--%>

Efficiency of monopolistic competition

Defenders of the efficiency of monopolistic competition are mainly persuasive when they insist which: (w) consumers benefit greatly from product differentiation. (x) any inefficiency is far less harmful than that of pure monopoly. (y) pure competition leads to unstable "cutthroat" competition. (z) economies of scale make product differentiation inevitable.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Purely competitive or monopolies or

    Compared to either purely competitive firms or oligopolists, monopolies are: (w) more probable to consider the possible reactions of other firms. (x) oblivious to the actions of other firms. (y) less likely to engage

  • Q : Negative relationship in Law of Demand

    The law of demand declares that the negative relationship exists among: (1) The purchases of poorer goods and the level of national income. (2) Unlimited demands and restricted resources. (3) A good’s price and the quantity of good people will b

  • Q : Problem on labor monopsonist Can

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The labor monopsonist will hire labor up to the point where marginal: (i) Revenue product of the labor equivalents the wage. (ii) Resource c

  • Q : Individual Welfare Recipients If an

    If an individual receives benefits from the government, associate to the benefits everyone else receives, which exceed the individual’s taxes like a proportion of total tax payments by all citizens, which individual can reasonably be viewed like

  • Q : Income floor by marginal tax rate A

    A marginal tax rate of 75 percent and an income floor of ____ give in a break-even level of income of $8,000. (w) $2,000. (x) $4,000. (y) $6,000. (z) $16,000. Hello guys I want you

  • Q : Substitution effects resulting from

    The Law of Demand mainly relies heavily on the: (1) Buying power consequences of relative price modifications. (2) Substitution effect resultant from the relative price changes. (3) Increase in opportunity costs as income is worn out. (4) Principle of the non satiety.

  • Q : Easily enter or exit the market in the

    This graph depicts a short run situation while long run equilibrium has been achieved for a firm along with some market (price-making) power when the firm cannot price discriminate and: (w) has explicit costs but no i

  • Q : Unemployment among skilled workers

    Rises in the legal minimum wage rate have not been blamed for rising: (i) Unemployment among the teenagers. (ii) Racial discrimination in the employment. (iii) Unemployment among trained workers who have lost their jobs since of competition from the cheaper imports. (

  • Q : Burden of tax reduce on suppliers of

    Most of the burden of an excise (i.e., per unit) tax would be borne through consumers of the taxed good, although some of the tax burden would reduce on suppliers of the good demonstrated in: (w) Panel A. (x) Panel B. (y) Panel C. (z)

  • Q : Problem on Illegal Union Strategies Not

    Not between strategies historically employed by some unions however now illegal in the United States are: (i) Jurisdictional strikes centered on which the unions will stand for a firm’s staff. (ii) Agency shop contracts forcing the non-union staff to pay ‘