--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

How present value of tax shields be calculated

I have two valuations of the company that we set as an objective. Within one of them, the present value of tax shields (D Kd T) computed using Ku (required return to unlevered equity) and, in one, by using Kd (required return to debt). The second valuation is too higher than the first one, but here which of the two is better?

E

Expert

Verified

Fernández (2001) demonstrates that discounting the tax shields along with the Ku and the WACC is not right. There are six habitual expressions to compute the value of tax shields that are frequently used. Just three of them are valid (they have a theoretical origin):

Myers (1974) and Modigliani-Miller (1963), while the company plans to return the existing debt without making a newest one; Miles-Ezzell (1980) while the company plans its debt proportionally to market value of shares; and also Fernández (2004), while the company plans its debt proportionally to book value of the assets or shares.

Fernández (2004): VTS = VA [D Ku T; Ku].

Miles-Ezzell (1980): VA[Ku; D T Kd] (1+Ku)/ (1+Kd)

Myers (1974) and Modigliani-Miller (1963): VTS = VA[Kd; D T Kd]. Other incorrect formulae to calculate the value of tax shields are:

Damodaran (1994): VA [Ku; DTKu – D (Kd – RF) (1–T)];

Practitioners: VA [Ku; DTKd – D(Kd – RF)]

Harris-Pringle (1985) y Ruback (1995, 2002): VA [Ku; D T Kd]

Myers (1974) has to be used only while it is possible to know with whole certainty the amount of the debt at any future instant. Miles y Ezzell (1980) has to be used only when the future debt is proportional to market value of the shares that we are not aware of any company which manages its debt in such a way. Fernández (2004) has to be used only when the risk of the future raise of the debt is the same to that of the FCF.

   Related Questions in Corporate Finance

  • Q : Problem about commercial and fiscal

    A court assigned to me (as an auditor and economist) a valuation of a market butcher’s. The butcher’s did not give any simple income statements or any valuable information that I could use in my valuation. This is a small business with just two workers, th

    		•
  • Q : Cost of Equity AB Corporation has 16%

    AB Corporation has 16% cost of equity, 35% tax rate, and debt-to-equity ratio of 30%. XY Corporation has 30% tax rate and debt-to-equity ratio of 40%. Both AB and XY are in the same business of selling automotive parts. If the riskless rate is 4% and the expected retu

    		•
  • Q : Which frame work does not give very

    Which model of frame work does not provide the very good prices for bonds?

    		•
  • Q : Sinking Fund problem Berks Corporation

    Berks Corporation is expecting to have EBIT next year of $12 million, with a standard deviation of $6 million. Berks have $30 million in bonds with coupon of 10%, selling at par, which are being retired at the rate of $2 million annually. Berks also have 100,000 share

    		•
  • Q : What is Net Operating Profit after Tax

    What is Net Operating Profit after Tax (NOPAT)?

    		•
  • Q : Valuation & Merger analysis Problem

    Problem 21-1 Valuation Harrison Corporation is interested in acquiring Van Buren Corporation. Assume t

    		•
  • Q : Efficient Market Hypotheses Write

    Write Efficient Market Hypotheses in brief?

    		•
  • Q : Problem regarding purchasing machine

    Alger Corp needs to buy some construction equipment for $50,000 that has a helpful life of 4 years with no salvage value. The Alger utilizes straight-line depreciation. Alger contains a tax rate of 30%, and it employs a discount rate of 10%. The equipment will produce

    		•
  • Q : Who explained the high-peak/fat-tails

    Who explained the high-peak/fat-tails?

    		•
  • Q : Convertible Bonds-Corporate Bonds State

    State the term Convertible Bonds in Corporate Bonds?

    		•