--%>

Institutes a legal price floor in parity pricing

Assume that recent advances within agricultural technology resulted into the U.S. wheat market being at a first equilibrium upon S0D0. Farmers complain which gluts within the wheat market have depressed their incomes, endangering the family farm. Assume that now the government institutes a legal price floor at P3 per bushel of wheat beneath a program termed as parity pricing. One outcome will be like: (w) an annual surplus of wheat equal to distance ae. (x) decreases into the prices of bread and pasta. (y) an annual shortage of wheat equivalent to distance bf. (z) increases in farm income therefore total farm revenues equal area 0P4gQ4.

208_examle of Total Revenue.png

Please choose the right answer from above...I want your suggestion for the same.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Price elasticity of demand at

    At prevailing prices, there the price elasticity of demand for that good would be lowest: (w) Coca Cola. (x) Generic soda. (y) Water. (z) Dasani bottled water. Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem o

  • Q : More elastic demand for labor The

    The demand for labor is more elastic the: (i) larger labor costs are like a proportion of total costs. (ii) shorter the time interval considered. (iii) greater the supply of labor. (iv) more difficult this is to substitute one resource for another. (v

  • Q : Analytic time in market structure In

    In this figure the firm probably to go out of business the soonest would be as: (w) Firm A. (x) Firm B. (y) Firm C. (z) Firm D. 298_Market Str</span></p>
                                        </div>
                                        <!-- /comment-box -->
                                    </li>
   
   </td>
	</tr><tr>
		<td>
       
      <li>
                                        <div class=

    Q : Marginal revenue by maximizes total

    A monopolist maximizes its total revenue where marginal revenue: (1) is flat. (2) is rising. (3) is zero. (4) equals marginal cost. (5) is negative. Can someone explain/help me with best solution a

  • Q : Coefficient of cross-elasticity of

    When a price hike from $15 to $20 for DVD disks causes sales of DVD players to reduce from 100 to 50 units, in that case the coefficient of cross-elasticity of demand among these goods is approximately: (w) 1/10. (x)  10. (y)  7/3. (z) 

  • Q : Negatively relative interest rate

    Interest rates tend to be negatively associated to: (w) household preferences for more liquid assets. (x) typical rates of return on alternative investments. (y) household willingness to delay consumption. (z) investor optimism concerning rates of ret

  • Q : Law of Supply in quantity supplied The

    The law of supply defines that higher prices cause rise in the: (i) Demand for good. (ii) Supply of the good. (iii) Quantity supplied. (iv) Gains of investors. Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the

  • Q : Relatively price inelastic demand For

    For Cournot’s Spring Water the demand is relatively price inelastic at: (i) point a. (ii) point b. (iii) point c (iv) point d. (v) point e.

    Q : Problem on spending shares of national

    The view which big corporations unfailingly capture much stable shares of spending out of national income is: (i) Accepted by almost all the economists. (ii) Contrary to the confirmation of turnover among big over the decades. (iii) The symptom of strong competition.

  • Q : Price of elastic demand for raises

    When decreasing ticket prices for Usher concerts raises total revenues, in that case the demand for tickets for Usher concerts: (1) perfectly price elastic. (2) relatively price elastic. (3) unitarily price elastic. (4) relatively pri