--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Explain Tachyon paradox

Tachyon paradox: The argument explaining that tachyons (should they subsist, of course) can’t carry an electric charge. For an imaginary-massed particle travelling faster than c, less energy the tachyon has, the faster it travels, till at zero energy the tachyon is travelling with unlimited velocity, or is transcendent. Now a charged tachyon at a specified (non-infinite) speed will be travelling faster than light in its own medium, and must emit Cherenkov radiation. The loss of this energy will obviously decrease the energy of the tachyon that will make it go faster, resultant in a runaway reaction where some charged tachyon will rapidly race off to the transcendence.

Though the above argument outcomes in a curious end, the meat of the tachyon paradox is this: In relativity, the transcendence of the tachyon is frame-dependent. That is, even as a tachyon may emerge to be transcendent in one frame, it would emerge to others to still have non-zero energy. However in this situation we have a condition where in one frame it would encompass come to zero energy and would stop emitting the Cherenkov radiation; however in the other frame it would still contain energy left and must be emitting Cherenkov radiation on its way to the transcendence. As they can’t both be true, by the relativistic arguments, tachyons can’t be charged.

This argument obviously does not make any account of the quantum mechanical treatments of tachyons that complicate the circumstances a huge deal.

   Related Questions in Physics

  • Q : Explain Gauss law for magnetic fields

    Gauss' law for magnetic fields (K.F. Gauss): The magnetic flux via a closed surface is zero (0); no magnetic charges present; in its differential form, div B = 0

    		•
  • Q : Define Ohm or SI unit of electric

    Ohm: Omega: O (after G. Ohm, 1787-1854) The derived SI unit of electric resistance, stated as the resistance among two points on a conductor whenever a constant potential difference of 1 V generates a current of 1 A in the conductor;

    		•
  • Q : Explain Correspondence limit or

    Explain Correspondence limit or Correspondence principle? Correspondence limit (N. Bohr): The limit at which a more common theory decreases to a more specialized theory when the situations that the

    		•
  • Q : Explain Null experiment Null

    Null experiment: The experiment which, after being performed, yields no outcome. The null experiments are just as significant as non-null experiments; when current theory predicts an observable result (or predicts there must be no observable result),

    		•
  • Q : What is Lawson criterion Lawson

    Lawson criterion (J.D. Lawson): This is the condition for the discharge of energy from a thermonuclear reactor. This is usually stated as the minimum value for the product of the density of the fuel particles and the energy imprisonme

    		•
  • Q : What is Simultaneity principle

    Simultaneity principle: The principle which all frames of reference will contain invariant simultaneity; that is, the two events perceived as simultaneous (that is, containing the similar time coordinate) in one frame will be apparent as simultaneous

    		•
  • Q : What is Standard quantum limit Standard

    Standard quantum limit: It is the limit obligatory on standard techniques of measurement by the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics.

    		•
  • Q : Define Singularity Singularity : The

    Singularity: The center of a black hole, where the curvature of space-time is maximal. At singularity, the gravitational tides deviate; no solid object can yet theoretically survive beating the singularity. Though singularities usually predict inconsi

    		•
  • Q : Define Tau-theta paradox Tau-theta

    Tau-theta paradox (1950s): Whenever two distinct kinds of kaons, tau and theta (nowadays tau refers to a totally different particle) decay, tau decays into three particles, whereas the theta decays into two. The tau and theta vary onl

    		•
  • Q : What is Cosmic censorship conjecture

    Cosmic censorship conjecture (R. Penrose, 1979): The conjecture, so far wholly undemonstrated in the context of general relativity, that all singularities (that is with the possible exception of the big bang singularity) are attended

    		•