--%>

Majority worse off and minority better off of population

When an economic change makes a huge majority of the population worse off and a minute minority better off, the alteration is: (w) good for society because it made some people better off. (x) bad for society since only a few people are better off and several are worse off. (y) neither socially good nor bad since the welfare losses now offset the gains. (z) Nothing can be said about social welfare during this case without a value judgment.

I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion for the same by using above options.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Society based on pure capitalism Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. In a society, based on pure capitalism, the government: (i) Is completely needless, as anarchy is ideal. (ii) Specifies the production and distribution plans in detail. (iii) Enforces the prop

  • Q : Example of distributive efficiency in

    I found a seashell which you would truly like to have, and you determined a coconut that I would truly like to include. Trading your coconut for my seashell would improve: (i) allocative efficiency. (ii) productive efficiency. (iii) distributive efficiency. (iv) quali

  • Q : Socialism-ownership of non-human

    Can someone please help me in finding out the right answer from the following question. A faith that most of the nonhuman resources must be owned, not by the private individuals, however instead ‘by everyone’ in common, with the govt. as t

  • Q : Value of the best foregone alternative

    The value of the best foregone alternative explains: (w) opportunity costs. (x) monetary costs. (y) irrational behavior through a consumer. (z) retail price margins over production costs. How can I solve my above e

  • Q : Explain TANSTAAFL TANSTAAFL is an

    TANSTAAFL is an acronym suggestive of that: (1) Tax agents never observe the awful influences from levies. (2) Tenants and needy must take all assets by landlords. (3) There ain't no all things like a free lunch. (4) Temperance and non satiety togethe

  • Q : Requirements of Economic Efficiency

    Economic efficiency needs: (w) distributive, productive and allocative efficiency. (x) engineering and dynamic efficiency. (y) historical and sociological efficiency. (z) chemical and physical efficiency. How can I

  • Q : Reason of confronting problem of

    People whole the world confront the problem of scarcity at all times just because which one reason: (i) Greedy capitalist monopolies under-produce goods, (ii) International markets are plagued with flawed distribution, (iii) Restricted resources and t

  • Q : Determine the opportunity cost while

    While people buy something, then its opportunity cost is the: (w) monetary price they paid. (x) enjoyment they get by their purchase. (y) satisfaction they lost by not buying something else. (z) time they should work to pay their bills.

    Q : Population increase-Economic Growth I

    I have a problem in economics on Population increase-Economic Growth. Please help me in the following question. The production-possibilities frontier can be shifted external by: (i) Removing unemployment. (ii) Lowering the market prices. (iii) A popul

  • Q : Illustration of Economic Reasoning by

    Occam’s razor refers to the idea which while evaluating a theory: (1) good theory describes the phenomenon as simply as possible, but not moreso. (2) complexity is obvious to make sure that correct answers are reached. (3) conformity along with