--%>

Maximum possible profitable firm

A firm possessing important market power may suffer by managerial slack [X-inefficiency] and unessential high costs, which implies that, the firm: (i) is likely to be absorbed through a predatory rival. (ii) realizes less than the maximum possible profit. (iii) is likely to aggressively try to acquire other firms. (iv) is protected from competition through strategic barriers to entry. (v) will suffer economic losses due to asymmetric information.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Diminishing the Marginal Utility of

    The additional dollar of income would be most probable to mean more to a usual poor individual than to a rich one if: (i) Efforts to raise income are proportional to the value of additional dollar earned. (ii) Each and every individual had similar total utilities from

  • Q : Long run economic profits at entry

    Unlike firms within pure competition, several unregulated monopolistic firms can potentially: (w) reap long run economic profits when entry barriers prevent competition. (x) generate only normal profits in the long run. (y) sustain consistent economic

  • Q : Effect of an increase in the price

    Which of the following diagrams depictes(s) the effect of an increase in the price of Budweiser beer on the market for Coors beer? A) A and C. B) A only. C) B only. D) C only. 190_gh.pn</span></p>
                                        </div>
                                        <!-- /comment-box -->
                                    </li>
   
   </td>
	</tr><tr>
		<td>
       
      <li>
                                        <div class=

    Q : Income and Inferior Goods problem I

    I have a problem in economics on Income and Inferior Goods problem. Please help me in the following question. For a non-vegetarian, Spam is to filet the mignon as: (1) Luxury goods are to requirements. (2) Complementary goods are to substitute goods.

  • Q : Practicing for predatory pricing A firm

    A firm which practices predatory pricing as: (w) tends to incur short-run losses greater than its rival. (x) lowers its price to drive out its rival and then keeps the price low to discourage extra entry. (y) will sell similar amount of output as when

  • Q : Downward slope of consumer demand curves

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The downward slope of the consumer demand curves for normal goods is partly described by: (i) Income effects. (ii) Diminishing marginal utility. (iii) Substitution effects. (iv)

  • Q : Equilibrium price in the short run The

    The equilibrium price for Christmas trees in the short run is: (w) P1. (x) P2. (y) P3. (z) P4.

    Q : Effects of increasing the price raise

    Increasing the price as in demonstrated figure for DVD games will raise total revenue at the entire prices: (w) on this demand curve. (x) above $30. (y) below $30. (z) below $25. Hey friends please give your opinio

  • Q : Pure competitors in market structures

    Marginal revenue is not below the market price by the perspectives of simply: (i) monopolistic competitors. (ii) monopolists. (iii) cartel members. (iv) pure oligopolists. (v) pure competitors. Can

  • Q : Marginal utility of Goods and Bads When

    When Joe Glutton’s final bite of a burger yielded no profit in total utility, then Joe: (i) Don’t like hamburgers. (ii) Has reached the minimum utility from eating the burgers. (iii) Has reached the point where marginal utility of hamburgers is 0 (zero). (