--%>

Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large

Why the Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large? Okun's Law posits not a 1-to-1 relation but a 2.5-to-1 relationship between real GDP growth and the unemployment rate. That is, a one percentage-point fall in the unemployment rate is associated not with a 1 but a 2.5 percent boost in the level of production. Why is this Okun's Law coefficient so large? Why isn't it the case that a one percentage point fall in unemployment produces a one percent rise in output, or even less? One answer is that the unemployment rate, as officially measured, does not count discouraged workers. In a recession, the number of people at work falls, the number of people looking for work rises, and the number of people who are not looking for work because they doubt they could find jobs--but would be working if business conditions were better--rises. Because the conventionally-measured unemployment rate does not include these discouraged workers, more than a 1 percent rise in real GDP is needed to reduce the unemployment rate by 1 percentage point. Moreover, when business returns to normal, firms' initial response is not to hire more employees, but to ask existing employees to work longer hours. So average hours of work per week go up, and the unemployment rate falls by less than one would otherwise expect. Finally, in some industries employing more workers increases production by more than a proportional amount: product design and set-up need to be done only once, no matter how much is produced. Thus businesses which have economies of scale do not need twice as many workers to produce twice as much output.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Assumption of Ceteris paribus Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Suppose that everything except the variables we are studying remains constant or steady is termed as the: (1) Ceteris paribus assumption. (2) Ex-ante assumption. (3) Ex-post assumption. (4) Po

  • Q : Example of Industrial Unions Can

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The United Auto Workers (or UAW) is an illustration of the: (1) Industrial union. (2) Company union. (3) Mechanical union. (4) Craft union.

  • Q : Increase revenues when price falls When

    When the price elasticity of demand for fried cheesy grits at Pixie’s Breakfast Grill is two, in that case a price cut of $2.80 to $2.00 per serving of grits would be most probably to: (1) reduce Pixie’s revenues from grits by roughly fort

  • Q : Pure economic profit in the short run

    Monopolistically competitive firms: (w) profit by erecting durable barriers to entry and exit. (x) may realize pure economic profit in the short run, but not in the long run. (y) supply homogenous goods. (z) produce where marginal cost is at its minim

  • Q : Practicing joint profit maximization A

    A cartel is: (w) any large multinational corporation like OPEC. (x) a group of oligopolists practicing conscious parallelism of action. (y) a group of firms which practices joint profit maximization. (z) a multinational firm along with government subs

  • Q : Barriers prevent entry in monopoly

    Monopolists are more probable to generate economic profits within the long run than are pure competitors since: (w) monopolists are crooks. (x) monopolists are more interested in profits. (y) barriers prevent entry by new firms in a m

  • Q : Absolute values in price elasticity The

    The form of elasticity which economists commonly state like an absolute value since this is classically negative is the: (1) price elasticity of supply. (2) income elasticity of demand. (3) price-cross elasticity of supply. (4) price-

  • Q : Free products Select the right answer

    Select the right answer of the question .Free products offered by firms :1) may or may not be free to society, but are never free to individuals. 2) may or may not be free to individuals, but are never free to society. 3) are poduced and distributed at no cost to soci

  • Q : Direction of the income effect The

    The direction of the income effect can’t be: (i) Negative for inferior goods. (ii) Positive for the luxury goods. (iii) Zero for a good which some people consider a requirement. (iv) Expected when we know only the size and direction of substitution effect.

  • Q : Standard categories of economic

    Standard categories of economic discrimination which tend to make income less equally distributed do not comprise: (1) wage discrimination (2) employment discrimination (3) occupational discrimination (4) human capital discrimination (5) income discri