--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Legal doctrine in Laws and Regulations

Whenever goods are non-standardized and rarely purchased by an individual, an assumption that the sellers will contain superior knowledge of the product characteristics is an argument for applying the authorized doctrine of: (1) Caveat emptor. (2) Nolo contendere. (3) No-fault insurance. (4) Caveat venditor. (5) Ceteris paribus.

Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the above options.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Rule of thumb for office rent Is there

    Is there any rule of thumb for office rent or on lease per gross income? If yes, then explain?

    		•
  • Q : Problem regarding Wage Discrimination I

    I have a problem in economics on Problem regarding Wage Discrimination. Please help me in the following question. The economic term applied if equally productive workers are paid various wages is: (i) Wage discrimination. (ii) Racism. (iii) Employment

    		•
  • Q : Price cross-elasticities of demand When

    When the price of thermal underwear is increased from $12 to $18 per pair, because of the quantity of cross country snow skis to decline by 1,200 to 800 pairs annual, such goods are ____ and the price cross elasticity of demand equiva

    		•
  • Q : Price elasticity of demand as the

    The price elasticity of demand is approximately measured as the absolute value of as: (1) (% change in Q) / (% change in Y). (2) ratio of the slopes of demand relative to supply. (3) (% change in Q) / (% change in P). (4) constant slo

    		•
  • Q : Concentration ratio Explain the concept

    Explain the concept of a concentration ratio.  Is the concentration ratio in a monopolistically competitive industry likely to be higher than for a perfectly competitive industry

    		•
  • Q : Define Marginal Utility Marginal

    Marginal Utility: It is addition more to the net or total utility as consumption is increased by one more unit of commodity.

    		•
  • Q : Efficiency of monopolistic competition

    Defenders of the efficiency of monopolistic competition are mainly persuasive when they insist which: (w) consumers benefit greatly from product differentiation. (x) any inefficiency is far less harmful than that of pure monopoly. (y) pure competition

    		•
  • Q : Spending pattern in Substitution Effects

    I have a problem in economics on spending pattern in Substitution Effects. Please help me in the following question. Even when your real income were held steady by adjusting for price modifications, your spending pattern would react to modifications in relative prices

    		•
  • Q : Implication of price discrimination

    Price discrimination implies: (1) charging different prices for identical goods that have identical production costs. (2) paying wages based on race or sex quite than productivity. (3) exploiting the working masses by charging the highest single price

    		•
  • Q : Problem on spending shares of national

    The view which big corporations unfailingly capture much stable shares of spending out of national income is: (i) Accepted by almost all the economists. (ii) Contrary to the confirmation of turnover among big over the decades. (iii) The symptom of strong competition.

    		•