--%>

Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large

Why the Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large? Okun's Law posits not a 1-to-1 relation but a 2.5-to-1 relationship between real GDP growth and the unemployment rate. That is, a one percentage-point fall in the unemployment rate is associated not with a 1 but a 2.5 percent boost in the level of production. Why is this Okun's Law coefficient so large? Why isn't it the case that a one percentage point fall in unemployment produces a one percent rise in output, or even less? One answer is that the unemployment rate, as officially measured, does not count discouraged workers. In a recession, the number of people at work falls, the number of people looking for work rises, and the number of people who are not looking for work because they doubt they could find jobs--but would be working if business conditions were better--rises. Because the conventionally-measured unemployment rate does not include these discouraged workers, more than a 1 percent rise in real GDP is needed to reduce the unemployment rate by 1 percentage point. Moreover, when business returns to normal, firms' initial response is not to hire more employees, but to ask existing employees to work longer hours. So average hours of work per week go up, and the unemployment rate falls by less than one would otherwise expect. Finally, in some industries employing more workers increases production by more than a proportional amount: product design and set-up need to be done only once, no matter how much is produced. Thus businesses which have economies of scale do not need twice as many workers to produce twice as much output.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Road charging-an end to congestion

    ‘State the economic arguments on whether big cities which have congested roads must charge a road tax?’

  • Q : Explain about price-taker The purely

    The purely competitive firm: (w) is a price-taker. (x) confronts an inelastic demand curve. (y) should decide what price to charge. (z) maximizes total revenue. How can I solve my Economics problem

  • Q : Problem regarding monopsonistic

    I have a problem in economics on monopsonistic exploitation. Please help me in the following question. The Labor union contracts, an analogous worth rule or the minimum wage laws might boost equilibrium employment when a firm has been practicing: (1)

  • Q : Monopolistic competition and oligopoly

    One of my friends can't succeed to get the solution of this question. Give me solution of this question. Under what circumstances can monopolistic competition and oligopoly describe stable prices?

  • Q : Problem on Normal and Inferior Goods

    Lobster is a normal good and peanut butter is a poorer good. When your income increases, you will most likely consume: (1) More of both the goods. (2) More lobster and less peanut butter. (3) More peanut butter and less lobster. (4) Less of both goods.

    Q : Vigorously competitive market

    Economic rents which can be capitalized are least possible to arise by: (1) production cost advantages. (2) proprietary knowledge. (3) being first to market a differentiable new product or to innovate a new production technology. (4) a vigorously comp

  • Q : LEAST capable inventories of

    A competitive firm is LEAST capable to adjust its inventories throughout the: (w) market period. (x) short-run. (y) intermediate period. (z) long-run. Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for above Eco

  • Q : Examples of pairs of complementary goods

    I have a problem in economics on Examples of pairs of complementary goods. Please help me in the following question. The illustrations of pairs of complementary goods would comprise: (1) Coffee and tea. (2) Butter and margarine. (3) Motor boats and wa

  • Q : Break-even level of income under

    For a family of four the break-even level of income under the negative income tax system demonstrated in this figure is: (1) $15,000 per year. (2) $30,000 per year. (3) $45,000 per year. (4) $60,000 per year. (5) $75,000 per year.

  • Q : Determine Income Floor A marginal tax

    A marginal tax rate of 40% and an income floor of __________ give in a break-even level of income of $12,000 is: (1) $30,000 (2) $4,800 (3) $7,200 (4) $3,000 (5) $16,800 Hey friend