--%>

Market Price in intervention

Let’s take a perfectly competitive market in which the market demand curve is provided by Qd = 20 − 2Pd and the market supply curve is provided by Qs = 2Ps.

a) Determine the equilibrium price and quantity in the lack of government intervention.

b) Assume that the government obliges a price ceiling of $3 per unit. How much is supplied?

c) Assume that, as an alternative, the government obliges a production quota restricting the quantity supplied to 6 units. Determine the market price beneath this kind of intervention? Is the quantity supplied beneath the price ceiling bigger than, less than, or similar as the quantity beneath the production quota?

E

Expert

Verified

a) Letting P = Pd = Ps stand for the market price in the lack of government intervention, we encompass: 20 – 2P = 2P => P = 5. Therefore the equilibrium quantity is 10 units.

b) The quantity supplied beneath a price ceiling of $3 per unit is 6 units.

c) The market-clearing price whenever a production quota of 6 is obliged is provided by 6 = 20 – 2P or P = 7.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : What demand curve illustrates What

    What demand curve illustrates?

  • Q : Strategy of labor union goals The

    The strategy most probable to outcome the maximum wages and employment and the greatest economic clout for all the workers over long run would be for the union to: (1) Restrict entry to a specific occupation. (2) Boycott non-unionized firms which compete with the unio

  • Q : Law of Diminishing Merginal utility Law

    Law of Diminishing Merginal utility: This states that as consumer consumes more and more units of commodity, the utility derived from each and every successive unit goes on decreasing. According to this law TU increases at decreasing rate and the MU d

  • Q : Law of supply regarding firms I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Law of supply regarding firms. Please help me in the following question. The law of supply signifies that: (i) Firms provide less for sale at lower prices. (ii) Purchases and prices differ inversely. (iii) Minimum inve

  • Q : Substitution problem on consumption I

    I have a problem in economics on Substitution problem on consumption. Please help me in the following question. Teddy forever eats peanut butter and jelly sandwiches for lunch as he should live on $20 dollars a week. Jelly jumped in price and, to plea

  • Q : Alfred Marshall categorization of

    If Alfred Marshall categorized the analytical periods of time, he supposed that in short run it is: (i) Not possible to vary technology and at least one resource is fixed and hence at least one kind of cost is as well fixed. (ii) Possible to move the resources from on

  • Q : Consumer Surplus-Difference in amounts

    Kiley pays $1.00 for the cold Pepsi on a hot afternoon, however would be willing to pay $5.00. The $4.00 difference in such amounts is her: (i) Consumer surplus. (ii) Income effect. (iii) Economic gain. (iv) Marginal utility. (v) Pleasure coefficient.

    Q : Definitions of Poverty The official

    The official United States “poverty line” is based upon the cost of securing the goods essential to maintain a standard of living: (w) at a middle class level of comfort. (x) one standard deviation below the national average. (y) that is m

  • Q : Risk and Uncertainty In word of Frank

    In word of Frank Knight, risk: (w) exists when the probability of any specified event can be predicted. (x) appeals to the gambler personalities of innovators who next in social progress. (y) is irrelevant to good calculates of the economic costs of p

  • Q : Discrimination and Income Differentials

    By 2000, the differential among the rich and the poor which can be attributed to economic discrimination was computed at: (w) approximately 60 percent. (x) approximately 30 percent. (y) under 10 percent. (z) zero.