--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Majority worse off and minority better off of population

When an economic change makes a huge majority of the population worse off and a minute minority better off, the alteration is: (w) good for society because it made some people better off. (x) bad for society since only a few people are better off and several are worse off. (y) neither socially good nor bad since the welfare losses now offset the gains. (z) Nothing can be said about social welfare during this case without a value judgment.

I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion for the same by using above options.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Illustrate the argue by David Hume

    Argument by David Hume that: (w) money is a “veil” which hides the actual workings of the economic system. (x) Corn Laws prevented English workers through competition through low-wage foreign workers. (y) capitalism is the system mainly co

    		•
  • Q : Population increase-Economic Growth I

    I have a problem in economics on Population increase-Economic Growth. Please help me in the following question. The production-possibilities frontier can be shifted external by: (i) Removing unemployment. (ii) Lowering the market prices. (iii) A popul

    		•
  • Q : Case of priceless in relative prices

    While people sincerely refer to something like "priceless", so they most likely mean that this is: (a) mostly meaningless to name a monetary price since its opportunity cost is more high. (b) worthless junk on that they place no value. (c) irreplaceab

    		•
  • Q : Explain about the NO economic reform NO

    NO economic reform could probably: (w) remove scarcity. (x) decrease the average costs of production. (y) abolish equality in income distribution. (z) increase wages for most workers. How can I solve my eco

    		•
  • Q : Governmental allocations of non-human

    The fundamental foundations of a capitalist system do not comprise: (1) Supplies and demands. (2) Private property rights. (3) Governmental allocations of non-human resources. (4) Laissez faire policies. (5) Market-determined prices and outputs.

    		•
  • Q : Explain the problem of Self Interest in

    As per the view of humans as Homo economics, individuals: (w) can simply achieve states of whole satisfaction. (x) must learn to get by along with what they have. (y) want to maximize personal satisfaction by self-interested behavior. (z) have fewer requirements as th

    		•
  • Q : Changes in relative prices make

    Changes in relative prices make easy allocative efficiency through operating like a rationing mechanism while: (i) Ken and Barbie postpone their wedding since they both lost their jobs throughout a recession. (ii) Political instabilit

    		•
  • Q : Illustration of a positive scientific

    An illustration of a positive scientific statement would be which college graduates who: (i) create higher incomes than high school drop outs deserve that higher income. (ii) charge victims of hurricanes as well as other natural disasters outrageous prices must be sho

    		•
  • Q : Study of economics is largely explain

    Hello guys please explain to how study of economics is broadly focused: (w) firms operate, (x) consumers make a decision what to buy, (y) Scarce resources are allocated to satisfy human requirements and (z) Resource ownership finds out the distribution of wealth and i

    		•
  • Q : Estimate relative cost When SCUBA

    When SCUBA vacations are $480 and DVDs are $16, in that case what is the relative cost of a SCUBA vacation within terms of a DVD?: (i) 30 disks. (ii) 360 disks. (iii) 180 disks. (iv) 20 disks. (e) 3,600 disks. I ne

    		•