--%>

Majority worse off and minority better off of population

When an economic change makes a huge majority of the population worse off and a minute minority better off, the alteration is: (w) good for society because it made some people better off. (x) bad for society since only a few people are better off and several are worse off. (y) neither socially good nor bad since the welfare losses now offset the gains. (z) Nothing can be said about social welfare during this case without a value judgment.

I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion for the same by using above options.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Rationally optimal decisions hinge on

    Economic scarcity is pervasive, that makes choices essential. Therefore, rationally optimal decisions hinge on tradeoffs which essentially reflect as: (1) using cooperative allocative mechanisms to minimize inequity. (2) opportunity costs. (3) competi

  • Q : Quantity theory of money David Hume and

    David Hume and John Locke summarized an early version of: (1) the circular flow of income. (2) the permanent income hypothesis. (3) the quantity theory of money. (4) the marginal disutility of poverty. (5) the backward-bending supply

  • Q : Where is economic efficiency for

    Economic efficiency for society does not need that such: (w) the greatest possible satisfaction is enjoyed through all consumers specified their individual budgets. (x) maximum possible value of output from obtainable resources. (y) exact goods are us

  • Q : Improvements in Economic growth I have

    I have a problem in economics on Improvements in Economic growth. Please help me in the following question. Economic growth would be encouraged by enhancements in: (1) Economic efficiency. (2) Technology. (3) People’s attitudes. (4) Unemployment

  • Q : Price Specie-Flow Mechanism-early

    The equation ΔMV is equal to ΔPQ while real GDP (which is adjusted for inflation), is fixed is a modern method to distinguish: (w) Adam Smith’s labor theory of value. (x) Francois Quesnay’s circular flow model. (y) Roberto Mich

  • Q : Scaring people of a commodity or service

    Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for given problem that when are people of a commodity or service scarce: (1) gain from having this obtainable, (2) Wish more than the amount freely obtainable, (3) Say no to p

  • Q : Technological advances in Production

    Movements all along the production possibilities curve would not replicate: (1) Technological advances. (2) A society’s choice-making among alternative output combinations. (3) The limiting factor of scarcity in output choices. (4) Opportunity c

  • Q : Determine the initial distribution of

    When goods are traded and several families gain without worsening other families' well-being, so in that case the initial distribution of goods should have been: (w) optimal. (x) distributively inefficient. (y) superior to the new dis

  • Q : Purchases of recently issued bonds and

    Define one reason that the purchases of recently issued bonds and stocks: (1) just only increase the value of federal funds. (2) Are not economic investments since they are just alternative forms of people’s financial saving? (3) Reduce the prof

  • Q : Requirement of technically efficient

    I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion that for production to be technically efficient needs that the: (i) Maximum benefits are acquired at the highest possible cost. (ii) Opportunity costs of production