--%>

Explain Factorisation by trial division

Factorisation by trial division: The essential idea of factorisation by trial division is straightforward. Let n be a positive integer. We know that n is either prime or has a prime divisor less than or equal to √n. Therefore, if we divide n in turn by the primes 2, 3, 5,..., going possibly as far as [√n], we will either encounter a prime factor of n or otherwise be able to infer that n is prime. Repeating this process as often as necessary we will be able to nd all the prime
factors of n.

We can re fine this idea a little. If we fi nd on division by the prime p that p is a factor of n, then we can recommence trial divisions, but now dividing into the integer n/p rather than n. Also, the divisions can start with the prime p rather than restarting with 2, since we know that n, and hence n/p, has no prime factors smaller than p.

Further, we now need only carry out trial divisions by primes up to [√n/p]. Similarly for later steps.

An obvious difficulty with trial division is that we need either to store or to generate the primes up to [√n], and it may be better simply to divide by all the integers from 2 up to [√n], or, for example, by 2 and then all the odd numbers up to [√n].

Other improvements are possible too, but even with a few improvements the trial division algorithm is inefficient , and the algorithm is unsuitable for all but fairly small initial values of n.

Despite this, the trial division algorithm is in practical use. It is often used as a preliminary phase in a factorisation algorithm to nd the `small' prime factors of a number, and the remaining unfactorised part, containing all the `large' prime factors, is left to later phases.

Most numbers have some small prime factors. For example, it is not hard to show that about 88% of positive integers have a prime factor less than 100 and that about 91% have a prime factor less than 1000, and trial division will be good at finding these factors.

On the other hand, most numbers also have large prime factors. It can be shown (though not so easily) that a random positive integer n has a prime factor greater than √n with probability ln 2, or about 69% of the time, and of course if n is large, then trial division will not be of any help in nding such a factor.

   Related Questions in Mathematics

  • Q : Formal logic It's a problem set, they

    It's a problem set, they are attached. it's related to Sider's book which is "Logic to philosophy" I attached the book too. I need it on feb22 but feb23 still work

  • Q : Problem on Nash equilibrium In a

    In a project, employee and boss are working altogether. The employee can be sincere or insincere, and the Boss can either reward or penalize. The employee gets no benefit for being sincere but gets utility for being insincere (30), for getting rewarded (10) and for be

  • Q : Numerical solution of PDE i want you to

    i want you to solve this assignment. this consist of two parts theoretical and coding. the code has to be created by you. no modified or copying code. you have to mention the exact solution and the proportion error. also you have to explain the sketch that you get from the code. these information

  • Q : Calculus I need it within 4 hours. Due

    I need it within 4 hours. Due time March 15, 2014. 3PM Pacific Time. (Los Angeles, CA)

  • Q : Containee problem For queries Q 1 and Q

    For queries Q1 and Q2, we say Q1 is containedin Q2, denoted Q1 C Q2, iff Q1(D) C Q2

  • Q : How to get calculus homework done from

    How to get calculus homework done from tutor

  • Q : State Prime number theorem Prime number

    Prime number theorem: A big deal is known about the distribution of prime numbers and of the prime factors of a typical number. Most of the mathematics, although, is deep: while the results are often not too hard to state, the proofs are often diffic

  • Q : Bolzano-Weierstrass property The

    The Bolzano-Weierstrass property does not hold in C[0, ¶] for the infinite set A ={sinnx:n<N} : A is infinite; Show that has no “ limit points”.

  • Q : Numerical Analysis Hi, I was wondering

    Hi, I was wondering if there is anyone who can perform numerical analysis and write a code when required. Thanks

  • Q : Law of iterated expectations for

     Prove the law of iterated expectations for continuous random variables. 2. Prove that the bounds in Chebyshev's theorem cannot be improved upon. I.e., provide a distribution that satisfies the bounds exactly for k ≥1, show that it satisfies the bounds exactly, and draw its PDF. T