Explain Requirement for Liability under Tort Law
Explain the causation as a Requirement for Liability under Tort Law?
Expert
As is the case with negligence in general, a duty of care owed to the plaintiff and a breach of that duty are necessary but not sufficient conditions for liability. There must also be a clear causal link between the breach of the duty by the defendant and the injury suffered by the plaintiff. A plaintiff must have relied on the negligent misrepresentation before that misrepresentation can be said to have "caused" the plaintiff's loss. Reliance includes the willing cooperation of the plaintiff—an element not present in the commission of most torts. Therefore, proving causation is a subtle feat since a whole host of factors may enter into someone's decision, say, to buy shares, make a loan, buy a house, or undergo surgery.
Explain administration and settlement of a bankrupt's affairs?
Explain what do you mean by Implied Repudiation?
Did the Breach Cause the Harm?
Explain Seller's Title and the Nature of Goods?
Explain assignment and subletting of Standard Covenants?
Illustrate the capacity of a contract?
What are the Exceptions to the Parol Evidence Rule?
How many types of Compensatory damages? Explain?
Elucidate what do you mean by Corporate Financing?
What do you mean by contract law?
18,76,764
1933683 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1413390
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!