--%>

Explain Factorisation by trial division

Factorisation by trial division: The essential idea of factorisation by trial division is straightforward. Let n be a positive integer. We know that n is either prime or has a prime divisor less than or equal to √n. Therefore, if we divide n in turn by the primes 2, 3, 5,..., going possibly as far as [√n], we will either encounter a prime factor of n or otherwise be able to infer that n is prime. Repeating this process as often as necessary we will be able to nd all the prime
factors of n.

We can re fine this idea a little. If we fi nd on division by the prime p that p is a factor of n, then we can recommence trial divisions, but now dividing into the integer n/p rather than n. Also, the divisions can start with the prime p rather than restarting with 2, since we know that n, and hence n/p, has no prime factors smaller than p.

Further, we now need only carry out trial divisions by primes up to [√n/p]. Similarly for later steps.

An obvious difficulty with trial division is that we need either to store or to generate the primes up to [√n], and it may be better simply to divide by all the integers from 2 up to [√n], or, for example, by 2 and then all the odd numbers up to [√n].

Other improvements are possible too, but even with a few improvements the trial division algorithm is inefficient , and the algorithm is unsuitable for all but fairly small initial values of n.

Despite this, the trial division algorithm is in practical use. It is often used as a preliminary phase in a factorisation algorithm to nd the `small' prime factors of a number, and the remaining unfactorised part, containing all the `large' prime factors, is left to later phases.

Most numbers have some small prime factors. For example, it is not hard to show that about 88% of positive integers have a prime factor less than 100 and that about 91% have a prime factor less than 1000, and trial division will be good at finding these factors.

On the other hand, most numbers also have large prime factors. It can be shown (though not so easily) that a random positive integer n has a prime factor greater than √n with probability ln 2, or about 69% of the time, and of course if n is large, then trial division will not be of any help in nding such a factor.

   Related Questions in Mathematics

  • Q : Solve each equation by factoring A

    A college student invested part of a $25,000 inheritance at 7% interest and the rest at 6%.  If his annual interest is $1,670 how much did he invest at 6%?  If I told you the answer is $8,000, in your own words, using complete sentences, explain how you

  • Q : Problem on Datalog for defining

    The focus is on  the use of Datalog for defining properties  and queries on graphs. (a) Assume that P is some property of graphs  definable in the Datalog. Show that P is preserved beneath extensions  and homomo

  • Q : What is the probability that the film

    T.C.Fox, marketing director for Metro-Goldmine Motion Pictures, believes that the studio's upcoming release has a 60 percent chance of being a hit, a 25 percent chance of being a moderate success, and a 15 percent chance of being a flop. To test the accuracy of his op

  • Q : Simulation with Arena An office of

    An office of state license bureau has two types of arrivals. Individuals interested in purchasing new plates are characterized to have inter-arrival times distributed as EXPO(6.8) and service times as TRIA(808, 13.7, 15.2); all times are in minutes. Individuals who want to renew or apply for a new d

  • Q : Theorem-Group is unique and has unique

    Let (G; o) be a group. Then the identity of the group is unique and each element of the group has a unique inverse.In this proof, we will argue completely formally, including all the parentheses and all the occurrences of the group operation o. As we proce

  • Q : Law of iterated expectations for

     Prove the law of iterated expectations for continuous random variables. 2. Prove that the bounds in Chebyshev's theorem cannot be improved upon. I.e., provide a distribution that satisfies the bounds exactly for k ≥1, show that it satisfies the bounds exactly, and draw its PDF. T

  • Q : Define Big-O notation Big-O notation :

    Big-O notation: If f(n) and g(n) are functions of a natural number n, we write f(n) is O(g(n)) and we say f is big-O of g if there is a constant C (independent of n) such that f

  • Q : Containee problem For queries Q 1 and Q

    For queries Q1 and Q2, we say Q1 is containedin Q2, denoted Q1 C Q2, iff Q1(D) C Q2

  • Q : Define terms Terms : Terms are defined

    Terms: Terms are defined inductively by the following clauses.               (i) Every individual variable and every individual constant is a term. (Such a term is called atom

  • Q : Test Please read the assignment

    Please read the assignment carefully and confirm only if you are 100% sure. Please go through below mentioned guidelines and penalties: • Your solution must be accurate and complete. • Please do not change Subject Title of the Email. • Penalty clause will be applied in case of delayed or plag