--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Market Price in intervention

Let’s take a perfectly competitive market in which the market demand curve is provided by Qd = 20 − 2Pd and the market supply curve is provided by Qs = 2Ps.

a) Determine the equilibrium price and quantity in the lack of government intervention.

b) Assume that the government obliges a price ceiling of $3 per unit. How much is supplied?

c) Assume that, as an alternative, the government obliges a production quota restricting the quantity supplied to 6 units. Determine the market price beneath this kind of intervention? Is the quantity supplied beneath the price ceiling bigger than, less than, or similar as the quantity beneath the production quota?

E

Expert

Verified

a) Letting P = Pd = Ps stand for the market price in the lack of government intervention, we encompass: 20 – 2P = 2P => P = 5. Therefore the equilibrium quantity is 10 units.

b) The quantity supplied beneath a price ceiling of $3 per unit is 6 units.

c) The market-clearing price whenever a production quota of 6 is obliged is provided by 6 = 20 – 2P or P = 7.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Complication in accusation of predatory

    An accusation of predatory pricing is complicated to prove within a court of law since: (w) firms generally have too much power. (x) consumers and juries like the low prices and are less likely to fine a firm for lowering price. (y) predatory behavior

    		•
  • Q : Quantity of good supplied exceeds

    While the quantity of a good supplied exceeds the quantity demanded: (1) sellers are more likely to create concessions to buyers. (2) the current market price is below equilibrium. (3) consumers gain through buying before prices adjust upward. (4) the quality of outpu

    		•
  • Q : Quantity demanded decrement of elastic

    When the price elasticity of demand for goose grease is 2.5 and a 10% price hike will reasons of quantity demanded to: (w) grow by roughly 2.5%. (x) grow by roughly 25%. (y) fall by roughly 25%. (z) fall by roughly 4%.

    Q : Opponents of Contribution Standard

    Opponents of contribution standard for income distribution, the: (w) prefer a more efficient mechanism to distribute income. (x) accept marginal productivity theory. (y) question how well the market system measures productivity. (z) generally favor de

    		•
  • Q : Normative Standards for Distribution

    Relative to a requirements standard for distributing income, in that case the adoption of an equality standard would most likely tend to be: (w) unarguably fairer. (x) less bureaucratic. (y) more harmful to work incentives. (z) clearly less fair.

    		•
  • Q : NOT price discriminate by monopoly Into

    Into equilibrium, a monopoly which does NOT price discriminate will tend to produce: (w) the socially optimal rate of output. (x) a level of output where price exceeds marginal social cost. (y) lower output at lower prices than a competitive market. (

    		•
  • Q : Purely-competitive output by profit

    Profit is maximized when this purely-competitive brickyard constructs at: (i) point a. (ii) point b. (iii) point c. (iv) point d. (v) point e.

    Q : Illustration of long-run adjustment in

    A rising market demand for generic puffy cheese chips produces economic profits and makes a new firm to build a vast modern factory to bake puffy cheese chips. It is an illustration of: (i) monopoly power. (ii) adjustments in the mark

    		•
  • Q : Problem on financial Intermediation The

    The main reason for the existence of financial intermediaries is as: (1) Direct flows of savings from the individuals to firms would necessitate higher transaction costs. (2) That just wealthy individuals can afford to invest in the stocks and bonds. (3) The habits of

    		•
  • Q : Higher prices of good-Substitution The

    The demand for Toyota Corollas will rise in response to: (i) Higher prices for Honda Civics. (ii) The decrease in price of steel. (iii) Honda offering enormous discounts to probable buyers. (iv) Technological progress for designing a car. (v) Higher safety ratings for

    		•