--%>

Explains economic problem posed for chorus of Rolling Stones

The chorus of a Rolling Stones' song begins along with a line that is, "You can't always acquire what you wish for," that broadly explains the economic problem posed by which factor: (v) scarcity, (w) opportunity costs (x) human greed (y) diminishing returns and (z) marginal utility?

How can I solve my economics problems as given above? Please suggest me the accurate answer.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : When is an economic system economically

    An economic system is economically efficient when: (w) economic inequity has been removed. (x) any gains to someone through several possible rearrangement of goods or resources would need losses on the part of someone else. (y) more o

  • Q : When is an economic theory a positive

    Economic theory is a positive science only to the extent which this yields: (i) scientifically testable predictions. (ii) moral answers to ethical disputes. (iii) absolutely exact descriptions of how the world works. (iv) optimistic, quite than pessim

  • Q : Scaring people of a commodity or service

    Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for given problem that when are people of a commodity or service scarce: (1) gain from having this obtainable, (2) Wish more than the amount freely obtainable, (3) Say no to p

  • Q : What would illustrations of economic

    I need your answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion that illustrations of economic capital would contain a: (1) Garbage truck. (2) $10,000 ten-year United States Treasury bond. (3) College diploma. (4) Deeded right to

  • Q : Limits of Technological Advances

    Technological advances would not comprise: (i) Native Americans demonstrating Pilgrims how crops grow faster when rotten fish are dropped within with seeds they plant. (ii) pouring coffee through a coffee pot you obtained as a birthday gift. (iii) new

  • Q : Efficiently distribution of goods If

    If goods are efficiently distributed in between households, then all family is: (w) sure to lose when any income redistribution arises. (x) treated equitably. (y) and also off as possible without making any other family worse off. (z) able of gaining by a better distr

  • Q : Worse off and better off condition in

    When an economic change makes one person worse off and one thousand persons better off, this is: (1) good for society. (2) bad for society. (3) neither bad nor good for society. (4) not possible to assess without a va

  • Q : Explain the view of economist land to

    What is an economist describe “land” to encompass: (1) Such enhancements to natural resources as sidewalks and utility lines. (2) the productive muscle of the economy. (3) all equipment and machinery. (4) any type of additions to the econo

  • Q : Economic goals of all economic activity

    Adam Smith believed about the ultimate suitable objective of all economic activity is to maximizing: (w) wealth and power of the national government. (x) satisfaction of individuals by giving people along with the goods they want. (y) employment oppor

  • Q : Population increase-Economic Growth I

    I have a problem in economics on Population increase-Economic Growth. Please help me in the following question. The production-possibilities frontier can be shifted external by: (i) Removing unemployment. (ii) Lowering the market prices. (iii) A popul