--%>

Fiscal Monetary changes

With the general equilibrium framework in place, the stage is now set for introducing fiscal and monetary changes and analysing their effects on the general equilibrium. We will first introduce a fiscal change in the form of increase in deficit-financed expenditure, and then introduce a discretionary increase in money supply, and look into their effect on the equilibrium rate of interest and the income level. Finally, we will analyse the combined effects of the simultaneous fiscal and monetary changes.


Effect of fiscal changes in general equilibrium framework

The effect of change in government spending on the national income, ?Y = ?G X G-multiplier . But, in the general equilibrium framework, the result is significantly different. Why? This is the issue of this section. To begin with, recall the analysis of increase in deficit financed ?G of $100 bullion on the product market equilibrium. We gave shown there how a ?G  causes shift in the  IS  curve. Here, we discuss the effect of  ?G of $100 billion  on the general equilibrium. We know that ?G causes and upward shift in the is curve and, thereby, a rise in the equilibrium income. The new IS-function can be estimated as follows.

The demand side of the product market equilibrium equation reads as

I + G + ?G = 200 - 2000i + 100 = 300 - 2000i

And supply side, in our example, reads as  S +T = - 100 + 0.4Y . Recall also that by using these equations, we can derive a new IS  schedule with ?G = 100 . The process is reproduced below.

I + G + ?G = S + T

300 - 2000i = - 100 + 0.4Y

Y = 1000 - 5000i


The  ISt   schedule intersects the LM0   schedule at point  B  note that pre-?G  equilibrium was at point A. the shift in the equilibrium point from  A to B,  shows that, with ?G = $100 billion  and no change I money supply, the equilibrium level of income increases form $475 billion to $600 billion and interest rate rises to 8%.

This can also be proved algebraically given the  ISt  schedule in  and LM0   schedule as Y = 200 + 5000 I,  , the product and money market equilibrium equation can be written as, 

1000-5000i = 200 + 5000i

I = 0.08 or 8%

By substitution 0.08   for I   , we get the equilibrium Y   as 

Y = 1000 - 5000 (0.08)  

Y = 600 billion


It is important to note here that an increase in the government spending increases both the rate of interest and the level of income. If is more important to note that ?Y < ?G X G - multiplier . This is so because of what economists call crowding-out effect of public expenditure.

   Related Questions in Macroeconomics

  • Q : Changing value of multiplier ‘Over the

    ‘Over the precedent 30 years, and particularly as our entry into the EU, imports (and exports) as a proportion of GDP have increases considerably in the UK. What influence has this had on the value of multiplier in the UK?’

  • Q : Problem on rational consumption

    Whenever you dine at an “all-you-can-eat” buffet, the rational consumption prototype is to carry on eating till: (1) The restaurant goes bankrupt. (2) You have eaten as much food as it would encompass cost had you made your own meal at hom

  • Q : Tariffs Tariffs: -are also called

    Tariffs: -are also called import quotas. -may be imposed either to raise revenue (revenue tariffs) or to shield domestic producers from foreign competition (protective tariffs). -are per unit subsidies designed to promote exports. -are excise taxes on goods exported abroad.

  • Q : Principles of macroeconomics What are

    What are the “powers of the Federal Reserve

  • Q : Transactions demand for money The basic

    The basic determinant of the transactions demand for money is the

  • Q : Recovery of loans-capital receipt Why

    Why is recovery of loans taken as a capital receipt? Answer: Recovery of loans is always treated as a capital receipt since it leads to refuse in financial assets o

  • Q : Define Demand schedule What is Demand

    What is Demand schedule and how it is associated to demand curve?

  • Q : Value of the net benefits Whenever

    Whenever consumers paid an amount for water which reflects the value of the net benefits they obtain from consuming it, water would outcome: (1) Maximum consumer excess. (2) Zero consumer excess. (3) Total revenue equivalent to variable cost. (4) Zero

  • Q : POSSIBILITIES Possibilities Food

    Possibilities Food (millions of tons per year) Tractors (millions per year) A 0 30 B 4 28 C 8 24 D 12 20 E 16 14 F 20 8 G 24 0 a. Is it possible for this nation to produce thirty million tons of food per year? Why or why not. b. Is it possible for this nation to produce thirty million

  • Q : Paradox of Value-total utility and

    I have a problem in economics on Paradox of Value-total utility and marginal utility. Please help me in the following question. Water is more precious than diamonds when measured by _____, however less valuable when measured by _____. (i) Total cost, total benefit. (i