--%>

Normal profit

Normal profit signifies zero economic profit. Explain why?

E

Expert

Verified

Answer: Assume that the existing firms are earning over normal profits. Attracted by the positive gains, the new firms enter in industry. The market supply rises and the price comes down. New firms carry on entering and the price persists to fall till economic profits are decreased to zero.

In condition of losses, firms begin leaving the industry, supply downs and prices begins going up and all this carry on till losses are wiped out. Remaining firms in industry then once again earn only normal profits or zero profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Shift in the demand for loanable funds

    Assume that this market is initially within equilibrium along with a supply of funds consequent to S0 and a demand for loanable funds consequent to I1. When the U.S. Department of the Treasury be

  • Q : Problem on price level-real domestic

    Refer to the below diagram. Give me answer of this question. If equilibrium real output is Q2, then: A) aggregate demand is AD1. B) the equilibrium price level is P1. C) producers will supply output level Q1. D) the equili

  • Q : Individual firm in purely competitive

    In a purely competitive industry, the individual firm: (i) can raise the quantity demanded by lowering the price of its product. (ii) experiences substantial economies of scale. (iii) faces a completely inelastic demand curve. (iv) cannot influence th

  • Q : Pure competition and monopolistic

    Monopolistically competitive and purely competitive industries tend to be described by: (i) important economies of scale in production. (ii) many potential buyers and sellers. (iii) horizontal demand curves facing each firm. (iv) conscious interdepend

  • Q : Total economic of profit or loss at

    When the wholesale price P = $10 per bushel of peaches, it purely competitive peach orchard maximizes profit through producing ___ bushel of peaches at a total economic as profit or loss of $___. (i) zero; loss; -$4,000. (ii) 2000; lo

  • Q : Income Distribution and Satisfaction

    The proposition which taxing the rich to provide to the poor improves social welfare can’t be proved due to the impossibility of: (1) developing a political consensus about efficient redistribution programs. (2) the marginal utility of income di

  • Q : Concentration ratio explain the concept

    explain the concept of a concentration ratio. is the concentration ratio in a monoplistically competitive industry likely to be higher than for a perfectly competitive industry?

  • Q : Supply curves toward right from

    Technological progress shift: (i) Demand curves up and to right. (ii) Production possibilities curve in the direction of their origins. (iii) Prices into inflationary spiral. (iv) Supply curves rightward from vertical axis. Can som

  • Q : NOT cartelized product in market power

    Products which have NOT been cartelized comprise: (w) oil. (x) bananas. (y) sugar. (z) wheat. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?

  • Q : Third degree price discrimination Firm

    Firm A has no costs of production and sells its products to just two buyers. The buyers (1 and 2) have the following demand functions: P1 = 90 -10q1 P2 = 60 - 5q2 (a) Assuming that the rm can engage in third degree price discrimination, nd the