point. Moreover, when business returns to normal, firms' initial response is not to hire more employees, but to ask existing employees to work longer hours. So average hours of work per week go up, and the unemployment rate falls by less than one would otherwise expect. Finally, in some industries employing more workers increases production by more than a proportional amount: product design and set-up need to be done only once, no matter how much is produced. Thus businesses which have economies of scale do not need twice as many workers to produce twice as much output.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Claimants to a firms income stream The

    The least probable of the given to be claimants to the firm’s income stream would be the firm’s: (1) Shareholders. (2) Managers. (3) Customers. (4) Suppliers. (5) Government. Can someone please help me in finding out th

  • Q : Individual taker in pure competition

    For a particular price taker: (w) price is uninfluenced by quantity. (x) total revenue is constant. (y) profit is constant. (z) consumer surplus is zero. I need a good answer on the topic of Economics

  • Q : Example of variable in Short Run The

    The resource which a carpet manufacturer is most probable to view as the variable in short run would be: (i) The warehouse it owns (ii) Truck driver. (iii) The truck on a 5-year lease agreement. (iv) Firm’s biggest factory. C

  • Q : Capital to Labor Ratio When the

    When the capital-to-labor (K/L) ratio raises: (1) capital becomes more productive. (2) the interest payments to capital will raise. (3) the wages to labor will probably reduce. (4) labor productivity should rise. (5) the price of capital increases.

  • Q : Perfectly inelastic demand problem When

    When will an augment in supply entail a raise in price however no change in quantity?

  • Q : Existence of Diseconomies I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Existence of Diseconomies. Please help me in the following question. Diseconomies of the scale exist if: (1) Price reduces as more units are sold. (2) Total costs reduction as output raise. (3) Average costs raise as output rises. (4)

  • Q : Purely competitive decreasing cost

    When a decreasing cost industry is purely competitive in that case: (1) each firm’s long-run supply curve is downward sloping. (2) each firm encounters increasing returns to scale. (3) growth of industry output yields lower per unit costs. (4) c

  • Q : Charging price of profit-maximizing

    Hybrid Roses is the merely florist in 60 miles of Presidio, Texas. When total fixed costs (for example, rent and utilities) are $9 per hour, that profit-maximizing monopolist will charge a price of: (1) $10 per dozen roses. (2) $12 pe

  • Q : Charging price in short run for profit

    Now Roast chicken dinners replace fried chicken in popularity in this given demonstrated figure. In the short run that profit maximizing firm will charge a price equal to: (w) $12.00. (x) $11.00. (y) $10.00. (y) $9.00. (z) $6.50.

    Q : Determine free-market equilibrium price

    In the year of 1983, the Reagan Administration introduced a new agricultural program known as the Payment-in-Kind Program. To distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Assume the demand function is QD = 28 - 2P and the supp