--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Implication of price discrimination

Price discrimination implies: (1) charging different prices for identical goods that have identical production costs. (2) paying wages based on race or sex quite than productivity. (3) exploiting the working masses by charging the highest single price possible. (4) eliminating all costs hence only pure profits are realized. (5) ignoring high priced suppliers.

Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for above Economics problems.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Distribution of Income before taxes and

    Income is distributed before taxes and transfers in the United States such as, in 2003 year, the lowest quintile [20%] earned around: (w) 4% of all income and the highest quintile earned over half of all income. (x) 5% as much as the highest quintile.

    		•
  • Q : Analytic Time-The Short Run I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Analytic Time-The Short Run. Please help me in the following question. Economists classify a time-period in which at least one resource is fixed as: (i) Short run. (ii) Long run. (iii) Production period. (iv) Profit period.

  • Q : Income Elasticities of Demand Question:

    Question: (a)  Suppose the income elasticity of demand for pre-recorded music compact disks is +4 and the income elasticity of demand for a cabinet maker's work is +0.4.  Compare the impact on pre-recorde

    		•
  • Q : Problem regarding Substitution of goods

    When tuna fish ice cream and licorice gummy bears are substitutes, then: (1) Decline in the price of licorice gummy bears raises the demand for tuna fish ice-cream. (2) The demand for tuna fish ice-cream is independent of price of licorice gummy bears. (3) Consuming m

    		•
  • Q : Split roughly burden of tax The burden

    The burden of an excise (i.e., per unit) tax would be divide roughly fifty by fifty on consumers and suppliers of the taxed good within: (w) Panel A. (x) Panel B. (y) Panel C. (z) Panel D.

  • Q : Movement according to economist Assume

    Assume that you purchased a ton of gold in Belgium for $450 per ounce and instantly sold all of it in Chile for $480 per ounce. Economists label your movement as: (i) Arbitrage. (ii) Scalping. (iii) Screening. (iv) Speculation. (v) Signaling.

    Q : Equilibrium in the long run This would

    This would be a fallacy to suppose that: (w) a purely competitive firm’s demand curve is perfectly elastic. (x) a purely competitive firm’s supply curve is the marginal cost above the minimum point of the AVC. (y) purely competitive firms generate where MR

    		•
  • Q : Pepsi and Coke market Some of the

    Some of the consumers strongly prefer Pepsi and some strongly prefer Coke. Thus there is no single market for colas. This statement is true or false ? Explain.This statement is false. Although some people have strong preferences for a specific

    		•
  • Q : Competition and exploitation of the

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The capability to exploit the labor is minimal if a firm consists of: (1) Monopoly power. (2) Government contracts to accomplish. (3) Monopsony power. (4) Labor union contracts that terminate

    		•
  • Q : Maximizes total revenue by a monopolist

    A monopolist maximizes total revenue through producing where is: (w) marginal revenue = marginal cost [MR = MC]. (x) marginal revenue = 0. (y) demand is elastic. (z) demand is inelastic. How can I solve my