--%>

Low marginal tax with basic income

In a negative income tax system, where a combining fundamental income floor with low marginal tax rates gives in: (w) reduced incentives for “voluntary poverty.” (x) higher minimal standards of living for the poor. (y) an NIT program more costly than the current “welfare mess.” (z) a growing proportion of the population on welfare.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Determine price elasticity of demand An

    An approximate estimate of the price elasticity of demand is best computed by the absolute value of the formula: (1) change in P / change within Q. (2) % change in Q / % change in P. (3) % change in Q / % change in income. (4) % chang

  • Q : Wage Discrimination and Social Welfare

    The sum up of monopsonistic exploitation by the firm raises however the firm as well operates at a more socially and economically proficient level of output and employment whenever the firm is capable to engage in: (i) Blacklisting in its hiring of the labor. (ii) Yel

  • Q : Ceteris Paribus assumption The ceteris

    The ceteris paribus (all as well constant) assumption is most obviously implicit in the statement of a tailor who states that, “We will vend more suits in the month of May of 2008: (i) Than we sold in the month of May 2003. (ii) Than we sold in

  • Q : Firms and Transaction Costs An

    An individual or organization which simultaneously purchases low and sells high in various markets is a/an: (i) Angel duster. (ii) Escalator. (iii) Arbitrageur. (iv) Finagler.  (v) Optimizer. Can someone please help me in find

  • Q : Good illustration of oligopoly The

    The tobacco industry within the United States is a good illustration of: (1) monopoly. (2) pure competition. (3) oligopoly. (4) corporate responsibility. (5) duopoly. I need a good answer on the topic of Economics

  • Q : Increase profits of quantity selling by

    When a monopolist was selling a quantity which marginal revenue [MR] is greater than marginal costs [marginal costs [MC] in that case this could increase profits by: (w) raising price. (x) increasing output. (y) raisi

  • Q : Resource demands from purely

    Relative to the resource demands from purely competitive sellers, demands through imperfectly competitive firms for resources tend to: (1) Perfectly price elastic. (2) Upward sloping. (3) Backward bending. (4) Less price elastic. (5) Perfectly price inelastic.

  • Q : Reasons for shifting demand curve

    Probable reasons for this shift of demand curve from D0 to D1 would not comprise: (1) lowering the lowest age for a driver’s license. (2) Reduces in the prices of ski boats. (3) Raised prices for airline tickets. (4) Decrease in the relative price of gasoline. (

  • Q : Price inelasticity of supply The price

    The price elasticity of supply is zero therefore supply is perfectly price inelastic within: (w) Panel A. (x) Panel B. (y) Panel C. (z) Panel D.

    Q : Competitive resource markets and low

    When resource markets are competitive and transaction costs are low, in that case landowners: (1) pass forward completely any land tax. (2) can drive up the rental rate of land by changing its supply. (3) bear the full burden of any t