--%>

Majority worse off and minority better off of population

When an economic change makes a huge majority of the population worse off and a minute minority better off, the alteration is: (w) good for society because it made some people better off. (x) bad for society since only a few people are better off and several are worse off. (y) neither socially good nor bad since the welfare losses now offset the gains. (z) Nothing can be said about social welfare during this case without a value judgment.

I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion for the same by using above options.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Basic economic questions NOT included

    The three basic economic questions do NOT include: (w) What?, (x) For whom?, (y) Where? and (z) How? Can someone explain me with about above problem of fundamental economic concept...

  • Q : Crime punishment suggest by Jeremy

    Suggestion of Jeremy Bentham that crime must be punished proportionally to the harm completed to society, but without consideration of intent, remorse or motive.” His proposal would result within more than the optimal amount of crime due to the:

  • Q : Problem regarding Property Rights Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the following options. Fee simple rights don’t comprise the right to: (1) Demolish your property. (2) Sell your property. (3) Employ your property for your own advantage. (4) Damage another’s propert

  • Q : Determine the address of Microeconomics

    Microeconomics and Macroeconomics address: (w) exactly similar questions. (x) totally different questions. (y) incompatible sets of value judgments. (z) economic matters at somewhat different levels. How can I solv

  • Q : Maximization of complete value of

    Maximization of the complete value of output from a fixed amount of resources gives in: (i) Opportunity cost. (ii) Economic efficiency. (iii) Potential profitability. (iv) Comparative benefit. (v) Scarcity. How can I solve my

  • Q : Hypothesis included by normative

    Please help me to solve the problem of hypothesis in normative statements in normative economics that is given below: Normative statements would consist of the hypothesis which: (v) Abuse of alcohol lowers GPAs. (w

  • Q : Determine broad distributive economics

    Economy-broad efficiency: (w) may only be got in a command economy. (x) is classically the most significant goal of public policies. (y) has little to do along with price or market conditions. (z) needs that additional gains to anyone entails losses t

  • Q : Wealth of nation according to Adam Smith

    Adam Smith asserted that a wealth of nation is not gold, although is as an alternative the: (w) wisdom of its government. (x) goods and resources its people control. (y) new physical territory this conquers. (z) military power this co

  • Q : Determine desirable items without

    Desirable items without opportunity costs are termed as: (i) free goods. (ii) economic goods. (iii) capital goods. (iv) financial goods. (v) gifts of nature. Hey friends please give your view for the problem of opportunity

  • Q : Example of Relative Price Suppose a

    Suppose a deluxe hamburger is $5, an Oreo blizzard is $3, and a soda is $1. Then the relative price of the hamburger is: (a) 1.6 blizzards. (b) four sodas and half of a blizzard. (c) two blizzards. (d) a blizzard and one soda.

    Discover Q & A

    Leading Solution Library
    Avail More Than 1438294 Solved problems, classrooms assignments, textbook's solutions, for quick Downloads
    No hassle, Instant Access
    Start Discovering

    18,76,764

    1949870
    Asked

    3,689

    Active Tutors

    1438294

    Questions
    Answered

    Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!

    Submit Assignment

    ©TutorsGlobe All rights reserved 2022-2023.