--%>

How present value of tax shields be calculated

I have two valuations of the company that we set as an objective. Within one of them, the present value of tax shields (D Kd T) computed using Ku (required return to unlevered equity) and, in one, by using Kd (required return to debt). The second valuation is too higher than the first one, but here which of the two is better?

E

Expert

Verified

Fernández (2001) demonstrates that discounting the tax shields along with the Ku and the WACC is not right. There are six habitual expressions to compute the value of tax shields that are frequently used. Just three of them are valid (they have a theoretical origin):

Myers (1974) and Modigliani-Miller (1963), while the company plans to return the existing debt without making a newest one; Miles-Ezzell (1980) while the company plans its debt proportionally to market value of shares; and also Fernández (2004), while the company plans its debt proportionally to book value of the assets or shares.

Fernández (2004): VTS = VA [D Ku T; Ku].

Miles-Ezzell (1980): VA[Ku; D T Kd] (1+Ku)/ (1+Kd)

Myers (1974) and Modigliani-Miller (1963): VTS = VA[Kd; D T Kd]. Other incorrect formulae to calculate the value of tax shields are:

Damodaran (1994): VA [Ku; DTKu – D (Kd – RF) (1–T)];

Practitioners: VA [Ku; DTKd – D(Kd – RF)]

Harris-Pringle (1985) y Ruback (1995, 2002): VA [Ku; D T Kd]

Myers (1974) has to be used only while it is possible to know with whole certainty the amount of the debt at any future instant. Miles y Ezzell (1980) has to be used only when the future debt is proportional to market value of the shares that we are not aware of any company which manages its debt in such a way. Fernández (2004) has to be used only when the risk of the future raise of the debt is the same to that of the FCF.

   Related Questions in Corporate Finance

  • Q : WCR fend off takeover bid WCR fend off

    WCR fend off takeover bid: The WCR estimation ensures that a firm takes corrective action in time to correct its WC status. This ensures that the firm is always in a positive WC status. In other words, the firm will be able to pay off all its short-te

  • Q : Define stock variable Stock variable :

    Stock variable: It is a variable whose value is measured or evaluated at a point of time.

  • Q : Financial engineering financial

    financial engineering examples,benifits,disadvantages

  • Q : How form a portfolio with higher

    Does this make any sense to form a portfolio comprised of companies along with a higher return/dividend?

  • Q : Estimate stock's current price A

    A company currently pays a dividend of $3.75 per share, D0 = 3.75. It is estimated that the company's dividend will grow at a rate of 15% percent per year for the next 2 years, then the dividend will grow at a constant rate of 7% the

  • Q : Explain essential hypotheses for

    Which are the essential hypotheses so that valuations of the Economic Value Added (EVA) give similar results to discounting cash flows?

  • Q : Structure of Interest rates Which

    Which determines the shape of the term structure of Interest rates?

  • Q : Understand and interpret financial

    Our purpose this week: learning how to understand and interpret financial statements. Assignment: The class should discuss all of the questions listed below as they rel

  • Q : Data Case Please assist with the

    Please assist with the attached Data Case assignment

  • Q : Regarding WACC Regarding the WACC which

    Regarding the WACC which has to be applied to a project, must it be an expected return, the average historical return or an opportunity cost on similar projects?