--%>

Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large

Why the Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large? Okun's Law posits not a 1-to-1 relation but a 2.5-to-1 relationship between real GDP growth and the unemployment rate. That is, a one percentage-point fall in the unemployment rate is associated not with a 1 but a 2.5 percent boost in the level of production. Why is this Okun's Law coefficient so large? Why isn't it the case that a one percentage point fall in unemployment produces a one percent rise in output, or even less? One answer is that the unemployment rate, as officially measured, does not count discouraged workers. In a recession, the number of people at work falls, the number of people looking for work rises, and the number of people who are not looking for work because they doubt they could find jobs--but would be working if business conditions were better--rises. Because the conventionally-measured unemployment rate does not include these discouraged workers, more than a 1 percent rise in real GDP is needed to reduce the unemployment rate by 1 percentage point. Moreover, when business returns to normal, firms' initial response is not to hire more employees, but to ask existing employees to work longer hours. So average hours of work per week go up, and the unemployment rate falls by less than one would otherwise expect. Finally, in some industries employing more workers increases production by more than a proportional amount: product design and set-up need to be done only once, no matter how much is produced. Thus businesses which have economies of scale do not need twice as many workers to produce twice as much output.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Help In the quintile distribution of

    In the quintile distribution of income, the term "quintile" represents

  • Q : Short run operations of a

    This figure in below is demonstrates the operations of a profit-maximizing pure competitor into the: (1) market period. (2) short run. (3) long run. (4) super long run since this can alter technology. (5) shutdown range of production.

    Q : Implicitly weigh marginal cost and

    implicitly weigh marginal cost and marginal benefit

  • Q : Demand for Labor-Market Power Can

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The monopolist in product market will hire a labor to a point where the: (i) Marginal revenue product of the labor equivalent its marginal factor cost. (ii) The value of margina

  • Q : Isoquants and isocost lines By using

    By using isoquants and isocost lines, illustrates graphically that rise in y will result in a decline in the quantity demanded of x1 and also illustrates that rise in the price of x1 will result in a reduction in the quantity demanded of x1<

  • Q : Profit from predatory pricing In order

    In order for a firm to profit from predatory pricing: (w) the incumbent must fulfill the entire industry demand at a price below costs. (x) the cost of predation should be less than the profits incurred through driving out one’s rivals from the

  • Q : Kinked demand curve about product price

    When an oligopolist is aware about the firm faces a kinked demand curve, this: (1) may cut price along with little expected reaction by rivals. (2) can avoid consumer demand and preferences. (3) may keep product price despite large ch

  • Q : Problem on perfectly competitive

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The profit-maximizing firm which is perfectly competitive in the resource market however which has the market power in output market will hire labor at a point where: (1) VMP =

  • Q : Problem on Horizontal Integration I

    I have a problem in economics on Horizontal Integration. Please help me in the following question. McDonalds makes hamburgers at a number of various locations. This is an illustration of a: (i) Horizontally integrated firm. (ii) Monopoly. (iii) Vertic

  • Q : Unambiguously Poverty Poverty is most

    Poverty is most unambiguously: (w) an absolute concept that is easily and precisely defined. (x) more prevalent in North America than elsewhere. (y) the absence of income sufficient to survive in reasonable comfort. (z) a relative concept when poverty