--%>

Maximum possible profitable firm

A firm possessing important market power may suffer by managerial slack [X-inefficiency] and unessential high costs, which implies that, the firm: (i) is likely to be absorbed through a predatory rival. (ii) realizes less than the maximum possible profit. (iii) is likely to aggressively try to acquire other firms. (iv) is protected from competition through strategic barriers to entry. (v) will suffer economic losses due to asymmetric information.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Price increment in elasticity A price

    A price hike $4 to $5 per slice of pizza because of total revenue to: (w) fall. (x) remain constant. (y) rise. (z) this is not possible to tell from such data.

    Q : Competitive Markets-Unions of labor Can

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question? The purely competitive labor markets are not characterized through: (w) Most of the individual buyers and sellers of the labor services. (x) Wages equivalent to the marginal res

  • Q : Internal financing in Corporate Finance

    Can someone help me in finding out the precise answer from the given options. The corporations might get internal financing by: (i) Borrowing from the stockholders. (ii) Reinvesting the corporate income rather than paying it out as the dividends to stockholders. (iii)

  • Q : Resources to escape state of destitution

    When an individual or family lacks adequate resources to escape a state of destitution, their circumstances are described as: (1) involuntary poverty. (2) relative poverty. (3) a vicious cycle of poverty (4) institutional poverty. (5) a culture of pov

  • Q : Price equality with marginal costs It

    It is not possible for a nondiscriminating, that profit maximizing monopolist to attain equilibrium where MR = MC as well as: (w) economic profit = 0. (x) economic profit is negative. (yz marginal costs are at the minimum of average costs [MC = ATC].

  • Q : When market for a good is in equilibrium

    Whenever the market for the good is in equilibrium, this signifies that the: (i) Demand and supply are equivalent. (ii) Tax wedge is perfectly offset by the government advantages. (iii) Differences among demand prices and supply prices equivalent profit per unit. (iv)

  • Q : Demand curve for Complementary Goods

    The ban on assault weapons enacted in the year 1994 lapsed in the year 2004. Prices for assault weapons fell in year 2004 since the only way to get such guns throughout the ban was via the black market. This modify in the law in year 2004 is most probable to shift the

  • Q : Problem on Horizontal Mergers Can

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. Which of the given below is not an illustration of horizontal integration? (1) Prudential Insurance gets Metropolitan Life Insurance. (2) Daimler-Benz absorbs Chrysler. (3) McDo

  • Q : Price of related goods-consequence on

    Price of related goods: a) Substitute goods – Whenever the price of substitute goods raises they become dearer whenever the price replaces goods falls they bec

  • Q : Assumption of Ceteris paribus Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Suppose that everything except the variables we are studying remains constant or steady is termed as the: (1) Ceteris paribus assumption. (2) Ex-ante assumption. (3) Ex-post assumption. (4) Po