--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Fee-simple private property rights

I have a problem in economics on Resources and Products Flow Model. Please help me in the following question. “Fee-simple” private property rights permit you to: (1) Shoot trespassers who are on your land with no permission. (2) Refuse to lend your car to the neighbor. (3) Commit victimless crimes devoid of penalty. (4) Burn your home to assemble insurance. (5) Abuse your child.

Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the above options.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Illustrates a problem of Distributive

    Bob the Baker and Bill the Butcher while both would be willing to trade three loaves of bread for a pair of T-Bone steaks, but for several reasons they not include: (i) Bob must become a vegetarian so he doesn't contain to rely upon Bill. (ii) The economy has producti

    		•
  • Q : Opportunity cost of buying a new car I

    I need a good answer upon the topic of opportunity cost problems. What is the opportunity cost of buying a new car: (i) last dollar price one pays for this. (ii) Value of the old car traded within. (iii) Sticker pr

    		•
  • Q : Allocative Mechanisms and Efficiency

    Allotment of resources and goods through tradition or brute force will most probable outcome in: (i) Inadequately low production. (ii) Equivalent income distributions. (iii) Democratic resource allocation. (iv) Production possibilities growth.

  • Q : Consequence of the increased

    People would be least probable to be happier like a consequence of the increased accessibility of: (1) free goods. (2) economic resources. (3) superior technologies. (4) economic goods. (5) economic bads. Hello guys I want your adv

    		•
  • Q : Fee-simple private property rights I

    I have a problem in economics on Resources and Products Flow Model. Please help me in the following question. “Fee-simple” private property rights permit you to: (1) Shoot trespassers who are on your land with no permission. (2) Refuse to

    		•
  • Q : Explain TANSTAAFL TANSTAAFL is an

    TANSTAAFL is an acronym suggestive of that: (1) Tax agents never observe the awful influences from levies. (2) Tenants and needy must take all assets by landlords. (3) There ain't no all things like a free lunch. (4) Temperance and non satiety togethe

    		•
  • Q : Illustrates a case of entrepreneurs in

    The economic profits realized through organizing production, bearing uncertainty, taking risks and innovating are rewards to: (i) corporate managers. (ii) astute financial investors. (iii) corporate stockholders. (iv) creative inventors. (v) entrepreneurs.

  • Q : Gains from trade and economic consensus

    While considering current events and matters, economists and the common public seem to disagree relatively the most about: (i) what to do regarding the War in Iraq. (ii) whether Democrats or Republicans must win the next election. (iii) the relative costs and advantag

    		•
  • Q : Argument for infant industries to

    The argument for infant industries must be protected through competition through established foreign industries was first advanced through: (1) Richard List. (2) Gustav Schmoller. (3) David Ricardo. (4) Alexander Hamilton. (5) Thomas Robert Malthus. (6) early mercanti

    		•
  • Q : Unregulated market competition in

    Adam Smith’s well-known reference to an “invisible hand” implies that: (w) unregulated market competition improves economic welfare. (x) government must closely regulate monopolies. (y) pure competition is a divinely motivated market

    		•