Is book value the excellent proxy to the value of shares
Is book value the excellent proxy to the value of the shares?
Expert
No. This would be a miracle when the number which appears in the Shareholders’ Equity had anything to do along with the value of the shares. While we have a look at the relation among the market value and the book value of all the Spanish companies into the continuous market, we enter at several conclusions:
a) In February 2005 and December 2006 where there was no company that market value equalled its book value;
b) The average in February 2005 was 4.1 and in December 2006 it was 4.6 and
c) There was just one company in December 2006 which market value was lower than its book value. If we repeat similar exercise for the companies involved in the S and P 500, we can see that, in February 2005 and in December 2006, there was no company whose market value equaled its book value; the average was 3.8 in 2005 as well as 4.5 in 2006.
AB Restaurants has debt/equity ratio .25, and its leveraged beta is 1.5. Its tax rate is 30%, and its cost of equity is 15%. The risk-free rate is 5%. CD Restaurants has debt/equity ratio .4, and tax rate 35%. Find the cost of equity for CD.
Is this true that a company creates value for its shareholders in a year when this distributes dividends or when the quotation of the shares increases?
Is there any consensus among the chief authors in finance concerning the market risk premium?
Corporate Development: Corporate development is a term which references the range of planning options and strategies which can assist to move a company toward its targets. The procedure of this kind of strategic development can be exerted to just abou
Tudor Online Publishing Corporation has tax rate of 35%, debt-to-equity ratio of 25%, and has (leveraged) beta 1.25. The riskless rate is 3% and the market return is 12%. Windsor Publishing Company is an all equity company and is in the same business. What is the requ
An investment bank computed my WACC. The report is as: “the definition of the WACC is defined as WACC = RF + βu (RM – RF); here RF being the risk-free rate and βu the unleveraged beta and RM the market risk rate.” It is differ from what we
Is this possible to use different WACCs within order to discount each year’s flows? In which cases?
What is the current example of a value company and would you buy it as an investment. Why or why not?
Why is Split useful?
When valuing the shares of my company, I calculate the present value of the expected cash flows to shareholders moreover I add to the result obtained cash holdings and liquid investment. Is that correct?
18,76,764
1950340 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1440535
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!