--%>

Majority worse off and minority better off of population

When an economic change makes a huge majority of the population worse off and a minute minority better off, the alteration is: (w) good for society because it made some people better off. (x) bad for society since only a few people are better off and several are worse off. (y) neither socially good nor bad since the welfare losses now offset the gains. (z) Nothing can be said about social welfare during this case without a value judgment.

I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion for the same by using above options.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Existence of scarcity for human survival

    Please help me to solve the problem of scarcity that is given below: Why is Scarcity existed for human: (1) survival requires unlimited resources, (2) needs are enormous relative to the means obtainable to satisfy

  • Q : Explain about the NO economic reform NO

    NO economic reform could probably: (w) remove scarcity. (x) decrease the average costs of production. (y) abolish equality in income distribution. (z) increase wages for most workers. How can I solve my eco

  • Q : Function to organizing productive

    Can someone explain me with best solution regarding problem of organizing productive resource and innovating new products... Organizing another productive resource, innovating new products and production methods, and willingness to

  • Q : Illustrations of economic bads included

    How can determine where would be illustrations of economic “bads” included. Please suggest me the accurate answer: (i) loud stereo systems,. (ii) beautiful sunsets caused through high levels of air pollution, (iii) golf courses built upon abandoned garbage

  • Q : Problem on Laissez-faire The movement

    The movement towards laissez-faire policies would best be described by a strategy to: (1) Stimulate the domestic production by raising import tariffs. (2) Remove laws to subsidize farming. (3) Guarantee food stamps for fundamental survival. (4) Functi

  • Q : Spending money for enhancement in

    Choosing NOT to spend the additional money required to enhance the safety of a dangerous traffic intersection is an illustration of: (v) macroeconomic policy decisions. (w) positive economics. (x) how society assigns prices to human lives. (y) economic inefficiency. (

  • Q : Determine broad distributive economics

    Economy-broad efficiency: (w) may only be got in a command economy. (x) is classically the most significant goal of public policies. (y) has little to do along with price or market conditions. (z) needs that additional gains to anyone entails losses t

  • Q : Define the inflation most influences

    Please help me to solve the problem of Prices that is given below: Inflation most influences: (i) absolute prices. (ii) subjective values. (iii) relative prices. (iv) objective prices. (v) tax rate

  • Q : Illustrates a case of entrepreneurs in

    The economic profits realized through organizing production, bearing uncertainty, taking risks and innovating are rewards to: (i) corporate managers. (ii) astute financial investors. (iii) corporate stockholders. (iv) creative inventors. (v) entrepreneurs.

  • Q : What would be contained in fundamental

    Fundamental economic questions consist of: (w) what, for whom and how. (x) where, how and when. (y) when, how and what. (z) how many, how much and what color,. Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem o