--%>

Market hypotheses

Efficient market hypotheses:

a) Weak-form efficient market hypothesis: It assumes that current stock prices reflect all security market information including the historical sequence of prices, rates of return, trading volume data and other market generated information. This hypothesis implies that past rates  of return and other historical market data have no relationship with the future rates of return. For investment purpose, this means that one would not be able to gain by using any trading rule that decides whether to buy or sell a security based on past rates of return or any other security market data.

b) Semistrong-form efficient market hypothesis: It asserts that security prices rapidly adjust to the release of all information i.e. current security prices reflect all public information. This hypothesis encompasses the weak form hypothesis because all the market information considered by the weak form hypothesis such as stock prices, rates of return and trading volume is public. Public information also includes all non-market information like earnings and dividend announcements, price to earnings ratio, stock splits, economic and political news. From the investment point of view, the investors who base their decisions on any important new information after it is public should not derive above average risk adjusted profits from their transactions.

c) Strong-form efficient market hypothesis: This contends that stock prices fully reflect all information from public and private sources. This means that no group of investors has monopolistic access to information relevant to the formation of prices. From investment point of view, no group of investors should be able to consistently derive above average risk adjusted rates of return.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Relation between Implicit Costs and

    I have a problem in economics on Relation between Implicit Costs and Opportunity costs. Please help me in the following question. The Implicit costs are: (1) Opportunity costs. (2) Always variable costs. (3) Similar as the accounting costs. (4) Similar as the explicit

  • Q : Reduced effectiveness by pressure The

    The increased pace of globalization and the steady development of worldwide demands for petroleum-based products from 2002 have tended to decrease the: (w) derived demand for petroleum. (x) prices of gasoline and electricity. (y) pressures which had reduced OPEC's eff

  • Q : Natural barrier to entry in monopolizes

    The Diamante Corporation is vast and owns the world’s merely red diamond mine. Thus diamante monopolizes the market for red diamonds, and this is protected by competition by a: (1) regulatory barrier to entry. (2) strategic barrier to entry. (3) natural barrier

  • Q : Market Power and Monopsony Power Assume

    Assume that a firm with the market power in output market wishes to grow and that hiring more workers needs it to increase salaries 8 percent for all the workers. The output prices will most likely: (i) Increase 8 percent to cover the wage rise. (ii) Increase less tha

  • Q : Price fluctuations to go bankrupt in

    Speculators are most probable to go bankrupt when their activities: (w) increase price fluctuations. (x) decrease transaction costs to other buyers or sellers. (y) dampen the volatility of prices. (z) improve economic efficiency.

    Q : Demand for loanable funds An increase

    An increase in the demand for loanable funds is reflected within an increase in the: (1) term structure of interest rates. (2) demand for money. (3) supply of bonds. (4) supply of money. (5) demand for bonds. I nee

  • Q : Taxes on pure land rent Taxes on pure

    Taxes on pure land rents: (1) especially distort economic behavior. (2) are forward shifted to consumers. (3) transfer income from the public treasury to private landowners. (4) are allocatively neutral relative to most alternative taxes. (5) are over

  • Q : Example of price elasticity of demand

    At P = $100, there 50 tons of Garden-Rich fertilizer are demanded within Patagonia; at P = $80, there quantity demanded is 70 tons. Therefore price elasticity of demand for fertilizer: (w) 5/8. (x) 3/2. (y) 4/5. (z) 2/3.

  • Q : Law of Demand in respect to relative

    I have a problem in economics on Law of Demand in respect to relative price. Please help me in the following question. The law of demand defines that as: (1) Absolute prices rise, quantity demanded raises. (2) Relative prices raise, quantity demanded

  • Q : Explain about price-taker The purely

    The purely competitive firm: (w) is a price-taker. (x) confronts an inelastic demand curve. (y) should decide what price to charge. (z) maximizes total revenue. How can I solve my Economics problem