--%>

How present value of tax shields be calculated

I have two valuations of the company that we set as an objective. Within one of them, the present value of tax shields (D Kd T) computed using Ku (required return to unlevered equity) and, in one, by using Kd (required return to debt). The second valuation is too higher than the first one, but here which of the two is better?

E

Expert

Verified

Fernández (2001) demonstrates that discounting the tax shields along with the Ku and the WACC is not right. There are six habitual expressions to compute the value of tax shields that are frequently used. Just three of them are valid (they have a theoretical origin):

Myers (1974) and Modigliani-Miller (1963), while the company plans to return the existing debt without making a newest one; Miles-Ezzell (1980) while the company plans its debt proportionally to market value of shares; and also Fernández (2004), while the company plans its debt proportionally to book value of the assets or shares.

Fernández (2004): VTS = VA [D Ku T; Ku].

Miles-Ezzell (1980): VA[Ku; D T Kd] (1+Ku)/ (1+Kd)

Myers (1974) and Modigliani-Miller (1963): VTS = VA[Kd; D T Kd]. Other incorrect formulae to calculate the value of tax shields are:

Damodaran (1994): VA [Ku; DTKu – D (Kd – RF) (1–T)];

Practitioners: VA [Ku; DTKd – D(Kd – RF)]

Harris-Pringle (1985) y Ruback (1995, 2002): VA [Ku; D T Kd]

Myers (1974) has to be used only while it is possible to know with whole certainty the amount of the debt at any future instant. Miles y Ezzell (1980) has to be used only when the future debt is proportional to market value of the shares that we are not aware of any company which manages its debt in such a way. Fernández (2004) has to be used only when the risk of the future raise of the debt is the same to that of the FCF.

   Related Questions in Corporate Finance

  • Q : Strategy of Bull Spread State when

    State when market is expected to go up then what is the Strategy of Bull Spread?

  • Q : Tax benefits of lease FedEx would like

    FedEx would like to acquire 300 vans for its business. It can buy each van for $35,000, depreciate it completely over 5 years, and then sell it for $10,000. The tax rate of FedEx is 30%, and its cost of debt is 10%. Avis Fleet Rental will lease these vans to FedEx for

  • Q : What is the current example of a value

    What is the current example of a value company and would you buy it as an investment. Why or why not?

  • Q : Financing EBIT problem Rusk Inc needs

    Rusk Inc needs $50 million in new capital that it might obtain by selling bonds at par with coupon of 12% or by selling stock at $40 (net) per share. The current capital structure of Rusk consists of $300 million (face value) of 10% coupon bonds selling at 90 and 10 m

  • Q : Who explained market-neutral delta

    Who explained market-neutral delta hedging?

  • Q : Problem on EBIT ABC Corporation stock

    ABC Corporation stock sells at $27 per share and its dividend per share is $1.20. ABC has price-earnings ratio of 16. The company contains $40 million worth of bonds, selling at par, with 8.5% coupon. The EBIT of ABC is of $12 million and its tax rate is 30%. Calculat

  • Q : Explain the result of volatility

    Explain the result of volatility structure.

  • Q : Which parameter good measures value

    Which parameter good measures value creation; the Economic Value Added (EVA), the CVA (Cash Value Added) or the economic profit?

  • Q : Explain the working of breakthrough for

    Explain the working of breakthrough in low-discrepancy sequences used for option valuation.

  • Q : Illustrates reserves are real money or

    The part of the net income which is not distributed to shareholders goes to reserves (to shareholders’ equity). As dividends shows real money, reserves are real money as well. Is it true?