Is it possible to use a constant WACC in valuation
Is this possible to use a constant WACC in the valuation of a company along with a changing debt?
Expert
The WACC can only be constant theoretically; if a constant debt is expected. If the debt changes from one year to the subsequent, the WACC changes too. In turn to value companies wherein debt changes dramatically, the Adjusted Present Value (AVP) is easier and more intuitive.
This is possible to use a constant WACC that is the weighted average of the WACC of the different years while debt changes, but this is a number that does not contain anything to do with the WACC in an exact year.
Is PER an excellent guide to investments?
PV of dividends: Cortez, Inc., is expecting to pay out a dividend of $2.50 next year. After that it expects its dividend to grow at 7 percent for the next four years. What is the present value of dividends over the next five-year period if the required rate of return is 10 percent?
Part I Guidelines and requirements: The questions in Part I of this assignment are based on the materials covered in Units 1 and 2. Please write a short-ess
Rusk Inc needs $50 million in new capital that it might obtain by selling bonds at par with coupon of 12% or by selling stock at $40 (net) per share. The current capital structure of Rusk consists of $300 million (face value) of 10% coupon bonds selling at 90 and 10 m
Which one model was great breakthrough for side of finance theory?
Our company (A) is going to buy the other company (B). We need to value the shares of B and, thus, we will use three options of the structure Debt/Shareholders’ Equity in order to obtain the WACC as: 1) Present structure of A
Explain the model of Heath, Jarrow and Morton regarding tree building or Monte Carlo simulation.
Is the market risk premium a parameter, for the world economy or for the national economy?
Does it make any sense to compute betas against local indexes while a company has a great part of its operations outside such local market? I have two illustrations: BBVA and Santander.
We are valuing a company, many smaller than ours, so as to buy it. As that company is too smaller than ours this will have no influence on the capital structure and at the risk of the resulting company. It is the reason why I believe this the beta and the capital stru
18,76,764
1955513 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1453338
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!