--%>

Efficiency of monopolistic competition

Defenders of the efficiency of monopolistic competition are mainly persuasive when they insist which: (w) consumers benefit greatly from product differentiation. (x) any inefficiency is far less harmful than that of pure monopoly. (y) pure competition leads to unstable "cutthroat" competition. (z) economies of scale make product differentiation inevitable.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Price ceiling If the government puts a

    If the government puts a rent ceiling of $650 a month, what is the rent paid and how many rooms are rented? Explain why?

  • Q : Marginal utility of Goods and Bads When

    When Joe Glutton’s final bite of a burger yielded no profit in total utility, then Joe: (i) Don’t like hamburgers. (ii) Has reached the minimum utility from eating the burgers. (iii) Has reached the point where marginal utility of hamburgers is 0 (zero). (

  • Q : Maximizing utility from consumption of

    Given that a MU of French fries of 35 utils and a MU for serving of potato chips at 25 utils, when their respective prices are $1.50 and $.80, the person who wants to maximize utility from the consumption of both of such goods would consume: (i) The similar amount of

  • Q : Effects of higher real interest rates

    Higher real interest rates give in: (w) greater incentives to save and decreased incentives to invest. (x) increases in the amount of liquidity desired by financial investors. (y) increases in the optimal debt-equity ratio of a corporation. (z) decrea

  • Q : Income rate variation in Loren curve

    When you were unconcerned about the welfare of other people and your income rated you onto the top two percent of the population, then you would be happiest while the Lorenz curve for your country resembled as: (1) li

  • Q : Avoid losses incurred from predatory

    To drive rivals by a market but ignore losses incurred by predatory pricing, a firm could: (w) cut price below costs but continue to sell similar amount of output. (x) set price equal to average costs, removing incentives for other firms to reenter th

  • Q : Negative income tax programs Negative

    Negative income tax programs attack poverty through: (w) levying heavy taxes on the poor to encourage them to work more. (x) providing transfers in kind to low income households. (y) providing cash subsidies to guarantee a minimum income to low income

  • Q : Characteristics of constant cost

    Characteristics of industries which are not characteristics internal to operations of an individual firm include: (1) potential principal-agent problems. (2) diseconomies of scale. (3) production costs which either increase or decrease like the size of a market not su

  • Q : Case of heroin in public policies When

    When heroin were legalized in that case: (w) its price would fall and fewer addicts would connect in crime to support their habits. (x) the attractiveness of becoming a supplier would increase. (y) more people might experiment along with the drug since the price is re

  • Q : Under negative income tax the net income

    Under the negative income tax system demonstrated in this figure, where a family of four all along with earned income of $60,000 yearly would have a net [after-tax] income of: (1) $37,500 per year. (2) $42,500 per year. (3) $50,000 per year. (4) $55,0