Ex-ante investment
Ex-ante investment: This is planned or desired investment throughout a specific period.
‘State the economic arguments on whether big cities which have congested roads must charge a road tax?’
When the wholesale price P = $5 per dozen roses, this purely competitive rose farm maximizes profit through producing ___ dozen roses at a total (loss or profit) of $___. (1) zero; loss; $2000. (2) 2000; loss; $1500.
During product differentiation, the firms attempt to: (w) become price takers. (x) gain a degree of market power over their pricing and sales of their products. (y) increase the supply of their products. (z) raise the price elasticity of the demand fo
When the price of a financial asset is of $2,000 and the interest rate is 10 percent, in that case investment is not reasonable for: (1) a perpetuity paying $200 annually. (2) an income stream paying $1000, $800, and $600, respectivel
Of the given firms, the probably to be a price taker would be: (1) Microsoft. (2) Wal-Mart. (3) Toyota. (4) the Los Angeles Lakers. (5) the biggest wheat farm in Canada. I need a good answer on the topic of
According to several critics who favor reducing welfare payments, and existing welfare programs as: (1) cannot cure poverty without substantial funding hikes. (2) are justified only when they increase total production. (3) harm poor people by creating
Personal discrimination: (1) may impede economic discrimination. (2) fosters wage, employment, occupational, and human capital discrimination. (3) causes housing prices to exceed levels affordable by the poor. (4) is the only cause of occupational dis
This purely-competitive producer’s generic bricks presently sell for: (i) $60 per thousand. (ii) $70 per thousand. (iii) $80 per thousand. (iv) $90 per thousand. (v) $100 per thousand. Q : Labor Contracts-Check-off Provisions I have a problem in economics on Labor Contracts-Check-off Provisions problem. Please help me in the given question. The statement of check-off provision: (1) Was outlawed through Taft Hartley Act. (2) Is unlawful in union shops. (3) Simplifies the un
I have a problem in economics on Labor Contracts-Check-off Provisions problem. Please help me in the given question. The statement of check-off provision: (1) Was outlawed through Taft Hartley Act. (2) Is unlawful in union shops. (3) Simplifies the un
Given that a MU of French fries of 35 utils and a MU for serving of potato chips at 25 utils, when their respective prices are $1.50 and $.80, the person who wants to maximize utility from the consumption of both of such goods would consume: (i) The similar amount of
18,76,764
1947761 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1412917
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!