--%>

Explain about the positive economic statements

Positive economic statements: (1) are factual and can never be wrong. (2) predict political viewpoints. (3) are attempts to explain economic relationships. (4) estimate the fairness of social programs. (5) can resolve the matter of equity.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Entry-exit of competitive firms in long

    When a typical firm in a perfectly competitive industry is earning profits, in that case: w) all firms will carry on earning profits. x) new firms will enter into the long run causing market supply to reduce, market price to rise and

  • Q : Define the positive economics Please

    Please guys help me to solve out this problem that positive economics, which: (w) is accepted like true through all economists. (x) is less technical than normative economics. (y) involves statements which, when false, could be proven false. (z) addre

  • Q : With whom is Economists LEAST concerned

    Economists are LEAST related along with the: (w) gains and losses from changes in government policies. (x) adjustments people make when tax structures change. (y) causes of inflation and unemployment. (z) ethics of political campaigning.

  • Q : Criterion for distributing The

    The requirements criterion for distributing income entails: (1) Government costless offering all goods required for survival. (2) High administrative costs as determining someone else’s wants are difficult. (3) Dividing the national income unifo

  • Q : Explain statement of normative

    Please help me to solve the problem of normative economics that is given below: Normative economic hypotheses would contain the statement which: (i) Earth consist of five moons composed of blue che

  • Q : Explain economics as the study of

    Economics is generally explained as the study of how societies and individuals: (1) make options about work and the division of labor, (2) try to maximize their financial wealth and incomes, (3) answer the fundamental economic questions of "Why, Where, and When", (4)

  • Q : Majority worse off and minority better

    When an economic change makes a huge majority of the population worse off and a minute minority better off, the alteration is: (w) good for society because it made some people better off. (x) bad for society since only a few people ar

  • Q : Governmental allocations of non-human

    The fundamental foundations of a capitalist system do not comprise: (1) Supplies and demands. (2) Private property rights. (3) Governmental allocations of non-human resources. (4) Laissez faire policies. (5) Market-determined prices and outputs.

  • Q : Define cut costs without reducing the

    A firm which could cut costs without reducing the value of its output is experiencing as: (i) Allocative inefficiency. (ii) Productive inefficiency. (iii) Distributive inefficiency. (iv) Technological decline. Can

  • Q : Moral dimensions of social decisions in

    Positive economics is LEAST related with the: (w) allocation of economic resources. (x) conflict of obtainable resources and societal needs. (y) mechanisms by that resources are used to satisfy societal requirements. (z) moral dimensions of social dec