--%>

How present value of tax shields be calculated

I have two valuations of the company that we set as an objective. Within one of them, the present value of tax shields (D Kd T) computed using Ku (required return to unlevered equity) and, in one, by using Kd (required return to debt). The second valuation is too higher than the first one, but here which of the two is better?

E

Expert

Verified

Fernández (2001) demonstrates that discounting the tax shields along with the Ku and the WACC is not right. There are six habitual expressions to compute the value of tax shields that are frequently used. Just three of them are valid (they have a theoretical origin):

Myers (1974) and Modigliani-Miller (1963), while the company plans to return the existing debt without making a newest one; Miles-Ezzell (1980) while the company plans its debt proportionally to market value of shares; and also Fernández (2004), while the company plans its debt proportionally to book value of the assets or shares.

Fernández (2004): VTS = VA [D Ku T; Ku].

Miles-Ezzell (1980): VA[Ku; D T Kd] (1+Ku)/ (1+Kd)

Myers (1974) and Modigliani-Miller (1963): VTS = VA[Kd; D T Kd]. Other incorrect formulae to calculate the value of tax shields are:

Damodaran (1994): VA [Ku; DTKu – D (Kd – RF) (1–T)];

Practitioners: VA [Ku; DTKd – D(Kd – RF)]

Harris-Pringle (1985) y Ruback (1995, 2002): VA [Ku; D T Kd]

Myers (1974) has to be used only while it is possible to know with whole certainty the amount of the debt at any future instant. Miles y Ezzell (1980) has to be used only when the future debt is proportional to market value of the shares that we are not aware of any company which manages its debt in such a way. Fernández (2004) has to be used only when the risk of the future raise of the debt is the same to that of the FCF.

   Related Questions in Corporate Finance

  • Q : International financial what can we

    what can we expanded opportinity set of international finance?

  • Q : Problem on Stock per share value ABC

    ABC Company plans to buy back 1 million shares of its own stock from its cash reserves at $50 a share. This will raise the bankruptcy costs by $10 million, and the debt/assets ratio from 35% to 40%. The income tax rate of the company is 30%. Determine the value of the

  • Q : Problem on annual obligation payment

    ABC Corp. has a challenge: The CEO wants to set aside annual, end of year payments into a sinking fund account earning 5% over the next 6 years in order to retire $25 million in bonds that will be outstanding at that time. Determine the annual payment required each ye

  • Q : What did better mean specified by

    What did ‘better’ mean specified with Markowitz questioned regarding portfolio selection?

  • Q : Is cash flow is a flow of cash to

    The often known as "cash flow" that is net income plus depreciation, is a flow of cash, but is this a flow to the company or to the shareholders?

  • Q : What is EBITDA What are Earnings before

    What are Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)?

  • Q : Applied approaches to theory development

    Discuss and distinguish between the following applied approaches to theory development:  true-income (income statement and balance sheet approaches), efficient markets, and predictive ability.  You may want to include in your discussion any articles or studies that either supported or u

  • Q : Define Economy Impacts Economy Impacts

    Economy Impacts: An upcoming economy is indicated by rise in stock market, as stock market is primary indicator of a economic strength of a country. Progressing economy results in market boom. Yield of companies’ increases on improving economy,

  • Q : Minimum annual savings problem XYZ

    XYZ Company is interested in purchasing a new corporate jet for $6 million. This will depreciate the jet completely in 5 years and then sell it for $5 million. The jet will utilize $60,000 in fuel annually, and its maintenance will be $40,000 yearly. The tax rate of X

  • Q : Explain market efficiency hypothesis

    According to what I read inside a book, market efficiency hypothesis means that the expected average value of variations is zero in the shares price. Thus, the best estimate of the future price of a share is its price now, as this incorporates all the available inform