--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Efficiency of monopolistic competition

Defenders of the efficiency of monopolistic competition are mainly persuasive when they insist which: (w) consumers benefit greatly from product differentiation. (x) any inefficiency is far less harmful than that of pure monopoly. (y) pure competition leads to unstable "cutthroat" competition. (z) economies of scale make product differentiation inevitable.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Time and opportunity cost in

    The time and other opportunity costs incurred in obtaining information regarding products and prices and in that case driving to and from markets are illustrations of: (1) mobilization costs. (2) contracting costs. (3) transactions co

    		•
  • Q : Case of heroin in public policies When

    When heroin were legalized in that case: (w) its price would fall and fewer addicts would connect in crime to support their habits. (x) the attractiveness of becoming a supplier would increase. (y) more people might experiment along with the drug since the price is re

    		•
  • Q : Demand for product when its sales fall

    When a 10% hike in the price of paisley socks causes sales to fall with 20%, the demand for such socks is: (1) perfectly inelastic. (2) relatively inelastic. (3) unitarily elastic. (4) relatively elastic. (5) perfectly elastic. <

    		•
  • Q : Determine the relationship among APC

    Determine the relationship among APC and APS? Answer: APC + APS = 1.

    		•
  • Q : Law of supply regarding firms I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Law of supply regarding firms. Please help me in the following question. The law of supply signifies that: (i) Firms provide less for sale at lower prices. (ii) Purchases and prices differ inversely. (iii) Minimum inve

    		•
  • Q : Transitivity Please provide me answer

    Please provide me answer of this question. What will be the implications for consumer's preferences and her indifference curves if the axiom of transitivity does not hold?

    		•
  • Q : Price elasticity of demand for pizza

    Since the price drops/falls from $8 to 1 all along this demand curve, the price elasticity of demand for pizza: (1) increases towards infinity. (2) Drops/Falls towards zero. (3) Increases, then drop/falls. (4) Always equivalents 1 and demand is unitar

    		•
  • Q : Normative Standards for Distribution

    Relative to a requirements standard for distributing income, in that case the adoption of an equality standard would most likely tend to be: (w) unarguably fairer. (x) less bureaucratic. (y) more harmful to work incentives. (z) clearly less fair.

    		•
  • Q : Problem on Decisions at the Marginal

    The least clear illustration of how decisions are generally at the margin would be: (i) A floral shop hiring an additional clerk and opening earlier in hopes of increasing revenues by half. (ii) Eating less whenever the menu is a-la-carte than at an ‘all-you-can

    		•
  • Q : Decreasing price of Complementary Goods

    The increase in demand for tartar sauce would be a probable result of: (1) A reduction in the price of fish. (2) An raise in the price of tartar sauce. (3) A bumper crop of the tartar sauce. (4) A raise in the price of fish. (v) The reduction in price

    		•