--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Explain Tachyon paradox

Tachyon paradox: The argument explaining that tachyons (should they subsist, of course) can’t carry an electric charge. For an imaginary-massed particle travelling faster than c, less energy the tachyon has, the faster it travels, till at zero energy the tachyon is travelling with unlimited velocity, or is transcendent. Now a charged tachyon at a specified (non-infinite) speed will be travelling faster than light in its own medium, and must emit Cherenkov radiation. The loss of this energy will obviously decrease the energy of the tachyon that will make it go faster, resultant in a runaway reaction where some charged tachyon will rapidly race off to the transcendence.

Though the above argument outcomes in a curious end, the meat of the tachyon paradox is this: In relativity, the transcendence of the tachyon is frame-dependent. That is, even as a tachyon may emerge to be transcendent in one frame, it would emerge to others to still have non-zero energy. However in this situation we have a condition where in one frame it would encompass come to zero energy and would stop emitting the Cherenkov radiation; however in the other frame it would still contain energy left and must be emitting Cherenkov radiation on its way to the transcendence. As they can’t both be true, by the relativistic arguments, tachyons can’t be charged.

This argument obviously does not make any account of the quantum mechanical treatments of tachyons that complicate the circumstances a huge deal.

   Related Questions in Physics

  • Q : Why heat causes matter to expand What

    What is the reason that heat causes matter to expand? Briefly explain it.

    		•
  • Q : Define Lux or SI unit of the illuminance

    Lux: lx: The derived SI unit of the illuminance equivalent to the illuminance generated by a luminous flux of 1 lm distributed consistently over a region of 1 m2; it therefore has units of lm/m2.

    		•
  • Q : Explain Correspondence limit or

    Explain Correspondence limit or Correspondence principle? Correspondence limit (N. Bohr): The limit at which a more common theory decreases to a more specialized theory when the situations that the

    		•
  • Q : What is Universal age paradox Universal

    Universal age paradox: The two most straightforward techniques of computing the age of the Universe -- via red-shift measurements, and via stellar evolution -- outcome incompatible outcomes. Recent (in mid 1990s) measurements of the distances of far-a

    		•
  • Q : What is Permeability of free space or

    Permeability of free space: magnetic constant: mu_0: The ratio of the magnetic flux density in the substance to the external field strength for vacuum. It is equivalent to 4 pi x 10-7 H/m.

    		•
  • Q : Define Hoop conjecture Hoop conjecture

    Hoop conjecture (K.S. Thorne, 1972): The conjecture (as so far unproven, although there is substantial proof to support it) that a non-spherical object, non-spherically compressed, will only form a black hole whenever all parts of the

    		•
  • Q : Problem on two coupled coils connected

    In a series adding connection, two coupled coils have equivalent inductances LA; in a series opposing connection, LB. Determine an expression for M in terms of LA and LB. What does the outcome suggest?

    		•
  • Q : Define Luxon Luxon : The particle that

    Luxon: The particle that travels solely at c (that is the speed of light in vacuum). All luxons have a rest mass of exactly zero. Though they are mass less, luxons do take momentum. The photons are the prime illustration of luxons (that is the name it

    		•
  • Q : Kirchhoffs rules or Loop rule or Point

    Explain Kirchhoff's rules or Kirchhoff's Loop rule and Point rule? Kirchhoff's rules (G.R. Kirchhoff) <

    		•
  • Q : Define Olbers paradox Olbers' paradox

    Olbers' paradox (H. Olbers; 1826): If the Universe is infinite, consistent, and unchanging then the whole sky at night would be bright -- concerning as bright as the Sun. The further you stared out into space, the more stars there would be, and theref

    		•