--%>

Experiencing the Economies of Scope

A soft drink bottler which finds it cost efficient and gainful to deliver the chips and other snack foods all along with cola would be experiencing: (i) Economies of scope. (ii) Positive psychic income. (iii) Economies of scale. (iv) Economies of structure. (v) Diseconomies of the scale.

Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Price discriminate by unregulated

    Unregulated monopolistic firms which do not price discriminate do NOT: (i) have power as price makers. (ii) dominate the supply side of the market. (iii) select profit maximizing price/quantity combinations from the market demand curv

  • Q : Law of demand is the price in the "law

    is the price in the "law of demand" a relative price or an absolute price

  • Q : Monopsonistic Exploitation problem In

    In equilibrium for the firm with power to adjust the salary it pays, then the rate of monopsonistic exploitation equivalents any difference among: (i) VMP and MFC. (ii) MRP and MFC. (iii) P and MC. (iv) MRP and w. (v) MR and w. Fin

  • Q : Price elasticity of supply problem The

    The price elasticity of supply generally evaluates the ratio of relative: (i) Gain to the amounts firms supply at different prices. (ii) Price increase need to induce a firm to raise output. (iii) Change in the quantity supplied to a associative chang

  • Q : Emerging by price discrimination

    Oligopolies are least expected to emerge due to: (1) economies of scale. (2) price discrimination. (3) strategic barriers to entry. (4) mergers. (5) legal barriers to entry. Can anybody suggest me the proper explan

  • Q : Law of demand is price in the law of

    is price in the law of demand an absolute or relative price

  • Q : General law of demand I have problem in

    I have problem in this question based on law of demand. Provide me correct answer of this. Described the circumstances in which the "general law of demand" not hold?

  • Q : Long run equilibrium for a purely

    In long-run equilibrium for a purely competitive firm: (w) MC = P = MR = min.(LRAC). (x) MC = TR = PQ = AVC. (y) LRAC = PQ = TVC + TFC = MR. (z) P = Q = wL + rK = Y. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation fo

  • Q : Hire labor at any amount in purely

    When this purely competitive firm can hire any amount of labor at pre hour wage of $9 per worker, in this given figure, as it will hire: (1) L2 workers. (2) L3 workers. (3) L4 workers. (4) L5 workers. (5) L<

  • Q : Problem regarding rise in quantity

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The raise in the quantity supplied of frozen vegetarian lasagna would be most probable to outcome from raise in the: (i) cost of ingredients in the vegetarian lasagna. (ii) Numb