--%>

Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large

Why the Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large? Okun's Law posits not a 1-to-1 relation but a 2.5-to-1 relationship between real GDP growth and the unemployment rate. That is, a one percentage-point fall in the unemployment rate is associated not with a 1 but a 2.5 percent boost in the level of production. Why is this Okun's Law coefficient so large? Why isn't it the case that a one percentage point fall in unemployment produces a one percent rise in output, or even less? One answer is that the unemployment rate, as officially measured, does not count discouraged workers. In a recession, the number of people at work falls, the number of people looking for work rises, and the number of people who are not looking for work because they doubt they could find jobs--but would be working if business conditions were better--rises. Because the conventionally-measured unemployment rate does not include these discouraged workers, more than a 1 percent rise in real GDP is needed to reduce the unemployment rate by 1 percentage point. Moreover, when business returns to normal, firms' initial response is not to hire more employees, but to ask existing employees to work longer hours. So average hours of work per week go up, and the unemployment rate falls by less than one would otherwise expect. Finally, in some industries employing more workers increases production by more than a proportional amount: product design and set-up need to be done only once, no matter how much is produced. Thus businesses which have economies of scale do not need twice as many workers to produce twice as much output.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Horizontal sum of the quantities in

    The short-run supply curve for a purely competitive industry is the horizontal total of the: (a) quantities demanded by consumers at each price. (b) prices charged by individual firms for each quantity supplied. (c) quantities supplied by established

  • Q : Facing a demand curve by purely

    A purely competitive firm faces a demand curve which is: (1) perfectly inelastic. (2) upward sloping. (3) perfectly elastic. (4) a vertical line. (5) downward sloping. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation

  • Q : Demand and supply influences

    Changes in both demand and supply of a commodity might or might not influence its equilibrium price. Describe.

  • Q : Explain about price-taker The purely

    The purely competitive firm: (w) is a price-taker. (x) confronts an inelastic demand curve. (y) should decide what price to charge. (z) maximizes total revenue. How can I solve my Economics problem

  • Q : Exploitation of Labor I have a problem

    I have a problem in economics on Exploitation of Labor Please help me in the following question. The exploitation might not exist even when wage a worker is paid is less than the worker’s: (1) average revenue product. (2) The value of marginal p

  • Q : Demand and Supply in short run Both

    Both demand and supply of hamburgers would plummet in short run, as would be quantity sold, however we can’t be certain how the price would adjust when: (i) 75 % of the population became serious vegetarians. (ii) People abruptly decreased their intake of milk pr

  • Q : Government and Labor Assume that the

    Assume that the male nurses are salaried more than female nurses for the similar work. When an ‘equal pay for equal work’ law is passed and enforced, this might: (i) Decrease the wages of male nurses. (ii) Not influence the wages of the female nurses. (iii

  • Q : Individual taker in pure competition

    For a particular price taker: (w) price is uninfluenced by quantity. (x) total revenue is constant. (y) profit is constant. (z) consumer surplus is zero. I need a good answer on the topic of Economics

  • Q : Effected income of a small changes The

    The income effect of a small change in wage rate in demonstrated figure of Glynn dominates the substitution effect at: (1) point a. (2) point b. (3) point c. (4) point d. (5) every point specified in the figure.

  • Q : Thought of economists for law of equal

    Explain different thought of economists for law of equivalent marginal advantage.