--%>

Majority worse off and minority better off of population

When an economic change makes a huge majority of the population worse off and a minute minority better off, the alteration is: (w) good for society because it made some people better off. (x) bad for society since only a few people are better off and several are worse off. (y) neither socially good nor bad since the welfare losses now offset the gains. (z) Nothing can be said about social welfare during this case without a value judgment.

I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion for the same by using above options.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Most dealing of normative economic

    Normative economic statements deal mainly along with: (w) the way things should be. (x) production possibilities frontier analysis. (y) facts in place of theories. (z) how to measure economic variables. Please choo

  • Q : Current situation- better off without

    When it is possible to make somebody better off without making anybody worse off, the current condition is: (w) efficient. (x) inefficient. (y) optimal. (z) simply enhanced. How can I solve my problem of Economic Efficiency

  • Q : Economic equity consideration in

    Economic equity considered as to: (1) financial settlements of court cases. (2) the balance of national trade. (3) questions of the fairness of several economic arrangement. (4) passing hidden costs upon to consumers. (5) the gross value of any stocks

  • Q : Spending money for enhancement in

    Choosing NOT to spend the additional money required to enhance the safety of a dangerous traffic intersection is an illustration of: (v) macroeconomic policy decisions. (w) positive economics. (x) how society assigns prices to human lives. (y) economic inefficiency. (

  • Q : Define the positive economics Please

    Please guys help me to solve out this problem that positive economics, which: (w) is accepted like true through all economists. (x) is less technical than normative economics. (y) involves statements which, when false, could be proven false. (z) addre

  • Q : Reason of confronting problem of

    People whole the world confront the problem of scarcity at all times just because which one reason: (i) Greedy capitalist monopolies under-produce goods, (ii) International markets are plagued with flawed distribution, (iii) Restricted resources and t

  • Q : Determine an example of net investment

    When gross investment is $100 billion whereas $10 billion of capital is worn out, in that case net investment is: (w) $90 billion. (x) $100 billion. (y) $110 billion. (z) not possible to calculate without more information.

    Q : Behavior of deliberately act in

    Deliberately acting in a way which cannot attain a wanted goal is: (w) rational behavior. (x) random behavior. (y) irrational behavior. (z) maximizing behavior. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regard

  • Q : Define subjective opportunity cost for

    Can someone explain me with excellent solution about problem of economic concept of Opportunity Cost... If you exchange your Audi for a race horse you hate, and exchange the race horse for 100 shares of gold-mine stock you believe

  • Q : Property Rights I have a problem in

    I have a problem in economics on Property Rights. Please help me in getting the right answer from the following question. John Locke believed that the value and property rights derive from: (i) Social conventions prevailing inheritance. (ii) The helpf