Explain the commonsense criteria that of a measure of risk
Explain the commonsense criteria that of a measure of risk.
Expert
An ordinary criticism of traditional VaR has been that this does not satisfy all of specific commonsense criteria. Artzner et al. (1997) explained the following set of sensible criteria as a measure of risk, ρ(X) here X is a set of outcomes, must satisfy. These are as follows:
1. Sub-additivity: ρ(X + Y) ≤ ρ(X) + ρ(Y). This just says that when you add two portfolios together the total risk cannot get any worse than adding the two risks independently. Indeed, there may be cancellation outcomes or economies of scale which will make the risk better.
2. Monotonicity: If X ≤ Y for each scenario then ρ(X) ≥ ρ(Y).Portfolio’ risk will be better; if one it has better values than other under all scenarios.
3. Positive homogeneity: For all λ>0, ρ(λX) = λρ(X). Double your portfolio after that you doubles your risk.
4. Translation invariance: For all constant c, ρ(X + c) = ρ(X) − c. Imagine of just adding cash to a portfolio; it would come off your risk.
Risks measure which satisfies all of these termed as coherent.
What is the probability of probabilistic concepts occurrence in distribution?
In brief define each of the major types of international bond market instruments, noting their distinguishing characteristics.The major kind of international bond instruments & their distinguishing characteristics are as follows:
Describe the present economic crisis situation in Europe.
What is Generalized Auto Regressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity?
What is dynamically hedge?
What is a Poisson Process?
Normal 0 false false
State the term Calibration in financial model?
What is interest-rate model?
Why is traditional, simple VaR measurement not coherent?
18,76,764
1932718 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1427926
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!