--%>

Modern sociobiologists concept perpetuation of gene pool

Modern sociobiologists concept perpetuation of individual gene pool like the fundamental human drive, and give numerous illustrations of behavior which apparently conflict along with the economist's homo economicus supposition: Parents sacrifice their whole lives for their children, or they invest into their kids' college educations therefore the subsequently generation will enjoy richer lives. Conversely, people adopt other people's biological children and several childless people are voluntarily sterilized or connect religious orders which need sexual self-denial. To what extent may perpetuation of one's gene pool conflict along with self-interested behavior? Which of such assumptions do you believe will more precisely predict human behavior?

E

Expert

Verified

The illustrations cited through sociobiologists comprise sacrificing one's life for your children or in combat, for friends considers incompatible along with models depends on self-interest. Furthermore, sociobiology may give insights into several questions such that conventional economics models can’t address very sufficiently. For illustration, children participating within Head Start programs do not show to gain more knowledge than their non-participating siblings. Therefore Sociobiology suggests about this that an impoverished family might react to particularly favorable outside affects for one child by decreasing parental attention to that one child, when devoting more attention to children without the particular advantages. It increases the chances for lives and reproduction by more of offspring by parent.

One of the disadvantages of traditional economic models is which they can’t easily distinguish between the motives of families and their individuals. Even though sociobiology does give unique insights within family dynamics and a thin range of other economic matters, the traditional economic assumption of self interest considers much richer in producing useful predictions regarding a much extensive range of human behavior.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : When economists disagree in normative

    Can someone give details with best solution about problem of normative economics... Economists disagree MOST often about regions involving: (i) normative economics, while value judgments are involved. (ii) explanat

  • Q : Uses of positive economic analysis Hey

    Hey friends I need your help for given problem: Positive economic analysis would be least helpful like a guide to how a society can decrease: (w) specific criminal behavior from punishment. (x) inequality within th

  • Q : Global warming Can someone please

    Can someone please explain me that global warming, litter and pollution are all examples of...(v) produced goods, (w) by-products, (x) technological spin-offs, (y) errors in judgment and (z) economic bads. How can I solve my economics problems? Please

  • Q : Requirement of government transaction

    A federal regulation needing all government transaction to be based upon ideal information would be: (v) The surest way to create best decisions. (w) Consistent along with the ideals of Occam's razor. (x) Impossible since no computer could handle which much informatio

  • Q : When is Scarcity a problem become

    Scarcity is a problem for: (w) poor countries merely. (x) individuals only when they are poor. (y) capitalists, but not socialists. (z) all people and countries, rich and poor alike. Can someone explain/help me wit

  • Q : Requirement of technically efficient

    I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion that for production to be technically efficient needs that the: (i) Maximum benefits are acquired at the highest possible cost. (ii) Opportunity costs of production

  • Q : Explain statement of normative

    Please help me to solve the problem of normative economics that is given below: Normative economic hypotheses would contain the statement which: (i) Earth consist of five moons composed of blue che

  • Q : Primary comprehensive work in economics

    The primary comprehensive work upon economics within English was written via Adam Smith (1776 year) and entitled. An Inquiry within the Nature and Causes of: (1) Laws of Supply and Demand. (2) Wealth of Nations. (3) Movements of Prices in Competition. (4) Incomes of D

  • Q : Predictable outcome droughts in market

    The predictable outcome of the 2001 to 2002 droughts within the U.S. farm belt was to: (w) raise the price and quantity of farm goods sold. (x) stimulate exports of U.S. wheat. (y) reduce the supplies, and increase the prices of farm goods. (z) boost demands and price

  • Q : Determine desirable items without

    Desirable items without opportunity costs are termed as: (i) free goods. (ii) economic goods. (iii) capital goods. (iv) financial goods. (v) gifts of nature. Hey friends please give your view for the problem of opportunity