--%>

How present value of tax shields be calculated

I have two valuations of the company that we set as an objective. Within one of them, the present value of tax shields (D Kd T) computed using Ku (required return to unlevered equity) and, in one, by using Kd (required return to debt). The second valuation is too higher than the first one, but here which of the two is better?

E

Expert

Verified

Fernández (2001) demonstrates that discounting the tax shields along with the Ku and the WACC is not right. There are six habitual expressions to compute the value of tax shields that are frequently used. Just three of them are valid (they have a theoretical origin):

Myers (1974) and Modigliani-Miller (1963), while the company plans to return the existing debt without making a newest one; Miles-Ezzell (1980) while the company plans its debt proportionally to market value of shares; and also Fernández (2004), while the company plans its debt proportionally to book value of the assets or shares.

Fernández (2004): VTS = VA [D Ku T; Ku].

Miles-Ezzell (1980): VA[Ku; D T Kd] (1+Ku)/ (1+Kd)

Myers (1974) and Modigliani-Miller (1963): VTS = VA[Kd; D T Kd]. Other incorrect formulae to calculate the value of tax shields are:

Damodaran (1994): VA [Ku; DTKu – D (Kd – RF) (1–T)];

Practitioners: VA [Ku; DTKd – D(Kd – RF)]

Harris-Pringle (1985) y Ruback (1995, 2002): VA [Ku; D T Kd]

Myers (1974) has to be used only while it is possible to know with whole certainty the amount of the debt at any future instant. Miles y Ezzell (1980) has to be used only when the future debt is proportional to market value of the shares that we are not aware of any company which manages its debt in such a way. Fernández (2004) has to be used only when the risk of the future raise of the debt is the same to that of the FCF.

   Related Questions in Corporate Finance

  • Q : Explain the definition of WACC An

    An investment bank computed my WACC. The report is as: “the definition of the WACC is defined as WACC = RF + βu (RM – RF); here RF being the risk-free rate and βu the unleveraged beta and RM the market risk rate.” It is differ from what we

  • Q : Define Effective Utilization of Funds

    Effective Utilization of Funds: It is just the decision to maximize the return on investment of funds. When finance manager is not capable to raise the return by investing fund in profitable assets or other profitable projects, company’s busines

  • Q : Commercial Banking Assignment Part I

    Part I Guidelines and requirements: The questions in Part I of this assignment are based on the materials covered in Units 1 and 2. Please write a short-ess

  • Q : Purchaing or leasing problem Crawford

    Crawford Corporation is planning to lease a machine for the next 4 years for an annual lease payment of $3,000 paid in advance, plus a non-refundable initial fee of $3,000. There is a 1-year delay for the tax benefits of leasing. Crawford may buy the machine, deprecia

  • Q : Mm ase Study 1 You work in Walt Disney

    ase Study 1 You work in Walt Disney Company's corporate finance and treasury department and have just been assigned to the team estimating later today. You quickly realize that the information you need is readily available online. 1) Go to http://finance.yahoo.com. under " Market Summary," you will

  • Q : Illustrates reserves are real money or

    The part of the net income which is not distributed to shareholders goes to reserves (to shareholders’ equity). As dividends shows real money, reserves are real money as well. Is it true?

  • Q : Illustrates financial consultant has

    A financial consultant obtains various valuations of my company when this discounts the Free Cash Flow (FCF) as opposed to when this uses the Equity Cash Flow. Is it correct?

  • Q : Types of Corporate Bonds What are the

    What are the various types of Corporate Bonds?

  • Q : Explain the way of estimating an average

    Explain the way of estimating an average.

  • Q : Cost of capital You have joined Zurich

    You have joined Zurich Pvt. Ltd as a Finance manager. You are given the following information: Zurich Pvt Ltd. is a diversified manufacturing firm dealing with electrical appliances. In 2012, the firm reported an operating income of Rs. 857.60 million and faced a tax rate of 35% on income. The