--%>

Formally adopt inflation targeting

Question: Why might it be difficult for the Fed to formally adopt inflation targeting?  Would inflation targeting be a good policy for the Fed in the present economic environment?

Answer:

The most important part of the inflation targeting debate is about the optimal level of inflation. While many people believe that it should be in the range of 2%, it is difficult to ascertain the actual optimal level. Again, if the rate is fixed to 2%, then the Fed will have limited scope for a cut back in the interest rates, which might be required periodically to boost investment. Another case in point is that empirical evidence has suggested that US has experienced lowest level of unemployment when the inflation rate was in the range of 3-5%.

Another problem is that the inflation targeting itself might not be efficient, asset price and hence the asset market control will also become important if the goals of inflation targeting are to be realized. In the present economic scenario, when the economy needs stimulus, and investment levels are quite low with high level of unemployment, inflation targeting does not seem to be a good policy measure. There is a need for an increase in the aggregate demand, which if materializes, will lead to an increase in inflation. And if inflation targeting is in place, the interest rates will have to be hiked, which will hamper recovery.

 

   Related Questions in Business Economics

  • Q : Gross domestic product Question Would

    Question Would "Victory Points" be a measure of player's "GDP"? If not, then how would you calculate a player's GDP?

  • Q : Heterodox pricing process Compare the

    Compare the costing and pricing process of heterodox pricing process to the procedures utilized in neoclassical microeconomics to set prices.  In what ways are heterodox prices altered from neoclassical prices?

  • Q : Consumer and producer surplus in the

    In perfectly competitive market, the market demand and market supply curves are provided by Qd = 1000 −10Pd and Qd = 30Ps. Assume that the government gives a subsidy of $20 per unit to each and every seller in the mark

  • Q : Free rider problem Question: Explain

    Question: Explain why the free rider problem makes it difficult for perfectly competitive markets to provide the Pareto efficient level of a public good. Answer:

  • Q : Competition and the Invisible Hand

    Elucidate: Competition and the “Invisible Hand”?

  • Q : When productive resources are utilized

    While productive resources are utilized efficiently: (w) prices greatly exceed production costs for current outputs. (x) opportunity costs are at their minimums for all goods. (y) domestic production exceeds the value of foreign output. (z) the value

  • Q : Expiation of Economists for Economic

    Please help me to solve the problem of economic that is given below: Economists describe economic costs as like: (w) money outlays. (x) accounting cost. (y) opportunity cost. (z) v

  • Q : Rivalry for various types of resources

    Intermediaries ultimately prosper only when they give a service of decreasing: (1) demand for a good (2) prices paid to manufacturers of a good. (3) transaction costs. (4) rivalry for various types of resources. (5) cut-throat competition into markets

  • Q : Illustrates inverse relationship

    Illustrates the inverse relationship between price and quantity?

  • Q : Exploit consumers in highly competitive

    This is difficult for firms within highly competitive markets to exploit consumers since: (i) consumer advocates organize boycotts that generate bad publicity. (ii) market pressures force fair distributions of products. (iii) the government sets price