--%>

How present value of tax shields be calculated

I have two valuations of the company that we set as an objective. Within one of them, the present value of tax shields (D Kd T) computed using Ku (required return to unlevered equity) and, in one, by using Kd (required return to debt). The second valuation is too higher than the first one, but here which of the two is better?

E

Expert

Verified

Fernández (2001) demonstrates that discounting the tax shields along with the Ku and the WACC is not right. There are six habitual expressions to compute the value of tax shields that are frequently used. Just three of them are valid (they have a theoretical origin):

Myers (1974) and Modigliani-Miller (1963), while the company plans to return the existing debt without making a newest one; Miles-Ezzell (1980) while the company plans its debt proportionally to market value of shares; and also Fernández (2004), while the company plans its debt proportionally to book value of the assets or shares.

Fernández (2004): VTS = VA [D Ku T; Ku].

Miles-Ezzell (1980): VA[Ku; D T Kd] (1+Ku)/ (1+Kd)

Myers (1974) and Modigliani-Miller (1963): VTS = VA[Kd; D T Kd]. Other incorrect formulae to calculate the value of tax shields are:

Damodaran (1994): VA [Ku; DTKu – D (Kd – RF) (1–T)];

Practitioners: VA [Ku; DTKd – D(Kd – RF)]

Harris-Pringle (1985) y Ruback (1995, 2002): VA [Ku; D T Kd]

Myers (1974) has to be used only while it is possible to know with whole certainty the amount of the debt at any future instant. Miles y Ezzell (1980) has to be used only when the future debt is proportional to market value of the shares that we are not aware of any company which manages its debt in such a way. Fernández (2004) has to be used only when the risk of the future raise of the debt is the same to that of the FCF.

   Related Questions in Corporate Finance

  • Q : Explain the definition of WACC An

    An investment bank computed my WACC. The report is as: “the definition of the WACC is defined as WACC = RF + βu (RM – RF); here RF being the risk-free rate and βu the unleveraged beta and RM the market risk rate.” It is differ from what we

  • Q : Efficiency Ratios Efficiency Ratios :

    Efficiency Ratios: These ratios comprise Receivables Turnover, Inventory Turnover, Asset Turnover and Net Working Capital Turnover ratios. Efficiency ratios show the utilization of Assets of the company thus as to generate Revenue that is, the best ut

  • Q : Problem on annual mortgage payment You

    You just took out a variable-rate mortgage on your new home. The mortgage value is $100,000, the term is 30 years, and initially the interest rate is 8%. The interest rate is fixed for 5 years, after which the time rate will be adjusted according to the prevailing rat

  • Q : Applied approaches to theory development

    Discuss and distinguish between the following applied approaches to theory development:  true-income (income statement and balance sheet approaches), efficient markets, and predictive ability.  You may want to include in your discussion any articles or studies that either supported or u

  • Q : Financial statements The concept of

    The concept of conservatism has been influential in the development of accounting theory and practice.  A major effect of conservatism is that accountants tend to recognize losses but not gains.  For example, when the value of an asset is impaired, it is wri

  • Q : Problem on annual obligation payment

    ABC Corp. has a challenge: The CEO wants to set aside annual, end of year payments into a sinking fund account earning 5% over the next 6 years in order to retire $25 million in bonds that will be outstanding at that time. Determine the annual payment required each ye

  • Q : Explain investment of bank for

    When my company is not listed, therefore the investment banks apply an illiquidity premium. In fact, they say this is an illiquidity premium but then they call this a small cap premium. Only one of the banks, apparently based upon Tit

  • Q : Illustrates the Gordon and Shapiro

    What is the importance and the utility of the given formula: Ke = DIV(1+g)/P + g?

  • Q : Compute betas against local indexes

    Does it make any sense to compute betas against local indexes while a company has a great part of its operations outside such local market? I have two illustrations: BBVA and Santander.

  • Q : Assignment help for Financial Statement

    HW I: Show your approach to each problem (formulas, variables, etc.) You can use Excel sheet formulas to show the work or use the Finance calculator terms. For the ABC answers: choose the correct answer and delete the rest.