Illustrates the Gordon and Shapiro formula
What is the importance and the utility of the given formula: Ke = DIV(1+g)/P + g?
What is the importance and the utility of the given formula:
Ke = DIV(1+g)/P + g?
Expert
The given expression Ke = DIV(1+g)/P + g arrives from the Gordon and Shapiro formula to value shares as: P = DIV(1+g)/(Ke–g). In such formulas, P and DIV are identified and Ke and g are not identified. Some people take like g as expected growth of dividends the average of expectations of analysts, and after that they compute Ke (Ke computed in such way is usually termed as implicit).
But Ke computed in this way is just one of several that can be computed. The formula permits us to acquire pairs (Ke, g) which satisfy the equation.
Which determines the shape of the term structure of Interest rates?
The ROE is the ratio among net income and Shareholders’ equity. The meaning of Return on Equity is return to shareholders. Therefore, is ROE a correct measurement of the return to shareholders?
Explain new methodology of standard market practice.
Explain how companies with substandard financial history can draw the attention of investors. Are investors irrational or naive?
You have been given the following information on two corporations; you are to assume that thesecurities are correctly priced. My Corp, Inc. has a Beta of 1.25 and an Expected Return of .145;Your Corp, Inc. has a Beta of .75 and an Expected Return of .095. Based on the
Is the depreciation is the loss of value of fixed assets?
Credit & Collections: Usually, credit is stated as the procedure of providing a loan, in which one party transfers wealth to the other with the expectation that it will be re-paid in full plus interest. The definition of collections is connected t
Why can we not compute the required return (Ke) by the Gordon-Shapiro model [P0 = Div0 (1+g) / (Ke – g)] in place of using the CAPM? As we identify the current dividend (Div0) and the current share price (P0), we can acquire the growth rate of the dividend by th
When valuing the shares of my company, I calculate the present value of the expected cash flows to shareholders moreover I add to the result obtained cash holdings and liquid investment. Is that correct?
Suppose we calculate g as ROE (1–p)/(1–ROE (1–p)) and the Ke by the CAPM. We replace both values into the formula PER = (ROE (1+g) – g)/ROE (Ke-g) but there PER we obtain is fully different from the one we get by dividing the quotation of the s
18,76,764
1953474 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1445421
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!