--%>

Income Distribution and Satisfaction

Some researchers have determined that citizens of some prosperous countries [for example, Japan] explain themselves as “happy” far less frequently, onto average, than citizens of a few poorer nations [for example, Indonesia]. Nevertheless, almost all studies of the subject conclude which within almost every society, associate to poorer people, and people along with higher incomes are somewhat more probable to describe themselves as happy. Such results suggest that: (1) dealing with new technologies tends to make people happier. (2) urban living makes people miserable, compared to living in agricultural environs. (3) relative class, status, and power are significant influences on people’s happiness. (4) happier people value extra dollars more. (5) poorer people have lower marginal utilities of income.

Please help me to solve the problem of Economic that is given above.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Income tax rates and government

    When line 0C0' in this figure shows the current Lorenz curve for the U.S. distribution of income after taxes and transfers, the probably short run outcomes of 10 percent cuts into both income tax rates and government transfer

  • Q : Resources and Products Flow Model I

    I have a problem in economics on Resources and Products Flow Model. Please help me in the following question. The eventual owners of all resources and products in the society are as follows: (i) households. (ii) Firms. (iii) The tax-paying public. (iv

  • Q : Meaning of division of labor Give the

    Give the answer of following question. The division of labor means that: 1) labor markets are geographically segmented. 2) unskilled workers outnumber skilled workers. 3) workers specialize in various production tasks. 4) each worker performs a large number of tasks.<

  • Q : Competitive advertising as waste of

    Economists have conventionally concluded which, from the vantage point of society as an entire, competitive advertising in that case: (1) enables consumers to make more efficient economic choices. (2) is a waste of resources. (3) cons

  • Q : Meaning of term competition in Economic

    Economists generally use the word “competition” to refer to: (w) negotiations among buyers and sellers. (x) a type of market structure in that competitors are price takers and, occasionally, to rivalrous processes among firms. (y) how pric

  • Q : Abandonment of perfect competition This

    This needs to be identified that general abandonment of supposition of perfect competition, universal adoption of supposition of monopoly, need to have extremely destructive consequences for economic theory.” 

  • Q : Minor economic inefficiencies The minor

    The minor economic inefficiencies which monopolistically competitive firms may cause are as: (w) because of their inability to ever price discriminate. (x) a price which consumers pay for a greater range of slightly differentiated goods. (y) reflected

  • Q : Marginal costs and marginal revenue in

    Can someone help me to solve this problem as given below: A profit maximizing firm will generate where: (w) MR > MC. (x) MC > MR. (y) MR = MC. (z) ATC > P > MC. How can I solve my

  • Q : Impact of deficient demand in an economy

    Describe deficient demand in an economy? Determine its impact on output, employment and price? Answer: Deficient demand terms to the condition when aggregate demand

  • Q : Uncertainty and Decision-making I have

    I have a problem in economics on Uncertainty and Decision-making. Please help me in the following question. The error of omission would be: (i) The failure of an individual to invest in Microsoft 20 years ago. (ii) Individual cheating on a test. (iii)