--%>

Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large

Why the Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large? Okun's Law posits not a 1-to-1 relation but a 2.5-to-1 relationship between real GDP growth and the unemployment rate. That is, a one percentage-point fall in the unemployment rate is associated not with a 1 but a 2.5 percent boost in the level of production. Why is this Okun's Law coefficient so large? Why isn't it the case that a one percentage point fall in unemployment produces a one percent rise in output, or even less? One answer is that the unemployment rate, as officially measured, does not count discouraged workers. In a recession, the number of people at work falls, the number of people looking for work rises, and the number of people who are not looking for work because they doubt they could find jobs--but would be working if business conditions were better--rises. Because the conventionally-measured unemployment rate does not include these discouraged workers, more than a 1 percent rise in real GDP is needed to reduce the unemployment rate by 1 percentage point. Moreover, when business returns to normal, firms' initial response is not to hire more employees, but to ask existing employees to work longer hours. So average hours of work per week go up, and the unemployment rate falls by less than one would otherwise expect. Finally, in some industries employing more workers increases production by more than a proportional amount: product design and set-up need to be done only once, no matter how much is produced. Thus businesses which have economies of scale do not need twice as many workers to produce twice as much output.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Principal-Agent Problems instance An

    An instance of the principal-agent trouble would be:  (i) The student failing an exam since he did not study. (ii) The crook being caught as he made much noise. (iii) My son purchase baseball cards with the money I gave him to purchase milk for t

  • Q : Marginal resource cost of labor For a

    For a gain maximizing competitive firm operating in the competitive labor market, the: (1) Marginal resource cost of the labor is similar to the wage rate. (2) Supply of the labor is perfectly inelastic. (3) Production quota is precisely proportional to the labor hire

  • Q : Problem regarding Substitution effect

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. John freshly learned that a hotdog-and-fries combo is accessible at a local mall for similar price as a slice of pizza at Gino’s, where he routinely ate lunch. He starts buying hotdogs m

  • Q : Lorenz curve as graphical device A

    A Lorenz curve is graphical device which can be utilized to portray the: (w) number of people below the poverty level. (x) conflict between high tax rates and high tax revenues. (y) relative inequalities in the distribution of a variable across a popu

  • Q : Upward-sloping in Law of Supply The law

    The law of supply is graphically exhibited by the supply curve which is: (1) Moving all along the demand curve. (2) Vertical. (3) Upward-sloping. (4) Downward-sloping. Can someone please help me in finding out the

  • Q : Profit Maximization-total revenue and

    All profit-maximizing firms will hire much labor up to the point where: (i) Average physical product of the labor equals nominal wage. (ii) Last unit of the labor adds equally to net revenue and net cost. (iii) Marginal product of the labor is at its maximum value. (i

  • Q : Bond Prices and Interest Rates When you

    When you buy a bond at an interest rate of 15 percent and sell it while the interest rate is 10 percent, then you will: (w) receive more than you paid for the bond. (x) receive less than you paid for the bond. (y) receive similar amount that you paid

  • Q : Most likely resources in short run I

    I have a problem in economics on most likely resources in short run. Please help me in the following question. The most probable of the given resources to be fixed for the farmer in short run would be: (1) Land. (2) Labor. (3) Fertilizer. (4) All the above would be of

  • Q : Income distribution line in Lorenz curve

    When line 0C0' shows the 1975 U.S. income distribution, in that case the 2005 income distribution would most likely be most probable: (1) line 0A0'. (2) line 0B0'. (3) line 0C0'. (4) line 0D0'. (5) line 0E0'.

  • Q : Demand and Supply in short run Both

    Both demand and supply of hamburgers would plummet in short run, as would be quantity sold, however we can’t be certain how the price would adjust when: (i) 75 % of the population became serious vegetarians. (ii) People abruptly decreased their intake of milk pr