Verified
Internal OD Staff (Internal Organizational development Members) OD staff introduced for a specific objective within the organization. The main motive to create OD team to develop the organizational and individual functioning. Every expert has different definition for it but universally accepted definition of OD is that this is use n number of methods, Models, Techniques, Concepts theories at individual level which affect the whole group means Organization.
Questionnaires: Here the word questionnaires define and related with the concept or model by which organization trying to collect some data and information from the employees of the organization which help to define the new objective, Strategy and provide the overview of the current scenario as per the employees.
Questionnaires used as a tool to collect the Valuable information.
Discussion 1: Yes, Use of defined approach in the Statement “A” is the good strategy to generate the type of information that could create the behavioral endpoint of the questionnaires.
The rational of behind this logic is in terms of resources and contributors the employees are the key factor within the organization. As per the statement “A” the organizational approach to collect data is to use field force analysis to generate information by the employees. Field force is the technique which provides a blueprint related to those factors which influence the situations basically the originally social situations. Social situations derived by the existing environment of the organizational culture and nature of the working atmosphere.
Social situation develop by the working people who are the key assets of the organization. Employee’s behaviors, Approach, responsibilities towards the organization, way of approach, and way of Interaction create the social environment. So, to collect the data and develop the questionnaires to define the behavioral endpoint and issues this is the best way.
Discussion 2: Yes, they have a specific goal because they are working for the development of an organization. Yes, there will be significant advantages to creating meaningful and lasting change if we used managers or internal OD staff to facilitate the meetings. A meaningful is a term which has a worth and it is used in terms of usefulness and if we use managers or internal OD staff to facilitate the meetings because a manager and internal OD staff plays a role of most responsibilities in the company and in the meetings with a manager and OD staffs the company will get to know about the fact of issues, concerns, works, manpower and other related problems and conflictions in the path of achievement and goals. They work for the company and together they are forming a team who plays a responsibility for common goal there is no differences between their goals and ambitions. They will be open-minded and more interaction will be happen which will be very helpful in terms of knowledge as well in terms of reaching the goal. There will be a significant change because trust and understanding will develop which will help in meeting the goals as well as there will be an involvement and participation as well.
Discussion 3: Organizational factors that make this a "bad" approach or one to avoid are:
As per given information the organization has several approaches:
a) Involvement of Top managers: When the top managers start involving in the work of middle managers or a junior level department people then it truly creates a lot of problem as conflictions and people feel they are not having any freedom to work. They feel themselves as a slave which create disturbance and which arise problems in their goals. Everybody who is working anywhere has a full freedom and full rights to express their views and they want no involvement and there should be flexibility if they know their work specifically. Sometimes top management involve in that limits which creates a frustration for the people and all energy get lost. There will be an intra conflicts.
b) Involvement of OD Members (Organizational Members): When OD members involve in other processes of the organization so there is a probability of problems. As a result they have to be very familiar and can prepare the questions as per the organization which will be beneficial for all.
c) Involvement of the Employees: there will be a huge difference in terms of knowledge and information because they have no much knowledge and information and they are not giving that much content so there will be probability that information is incorrect and incomplete.
Factors:
Actively Participation By the all Members: the person whom we take the feedback is not giving the right information then there is no worth. If the respondents are not actively participating in the event then there will be no sound knowledge to complete the research.
Interest level: if the respondents are not interested in giving the data’s then there is no chances to finish the project because my requirements will not fulfill.
Analysis methods: the methods which are used to prepare the questionnaires if not correct and true then there is a chance of incomplete information and there will be a problem in the result and the graphs will vary from the right one.
Co-operation: The full co-operation and support will be helpful to complete the research. Without the help of respondents there will be no complacency.