--%>

Market hypotheses

Efficient market hypotheses:

a) Weak-form efficient market hypothesis: It assumes that current stock prices reflect all security market information including the historical sequence of prices, rates of return, trading volume data and other market generated information. This hypothesis implies that past rates  of return and other historical market data have no relationship with the future rates of return. For investment purpose, this means that one would not be able to gain by using any trading rule that decides whether to buy or sell a security based on past rates of return or any other security market data.

b) Semistrong-form efficient market hypothesis: It asserts that security prices rapidly adjust to the release of all information i.e. current security prices reflect all public information. This hypothesis encompasses the weak form hypothesis because all the market information considered by the weak form hypothesis such as stock prices, rates of return and trading volume is public. Public information also includes all non-market information like earnings and dividend announcements, price to earnings ratio, stock splits, economic and political news. From the investment point of view, the investors who base their decisions on any important new information after it is public should not derive above average risk adjusted profits from their transactions.

c) Strong-form efficient market hypothesis: This contends that stock prices fully reflect all information from public and private sources. This means that no group of investors has monopolistic access to information relevant to the formation of prices. From investment point of view, no group of investors should be able to consistently derive above average risk adjusted rates of return.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Fixed cost in long run Can there be

    Can there be certain fixed cost in long run? If not why? Answer: No, there can’t be any fixed cost in long run. The main reason is that there is no fixed inpu

  • Q : Total variable costs in pure competition

    This profit-maximizing, as in demonstrated graph, of brickyard’s total variable costs are about: (i) $200 per day. (ii) $600 per day. (iii) $750 per day. (iv) $900 per day. (v) $1200 per day.

  • Q : Purchasing power of Income Effects

    Whenever the price increases for a good that you enjoy extremely and purchase regularly: (i) The purchasing power of your income is reduced. (2) You adjust more rapidly than when the good was insignificant to you. (3) Your substitution effect is over-powered by an inc

  • Q : Dilemma on labor monopsonist The labor

    The labor monopsonist will hire labor up to the point where the marginal: (i) Revenue product of the labor equivalents the wage. (ii) Resource cost of labor equivalents the salary. (iii) Revenue product of labor equivalents its marginal resource cost. (iv) Resource co

  • Q : Determine a price taker from firm Of

    Of the given firms, the probably to be a price taker would be a: (i) sheep herder in a remote part of New Zealand. (ii) local gas and electric company. (iii) sculptor’s agent who contacts potential buyers through the internet. (iv) small town&rs

  • Q : Capital resources Select which of the

    Select which of the following lists includes only capital resources (and therefore no labor or land resources)? 1) an ice arena; a professional hockey player; hockey uniforms. 2) the owner of a new startup firm; a chemistry lab; a researcher. 3) a hydroelectric dam; w

  • Q : Profits of monopoly firm A monopoly

    A monopoly firm's profits: (w) equal only normal profits in long-run equilibrium. (x) may be whatever level the firm wishes. (y) are maximized where MC = MR. (z) tend to be lower than that of pure competitors. Hell

  • Q : Determine demand when total revenue and

    When raising ticket prices for Brad Paisley concert tickets raises total ticket revenue, in that case the demand for the concert tickets: (i) perfectly price inelastic. (ii) relatively price inelastic

  • Q : Substitution Effect-decreasing

    The substitution effect is negative since people react to a price raise by: (i) Reducing purchases of good. (ii) Generating more of good. (iii) Purchasing some substitute goods. (iv) Working less to sustain the existing purchasing patterns.

    Q : Capital markets efficiency What is

    What is capital markets efficiency?