--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Formally adopt inflation targeting

Question: Why might it be difficult for the Fed to formally adopt inflation targeting?  Would inflation targeting be a good policy for the Fed in the present economic environment?

Answer:

The most important part of the inflation targeting debate is about the optimal level of inflation. While many people believe that it should be in the range of 2%, it is difficult to ascertain the actual optimal level. Again, if the rate is fixed to 2%, then the Fed will have limited scope for a cut back in the interest rates, which might be required periodically to boost investment. Another case in point is that empirical evidence has suggested that US has experienced lowest level of unemployment when the inflation rate was in the range of 3-5%.

Another problem is that the inflation targeting itself might not be efficient, asset price and hence the asset market control will also become important if the goals of inflation targeting are to be realized. In the present economic scenario, when the economy needs stimulus, and investment levels are quite low with high level of unemployment, inflation targeting does not seem to be a good policy measure. There is a need for an increase in the aggregate demand, which if materializes, will lead to an increase in inflation. And if inflation targeting is in place, the interest rates will have to be hiked, which will hamper recovery.

 

   Related Questions in Business Economics

  • Q : Raising consumer surplus problem For

    For the question below, utilize the given information. The market for gizmos is competitive, with an increasing sloping supply curve and a downward sloping demand curve. With no govt. intervention, the equilibrium price is $25 and the equilibrium quantity is 10,000 gi

    		•
  • Q : Exploit consumers in highly competitive

    This is difficult for firms within highly competitive markets to exploit consumers since: (i) consumer advocates organize boycotts that generate bad publicity. (ii) market pressures force fair distributions of products. (iii) the government sets price

    		•
  • Q : Guardian implies that there really is

    Evaluate and explain the statements: “Market is its own guardian implies that there really is an invisible hand or taskmaster that watches over the decision makers in the marketplace”

    		•
  • Q : Problem regarding supplies-demands and

    The new supply and demand curves within University City are S0 and D0. But after the county commission imposed a $3 per six-pack excise tax upon beer: (1) demand fell to D1 from the perspectives of beer dealers. (2) co

    		•
  • Q : Factor Price Equalization theorem

    Please answer each of the exercises below. While you may work together on the homework, you must turn in your own work (in your own words). Homework must be handed in at the beginning of class on the due date unless other arrangements have been made. No late homework will be accepted. Homework wi

    		•
  • Q : Cost of debt and Equity Cost of debt =

    Cost of debt= (1-tax rate)* interest rate * (debt ÷capital employed)Cost of equity = risk free rate + market premium (equity shareholders funds÷ capital employed)

    		•
  • Q : Need urgent help need urgent help in

    need urgent help in business economics, please suggest

    		•
  • Q : Speculators decreases price volatility

    Speculators decrease price volatility through, in effect, changing demand curves: (w) out at low prices, and shifting supply curves out at high prices. (x) out at low prices, and shifting supply curves within at low p

    		•
  • Q : Speculators activities over the long-run

    Over the long-run the speculators activities are tend to: (1) decrease the volatility of prices. (2) attract legal attention and result in imprisonment. (3) increase the level and volatility of prices both. (4) yield tremendous profits and raise costs

    		•
  • Q : Distinguish between allocative

    Distinguish between allocative efficiency and productive efficiency. Give an illustration of achieving productive, but not allocative, efficiency?

    		•