--%>

How present value of tax shields be calculated

I have two valuations of the company that we set as an objective. Within one of them, the present value of tax shields (D Kd T) computed using Ku (required return to unlevered equity) and, in one, by using Kd (required return to debt). The second valuation is too higher than the first one, but here which of the two is better?

E

Expert

Verified

Fernández (2001) demonstrates that discounting the tax shields along with the Ku and the WACC is not right. There are six habitual expressions to compute the value of tax shields that are frequently used. Just three of them are valid (they have a theoretical origin):

Myers (1974) and Modigliani-Miller (1963), while the company plans to return the existing debt without making a newest one; Miles-Ezzell (1980) while the company plans its debt proportionally to market value of shares; and also Fernández (2004), while the company plans its debt proportionally to book value of the assets or shares.

Fernández (2004): VTS = VA [D Ku T; Ku].

Miles-Ezzell (1980): VA[Ku; D T Kd] (1+Ku)/ (1+Kd)

Myers (1974) and Modigliani-Miller (1963): VTS = VA[Kd; D T Kd]. Other incorrect formulae to calculate the value of tax shields are:

Damodaran (1994): VA [Ku; DTKu – D (Kd – RF) (1–T)];

Practitioners: VA [Ku; DTKd – D(Kd – RF)]

Harris-Pringle (1985) y Ruback (1995, 2002): VA [Ku; D T Kd]

Myers (1974) has to be used only while it is possible to know with whole certainty the amount of the debt at any future instant. Miles y Ezzell (1980) has to be used only when the future debt is proportional to market value of the shares that we are not aware of any company which manages its debt in such a way. Fernández (2004) has to be used only when the risk of the future raise of the debt is the same to that of the FCF.

   Related Questions in Corporate Finance

  • Q : Shall we use the arithmetic mean or the

    The market risk premium is the difference between the historical return on the stock market and the return on bonds. But how many years does “historical” imply? Shall we use the arithmetic mean or the geometric one?

  • Q : Define Cash to cash cycle Cash to cash

    Cash to cash cycle: The concept of cash to cash cycle is financial performance standard, which is associated with the management of a firm’s working capital. The definition of cash to cash or cash conversion cycle is “the length of time a

  • Q : Is Capital Cash Flow identical with

    Is Capital Cash Flow identical with Free Cash Flow?

  • Q : Difference between intrinsic value and

    XYZ explained the difference between intrinsic value and book value in terms of the money spent on a college education. Please provide another example using a different simile.

  • Q : Problem about commercial and fiscal

    A court assigned to me (as an auditor and economist) a valuation of a market butcher’s. The butcher’s did not give any simple income statements or any valuable information that I could use in my valuation. This is a small business with just two workers, th

  • Q : Compute betas against local indexes

    Does it make any sense to compute betas against local indexes while a company has a great part of its operations outside such local market? I have two illustrations: BBVA and Santander.

  • Q : Porters Primary activities Porter’s

    Porter’s Primary activities: 1. Inbound Logistics: • Suppliers’ details.• Storage details with respect to materials.• Details regarding pl

  • Q : Llustrate illiquidity risk and small

    My investment bank told me that beta given by Bloomberg incorporates the illiquidity risk and small cap premium since Bloomberg does well-known Bloomberg adjustment formula. Is it true?

  • Q : Explain Straddle and Strangle Straddle

    Straddle & Strangle: In the case of shorting butterfly spread, it can be seen that the gains are limited. However, there exists another strategy known as straddle which produces unlimited gains. This strategy benefits when the trader expects that

  • Q : Determine the future value What would

    What would the future value after 5 years of $100 be at 10% compound interest?