Illustrate either legal requirement is needed for writing
Illustrate either legal requirement is needed for writing?
Expert
In general, around no legal obligation those contracts must be in writing to be binding. How so ever, to avoid disputes as well as costly proceedings, all imperative contracts should be in writing, and some should be witnessed as well to attest to their authenticity.
When a contract is wholly oral, it may be complicated for parties themselves, let alone a court of law to be completely sure exactly what they decided to. When contracts are part oral and part written, it can still be difficult to be sure what was agreed to. Even when contracts are in writing, words may still be open to numerous interpretations. Not only it make good business logic to enter into written contracts, law requires some contracts to be written if the parties want to ensure that their interests are protected by law.
Elucidate the term Vicarious Liability?
Explain the disclosure of the True Cost of Credit?
What do you mean by environmental protection?
Which act allows for termination, in the absence of express agreement?
Illustrate the types of bailment?
Describe in brief about exceptions to Privity of Contract in respect of Interests in land, Constructive trust, Life insurance and undisclosed principal?
What are the different ways by which an Offer may be terminated?
Explain consumer protection acts?
What do you mean by Provincial Legislation?
Explain the role of Impossibility in Discharge by Frustration?
18,76,764
1951367 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1445407
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!