--%>

Fiscal Monetary changes

With the general equilibrium framework in place, the stage is now set for introducing fiscal and monetary changes and analysing their effects on the general equilibrium. We will first introduce a fiscal change in the form of increase in deficit-financed expenditure, and then introduce a discretionary increase in money supply, and look into their effect on the equilibrium rate of interest and the income level. Finally, we will analyse the combined effects of the simultaneous fiscal and monetary changes.


Effect of fiscal changes in general equilibrium framework

The effect of change in government spending on the national income, ?Y = ?G X G-multiplier . But, in the general equilibrium framework, the result is significantly different. Why? This is the issue of this section. To begin with, recall the analysis of increase in deficit financed ?G of $100 bullion on the product market equilibrium. We gave shown there how a ?G  causes shift in the  IS  curve. Here, we discuss the effect of  ?G of $100 billion  on the general equilibrium. We know that ?G causes and upward shift in the is curve and, thereby, a rise in the equilibrium income. The new IS-function can be estimated as follows.

The demand side of the product market equilibrium equation reads as

I + G + ?G = 200 - 2000i + 100 = 300 - 2000i

And supply side, in our example, reads as  S +T = - 100 + 0.4Y . Recall also that by using these equations, we can derive a new IS  schedule with ?G = 100 . The process is reproduced below.

I + G + ?G = S + T

300 - 2000i = - 100 + 0.4Y

Y = 1000 - 5000i


The  ISt   schedule intersects the LM0   schedule at point  B  note that pre-?G  equilibrium was at point A. the shift in the equilibrium point from  A to B,  shows that, with ?G = $100 billion  and no change I money supply, the equilibrium level of income increases form $475 billion to $600 billion and interest rate rises to 8%.

This can also be proved algebraically given the  ISt  schedule in  and LM0   schedule as Y = 200 + 5000 I,  , the product and money market equilibrium equation can be written as, 

1000-5000i = 200 + 5000i

I = 0.08 or 8%

By substitution 0.08   for I   , we get the equilibrium Y   as 

Y = 1000 - 5000 (0.08)  

Y = 600 billion


It is important to note here that an increase in the government spending increases both the rate of interest and the level of income. If is more important to note that ?Y < ?G X G - multiplier . This is so because of what economists call crowding-out effect of public expenditure.

   Related Questions in Macroeconomics

  • Q : Backward shifting of incidence tax When

    When firms bear the legal incidence of a tax, this is backward shifted while: (1) firms burden consumers by raising their prices. (2) the tax burden is borne by workers in the form of lower wages. (3) resource suppliers seek higher factor payments to

  • Q : Net revenue when price increases Net

    Net revenue for Macho Man fake mustaches increases after the price raised from $5 to $7, pointing that demand faced by Macho Man was: (i) Relatively elastic. (ii) Relatively inelastic. (iii) Unitarily elastic. (iv) Perfectly inelastic. (v) Perfectly e

  • Q : Why value of multiplier is low In poor

    In poor countries people spend a big percentage of their income so that APC and MPC are high. Yet, the value of multiplier is low. Explain why?

  • Q : One party to a transaction deceives

    If one party to a transaction deceives another party prior to a deal be reached, this is termed as: (i) Bad luck. (ii) Adverse selection. (iii) Moral hazard. (iv) Polyandry. (v) Rational ignorance. Please someone suggest me the rig

  • Q : Perfectly substitutable outcome Firms

    Firms which serve customers who vision the firm’s output as perfectly substitutable for the outcomes of huge numbers of other firms confront: (i) Horizontal (that is, perfectly price elastic) demand curves. (ii) Predatory pricing from greater mo

  • Q : FX rates In June 2005, a Big Mac sold

    In June 2005, a Big Mac sold for 6,000 pesos in Colombia and $3.00 in the United States. The exchange rate in June 2005 was 2,300 pesos per dollar. So, on Big Mac purchasing power parity grounds the Colombian peso was

  • Q : Equal Marginal advantage law Assume

    Assume that you receive $18 worth of “jollies” (that is, satisfaction, utility or pleasure) from the very first hole of golf played on a particular day, and that your extra jollies from succeeding holes drops $1 for each and every hole played. You should p

  • Q : National income Gross domestic capital

    Gross domestic capital formation is always greater than gross fixed capital formation

  • Q : Development economics Government tax

    Government tax and transfer payments generally

  • Q : National income how to calculate

    how to calculate national income under value added method