--%>

Exchange rate in purchasing power parity

Question:

In June 2005, a Big Mac sold for 6,000 pesos in Colombia and $3.00 in the United States.  The exchange rate in June 2005 was 2,300 pesos per US Dollar.  So, on Big Mac purchasing power parity grounds the Colombian peso was i. ___________________________.
ii. Briefly Explain?

Answer:

At the going exchange rate, the price in Columbia is 6,000 pesos while that in US is 6,900 pesos equivalent. Therefore, Colombian peso was undervalued and it should had been 2,000 peso per US dollar.

 

   Related Questions in Business Economics

  • Q : Elucidate the use of money as a medium

    Elucidate the use of money as a medium of exchange in Market System?

  • Q : Show that students who study more hours

    Suppose studies show that students who study more hours receive higher grades.  Is there any relationship which guarantees that any particular student who studies longer will get higher grades?

  • Q : Creating a Business Report Business

    Business Report Objectives This assessment item relat

  • Q : Estimate the impact of education on

    Using a random sample of 670 individuals for the population of people in the workforce in 1976, we want to estimate the impact of education on wages. Let wage denote hourly wage in 1976 U.S. dollars and let educ denote years of schooling. We obtain the following OLS regression line: wage = -0.54

  • Q : Formally adopt inflation targeting

    Question: Why might it be difficult for the Fed to formally adopt inflation targeting?  Would inflation targeting be a good policy for the Fed in the present economic environment? Answer:

  • Q : Scientific method how does it relate to

    What is the scientific method and how does it relate to theoretical economics?  What is the difference between a hypothesis and an economic law or principle?

  • Q : The market system not only accepts

    Explain the statements: The market system not only accepts self-interest as a fact of human existence.

  • Q : Gains from the Exchange Even people who

    Even people who are extremely good at everything couldn’t encompass: (i) absolute benefits in approximately everything. (ii) Much higher incomes than average. (iii) Comparative benefits in everything. (iv) Superior natural endowments of talent.

    Q : Briefly state the pros and cons of

    Briefly state the pros and cons of Partnership?

  • Q : Introduction of the term Cost of equity

    Give a brief introduction of the term Cost of equity shares?