--%>

Inverse relationship in Law of Demand

The law of demand signifies to: (i) The direct relationship accessible between quantity and prices demanded. (ii) The inverse relationship accessible between quantity demanded and opportunity cost. (iii) How demand shifts due to modifications in prices. (iv) How demand shifts due to factors which affect demand.

Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the above options.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Illustration of Rational Ignorance I

    I have a problem in economics on Illustration of Rational Ignorance. Please help me in the following question. Supposing that the meat you purchase from a grocery store is good devoid of inspecting its quality yourself with the microscope is an illustration of: (1) Be

  • Q : Equilibrium rate of monopsony

    I have a problem in economics on Equilibrium rate of monopsony exploitation. Please help me in the following question. Equilibrium rate of the monopsony exploitation by a firm is a difference between: (i) MRP and VMP. (ii) VMP and w. (iii) MFC and w.

  • Q : Problem regarding to intermediation for

    Ticket-scalpers allow latecomers to ignore standing into line for tickets and permit people to wait till the last moment before deciding to attend athletic or concerts events. Are promoters of an event harmed through scalping? Must ticket scalpers' services be free? S

  • Q : Illustration of predatory behavior An

    An illustration of predatory behavior would be a firm: (w) building excess capacity to deter entry. (x) lowering price because of production cost decreases. (y) adopting a cost reducing technological innovation. (z) lowering prices to remove excessive

  • Q : Featherbedding in its hiring practices

    The summation of monopolistic exploitation across all the workers tends to raise however a firm as well operates at a more socially and economically proficient level of output and employment whenever the firm is capable to engage in: (1) Blacklisting in its dealings t

  • Q : Monopsonistic Exploitation Can someone

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The employer with monopsony power exploits the labor if it pays a wage: (i) At a bare subsistence level. (ii) That stabilizes worker population. (iii) Less

  • Q : Purchasing low selling high Purchasing

    Purchasing low in one market and concurrently selling at a high price in another is NOT a mechanism which: (i) Rises supply in the low-price market. (ii) Risklessly produces profits. (iii) Is termed as arbitrage. (iv) Decreases price differentials among markets. (e) I

  • Q : Lower costs of large oligopolists This

    This is possible that consumers could pay a lower price within an oligopoly market than a competitive market since large oligopolists: (w) can price below cost. (x) often give quantity discounts to loyal customers. (y

  • Q : Problem regarding Substitution of goods

    When tuna fish ice cream and licorice gummy bears are substitutes, then: (1) Decline in the price of licorice gummy bears raises the demand for tuna fish ice-cream. (2) The demand for tuna fish ice-cream is independent of price of licorice gummy bears. (3) Consuming m

  • Q : Average variable costs of pure

    Average variable costs per generic brick of this pure competitor equal approximately: (i) $.02 (2 cents per brick). (ii) $.04 (4 cents per brick). (iii) $.07 (7 cents per brick). (iv) $.09 (9 cents per brick).