--%>

Explain statement of normative economics hypotheses

Please help me to solve the problem of normative economics that is given below:

Normative economic hypotheses would contain the statement which: (i) Earth consist of five moons composed of blue cheese. (ii) 250,000 students have attended such university from 1900. (iii) Japanese should be the world’s official language. (iv) Paul McCartney wrote 57 Top 10 hits. (v) The world’s highest golf course is within Peru.

Can someone give their opinion with best solution about problem of economic as in above...

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : When a free good enjoyed by people is

    A free good is something which people enjoy but that is not scarce since: (w) people can costlessly have all they want. (x) people can purchase this along  with credit without containing to immediately pay for htis. (y) luxuries

  • Q : Explain about excellent economic

    Good economic theories are tends to be: (w) detailed pictures of real-world economic behavior. (x) based upon value judgments. (y) logical and simple explanations of real world behavior. (z) intended at maximizing capitalists' profits.

    Q : Value of the best foregone alternative

    The value of the best foregone alternative explains: (w) opportunity costs. (x) monetary costs. (y) irrational behavior through a consumer. (z) retail price margins over production costs. How can I solve my above e

  • Q : Economic problem in all societies Can

    Can someone explain/help me with best solution regarding problem of economic concept of societies... Within all societies, the economic problem involves: (1) learning to be content with what is obtainable, (2) Equa

  • Q : Decisions and owns resources The

    The Economic systems are categorized mainly according to: (1) Who makes decisions and who owns the resources. (2) Which political parties are in the power. (3) The extent of economic growth. (4) How efficiently resources are employed.

    Q : Current situation- better off without

    When it is possible to make somebody better off without making anybody worse off, the current condition is: (w) efficient. (x) inefficient. (y) optimal. (z) simply enhanced. How can I solve my problem of Economic Efficiency

  • Q : Majority worse off and minority better

    When an economic change makes a huge majority of the population worse off and a minute minority better off, the alteration is: (w) good for society because it made some people better off. (x) bad for society since only a few people ar

  • Q : Explain TANSTAAFL TANSTAAFL is an

    TANSTAAFL is an acronym suggestive of that: (1) Tax agents never observe the awful influences from levies. (2) Tenants and needy must take all assets by landlords. (3) There ain't no all things like a free lunch. (4) Temperance and non satiety togethe

  • Q : Population increase-Economic Growth I

    I have a problem in economics on Population increase-Economic Growth. Please help me in the following question. The production-possibilities frontier can be shifted external by: (i) Removing unemployment. (ii) Lowering the market prices. (iii) A popul

  • Q : When is Economics LEAST related with

    Economics like a science is LEAST related with how people: (w) try to make themselves happy. (x) utilize resources to try to satisfy their desires. (y) adjust to changes within government policies. (z) morally justify cheating upon their income taxes.