--%>

Majority worse off and minority better off of population

When an economic change makes a huge majority of the population worse off and a minute minority better off, the alteration is: (w) good for society because it made some people better off. (x) bad for society since only a few people are better off and several are worse off. (y) neither socially good nor bad since the welfare losses now offset the gains. (z) Nothing can be said about social welfare during this case without a value judgment.

I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion for the same by using above options.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Better off with less in economic

    Anything of that people would be better off with less is which from given issue: (1) economic surplus, (2) external cost, (3) economic bad and (4) adverse consequence. Hello guys I need your advice. Please recommend some idea for a

  • Q : Demonstration of scarcity in the U.S.

    By which is scarcity in the U.S. economy demonstrated: (v) The "energy crisis" of the 1970s, (w) Welfare payments to impoverished families, (x) Government budgeting more funding for defence or more for education, (y) Housing shortages in Santa Monica

  • Q : Payments for Resources Incorrect

    Incorrect statements would contain the assertion which payments for: (a) The use of land is termed as land rent. (b) Labor is termed as wages. (c) Services are termed as profits. (d) Capital is termed as interest. Hello guys I need

  • Q : Case of unsuccessfulness of goods in

    Consider the several possible goods currently producible within the United States, specified our available technologies and resources. When we produced only cat litter and razor blades, there would be a failure to get: (i) distributive efficiency. (ii) economic equity

  • Q : Determine the positive technical

    Which of the given is a positive technical statement? (i) The Miss America contest is sexist and tasteless. (ii) The moon is made of green cheese. (iii) Microsoft’s record of innovation justifies Bill Gates’ incredible wealth. (iv) Capitalism improves peop

  • Q : Validation of a new theory in

    A new theory evolves within common sense only after this is determined: (1) Helpful through extensive testing. (2) Within conformity along with Newtonian mechanics and Occam's razor. (3) To contain relatively only some exceptions. (4) Acceptable through the Institute

  • Q : Payments to entrepreneurs in

    The payments to entrepreneurs are called as: (i) Profits increasing from bearing risk and uncertainty, innovating new products and organizing production as well as processes. (ii) Rental payments by extensive land holdings. (iii) Interest through loaning money. (iv) I

  • Q : Esurience of economy-wide efficiency

    For a specified distribution of income, economy-wide efficiency would make sure a: (i) Redistribution to make equal income. (ii) Minimal level of pollution. (iii) Maximum level of particular identity. (iv) Maximum value for whole production.

  • Q : Explain the positive economic statement

    A positive economic statement is one which: (w) involves scientifically testable predictions. (x) is based upon value judgments. (y) explains the world idealistically. (z) applies primarily to microeconomic data. H

  • Q : When are relative prices serving as

    The behavior on the given list most consistent along with relative prices serving like a rationing device, and not mainly as incentives, would be as: (i) Marcia, a status-seeking social climber that turning down requests of Wayne for dates after seeing small numbers u