--%>

Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large

Why the Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large? Okun's Law posits not a 1-to-1 relation but a 2.5-to-1 relationship between real GDP growth and the unemployment rate. That is, a one percentage-point fall in the unemployment rate is associated not with a 1 but a 2.5 percent boost in the level of production. Why is this Okun's Law coefficient so large? Why isn't it the case that a one percentage point fall in unemployment produces a one percent rise in output, or even less? One answer is that the unemployment rate, as officially measured, does not count discouraged workers. In a recession, the number of people at work falls, the number of people looking for work rises, and the number of people who are not looking for work because they doubt they could find jobs--but would be working if business conditions were better--rises. Because the conventionally-measured unemployment rate does not include these discouraged workers, more than a 1 percent rise in real GDP is needed to reduce the unemployment rate by 1 percentage point. Moreover, when business returns to normal, firms' initial response is not to hire more employees, but to ask existing employees to work longer hours. So average hours of work per week go up, and the unemployment rate falls by less than one would otherwise expect. Finally, in some industries employing more workers increases production by more than a proportional amount: product design and set-up need to be done only once, no matter how much is produced. Thus businesses which have economies of scale do not need twice as many workers to produce twice as much output.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Chance for arbitrage Normal 0 false

    Normal 0 false false

  • Q : Income elasticity of positive and

    This given figure as in below demonstrates how consumption of goods A, B, C and D varies like a family’s income changes. Since income rises, the income elasticity of demand is positive and increasing for: (w) good A. (x) good B  (y) good C.

  • Q : Traditional transfer in kind assistance

    Most traditional transfer in kind helps programs: (w) increased benefits for every dollar earned. (x) reduced benefits by $1 for every dollar earned. (y) reduced benefits by less than $1 for each dollar earned. (z) reduced benefits by more than $1 for

  • Q : Total cost for monopolistic competitor

    Total cost for that monopolistic competitor in shown below figure equals area: (w) 0cbQ. (x) 0deQ + dcbe. (y) 0paQ   cpab. (z) All of the above.

    Q : Competition from poor substitutes A

    A firm in an industry which is a pure monopoly faces as: (w) many competitors from into the industry. (x) competition from only poor substitutes produced in other industries. (y) a market demand curve which is horizontal. (z) prosecution when it impor

  • Q : Quantity demanded grows with price cut

    A price elasticity of demand coefficient of 2.5 approximately implies that: (1) quantity demanded rises 1 percent while price rises 2.5 percent. (2) quantity demanded grows 2.5 percent along with a 1 percent price cut. (3) price rises 2.5 percent whil

  • Q : Taft-Hartley Act and Closed Shops Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The Taft Hartley Act of 1946 made it illegal to encompass a: (1) Right-to-work law passed by the state legislature. (2) Conviction for the misdemeanor and serve as union officer. (3) Union for

  • Q : Problem on wage discrimination Firms

    Firms which discourage the workers from discussing their salaries or wages are most likely engaged in the policies of: (i) Respect for the worker’s privacy. (ii) Monopolistic exploitation. (iii) Perfect competition. (iv) Cooperation rather than competition. (v)

  • Q : What is Complements Complements : The

    Complements: The two goods for which a rise in the price of one good leads to a reduction in the demand for other.

  • Q : Aggregate effective demand Why,

    Why, according to Keynes, is investment the key economic variable? Why does he think that the volatility of investment spending is likely to cause a problem of aggregate effective demand? Why does he think that this problem can only be solved by government interventio