--%>

Moral Hazard evidence

Cameron is performing a research project on whale migration at Pacific Ocean. To assist with this research she hires a Ph.D. from the MIT to make computer software to organize data, paying the software genius $150,000 for his services. The Ph.D. assures Cameron that the software is succeeding nicely and the research group will be much satisfied with the Cameron’s final presentation. When time comes for the Cameron to present the software to her supporters, the computer software is less than what the computer brilliance promised as he has been working on the other projects, and financial support for research melts gone. This is most obviously evidence of: (i) Symmetric information. (ii) Moral hazard. (iii) Adverse selection. (iv) Consumer fraud. (v) Confidence scam.

Find out the right answer from the above options.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Yield behaviour conflicting law of

    Which of the given statements, if true, seems most probable to yield behavior which would conflict with the law of demand? (i) People cannot afford to drive as much whenever the price of gasoline goes above $3.00 per gallon. (ii) The greater heroin addicts encompass i

  • Q : Opponents of Contribution Standard

    Opponents of contribution standard for income distribution, the: (w) prefer a more efficient mechanism to distribute income. (x) accept marginal productivity theory. (y) question how well the market system measures productivity. (z) generally favor de

  • Q : Contribution Standard The concept that

    The concept that people must have income in proportion to their productivity is termed as the: (1) equality standard of distribution. (2) productivity standard of distribution. (3) needs standard of distribution. (4) utility standard

  • Q : Problem on Equilibrium price What

    What happens to equilibrium price if increase in demand is equivalent to increase in supply? Answer: In case of equivalent increase in demand and supply the equilib

  • Q : Structure conduct performance paradigm

    From about 1890 till 1970, the “structure-conduct-performance paradigm” dominated theories concerning how firms behave in various kinds of markets. The word “conduct” in this context refers to these things as: (i) decisions by

  • Q : Price fluctuations to go bankrupt in

    Speculators are most probable to go bankrupt when their activities: (w) increase price fluctuations. (x) decrease transaction costs to other buyers or sellers. (y) dampen the volatility of prices. (z) improve economic efficiency.

    Q : Demand curves rightward of potential

    Monopolistically competitive firms advertise in try to shift their: (1) own supply curves leftward. (2) competitors' costs upward. (3) existing customers' demand curves leftward. (4) tax burdens to resource suppliers. (5) potential customers' demand c

  • Q : Positively-sloped supply curve

    A straight-line, which positively-sloped supply curve which starts from the quantity axis is: (w) elastic for all prices and quantities. (x) inelastic for all prices and quantities. (y) unitarily elastic for all prices and quantities. (z) a sign that

  • Q : Relative magnitudes of income effects

    The firm’s wage elasticity of demand for the labor is least influenced by: (1) How much time the firm have to adjust to modifying wages. (2) The proportion of labor’s share of net costs. (3) The ease of replacement between labor and capita

  • Q : Unregulated monopoly economic efficiency

    Mainly economists object to unregulated monopoly primarily since: (w) economies of large scale operation may be attained. (x) technological advance may be fostered. (y) economic efficiency would be promoted. (z) economic efficiency may be decreased.