--%>

Explain Tax rate increase.

A change in tax rate changes the IS equation, LM equation remaining the same. Let same, let us suppose that the government raises the tax rate from 20 percent to 25 percent. The rise in tax rate from t = 0.20 to t = 0.25 would change the IS equation by changing the consumption function with increase in tax rate, the consumption function changes form C = 100 + 100 + 0.60 Y, given in Eq. to 

C= 100 + 0.75 [Y - (40 + 0.25Y + 40)]

= 100 + 0.5625Y


With change in the consumption function, the new IS schedule (say, IS2) can be obtained as follows. 

IS2 schedule: 

Y = C + I + G + ?G

= 100 + 0.5625Y + 250 - 4i +200

= 1257.14 - 9.14i


Given the new IS function (IS2) in Eq. the new equilibrium interest rate can be worked out as follows.

Is2 = LM

1257.14 - 9.14i = 800 + 80i

89.14i = 457.14

I = 5.13 (percent)

Once interest rate is known equilibrium income with tax effect can be computed by substituting the interest rate (5.13%) into the IS2 or LM equation. By using IS2 function, we get

Y = 1257.14 - 9.14i = 1257.14 - 9.14 (5.13)

The negative effect of increase in tax rate on the equilibrium income equals income before tax - rise less income after tax-rise that is

Tax effect = $1311.10 bn - $1210.25 bn

$100.85 billion

This calculation shows that increasing tax rate form t = 0.20 to I = 0.25 decreases equilibrium income by $100.85 billion

   Related Questions in Macroeconomics

  • Q : IMF? In saying that the present system

    In saying that the present system of floating exchange rates is managed we mean that: IMF officials determine exchange rates on a day-to-day basis. countries that allow their exchange rate to move freely will lose their borrowing privileges with the IMF. the value of any IMF member's currency

  • Q : Merger and acquisition of firms

    Question: Suppose firm 1 and firm 2 merge. Call the new firm A. It has output xA and profit πA. Suppose there is Cournot competition after the merger. For now, we assume that the marginal cost of Firm A, the mer

  • Q : Principles of macroeconomics what are

    what are the four factor of economic growth

  • Q : Consumer Surplus definition Can someone

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The basic difference between the dollar amounts people would willingly to pay for a particular quantity of a good and the amounts that they do pay at a particular market price is termed as: (1

  • Q : Expanding consumption of a good I have

    I have a problem in economics on Expanding consumption of a good. Please help me in the following question. Your consumption of a good tends to expand if it’s: (i) Relative marginal utility surpasses its relative price. (ii) Total utility is les

  • Q : Potential GDP The hypothetical

    The hypothetical information in the following table shows what the economic situation will be in 2015 if the Fed does not use monetary policy: Year Potential GDP Real GDP Price Level 2014 $15.2 trillion $15.2 trillion 110.0 2015 $15.6 trillion $15.8 trillion

  • Q : From where Washington bureaucrats

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. Typical Washington bureaucrats derive the maximum consumer surplus from: (1) Publicity in the Senate hearings. (2) Consuming the water. (3) Writing complex regulation. (4) Eatin

  • Q : Marginal utility of good at its maximum

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The consumer maximizes utility whenever the spending patterns cause: (1) Marginal utility of each and every good to be at its maximum value. (2) Marginal utilities of each and every goods cons

  • Q : Domestic Investment & Economies

    Question: How will a fall in domestic investment affect the trade surplus and net capital outflows in the domestic economy, the trade deficit and capital inflows in the rest of the world, investment in both economi

  • Q : Microeconomic and macroeconomic effects

    Predictions which restricting international trade to protect specific industries and “infant” firms would (a) inefficiently decrease aggregate output and employment, (b) raise the market power of the protected firms and their workers, and