--%>

Modern sociobiologists concept perpetuation of gene pool

Modern sociobiologists concept perpetuation of individual gene pool like the fundamental human drive, and give numerous illustrations of behavior which apparently conflict along with the economist's homo economicus supposition: Parents sacrifice their whole lives for their children, or they invest into their kids' college educations therefore the subsequently generation will enjoy richer lives. Conversely, people adopt other people's biological children and several childless people are voluntarily sterilized or connect religious orders which need sexual self-denial. To what extent may perpetuation of one's gene pool conflict along with self-interested behavior? Which of such assumptions do you believe will more precisely predict human behavior?

E

Expert

Verified

The illustrations cited through sociobiologists comprise sacrificing one's life for your children or in combat, for friends considers incompatible along with models depends on self-interest. Furthermore, sociobiology may give insights into several questions such that conventional economics models can’t address very sufficiently. For illustration, children participating within Head Start programs do not show to gain more knowledge than their non-participating siblings. Therefore Sociobiology suggests about this that an impoverished family might react to particularly favorable outside affects for one child by decreasing parental attention to that one child, when devoting more attention to children without the particular advantages. It increases the chances for lives and reproduction by more of offspring by parent.

One of the disadvantages of traditional economic models is which they can’t easily distinguish between the motives of families and their individuals. Even though sociobiology does give unique insights within family dynamics and a thin range of other economic matters, the traditional economic assumption of self interest considers much richer in producing useful predictions regarding a much extensive range of human behavior.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Spending money for enhancement in

    Choosing NOT to spend the additional money required to enhance the safety of a dangerous traffic intersection is an illustration of: (v) macroeconomic policy decisions. (w) positive economics. (x) how society assigns prices to human lives. (y) economic inefficiency. (

  • Q : Define the normative economics in

    Hello guys I want your opinion. Please suggest your answer for following Normative-economics problem. Normative economics: (i) based upon value judgments. (ii) involves statements which are either right or wrong. (

  • Q : Break-even price what is the break-even

    what is the break-even price in economics?

  • Q : Example of economic costs regarding the

    The economic costs of attending college to receive a bachelor’s degree would not comprise: (i) Potential wages earned through incoming work force right after high school. (ii) Potentially higher standards of living throughout the four years or therefore spent st

  • Q : Technological advance in costs All else

    All else equivalent, when the output of one good raises, the output of other goods: (1) Should fall in an underemployed economy. (2) May rise as well when society begins on its PPF. (3) Will drop in an efficient and completely employed economy. (4) Essentially experie

  • Q : Market adjustments change equilibrium

    A movement along the demand curve for a good would be caused through changes within: (1) preferences and tastes. (2) costs for productive resources. (3) supply which change the equilibrium price of the good. (4) expectations regarding future prices.

  • Q : Define the economic theories Economic

    Economic theories are: (w) true with definition. (x) generally excellent in theory but wrong during practice. (y) made up of generalizations regarding economic behavior. (z) normative, whereas economic policy is more positive.

    Q : Define much of a good as need at zero

    I need a good answer on the topic of free good in economic. Please give me your suggestion that when all people can consume as much of a good as they desire at zero cost, this is a: (w) welfare good. (x) bonus for buying something else. (y) surplus su

  • Q : Excessive production as a problem Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Governments which attempt to utilize ‘needs’ or ‘equality’ as the bases for distributing goods are NOT probable to: (1) Encounter extreme production as a problem. (2) R

  • Q : Example of Normative Economics with no

    A statement which needs no value judgments would be which an optimal distribution of goods is: (w) invariably best for society. (x) better for society than any non-optimal distribution of goods. (y) better for society only when this conforms to the will of the majorit