--%>

Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large

Why the Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large? Okun's Law posits not a 1-to-1 relation but a 2.5-to-1 relationship between real GDP growth and the unemployment rate. That is, a one percentage-point fall in the unemployment rate is associated not with a 1 but a 2.5 percent boost in the level of production. Why is this Okun's Law coefficient so large? Why isn't it the case that a one percentage point fall in unemployment produces a one percent rise in output, or even less? One answer is that the unemployment rate, as officially measured, does not count discouraged workers. In a recession, the number of people at work falls, the number of people looking for work rises, and the number of people who are not looking for work because they doubt they could find jobs--but would be working if business conditions were better--rises. Because the conventionally-measured unemployment rate does not include these discouraged workers, more than a 1 percent rise in real GDP is needed to reduce the unemployment rate by 1 percentage point. Moreover, when business returns to normal, firms' initial response is not to hire more employees, but to ask existing employees to work longer hours. So average hours of work per week go up, and the unemployment rate falls by less than one would otherwise expect. Finally, in some industries employing more workers increases production by more than a proportional amount: product design and set-up need to be done only once, no matter how much is produced. Thus businesses which have economies of scale do not need twice as many workers to produce twice as much output.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Zero elasticity for demand curves When

    When any truly existed, then perfectly inelastic demand curves would include: (i) price elasticities of infinity and be horizontal. (ii) zero elasticity and be horizontal. (iii) a slope of one. (iv) price elasticities of infinity and would be vertical

  • Q : Principal-Agent Problems instance An

    An instance of the principal-agent trouble would be:  (i) The student failing an exam since he did not study. (ii) The crook being caught as he made much noise. (iii) My son purchase baseball cards with the money I gave him to purchase milk for t

  • Q : Computing economic profit To compute

    To compute the economic profit, it is essential to know the opportunity cost of: (i) Capital. (ii) Land. (iii) Labor. (iv) All the productive resources. Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the above o

  • Q : Problem on Determinants of Demand I

    I have a problem in economics on Determinants of Demand. Please help me in the following question. Income and tastes most directly influence the: (i) Demand. (ii) Market equilibrium (iii) Prices. (iii) Quantities. (iv) Supply.

    Q : Key questions in evaluating a research

    Key questions in evaluating a research report: In brief, there are five key questions you, as a consumer of analytical work, should ask yourself as you are evaluating a research report. 1. What is the purpose of th

  • Q : Problem Regarding to Lorenz Curves A

    A Lorenz curve is a way to demonstrate: (w) that the U.S. has perfect equality of income distribution. (x) a mirror image of a production-possibility curve. (y) the percentages of families receiving different percentages of income. (z) differences wit

  • Q : Microeconomics Assignment Please give

    Please give me a quote for this uploaded assignment. I need it by the 10th of may 2013. Thank You

  • Q : Expected rate of return on R&D

    All of the following rise the expected rate of return on R&D expenditures, except: A) patents. B) trademarks. C) imitation by others. D) trade secrets

  • Q : Trends in Income Distribution The year

    The year in that a long-run trend towards greater equality within the U.S. income distribution was reversed, therefore income since then has become less equally distributed, it was roughly: (w) 1945. (x) 1960. (y) 1975. (z) 1990.

    Q : Screening devices problem The Screening

    The Screening devices employed whenever employers try to save adverse selection by the applicants for place do not comprise: (i) review resumes to recognize applicant’s qualifications. (ii) Needing non-compete clauses which prevent latest employees from working