--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Majority worse off and minority better off of population

When an economic change makes a huge majority of the population worse off and a minute minority better off, the alteration is: (w) good for society because it made some people better off. (x) bad for society since only a few people are better off and several are worse off. (y) neither socially good nor bad since the welfare losses now offset the gains. (z) Nothing can be said about social welfare during this case without a value judgment.

I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion for the same by using above options.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Rationally optimal decisions hinge on

    Economic scarcity is pervasive, that makes choices essential. Therefore, rationally optimal decisions hinge on tradeoffs which essentially reflect as: (1) using cooperative allocative mechanisms to minimize inequity. (2) opportunity costs. (3) competi

    		•
  • Q : Example of Normative Economic Goals

    Please help me to solve the problem of Normative Economic Goals that is given below: Almost everybody in the world would favor a normative economic aim that people all over must have: (i) high standards of living.

    		•
  • Q : Limits of Technological Advances

    Technological advances would not comprise: (i) Native Americans demonstrating Pilgrims how crops grow faster when rotten fish are dropped within with seeds they plant. (ii) pouring coffee through a coffee pot you obtained as a birthday gift. (iii) new

    		•
  • Q : Define cut costs without reducing the

    A firm which could cut costs without reducing the value of its output is experiencing as: (i) Allocative inefficiency. (ii) Productive inefficiency. (iii) Distributive inefficiency. (iv) Technological decline. Can

    		•
  • Q : When is Self-interest evident How can I

    How can I solve my following problem? Please suggest me the correct answer. Explain reason Self interest is evident while: (i) A mugger utilizes a $1 bullet upon his victim to take $100 by his wallet. (ii) Helen cr

    		•
  • Q : Growth and Development-Production

    The production possibilities curve might be shifted outward by: (1) Decreasing unemployment. (2) Reducing the labor force. (3) Limiting the output of capital goods. (4) Raising the amounts or productivity of the resources.

    Q : Why every society confronts the problem

    Each society confronts the problem of scarcity since: (i) human wants are virtually limitless relative to the resources obtainable. (ii) technology, resources and human potential are limitless. (iii) most people can't have enough money the goods they

    		•
  • Q : Punishment to criminals devoid of

    The early philosopher who argued about criminals must be punished proportionally to the harm completed to society, but without consideration of remorse, intent or motive was: (1) John Stuart Mill. (2) Edwin Chadwick. (3) Jeremy Bentham. (4) Adam Smith. (5) Aristotle.<

    		•
  • Q : Technological change in extracting

    Can someone help me in determining the right answer from the given options. A good illustration of technological change would be a discovery of a: (i) Pool of oil as big as any in Kuwait merely a bit south of Cleveland. (ii) Tenth planet as big as Neptune circling our

    		•
  • Q : Entails of a technical approach to

    A technical approach to economics entail: (1) positive questions since this cannot resolve normative matters. (2) normative questions since this cannot resolve positive matters. (3) positive and normative questions since this can resolve all matters.

    		•