--%>

Majority worse off and minority better off of population

When an economic change makes a huge majority of the population worse off and a minute minority better off, the alteration is: (w) good for society because it made some people better off. (x) bad for society since only a few people are better off and several are worse off. (y) neither socially good nor bad since the welfare losses now offset the gains. (z) Nothing can be said about social welfare during this case without a value judgment.

I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion for the same by using above options.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Illustration regarding to market

    When the soybean market begins within equilibrium upon S0D0 and in that case a highly publicized study demonstrates yoghurt to be much more nutritious than the tofu made by soybeans, the market changes to: (w) S0D2. (x) S

  • Q : When scientific economic analysis NOT

    Please help me to solve the problem of Normative Economics that is specified below: Scientific economic analysis could NOT be utilized for test if there: (i) higher tax rates cause tax revenues to decrease. (ii) on

  • Q : Find out supply shifted to higher

    This market for clothing started on S0 and D0. Inside this market for clothing,: (w) demand has increased, possibly because of a raise in income. (x) new equilibrium price lies below the original equilibrium price. (y) supply may have transferred

  • Q : Problem relating to the Distributive

    Several parents ask children to write down lists of “things” they would like Santa to carry for Christmas, as well as to rank their “wants” in sequence. While gifts are positively associated to children’s lists, that “wish list&rdqu

  • Q : Governmental allocations of goods I

    I have a problem in economics on Governmental allocations of goods. Please help me in determining the accurate answer of the following question. Pure capitalism is least reliable with: (i) Governmental allocations of goods. (ii) Laissez-faire policies

  • Q : Spending money for enhancement in

    Choosing NOT to spend the additional money required to enhance the safety of a dangerous traffic intersection is an illustration of: (v) macroeconomic policy decisions. (w) positive economics. (x) how society assigns prices to human lives. (y) economic inefficiency. (

  • Q : Define smog as in Bads economics problem

    Smog is: (w) a good since this gives the air texture. (x) a bad because most people would pay to find rid of this. (y) a free good since you could consume all you desire without having to pay for this. (z) an inefficient utilization of resources.

    Q : Define problem of restricted resources

    Alex wants a limitless supply of ice cream, flip-flops and candy bars. However, restricted resources and the time needed to produce these staples leaves Alex facing a problem termed as: (i) scarcity. (ii) disappointment. (iii) insufficiency. (v) inadequacy. (v) hunger. Hello guys I want y

  • Q : Determine an example of net investment

    When gross investment is $100 billion whereas $10 billion of capital is worn out, in that case net investment is: (w) $90 billion. (x) $100 billion. (y) $110 billion. (z) not possible to calculate without more information.

    Q : Case of economic capital involve in

    When Farmer MacDonald decides to plant a field complete of rutabagas, the economic capital involved within such crop production process would consist of the: (i) tractor he rides. (ii) land he farms. (iii) physical effort he puts into farming. (iv) money invested from