--%>

How present value of tax shields be calculated

I have two valuations of the company that we set as an objective. Within one of them, the present value of tax shields (D Kd T) computed using Ku (required return to unlevered equity) and, in one, by using Kd (required return to debt). The second valuation is too higher than the first one, but here which of the two is better?

E

Expert

Verified

Fernández (2001) demonstrates that discounting the tax shields along with the Ku and the WACC is not right. There are six habitual expressions to compute the value of tax shields that are frequently used. Just three of them are valid (they have a theoretical origin):

Myers (1974) and Modigliani-Miller (1963), while the company plans to return the existing debt without making a newest one; Miles-Ezzell (1980) while the company plans its debt proportionally to market value of shares; and also Fernández (2004), while the company plans its debt proportionally to book value of the assets or shares.

Fernández (2004): VTS = VA [D Ku T; Ku].

Miles-Ezzell (1980): VA[Ku; D T Kd] (1+Ku)/ (1+Kd)

Myers (1974) and Modigliani-Miller (1963): VTS = VA[Kd; D T Kd]. Other incorrect formulae to calculate the value of tax shields are:

Damodaran (1994): VA [Ku; DTKu – D (Kd – RF) (1–T)];

Practitioners: VA [Ku; DTKd – D(Kd – RF)]

Harris-Pringle (1985) y Ruback (1995, 2002): VA [Ku; D T Kd]

Myers (1974) has to be used only while it is possible to know with whole certainty the amount of the debt at any future instant. Miles y Ezzell (1980) has to be used only when the future debt is proportional to market value of the shares that we are not aware of any company which manages its debt in such a way. Fernández (2004) has to be used only when the risk of the future raise of the debt is the same to that of the FCF.

   Related Questions in Corporate Finance

  • Q : Is net income of a year is doubtful for

    Is the net income of a year money the company made that given year or is this a number whose importance is quite doubtful?

  • Q : Who wrote famous paper- distribution of

    Who wrote famous paper of on distribution of cotton price returns?

  • Q : Estimate stock's current price A

    A company currently pays a dividend of $3.75 per share, D0 = 3.75. It is estimated that the company's dividend will grow at a rate of 15% percent per year for the next 2 years, then the dividend will grow at a constant rate of 7% the

  • Q : Continuously compounded rate of return

    Solve for the stated annual rate, r equal to the continuously compounded rate of return implicit in turning $1 at the end of 1925 (beginning of 1926) into these reported valued from RWJ9 in 2008 Figure below: 1. Determine the state

  • Q : Purchaing or leasing problem Crawford

    Crawford Corporation is planning to lease a machine for the next 4 years for an annual lease payment of $3,000 paid in advance, plus a non-refundable initial fee of $3,000. There is a 1-year delay for the tax benefits of leasing. Crawford may buy the machine, deprecia

  • Q : Expected return and standard deviation

    If an investor is considered to be risk-averse, what is his/her attitude towards expected return and standard deviation?

  • Q : Who explain match theoretical & market

    Who demonstrated that how to match theoretical and market prices for normal bonds?

  • Q : Is this better to repurchase shares or

    Assuming a company needs to distribute money to shareholders of it, is this better to repurchase shares or to distribute dividends?

  • Q : Explain the way of estimating an average

    Explain the way of estimating an average.

  • Q : Sinking Fund problem Berks Corporation

    Berks Corporation is expecting to have EBIT next year of $12 million, with a standard deviation of $6 million. Berks have $30 million in bonds with coupon of 10%, selling at par, which are being retired at the rate of $2 million annually. Berks also have 100,000 share