--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Majority worse off and minority better off of population

When an economic change makes a huge majority of the population worse off and a minute minority better off, the alteration is: (w) good for society because it made some people better off. (x) bad for society since only a few people are better off and several are worse off. (y) neither socially good nor bad since the welfare losses now offset the gains. (z) Nothing can be said about social welfare during this case without a value judgment.

I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion for the same by using above options.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Existence of scarcity for human survival

    Please help me to solve the problem of scarcity that is given below: Why is Scarcity existed for human: (1) survival requires unlimited resources, (2) needs are enormous relative to the means obtainable to satisfy

    		•
  • Q : Define the root of normative economics

    Value judgments which address what “must be” are at the root of: (1) microeconomics. (2) scarcity economics. (3) normative economics. (4) positive economics. (5) macroeconomics. How can

    		•
  • Q : Esurience of economy-wide efficiency

    For a specified distribution of income, economy-wide efficiency would make sure a: (i) Redistribution to make equal income. (ii) Minimal level of pollution. (iii) Maximum level of particular identity. (iv) Maximum value for whole production.

  • Q : Labor resources of society Hello guys I

    Hello guys I need your advice. Please suggest some views for following economics problems that what are labor resources of society: (i) Identical along with its population, (ii) The mental and physical talents people make obtainable f

    		•
  • Q : Find out supply shifted to higher

    This market for clothing started on S0 and D0. Inside this market for clothing,: (w) demand has increased, possibly because of a raise in income. (x) new equilibrium price lies below the original equilibrium price. (y) supply may have transferred

    		•
  • Q : When is Scarcity a problem become

    Scarcity is a problem for: (w) poor countries merely. (x) individuals only when they are poor. (y) capitalists, but not socialists. (z) all people and countries, rich and poor alike. Can someone explain/help me wit

    		•
  • Q : Argument for infant industries to

    The argument for infant industries must be protected through competition through established foreign industries was first advanced through: (1) Richard List. (2) Gustav Schmoller. (3) David Ricardo. (4) Alexander Hamilton. (5) Thomas Robert Malthus. (6) early mercanti

    		•
  • Q : Positive declaration in positive

    When a mother tells her young child that thunder is caused by the angels bowling up in heaven, scientists would classify her statement as most clearly: (w) a normative statement. (x) a positive statement. (y) microeconomics in place of macroeconomics. (z) scientifical

    		•
  • Q : Define cut costs without reducing the

    A firm which could cut costs without reducing the value of its output is experiencing as: (i) Allocative inefficiency. (ii) Productive inefficiency. (iii) Distributive inefficiency. (iv) Technological decline. Can

    		•
  • Q : Technological advances in Production

    Movements all along the production possibilities curve would not replicate: (1) Technological advances. (2) A society’s choice-making among alternative output combinations. (3) The limiting factor of scarcity in output choices. (4) Opportunity c

    		•