--%>

How present value of tax shields be calculated

I have two valuations of the company that we set as an objective. Within one of them, the present value of tax shields (D Kd T) computed using Ku (required return to unlevered equity) and, in one, by using Kd (required return to debt). The second valuation is too higher than the first one, but here which of the two is better?

E

Expert

Verified

Fernández (2001) demonstrates that discounting the tax shields along with the Ku and the WACC is not right. There are six habitual expressions to compute the value of tax shields that are frequently used. Just three of them are valid (they have a theoretical origin):

Myers (1974) and Modigliani-Miller (1963), while the company plans to return the existing debt without making a newest one; Miles-Ezzell (1980) while the company plans its debt proportionally to market value of shares; and also Fernández (2004), while the company plans its debt proportionally to book value of the assets or shares.

Fernández (2004): VTS = VA [D Ku T; Ku].

Miles-Ezzell (1980): VA[Ku; D T Kd] (1+Ku)/ (1+Kd)

Myers (1974) and Modigliani-Miller (1963): VTS = VA[Kd; D T Kd]. Other incorrect formulae to calculate the value of tax shields are:

Damodaran (1994): VA [Ku; DTKu – D (Kd – RF) (1–T)];

Practitioners: VA [Ku; DTKd – D(Kd – RF)]

Harris-Pringle (1985) y Ruback (1995, 2002): VA [Ku; D T Kd]

Myers (1974) has to be used only while it is possible to know with whole certainty the amount of the debt at any future instant. Miles y Ezzell (1980) has to be used only when the future debt is proportional to market value of the shares that we are not aware of any company which manages its debt in such a way. Fernández (2004) has to be used only when the risk of the future raise of the debt is the same to that of the FCF.

   Related Questions in Corporate Finance

  • Q : How present value of tax shields be

    I have two valuations of the company that we set as an objective. Within one of them, the present value of tax shields (D Kd T) computed using Ku (required return to unlevered equity) and, in one, by using Kd (required return to debt). The second valuation is too high

  • Q : Strategy of Bull Spread State when

    State when market is expected to go up then what is the Strategy of Bull Spread?

  • Q : Determining Profitable purchasing ABC

    ABC Corporation is interested in purchasing a machine which will cost $50,000, and it will depreciate it on the straight-line basis over a 5-year period. The machine is predicted to last for 7 years and then Milan will sell it for $5,000. The expected earnings before

  • Q : Problem on rules of the International

    RainFlower Trading Limited is a wholesaler of electronic calculators in Hong Kong. It has been importing goods from a Philippine manufacturer for eight years. The Philippine manufacturer had accepted payments in advance in the past. Recently, because of political turm

  • Q : Set of conflicts in reducing working

    Give an illustration of a set of conflicts encountered when attempting to reduce working capital?

  • Q : What are flow variables Flow variables

    Flow variables: Any variable, whose magnitude is evaluated over a time period, is termed as glow variable.

  • Q : Using the DCF method Your Corp, Inc.'s

    Your Corp, Inc.'s data is as follows:Beta; 1.30Recent dividend; $.90Expected dividend growth; 7%Expected return of the market; 14%Treasury Bills are yielding; 4%Most recent stock price; $65 A] Us

  • Q : Compute the present value of the

    Is this possible to value companies by computing the present value of the Economic Value Added (EVA)?

  • Q : How much confidence can an investor

    I heard conversation of the Earnings Yield Gap ratio, that is the difference among the inverse of the PER and the TIR on 10-year-bonds. This is said that if this ratio is positive then this is more advantageous to invest in equity. How much confidence can an investor

  • Q : Explain market efficiency hypothesis

    According to what I read inside a book, market efficiency hypothesis means that the expected average value of variations is zero in the shares price. Thus, the best estimate of the future price of a share is its price now, as this incorporates all the available inform