--%>

Explain Factorisation by trial division

Factorisation by trial division: The essential idea of factorisation by trial division is straightforward. Let n be a positive integer. We know that n is either prime or has a prime divisor less than or equal to √n. Therefore, if we divide n in turn by the primes 2, 3, 5,..., going possibly as far as [√n], we will either encounter a prime factor of n or otherwise be able to infer that n is prime. Repeating this process as often as necessary we will be able to nd all the prime
factors of n.

We can re fine this idea a little. If we fi nd on division by the prime p that p is a factor of n, then we can recommence trial divisions, but now dividing into the integer n/p rather than n. Also, the divisions can start with the prime p rather than restarting with 2, since we know that n, and hence n/p, has no prime factors smaller than p.

Further, we now need only carry out trial divisions by primes up to [√n/p]. Similarly for later steps.

An obvious difficulty with trial division is that we need either to store or to generate the primes up to [√n], and it may be better simply to divide by all the integers from 2 up to [√n], or, for example, by 2 and then all the odd numbers up to [√n].

Other improvements are possible too, but even with a few improvements the trial division algorithm is inefficient , and the algorithm is unsuitable for all but fairly small initial values of n.

Despite this, the trial division algorithm is in practical use. It is often used as a preliminary phase in a factorisation algorithm to nd the `small' prime factors of a number, and the remaining unfactorised part, containing all the `large' prime factors, is left to later phases.

Most numbers have some small prime factors. For example, it is not hard to show that about 88% of positive integers have a prime factor less than 100 and that about 91% have a prime factor less than 1000, and trial division will be good at finding these factors.

On the other hand, most numbers also have large prime factors. It can be shown (though not so easily) that a random positive integer n has a prime factor greater than √n with probability ln 2, or about 69% of the time, and of course if n is large, then trial division will not be of any help in nding such a factor.

   Related Questions in Mathematics

  • Q : Probability and Stochastic assignment

    Introduction to Probability and Stochastic Assignment 1: 1. Consider an experiment in which one of three boxes containing microchips is chosen at random and a microchip is randomly selected from the box.

  • Q : Mathematical and Theoretical Biology

    Mathematical and theoretical biology is an interdisciplinary scientific research field with a range of applications in the fields of biology, biotechnology, and medicine. The field may be referred to as mathematical biology or biomathematics to stress the mathematical

  • Q : Numerical Analysis Hi, I was wondering

    Hi, I was wondering if there is anyone who can perform numerical analysis and write a code when required. Thanks

  • Q : State Fermat algorithm The basic Fermat

    The basic Fermat algorithm is as follows: Assume that n is an odd positive integer. Set c = [√n] (`ceiling of √n '). Then we consider in turn the numbers c2 - n; (c+1)2 - n; (c+2)2 - n..... until a perfect square is found. If th

  • Q : Problem on budgeted cash collections

    XYZ Company collects 20% of a month's sales in the month of sale, 70% in the month following sale, and 5% in the second month following sale. The remainder is not collectible. Budgeted sales for the subsequent four months are:     

  • Q : Problem on Fermats method A public key

    A public key for RSA is published as n = 17947 and a = 3. (i) Use Fermat’s method to factor n. (ii) Check that this defines a valid system and find the private key X.

    Q : Mathematical Method for Engineers The

     The function is clearly undefined at , but despite all of this the function does have a limit as approaches 0. a) Use MATLAB and ezplot to sketch for , and use the zoom on facility to guess the . You need to include you M-file, outp

  • Q : Formal logic It's a problem set, they

    It's a problem set, they are attached. it's related to Sider's book which is "Logic to philosophy" I attached the book too. I need it on feb22 but feb23 still work

  • Q : Theorem-G satis es the right and left

    Let G be a group. (i) G satis es the right and left cancellation laws; that is, if a; b; x ≡ G, then ax = bx and xa = xb each imply that a = b. (ii) If g ≡ G, then (g-1)

  • Q : What is Non-Logical Vocabulary

    Non-Logical Vocabulary: 1. Predicates, called also relation symbols, each with its associated arity. For our needs, we may assume that the number of predicates is finite. But this is not essential. We can have an infinite list of predicates, P