--%>

How you can predict future evolution of value of shares

Could we suppose that, as we cannot predict the future evolution of the value of shares, a good estimation would be to consider this constant during the next five years?

E

Expert

Verified

Such affirmation is an error. The relation among the value of the shares of various years is: Et = Et-1 (1+Ket) – CFact. The shares value is constant (Et = Et-1) only when CFact = Et-1 Ket. It happens in non-growing perpetuities.

   Related Questions in Corporate Finance

  • Q : Option Trading Strategies Explain the

    Explain the term Option Trading Strategies?

  • Q : Who explained market-neutral delta

    Who explained market-neutral delta hedging?

  • Q : Calculate valuation realized by

    Is a valuation realized through a prestigious investment bank a scientifically approved result that any investor could utilize as a reference?

  • Q : Tax credit for lease payments problem

    ABC Inc. is planning to lease a computer for $3000 per annum, payable in advance, for a period of 4 years. The lease will cover maintenance costs. ABC CFO feels that if he buys the same computer he should be able to sell it at 15% of the purchase price after 4 years.

  • Q : How much confidence can an investor

    I heard conversation of the Earnings Yield Gap ratio, that is the difference among the inverse of the PER and the TIR on 10-year-bonds. This is said that if this ratio is positive then this is more advantageous to invest in equity. How much confidence can an investor

  • Q : Who explain match theoretical & market

    Who demonstrated that how to match theoretical and market prices for normal bonds?

  • Q : FIN3000 Corporate Finance Task

    Task Description Length: 1000-2000 words (up to 500 words above 2000 permitted) Description: • Complete this assignment in groups of 4-5 students. • Maintain a portfolio of financial issues taken from 8 news sources. • Analyse the articles with reference to theory covered in class and highlig

  • Q : Explain undervaluation of share on the

    Suppose we calculate g as ROE (1–p)/(1–ROE (1–p)) and the Ke by the CAPM. We replace both values into the formula PER = (ROE (1+g) – g)/ROE (Ke-g) but there PER we obtain is fully different from the one we get by dividing the quotation of the s

  • Q : Explain the branching structure of the

    Explain the branching structure of the binomial model.

  • Q : Did you see Vueling case Did you notice

    Did you notice the Vueling case? How is this possible that an investment bank sets the objective price of its shares in €2.50 per share upon the 2nd of October, 2007, just after replacing Vueling shares at €31 per share in J