--%>

Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large

Why the Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large? Okun's Law posits not a 1-to-1 relation but a 2.5-to-1 relationship between real GDP growth and the unemployment rate. That is, a one percentage-point fall in the unemployment rate is associated not with a 1 but a 2.5 percent boost in the level of production. Why is this Okun's Law coefficient so large? Why isn't it the case that a one percentage point fall in unemployment produces a one percent rise in output, or even less? One answer is that the unemployment rate, as officially measured, does not count discouraged workers. In a recession, the number of people at work falls, the number of people looking for work rises, and the number of people who are not looking for work because they doubt they could find jobs--but would be working if business conditions were better--rises. Because the conventionally-measured unemployment rate does not include these discouraged workers, more than a 1 percent rise in real GDP is needed to reduce the unemployment rate by 1 percentage point. Moreover, when business returns to normal, firms' initial response is not to hire more employees, but to ask existing employees to work longer hours. So average hours of work per week go up, and the unemployment rate falls by less than one would otherwise expect. Finally, in some industries employing more workers increases production by more than a proportional amount: product design and set-up need to be done only once, no matter how much is produced. Thus businesses which have economies of scale do not need twice as many workers to produce twice as much output.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Cruise ship pollution-an economic

    This exercise inspects why ‘greywater’ dumped from cruise ships can be vision as an economic difficulty and the complexities of dealing with this.

  • Q : Ac illustrate a firm under monopolistic

    illustrate a firm under monopolistic competition?

  • Q : Increase total revenue at a diminishing

    When a monopolist increases output along with elastic demand, then total revenue: (w) increases at a constant rate. (x) increases at an increasing rate. (y) increases at a diminishing rate. (z) All of the above are possible.

  • Q : Analytic Time-The Short Run I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Analytic Time-The Short Run. Please help me in the following question. Economists classify a time-period in which at least one resource is fixed as: (i) Short run. (ii) Long run. (iii) Production period. (iv) Profit period.

  • Q : Break even and zero economic profit

    After Babble-On’s patents lapsed and entry and exit turned into possible in this illustrated figure of market, in the long run Babble-On would be expected to: (i) continue to reap economic profits. (ii) break even and experience zero economic pr

  • Q : World bank loans problem Select the

    Select the right answer of the question. The World Bank: A) provides military assistance to those nations interested in improving national defense. B) makes and guarantees loans for basic development projects such as the construction of dams, roads, and schools. C) pr

  • Q : Meaning of surplus in current price I

    I have a problem in economics on Meaning of surplus in current price. Please help me in the following question. The surplus of potting soil signifies that the current price: (1) Makes an surplus demand. (2) Is above the equilibrium. (3) Surpasses the

  • Q : Highest legal price for Whopper Slushees

    Beginning at equilibrium, a new highest legal price for Whopper Slushees set at P1 would: (i) cause people to purchase more Slushees and fewer cones from Dairy Queen. (ii) Reduce total market demand. (iii) Yield surplus demand and a scarcity. (iv) Inc

  • Q : Barriers to entry in the long run

    Imperfectly competitive firms protected by important barriers to entry are as: (1) assured of positive accounting profits in the short run. (2) almost certain to succeed in collusively fixing prices at high levels. (3) assured of positive economic pro

  • Q : Question on lowering the supply The

    The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of whe