--%>

Monopsony power-Purely competitive

Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options.

Dissimilar to a purely competitive hirer of labor, the firm with monopsony power can: (i) Both set any wage it wishes and hire as many workers as it desires. (ii) Generate as much as it wishes and charge any price it needs for its output. (iii) Be expected to try to maximize its gains. (iv) Make sure monopolistic exploitation through wage discrimination. (v) None of above.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Supply of good at market price When

    When producers become willing and capable to sell more of a good at each and every market price, then there has been a raise in: (1) Consumer preferences. (2) Supply. (3) Quantity supplied. (4) Demand. (5) Capitalists’ profits.

    Q : Diminishing Marginal utility principle

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The experience that your very first kiss with a latest crush was more thrilling and satisfying than your 10th kiss 35 minutes later is an illustration of the: (i) Familiarity principle. (ii) N

  • Q : Market Power-Demand for Labor I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Market Power and the Demand for Labor. Please help me in the given question. The lack of competition in product market outcomes in: (1) Less labor being hired than when the markets were competitive. (2) Many labor bein

  • Q : Positional Goods Consider things like

    Consider things like yachts, tattoos, mansions, Harley-Davidsons or bling. Whenever the satisfaction derived from the good depends just weakly on an intrinsic attributes of the good and much strongly on how the good signals group membership or the status, power or soc

  • Q : Relationship between Total utility and

    Describe the relationship between Total utility (TU) and Marginal utility (MU)? Answer:

    Q : Income and Substitution effects problem

    Economists decompose how the consumers react to a change in price of a good into the: (1) Diminishing marginal utility effect and indifference effect. (2) Indifference effect and enhancement effect. (3) Net utility effect and preference effect. (4) Income effect and s

  • Q : Demand of Income elasticity for various

    Liz admitted a pay cut in May and consequently start cooking at home more and dining out less frequently. Her adjustments provide illustrations of the: (i) Substitution effect. (ii) Income elasticity of the demands for various goods. (iii) Law of diminishing marginal

  • Q : Reasons for shifting demand curve

    Probable reasons for this shift of demand curve from D0 to D1 would not comprise: (1) lowering the lowest age for a driver’s license. (2) Reduces in the prices of ski boats. (3) Raised prices for airline tickets. (4) Decrease in the relative price of gasoline. (

  • Q : Short-run equilibrium of

    A purely-competitive, short-run equilibrium does NOT need which each firm: (w) produces where MC = MR = P > min(AVC). (x) experiences no excess demand or excess supply. (y) earns only zero economic profit. (z) adjust output hence m

  • Q : Preferential treatment of discrimination

    Programs that provide preferential treatment to members of groups which have previously suffered due to discrimination are termed as: (i) redistributive justice. (ii) affirmative action. (iii) compensating variations. (iv) equity considerations. (v) transfer programs.