--%>

Meaning of price taker

To be a price taker implies: (w) the larger firm in the industry will set the price for all other firms. (x) the entire market (industry) sets the price for all firms to take. (y) each firm takes the price as specified by the government. (z) firms take any price consumers offer.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Words of Economic Rent about David

    David Ricardo: (w) was the originator of the theory of pure economic rent onto land. (x) believed that land rent was earned since land would not be available at a zero price. (y) observed that marginal land which is just barely helpful commands positi

  • Q : Relation between Implicit Costs and

    I have a problem in economics on Relation between Implicit Costs and Opportunity costs. Please help me in the following question. The Implicit costs are: (1) Opportunity costs. (2) Always variable costs. (3) Similar as the accounting costs. (4) Similar as the explicit

  • Q : Shifting demand of labor The demand for

    The demand for labor will shift because of changes in all of the given except: (w) prices of other resources. (x) prices of output. (y) MPP (z) wages. Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for

  • Q : Equivalent marginal revenue product

    When a monopolist is maximizing its gain in the product market however consists of no monopsony power in labor market, and then it will: (1) Hire labor till marginal revenue product equivalents the average factor cost. (2) Pay a wage equivalent to the marginal revenue

  • Q : Deadweight Losses and Taxation Whenever

    Whenever a tax on a good outcome less government revenue than the sum of the losses of producer and consumer surpluses due to tax, economists state that the tax has caused a/an: (1) Administrative loss. (2) Market failure. (3) Economic loss. (4) Bureaucratic loss. (5)

  • Q : Disadvantage of sole proprietorships

    The disadvantage of both sole partnerships and proprietorships is that the: (i) Financial resources are generally more restricted than for a corporation. (ii) Income is subject to the double taxation. (iii) Principal-agent troubles are far less simple

  • Q : Lowest possible price in transaction

    Is the assertion such that "Everyone all the time buys everything at the lowest possible price" right? Have you paid more than you had to for any good yet, after permitting for all transaction costs?

  • Q : Psychological Pricing Define the term

    Define the term Psychological Pricing and what are their aspects?

  • Q : No close substitutes in monopoly When

    When Perpetual Motion Corporation’s recently-invented and patented teleporter buttons have no close substitutes, in that case Perpetual Motion operates: (1) along with absolute certainty of realizing a pure economic profit. (2) in violation of the laws of demand

  • Q : Advantage of a partnership over

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. One of the advantages of a partnership over proprietorship is: (i) In a partnership just one partner is liable for the debt. (ii) Partnerships permit for more specialization in the management.