--%>

Market Price in intervention

Let’s take a perfectly competitive market in which the market demand curve is provided by Qd = 20 − 2Pd and the market supply curve is provided by Qs = 2Ps.

a) Determine the equilibrium price and quantity in the lack of government intervention.

b) Assume that the government obliges a price ceiling of $3 per unit. How much is supplied?

c) Assume that, as an alternative, the government obliges a production quota restricting the quantity supplied to 6 units. Determine the market price beneath this kind of intervention? Is the quantity supplied beneath the price ceiling bigger than, less than, or similar as the quantity beneath the production quota?

E

Expert

Verified

a) Letting P = Pd = Ps stand for the market price in the lack of government intervention, we encompass: 20 – 2P = 2P => P = 5. Therefore the equilibrium quantity is 10 units.

b) The quantity supplied beneath a price ceiling of $3 per unit is 6 units.

c) The market-clearing price whenever a production quota of 6 is obliged is provided by 6 = 20 – 2P or P = 7.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Ecomomics Which one of the following

    Which one of the following statements about discretionary fiscal policy is correct? A. Discretionary fiscal policy refers to changes in taxes and government expenditures made by Congress to stabilize the economy. B. Discretionary fiscal policy refers to any change in government spending or taxes

  • Q : Economies of Scale problem Can someone

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. When average production costs reduce as the total production of a firm rises, the firm is experiencing: (i) Economies of the scale. (ii) Economies of scope. (iii) Diseconomies o

  • Q : Problem on market demand for chewing gum

    The market demand for the chewing gum is as: QG = 300 – 40PG – 8PS + 0.05IHere:QG = Quantity of gum demandedPG = price of gumPS = price of sodaI = average inc

  • Q : Reduce total revenue when demand is

    Boosting the price for Pixie’s cheesy fried grits by P2 to P3 will: (w) increases total revenue since demand within inelastic. (x) increase total revenue since demand is elastic. (y) reduce total revenue since demand is inelastic. (z) reduce total revenue since demand

  • Q : Law of comparative benefits Can someone

    Can someone please help me in determining the right answer from the following question. The law of comparative benefit exhibits: (a) Why trade with a country in which salaries are low is not fair. (b) How countries try to use each other via trade. (c)

  • Q : Perfectly price elastic demand For

    For Cournot’s Spring Water the demand is perfectly price elastic at:  (i) point a. (ii) point b. (iii) point c (iv) point d. (v) point e.

    Q : Problem on enhanced interstate highways

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. In the year 1950 the federal government enhanced interstate highways, therefore decreasing the: (1) Demand for and the volume of highway travel. (2) Growth rate of city sprawl. (3) Demand for

  • Q : Influences of Ceteris Paribus The Latin

    The Latin phrase applies to the idea which all other effects on some dependent variable are to be supposed constant if examining the effect of changing a single independent variable is as: (1) Fiat justitia, ruat coelum. (2) Platea unum. (3) Unum paribus. (4) Ceteris

  • Q : Asymmetric Information on quality The

    The Asymmetric information on quality can outcome in: (i) Not all potential profits from the exchange being realized. (ii) Lower equilibrium prices. (iii) Purchases of unexpectedly low-quality items termed as ‘lemons’. (iv) Some transactio

  • Q : Illustration of demand for Spurs tickets

    Can someone help me in finding out the precise answer from the given options. In the year 2005, the San Antonio Spurs basketball team increased all ticket prices and attendance surpassed the year 2004 attendance, pointing out a raise in the: (i) Upward slope of ticket