--%>

How present value of tax shields be calculated

I have two valuations of the company that we set as an objective. Within one of them, the present value of tax shields (D Kd T) computed using Ku (required return to unlevered equity) and, in one, by using Kd (required return to debt). The second valuation is too higher than the first one, but here which of the two is better?

E

Expert

Verified

Fernández (2001) demonstrates that discounting the tax shields along with the Ku and the WACC is not right. There are six habitual expressions to compute the value of tax shields that are frequently used. Just three of them are valid (they have a theoretical origin):

Myers (1974) and Modigliani-Miller (1963), while the company plans to return the existing debt without making a newest one; Miles-Ezzell (1980) while the company plans its debt proportionally to market value of shares; and also Fernández (2004), while the company plans its debt proportionally to book value of the assets or shares.

Fernández (2004): VTS = VA [D Ku T; Ku].

Miles-Ezzell (1980): VA[Ku; D T Kd] (1+Ku)/ (1+Kd)

Myers (1974) and Modigliani-Miller (1963): VTS = VA[Kd; D T Kd]. Other incorrect formulae to calculate the value of tax shields are:

Damodaran (1994): VA [Ku; DTKu – D (Kd – RF) (1–T)];

Practitioners: VA [Ku; DTKd – D(Kd – RF)]

Harris-Pringle (1985) y Ruback (1995, 2002): VA [Ku; D T Kd]

Myers (1974) has to be used only while it is possible to know with whole certainty the amount of the debt at any future instant. Miles y Ezzell (1980) has to be used only when the future debt is proportional to market value of the shares that we are not aware of any company which manages its debt in such a way. Fernández (2004) has to be used only when the risk of the future raise of the debt is the same to that of the FCF.

   Related Questions in Corporate Finance

  • Q : Define Working capital requirement

    Working capital requirement: Is a financial term known as WCR, which is used to judge the operational liquidity of the business and it is a part of operational capital. A firm in spite of having a good profitability and assets may not have a good liqu

  • Q : Is net income of a year is doubtful for

    Is the net income of a year money the company made that given year or is this a number whose importance is quite doubtful?

  • Q : What is the impact of auto portfolio

    What is the impact of auto portfolio into the quotation of the shares?

  • Q : Problem on sales collections The 2010

    The 2010 income statements of Leggett and Platt, inc. reports net sales of $4,076.1 million in 2010 and $4,250 million in 2009. The balance sheet reports accounts and other receivables, net of $550.5 million at December 31, 2010 and $640.2 million at December 31, 2009

  • Q : Define stock variable Stock variable :

    Stock variable: It is a variable whose value is measured or evaluated at a point of time.

  • Q : What is a 3 x 1 Split What is a 3 x 1

    What is a 3 x 1 Split?

  • Q : Problem on stock market John Wong is a

    John Wong is a fresh graduate and has a limited amount of funds for investments. He expects that the Hong Kong stock market will fall soon but he is not familiar with derivatives. In order to gain more money to buy a car, he explores engaging in Hang Seng Index (HSI)

  • Q : Who was the first to quantify the idea

    Who was the first to quantify the idea of Brownian motion?

  • Q : Explain value of shares is Is this

    Is this correct that the value of the shares is, the “value of the results’ capitalization” that, as per to the Institute of Accounting and Auditing (ICAC) shows “the sum of the expected future results of the company throughout a certain period

  • Q : Working Capital - Current Assets and

    I do not know the meaning of Working Capital Requirements. I think this should be same to Working Capital (Current Assets – Current Liabilities). There am I right?