--%>

Maximum possible profitable firm

A firm possessing important market power may suffer by managerial slack [X-inefficiency] and unessential high costs, which implies that, the firm: (i) is likely to be absorbed through a predatory rival. (ii) realizes less than the maximum possible profit. (iii) is likely to aggressively try to acquire other firms. (iv) is protected from competition through strategic barriers to entry. (v) will suffer economic losses due to asymmetric information.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Prices and costs in monopoly market

    When this monopoly generates Q units: (1) P > MC. (2) MR = MC. (3) total revenue total cost is maximized. (4) MSB > MSC. (5) All of the above.

    Q : Problem on Ceteris Paribus Can someone

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. Supposing everything to be constant apart from the variables being studied is termed as the: (1) Ceteris paribus assumption. (2) Ex post facto assumption. (3) Post hoc ergo prop

  • Q : Illustration of Cartels The

    The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) is an illustration of: (w) a monopoly. (x) monopolistic competition. (y) a cartel. (z) decentralized communism. Can someone explain/help me with best solution about problem o

  • Q : Profit-maximizing pure competitor in

    For a profit-maximizing pure competitor in the short-run equilibrium: (w) P = MC = MR. (x) MC = minimum AC. (y) MR > P. (z) only normal profits will be earned. Hey friends please give your opini

  • Q : Market Power and Demand for Labor All

    All of the given might causes labor markets to be non-competitive except: (i) Backward bending labor supply curves. (ii) Unions and employer trade associations. (iii) Monopolistic power exercised by the firm. (iv) Monopsonistic power exercised by the

  • Q : Price elasticity coefficient at

    Every point beside a vertical demand curve (when there was such a thing) would include a price elasticity coefficient equivalent to: (1) 1. (2)  1. (3) zero. (4) infinity. (5)  1/2. Hey friends please giv

  • Q : Elastic and Inelastic demand An

    An increase in the price of goods, outcomes in an increase in expenses on it. This demand is elastic or inelastic? Answer: Inelastic since there is direct relation

  • Q : Most desperate market participants of

    Tax burdens on transactions are probably to be disproportionately borne through the relatively as “most desperate” market participants those, who are: (1) sellers when the market supply curve is relatively

  • Q : Corporations stockholders not liable

    The corporation’s stockholders are not personally liable for the debts of firm since: (1) The Corporation is considered as a legal person, separate from its owner. (2) Usually there are too many stockholders to try to hold them all accountable. (3) In a corporat

  • Q : Relatively price inelasticity of demand

    When cuts into the price of cowboy hats drive down total revenues to hat makers, in that case demand: (1) relatively price elastic. (2) relatively price inelastic. (3) unitarily price elastic. (4) infinitely price elastic. (5) zero pr