--%>

Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large

Why the Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large? Okun's Law posits not a 1-to-1 relation but a 2.5-to-1 relationship between real GDP growth and the unemployment rate. That is, a one percentage-point fall in the unemployment rate is associated not with a 1 but a 2.5 percent boost in the level of production. Why is this Okun's Law coefficient so large? Why isn't it the case that a one percentage point fall in unemployment produces a one percent rise in output, or even less? One answer is that the unemployment rate, as officially measured, does not count discouraged workers. In a recession, the number of people at work falls, the number of people looking for work rises, and the number of people who are not looking for work because they doubt they could find jobs--but would be working if business conditions were better--rises. Because the conventionally-measured unemployment rate does not include these discouraged workers, more than a 1 percent rise in real GDP is needed to reduce the unemployment rate by 1 percentage point. Moreover, when business returns to normal, firms' initial response is not to hire more employees, but to ask existing employees to work longer hours. So average hours of work per week go up, and the unemployment rate falls by less than one would otherwise expect. Finally, in some industries employing more workers increases production by more than a proportional amount: product design and set-up need to be done only once, no matter how much is produced. Thus businesses which have economies of scale do not need twice as many workers to produce twice as much output.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Attract new firms by economics profits

    Economic profits within a competitive industry are signals which: (i) attract new firms into the industry. (ii) hinder innovation of new technologies. (iii) encourage inefficiency in existing firms. (iv) business conditions are deteriorating. (v) pric

  • Q : Comparing income and wealth As

    As comparing income and wealth: (w) differences in their distributions reflect economic discrimination precisely. (x) wealth is a flow variable, whereas income is a stock variable. (y) inheritance explains income differences more totally than wealth d

  • Q : Annually paying exact amounts by

    Securities annually paying exact amounts forever are: (1) stocks. (2) perennials. (3) royalties. (4) renewals. (5) perpetuities. How can I solve my Economics problem? Please suggest me the correct answer.

  • Q : Labor Unions and Employment job

    The labor union will not get better its member’s job prospects through: (i) Raising the worker productivity through apprenticeship. (ii) Restricting entry through quotas or high initiation fees. (iii) Lobbying for the tariffs on competing foreign goods. (iv) Col

  • Q : Define multiplier Multiplier : It is

    Multiplier: It is the number by which change in investment should be multiple in order to find out the resultant change in income and output.

  • Q : Charting of past prices Can the

    Can the charting of past prices be used to predict future prices?

  • Q : Formula to Economic profit Can someone

    Can someone please help me in finding out the most accurate answer from the following question. The Economic profit equivalents: (1) Accounting profit minus the implicit costs. (2) Normal profit. (3) Net revenue minus the implicit costs. (4) Net revenue minus the expl

  • Q : Federal minimum wage rose over

    The LEAST likely outcome, when the federal minimum wage is increased $1 over the equilibrium wage rate, that would be for the: (w) unemployment rate of teenagers and unskilled workers to rise. (x) quantity of unskilled workers supplie

  • Q : Entry-exit in Long-run equilibrium of

    A competitive industry is in long-run equilibrium only after: (w) net pressure for entry or exit is zero. (x) each firm produces to its capacity. (y) owners reap all the profits they desire. (z) union bosses and firm managers reach mutual agreements.<

  • Q : Gaining more Consumer Surplus I have a

    I have a problem in economics on gaining more Consumer Surplus. Please help me in the following question. Sushi lovers would be most probable to gain more consumer surplus as an outcome of rises in the: (i) Price of the steamed rice. (ii) Supply of sushi. (iii) Income