--%>

Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large

Why the Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large? Okun's Law posits not a 1-to-1 relation but a 2.5-to-1 relationship between real GDP growth and the unemployment rate. That is, a one percentage-point fall in the unemployment rate is associated not with a 1 but a 2.5 percent boost in the level of production. Why is this Okun's Law coefficient so large? Why isn't it the case that a one percentage point fall in unemployment produces a one percent rise in output, or even less? One answer is that the unemployment rate, as officially measured, does not count discouraged workers. In a recession, the number of people at work falls, the number of people looking for work rises, and the number of people who are not looking for work because they doubt they could find jobs--but would be working if business conditions were better--rises. Because the conventionally-measured unemployment rate does not include these discouraged workers, more than a 1 percent rise in real GDP is needed to reduce the unemployment rate by 1 percentage point. Moreover, when business returns to normal, firms' initial response is not to hire more employees, but to ask existing employees to work longer hours. So average hours of work per week go up, and the unemployment rate falls by less than one would otherwise expect. Finally, in some industries employing more workers increases production by more than a proportional amount: product design and set-up need to be done only once, no matter how much is produced. Thus businesses which have economies of scale do not need twice as many workers to produce twice as much output.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem Regarding to Contestable Markets

    Even though the concentration ratio for an oligopoly is close to hundred, firms may operate rather efficiently when the market: (1) price conforms to a limit pricing model. (2) is contestable since entry and exit are easy. (3) demand curve is unitaril

  • Q : Effective price discrimination

    Effective price discrimination does NOT need a firm to: (w) segment the market into groups along with various demand elasticities.  (x) be a monopoly. (y) prevent trading among customers who are charged different prices. (z) possess some market p

  • Q : Consumers equilibrium in case of two

    Describe the consumer’s equilibrium in case of two commodities (IC) approach. Answer: Consumer equilibrium refers to a condition when he spends his specified

  • Q : Profit-maximizing output for economic

    Babble-On maintains world-wide patents for software which translates any of 314 spoken languages in text, along with automatic audio and text translations within any of the other three-hundred-thirteen languages. When Babble-On produces its profit-maximizing o

  • Q : Define abnormal profit Abnormal profit:

    Abnormal profit: It is the gain earned over and above the normal profit.

  • Q : Profit-maximizing pure competitor in

    For a profit-maximizing pure competitor in the short-run equilibrium: (w) P = MC = MR. (x) MC = minimum AC. (y) MR > P. (z) only normal profits will be earned. Hey friends please give your opini

  • Q : Increasing economic profits in a

    Rising economic profits within a competitive market do NOT produce pressures for: (i) expansions of existing firms. (ii) entry by new firms. (iii) price hikes. (iv) increases in costs for specialized resources. (v) ultimate erosion of

  • Q : When would transaction cost be zero All

    All transaction costs would be zero when: (1) Congress required current prices to be cut by eighteen percent. (2) market information and transportation were both costless. (3) market prices were legally restricted to production costs. (4) inflation we

  • Q : Supply of curve in the short run I have

    I have a problem in economics on Supply of curve in the short run. Please help me in the following question. The supply curve of milk would shift in the short-run in response to the modification in: (i) Price of the milk. (ii) Demand for the milk. (iii) Numbers and si

  • Q : Problem on Demand Prices for deck of

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. Lauren, a solitaire addict, is eager to spend up to $2 for a new deck of cards. For Lauren, $2 is: (i) Market price for the deck of cards (ii) Demand price for deck of cards. (i