--%>

Explain Factorisation by trial division

Factorisation by trial division: The essential idea of factorisation by trial division is straightforward. Let n be a positive integer. We know that n is either prime or has a prime divisor less than or equal to √n. Therefore, if we divide n in turn by the primes 2, 3, 5,..., going possibly as far as [√n], we will either encounter a prime factor of n or otherwise be able to infer that n is prime. Repeating this process as often as necessary we will be able to nd all the prime
factors of n.

We can re fine this idea a little. If we fi nd on division by the prime p that p is a factor of n, then we can recommence trial divisions, but now dividing into the integer n/p rather than n. Also, the divisions can start with the prime p rather than restarting with 2, since we know that n, and hence n/p, has no prime factors smaller than p.

Further, we now need only carry out trial divisions by primes up to [√n/p]. Similarly for later steps.

An obvious difficulty with trial division is that we need either to store or to generate the primes up to [√n], and it may be better simply to divide by all the integers from 2 up to [√n], or, for example, by 2 and then all the odd numbers up to [√n].

Other improvements are possible too, but even with a few improvements the trial division algorithm is inefficient , and the algorithm is unsuitable for all but fairly small initial values of n.

Despite this, the trial division algorithm is in practical use. It is often used as a preliminary phase in a factorisation algorithm to nd the `small' prime factors of a number, and the remaining unfactorised part, containing all the `large' prime factors, is left to later phases.

Most numbers have some small prime factors. For example, it is not hard to show that about 88% of positive integers have a prime factor less than 100 and that about 91% have a prime factor less than 1000, and trial division will be good at finding these factors.

On the other hand, most numbers also have large prime factors. It can be shown (though not so easily) that a random positive integer n has a prime factor greater than √n with probability ln 2, or about 69% of the time, and of course if n is large, then trial division will not be of any help in nding such a factor.

   Related Questions in Mathematics

  • Q : Econ For every value of real GDP,

    For every value of real GDP, actual investment equals

  • Q : Bolzano-Weierstrass property The

    The Bolzano-Weierstrass property does not hold in C[0, ¶] for the infinite set A ={sinnx:n<N} : A is infinite; Show that has no “ limit points”.

  • Q : Problem on inventory merchandise AB

    AB Department Store expects to generate the following sales figures for the next three months:                            

  • Q : State Measuring complexity Measuring

    Measuring complexity: Many algorithms have an integer n, or two integers m and n, as input - e.g., addition, multiplication, exponentiation, factorisation and primality testing. When we want to describe or analyse the `easiness' or `hardness' of the a

  • Q : Numerical Analysis Hi, I was wondering

    Hi, I was wondering if there is anyone who can perform numerical analysis and write a code when required. Thanks

  • Q : What is Non-Logical Vocabulary

    Non-Logical Vocabulary: 1. Predicates, called also relation symbols, each with its associated arity. For our needs, we may assume that the number of predicates is finite. But this is not essential. We can have an infinite list of predicates, P

  • Q : Problem on augmented matrix Consider

    Consider the following system of linear equations.  (a) Write out t

  • Q : Profit-loss based problems A leather

    A leather wholesaler supplies leather to shoe companies. The manufacturing quantity requirements of leather differ depending upon the amount of leather ordered by the shoe companies to him. Due to the volatility in orders, he is unable to precisely predict what will b

  • Q : Theorem-Group is unique and has unique

    Let (G; o) be a group. Then the identity of the group is unique and each element of the group has a unique inverse.In this proof, we will argue completely formally, including all the parentheses and all the occurrences of the group operation o. As we proce

  • Q : Theorem-G satis es the right and left

    Let G be a group. (i) G satis es the right and left cancellation laws; that is, if a; b; x ≡ G, then ax = bx and xa = xb each imply that a = b. (ii) If g ≡ G, then (g-1)