--%>

Modern sociobiologists concept perpetuation of gene pool

Modern sociobiologists concept perpetuation of individual gene pool like the fundamental human drive, and give numerous illustrations of behavior which apparently conflict along with the economist's homo economicus supposition: Parents sacrifice their whole lives for their children, or they invest into their kids' college educations therefore the subsequently generation will enjoy richer lives. Conversely, people adopt other people's biological children and several childless people are voluntarily sterilized or connect religious orders which need sexual self-denial. To what extent may perpetuation of one's gene pool conflict along with self-interested behavior? Which of such assumptions do you believe will more precisely predict human behavior?

E

Expert

Verified

The illustrations cited through sociobiologists comprise sacrificing one's life for your children or in combat, for friends considers incompatible along with models depends on self-interest. Furthermore, sociobiology may give insights into several questions such that conventional economics models can’t address very sufficiently. For illustration, children participating within Head Start programs do not show to gain more knowledge than their non-participating siblings. Therefore Sociobiology suggests about this that an impoverished family might react to particularly favorable outside affects for one child by decreasing parental attention to that one child, when devoting more attention to children without the particular advantages. It increases the chances for lives and reproduction by more of offspring by parent.

One of the disadvantages of traditional economic models is which they can’t easily distinguish between the motives of families and their individuals. Even though sociobiology does give unique insights within family dynamics and a thin range of other economic matters, the traditional economic assumption of self interest considers much richer in producing useful predictions regarding a much extensive range of human behavior.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Define decisionsmaking on opportunity

    Decisions based upon opportunity costs are not concerned in a direct way whiles: (i) you fail to buckle up before driving a car. (ii) a brilliant high school graduate works like a rapid food cook in place of attending college. (iii) lightning starts a main forest fire

  • Q : Achieving economic welfare For any

    For any given point on the production possibilities (or PPF) curve: (i) More economic welfare is achieved than from any points within the PPF. (ii) Moving to some other output combination should yield enhanced economic welfare. (iii) More of some good can be generated

  • Q : Problem of Slavery and Normative

    Please guys help me to solve the problem of Slavery and Normative Economics that is given below: Slavery like a mechanism for allocating labor previous to the Civil War eventually proved to be in conflict along wit

  • Q : Rationally optimal decisions hinge on

    Economic scarcity is pervasive, that makes choices essential. Therefore, rationally optimal decisions hinge on tradeoffs which essentially reflect as: (1) using cooperative allocative mechanisms to minimize inequity. (2) opportunity costs. (3) competi

  • Q : Break-even price what is the break-even

    what is the break-even price in economics?

  • Q : Problem on private property rights and

    I have a problem in economics on private property rights and laissez faire. Please help me in the following question. The basics of pure capitalism comprise: (i) Social ownership of all non-human resources. (ii) Strong two party electoral system. (iii

  • Q : Where is Positive theory inaccurate Can

    Can anybody suggest me the proper description for given problem regarding positive theory in Economics generally. Positive theory which is inaccurate: (w) can be disproved through logic and fact. (x) includes poor

  • Q : Limits of Technological Advances

    Technological advances would not comprise: (i) Native Americans demonstrating Pilgrims how crops grow faster when rotten fish are dropped within with seeds they plant. (ii) pouring coffee through a coffee pot you obtained as a birthday gift. (iii) new

  • Q : Behavior of deliberately act in

    Deliberately acting in a way which cannot attain a wanted goal is: (w) rational behavior. (x) random behavior. (y) irrational behavior. (z) maximizing behavior. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regard

  • Q : Explain about the positive economic

    Positive economic statements: (1) are factual and can never be wrong. (2) predict political viewpoints. (3) are attempts to explain economic relationships. (4) estimate the fairness of social programs. (5) can resolve the matter of equity.