--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Majority worse off and minority better off of population

When an economic change makes a huge majority of the population worse off and a minute minority better off, the alteration is: (w) good for society because it made some people better off. (x) bad for society since only a few people are better off and several are worse off. (y) neither socially good nor bad since the welfare losses now offset the gains. (z) Nothing can be said about social welfare during this case without a value judgment.

I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion for the same by using above options.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Population increase-Economic Growth I

    I have a problem in economics on Population increase-Economic Growth. Please help me in the following question. The production-possibilities frontier can be shifted external by: (i) Removing unemployment. (ii) Lowering the market prices. (iii) A popul

    		•
  • Q : Explain about the positive economic

    Positive economic statements: (1) are factual and can never be wrong. (2) predict political viewpoints. (3) are attempts to explain economic relationships. (4) estimate the fairness of social programs. (5) can resolve the matter of equity.

  • Q : Illustrates a problem of Distributive

    Bob the Baker and Bill the Butcher while both would be willing to trade three loaves of bread for a pair of T-Bone steaks, but for several reasons they not include: (i) Bob must become a vegetarian so he doesn't contain to rely upon Bill. (ii) The economy has producti

    		•
  • Q : Limits of Technological Advances

    Technological advances would not comprise: (i) Native Americans demonstrating Pilgrims how crops grow faster when rotten fish are dropped within with seeds they plant. (ii) pouring coffee through a coffee pot you obtained as a birthday gift. (iii) new

    		•
  • Q : Existence of economic inefficiency

    Economic inefficiency exists while there is: (1) A society suffers through economic inequity. (2) No approach for anyone to gain unless someone else loses. (3) Additional output could be generated at lower cost. (4) Maximum net benefits are acquired f

    		•
  • Q : Illustration of Self Interest Elmer

    Elmer leaves his old mule Betsy and buys a new tractor to plow his fields. It is assumed to be consistent along with Elmer's perception of his best interest since: (w) tractors can plow more than a mule. (x) Elmer is assumed to be a rational farmer. (

    		•
  • Q : Wealthy entrepreneurs by perfectly

    Do you agree along with the adage such that "You cannot find rich working for somebody else"? Should successful entrepreneurs serve others to enrich themselves? Can wage earners acquire great wealth without investing? How may you test the accuracy of your answ

    		•
  • Q : Fundamental fact of scarcity I want a

    I want a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion that the basic fact of scarcity means that every decision includes: (i) Limitless time. (ii) Production costs. (iii) Restricted wants. (iv) Limitless resources (v)

    		•
  • Q : Define cut costs without reducing the

    A firm which could cut costs without reducing the value of its output is experiencing as: (i) Allocative inefficiency. (ii) Productive inefficiency. (iii) Distributive inefficiency. (iv) Technological decline. Can

    		•
  • Q : Case of economic capital involve in

    When Farmer MacDonald decides to plant a field complete of rutabagas, the economic capital involved within such crop production process would consist of the: (i) tractor he rides. (ii) land he farms. (iii) physical effort he puts into farming. (iv) money invested from

    		•