Explain the commonsense criteria that of a measure of risk
Explain the commonsense criteria that of a measure of risk.
Expert
An ordinary criticism of traditional VaR has been that this does not satisfy all of specific commonsense criteria. Artzner et al. (1997) explained the following set of sensible criteria as a measure of risk, ρ(X) here X is a set of outcomes, must satisfy. These are as follows:
1. Sub-additivity: ρ(X + Y) ≤ ρ(X) + ρ(Y). This just says that when you add two portfolios together the total risk cannot get any worse than adding the two risks independently. Indeed, there may be cancellation outcomes or economies of scale which will make the risk better.
2. Monotonicity: If X ≤ Y for each scenario then ρ(X) ≥ ρ(Y).Portfolio’ risk will be better; if one it has better values than other under all scenarios.
3. Positive homogeneity: For all λ>0, ρ(λX) = λρ(X). Double your portfolio after that you doubles your risk.
4. Translation invariance: For all constant c, ρ(X + c) = ρ(X) − c. Imagine of just adding cash to a portfolio; it would come off your risk.
Risks measure which satisfies all of these termed as coherent.
How approximately is future profit calculated?
What are the benefits of “paying late” and how do companies try to do this?
A. What per visit price must be set for the service to break even? To earn an annual profit of $100,000
foreign countries to finance its current account deficits
Can I employ real probabilities for pricing derivatives? Answer: Yes you can. But you may require moving away from classical quantitative finance.
How are brokers compensated? What is the role of a broker in security transactions?
Who proposed a scientific foundation for Brownian motion?
Give an example of dynamic hedging.
What is Arbitrage?
Explain the effect of a change in the discount rate on present value.
18,76,764
1959463 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1447613
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!