--%>

Efficiency of monopolistic competition

Defenders of the efficiency of monopolistic competition are mainly persuasive when they insist which: (w) consumers benefit greatly from product differentiation. (x) any inefficiency is far less harmful than that of pure monopoly. (y) pure competition leads to unstable "cutthroat" competition. (z) economies of scale make product differentiation inevitable.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Conscious Interdependence in

    When firms or individuals attempt to personal gains or maximize profits or to minimize losses by trying to predict how other firms or individuals are probable to reaction, decisionmaking involves: (i) parallelism of action. (ii) profit maximization. (

  • Q : Closed Shops problems Can someone

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. Firms which agreed to hire only workers who were already the union members would be operating: (1) Agency shops. (2) Bilateral monopolies. (

  • Q : Influence of drought in market price

    Severe drought outcomes in a drastic fall in the output of wheat. Examine how will it influence the market price of wheat? Answer: As an outcome of severe drought,

  • Q : Monopsonistic exploitation of many

    NCAA rules the forbidding standard employment negotiations among colleges and amateur athletes tend to outcome in: (i) Monopsonistic exploitation of numerous athletes. (ii) Incentives for the collusion among individual college coaches and individual owners of the prof

  • Q : Illustration of Substitution Effect

    Sally is very rich that money hardly matters to her, although when the price of JIF chunky peanut butter doubled Sally switched to Peter Pan chunky peanut butter. This alters is an example of the: (1) Income effect. (2) Payback effect. (3) Substitution effect. (4) Pri

  • Q : Price elasticity of supply while the

    If John Whittler can sell totem poles for $1,800 at all, he markets 60 yearly, but while the price falls to $600 apiece; in that case he is willing to sell only 24 yearly. His price elasticity of supply is: (w) 0.43. (x) 0.86. (y) 1.62. (z) 2.48.

  • Q : Collective Bargaining-John Hicks model

    I have a problem in economics on Collective Bargaining-John Hicks model. Please help me in the following question. Sir John Hick’s model of the collective bargaining doesn’t describe: (1) Final wage settlements. (2) The period of strikes.

  • Q : Problem on change in preferences Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Tim liked to snack on slim jims on fishing; however his friend Earl for all time brought beef jerky. Tom slowly developed a taste for jerky and at present buys it more frequently than slim jim

  • Q : Managerial economics and good business

    please find the attached file (project) and qoute for it. minimus 7 pages required.

  • Q : Decrease transportation and transaction

    The value of land is attributable to the ways exactly sites decrease transportation and other transaction costs are termed as: (1) location rents. (2) transportation rents. (3) short term quasi rents. (4) parcel posts. (5) transaction