--%>

Market Price in intervention

Let’s take a perfectly competitive market in which the market demand curve is provided by Qd = 20 − 2Pd and the market supply curve is provided by Qs = 2Ps.

a) Determine the equilibrium price and quantity in the lack of government intervention.

b) Assume that the government obliges a price ceiling of $3 per unit. How much is supplied?

c) Assume that, as an alternative, the government obliges a production quota restricting the quantity supplied to 6 units. Determine the market price beneath this kind of intervention? Is the quantity supplied beneath the price ceiling bigger than, less than, or similar as the quantity beneath the production quota?

E

Expert

Verified

a) Letting P = Pd = Ps stand for the market price in the lack of government intervention, we encompass: 20 – 2P = 2P => P = 5. Therefore the equilibrium quantity is 10 units.

b) The quantity supplied beneath a price ceiling of $3 per unit is 6 units.

c) The market-clearing price whenever a production quota of 6 is obliged is provided by 6 = 20 – 2P or P = 7.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Freedom to enter or leave the market in

    Purely competitive industries are not described by: (i) numerous potential buyers. (ii) product homogeneity. (iii) numerous potential sellers. (iv) freedom to enter or leave the market within the short run. (v) power to adjust quantities although no p

  • Q : Problem on Ceteris Paribus Can someone

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. Supposing everything to be constant apart from the variables being studied is termed as the: (1) Ceteris paribus assumption. (2) Ex post facto assumption. (3) Post hoc ergo prop

  • Q : Prevent operating in long run by

    A monopolist will prevent operating within the long run unless its economic profit is: (i) zero. (ii) positive. (iii) greater than accounting profit. (iv) zero or greater. (v) zero or less. I need a good answer on

  • Q : Profit-maximizing monopolists I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Profit-maximizing monopolists. Please help me in the following question. Profit-maximizing monopolists exploit the labor since: (i) Workers are paid very less than the value of their average physical products. (ii) The

  • Q : Burden of tax decrement The burden of

    The burden of an excise (i.e., per unit) tax would reduce solely upon consumers of the taxed good within: (w) Panel A. (x) Panel B. (y) Panel C. (z) Panel D.

    Q : Determine prise when demand decrease

    In this market for textbooks, demand has transferred from D0 to D1 and supply varied from S0 to S1. Such market for textbooks has experienced as: (w) a raise in demand and supply. (x) a redu

  • Q : Labor Contracts and Shop Agreements

    From the point of view of management, the favored union membership ranking (that is, most favored to least favored) would be: (i) Closed shop, union shop, agency shop and open shop. (ii) Open shop, agency shop, union shop and closed shop. (iii) Agency shop, open shop,

  • Q : Monopsony Power- Labors demand When

    When wage discrimination is not probable for the first 40 workers this profit-maximizing organization hires, however it can wage discriminate perfectly whenever hiring all the subsequent workers, it hires a net of: (p) Forty workers at an average salary of $700 per we

  • Q : Labor-Leisure Tradeoffs features When

    When the real wage increases, an extra unit of: (1) Labor supplied will purchase fewer goods. (2) Leisure is more costly. (3) Output needs more labor time. (4) Capital becomes more highly employed. Find out the right answer from th

  • Q : Strikes and Lockouts Can someone please

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The outcomes of strikes do not comprise: (i) Losses of the perishable products. (ii) Shipping delays. (iii) Decreased production costs. (iv) Shortages.