--%>

Majority worse off and minority better off of population

When an economic change makes a huge majority of the population worse off and a minute minority better off, the alteration is: (w) good for society because it made some people better off. (x) bad for society since only a few people are better off and several are worse off. (y) neither socially good nor bad since the welfare losses now offset the gains. (z) Nothing can be said about social welfare during this case without a value judgment.

I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion for the same by using above options.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Weak assumptions

    Philosopher-mathematician Henri Poincaré asserted, “When a phenomenon admits of a total mechanical explanation this will admit of any infinity of others that will account equally well for all of the peculiarities disclosed through the experiment.” O

  • Q : Illustrates a problem of Distributive

    Bob the Baker and Bill the Butcher while both would be willing to trade three loaves of bread for a pair of T-Bone steaks, but for several reasons they not include: (i) Bob must become a vegetarian so he doesn't contain to rely upon Bill. (ii) The economy has producti

  • Q : Define the behave of standard economic

    Standard economic theory supposes that individuals behave: (w) along with charity towards others while they are particularly moral. (x) irrationally while they are in large groups. (y) like home economists when they are Homo sapiens. (z) purposefully

  • Q : Improvements in Economic growth I have

    I have a problem in economics on Improvements in Economic growth. Please help me in the following question. Economic growth would be encouraged by enhancements in: (1) Economic efficiency. (2) Technology. (3) People’s attitudes. (4) Unemployment

  • Q : Economist-Conclusion for redistribution

    I want a good answer on the topic of normative economics. Please give me your opinion that if wealth and income both were redistributed by the richest one to the poorest five percent of the population, conclusion of an economist would be that: (w) soc

  • Q : Assignments I want it tomorrow night or

    I want it tomorrow night or before, please.

  • Q : Efficiently distribution of goods If

    If goods are efficiently distributed in between households, then all family is: (w) sure to lose when any income redistribution arises. (x) treated equitably. (y) and also off as possible without making any other family worse off. (z) able of gaining by a better distr

  • Q : Economic goals of all economic activity

    Adam Smith believed about the ultimate suitable objective of all economic activity is to maximizing: (w) wealth and power of the national government. (x) satisfaction of individuals by giving people along with the goods they want. (y) employment oppor

  • Q : Rational behavior in Economic Reasoning

    Please help me to solve the problem of Economic Reasoning that is given below: Rational behavior should be: (i) Consistent along with reaching an identified goal. (ii) Ethical behavior. (iii) Good

  • Q : Governmental allocations of goods I

    I have a problem in economics on Governmental allocations of goods. Please help me in determining the accurate answer of the following question. Pure capitalism is least reliable with: (i) Governmental allocations of goods. (ii) Laissez-faire policies