--%>

Fiscal Monetary changes

With the general equilibrium framework in place, the stage is now set for introducing fiscal and monetary changes and analysing their effects on the general equilibrium. We will first introduce a fiscal change in the form of increase in deficit-financed expenditure, and then introduce a discretionary increase in money supply, and look into their effect on the equilibrium rate of interest and the income level. Finally, we will analyse the combined effects of the simultaneous fiscal and monetary changes.


Effect of fiscal changes in general equilibrium framework

The effect of change in government spending on the national income, ?Y = ?G X G-multiplier . But, in the general equilibrium framework, the result is significantly different. Why? This is the issue of this section. To begin with, recall the analysis of increase in deficit financed ?G of $100 bullion on the product market equilibrium. We gave shown there how a ?G  causes shift in the  IS  curve. Here, we discuss the effect of  ?G of $100 billion  on the general equilibrium. We know that ?G causes and upward shift in the is curve and, thereby, a rise in the equilibrium income. The new IS-function can be estimated as follows.

The demand side of the product market equilibrium equation reads as

I + G + ?G = 200 - 2000i + 100 = 300 - 2000i

And supply side, in our example, reads as  S +T = - 100 + 0.4Y . Recall also that by using these equations, we can derive a new IS  schedule with ?G = 100 . The process is reproduced below.

I + G + ?G = S + T

300 - 2000i = - 100 + 0.4Y

Y = 1000 - 5000i


The  ISt   schedule intersects the LM0   schedule at point  B  note that pre-?G  equilibrium was at point A. the shift in the equilibrium point from  A to B,  shows that, with ?G = $100 billion  and no change I money supply, the equilibrium level of income increases form $475 billion to $600 billion and interest rate rises to 8%.

This can also be proved algebraically given the  ISt  schedule in  and LM0   schedule as Y = 200 + 5000 I,  , the product and money market equilibrium equation can be written as, 

1000-5000i = 200 + 5000i

I = 0.08 or 8%

By substitution 0.08   for I   , we get the equilibrium Y   as 

Y = 1000 - 5000 (0.08)  

Y = 600 billion


It is important to note here that an increase in the government spending increases both the rate of interest and the level of income. If is more important to note that ?Y < ?G X G - multiplier . This is so because of what economists call crowding-out effect of public expenditure.

   Related Questions in Macroeconomics

  • Q : Define Macro Economics Macro Economics

    Macro Economics: Macro economics studies the economy as an entire.

  • Q : Paradox of Value problem I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Paradox of Value problem. Please help me in the following question. The Diamond Water Paradox occurs from the difficulties in differentiating between: (i) Consumer surplus and the total utility. (ii) Total utility and

  • Q : Fiscal measures to accurate

    Describe the fiscal measures to accurate the condition of deficient demand and excess demand. Answer: Fiscal measures are the government’s budgetary policy th

  • Q : Supply law and it's factors State the

    State the Law of supply and explain the factors that affecting supply of commodity

  • Q : Determine the marginal propensity to

    If disposable income increases from Rs. 1,000 to Rs. 1,100, savings increase by Rs. 30. Determine the marginal propensity to save and marginal propensity to consume?

  • Q : Consumer Equilibrium of two goods The

    The consumer reaches equilibrium for any two goods X and Y whenever the: (1) MUx/Px = MUy/Py. (2) MUx/MUy = Py/Px. (3) Utility from X equivalents the utility produced by Y. (4) Point of diminishing returns is arrived at. Can someon

  • Q : Problem on production function Consider

    Consider a model economy with a production function Y = K0.2(EL)0.8, where K is capital stock, L is labor input, and Y is output. The savings rate (s), which is defined as

  • Q : Why is tax not a capital receipt

    Illustrate, why is tax not a capital receipt?

  • Q : FDI WHAT ARE THE STRENGTH AND WEAKNESS

    WHAT ARE THE STRENGTH AND WEAKNESS OF THE THEORY OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT

  • Q : Problem on law of diminishing marginal

    According to law of diminishing marginal utility, the longer that Lee and Chris kiss: (i) the less invested each will be in ongoing this relationship. (ii) The nearer they are to reaching their joined production possibilities frontier. (iii) The more