--%>

Majority worse off and minority better off of population

When an economic change makes a huge majority of the population worse off and a minute minority better off, the alteration is: (w) good for society because it made some people better off. (x) bad for society since only a few people are better off and several are worse off. (y) neither socially good nor bad since the welfare losses now offset the gains. (z) Nothing can be said about social welfare during this case without a value judgment.

I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion for the same by using above options.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Associates facts in Economics of

    Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem of Scientific Economic work that is given below: Scientific tries to relate facts to produce understanding of how things work are termed as: (w) mathematics. (x) theories or mode

  • Q : Improvements in Economic growth I have

    I have a problem in economics on Improvements in Economic growth. Please help me in the following question. Economic growth would be encouraged by enhancements in: (1) Economic efficiency. (2) Technology. (3) People’s attitudes. (4) Unemployment

  • Q : Primarily dealing of positive economic

    Please help me to solve the problem of Positive Economics which is specified above. Positive economic statements deal primarily along with: (w) the way things should be. (x) Technically testable ec

  • Q : Explain invisible hand of Adam Smith

    The “invisible hand” of Adam Smith described: (w) a large role for the government. (x) altruist motives in civilized society. (y) technological advances promoted throguh monopolies. (z) self-correcting market mechanisms.

  • Q : Define the behave of standard economic

    Standard economic theory supposes that individuals behave: (w) along with charity towards others while they are particularly moral. (x) irrationally while they are in large groups. (y) like home economists when they are Homo sapiens. (z) purposefully

  • Q : Example of Normative Economics with no

    A statement which needs no value judgments would be which an optimal distribution of goods is: (w) invariably best for society. (x) better for society than any non-optimal distribution of goods. (y) better for society only when this conforms to the will of the majorit

  • Q : When is normative economics crucial Can

    Can anybody suggest me the appropriate explanation for given problem regarding normative economics generally. Normative economics is critical while an economist tries to: (i) predict how OPEC's refuse will influenc

  • Q : Why are Land Land, labor, and capital

    Land, labor, and capital are all scarce since: (w) human wants are restricted. (x) less is obtainable than people want. (y) each productive resource needs a monetary return for its use. (z) once employed they cannot be used again.

    Q : Fundamental categories for economic

    The four fundamental categories for economic resources are: (w) matter, energy, technology and information. (x) wages, rent, interest and profits. (y) land, labor, capital and entrepreneurship. (z) machinery, energy, workers and government.

  • Q : Determine the essence of positive

    The essence of positive economic statements is which they: (1) should be correct, or they turn into normative statements. (2) yield predictions which can be tested for validity. (3) clearly resolve ethical or moral matters. (4) focus upon cheerful in