--%>

Monopsonistic exploitation of many athletes

NCAA rules the forbidding standard employment negotiations among colleges and amateur athletes tend to outcome in: (i) Monopsonistic exploitation of numerous athletes. (ii) Incentives for the collusion among individual college coaches and individual owners of the professional teams. (iii) Noteworthy discrimination against the female athletes. (iv) Incentives for the amateur athletes to venture on games with competitor teams. (v) Investments in tutoring by student athletes which exceed the optimal levels.

Choose the right answer from the above options.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem on substitution effect The

    The substitution effect is the modification in purchases of a good which outcome from a change only in: (1) Tastes and preferences. (2) Its associative price. (3) Real national income. (4) The wealth of consumer. P

  • Q : Break-even on profit-maximizing strategy

    Robomatic Corporation would exactly break-even upon its RoboMaids when, instead of exactly identifying its profit-maximizing strategy, this: (i) operated at point i, charging only $10,000 per unit and producing 16,000 robots. (ii) pri

  • Q : Introduction of marginal utility The

    The marginal utility (MU) of a good: (1) Was first introduced by Adam Smith. (2) Is simply measured in dollars. (3) Is determined by society as an entire. (4) Reflects subjective preferences. Can someone help me in getting through

  • Q : Majority of surviving below the poverty

    In the United States, a mainstream of those living below “the poverty line”: (1) have televisions, automobiles, main appliances, and other amenities possessed only by the wealthy [when anyone] in earlier times and nowadays, only by the wea

  • Q : Long-run equilibrium output of

    This monopolistic competitor produces Q0 units and is demonstrated: (w) earning total profit equal to 0PbQ. (x) as a price taker. (y) setting price equal to marginal revenue. (z) in long-run equilibrium.

  • Q : Inverse relationship in Law of Demand

    The law of demand signifies to: (i) The direct relationship accessible between quantity and prices demanded. (ii) The inverse relationship accessible between quantity demanded and opportunity cost. (iii) How demand shifts due to modifications in price

  • Q : Determining Substitution products When

    When a price hike for Big Gulps of GlugaChug from $1 to $2 improves sales of dehydrated water from 50 to 100 kegs, then the dehydrated water and GlugaChug are: (1) Joint outputs in the production. (2) Complements. (3) Substitutes. (4) Mixed resource alternatives.

  • Q : Relatively inelastic supply curve in

    Marginal revenue is below average revenue as [TR/Q] for a firm along with market power since: (w) the demand curve this faces is negatively sloped. (x) its supply curve is relatively inelastic. (y) marginal cost is be

  • Q : Problem on Laws and Regulations Can

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. Raised demand for beer would be most probable to follow a fall in the: (1) Legal drinking age. (2) Price of ale. (3) Price of hard liquor. (4) Price of wine.

  • Q : Price Elasticity-Income Elasticity and

    When both population and per capita income grow across time, in that case your income will tend to be most erratic but the goods you sell are: (1) both income inelastic and price inelastic within demand. (2) a large part of classical