--%>

Effect of higher price for normal good

Let consider the law of demand. The idea that the higher price for a normal good will outcome in less of good being purchased never based logically on the: (1) Income effect, by which the higher price decreases the purchasing power of the income. (2) Demand for good falling since of the higher price. (3) Law of diminishing marginal utility. (4) Substitution effect, by which the higher price causes people to purchase other things.

Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the above options.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Minimum Wage Laws-Group least likely to

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The group which is least likely to be helped by the minimum wage law is: (1) African-American teenagers. (2) Skilled industrial workers. (3) Members of the unions. (4) Experienced construction

  • Q : Drive rivals out of business A firm may

    A firm may temporarily lower prices as well as earn negative profits in trying to: (w) drive rivals out of business. (x) find rivals to lower prices. (y) maximize current profit. (z) A rational firm would not do this.

    Q : Least Relative Market Interest Rate

    Market interest rates are least associated to the: (1) willingness of people to defer consumption (to save) when they are rewarded for doing so. (2) relative liquidities of alternative financial assets. (3) marginal productivity of new capital relativ

  • Q : Oligopolistic markets in equilibrium

    Oligopolistic markets in equilibrium are described by: (w) a large number of sellers of homogeneous output. (x) monopolistic sellers dealing along with only some buyers. (y) a small number of sellers of close substitutes. (z) socially optimal amounts

  • Q : Hike in relative price of a good I have

    I have a problem in economics on Hike in relative price of a good. Please help me in the following question. The hike in relative price of a good will quickly increase the: (i) Quantity demanded. (ii) Market supply. (iii) Rate of inflation. (iv) Quant

  • Q : Emergence and development of common

    The economist most intimately identified along with the emergence and early development of common equilibrium analysis was: (w) Adam Smith. (x) Leon Walras. (y) Alfred Marshall. (z) William Stanley Jevons. Can some

  • Q : Total revenue for profit-maximizing

    TR (total revenue) for this profit-maximizing pure competitor equivalents area: (i) 0PeQ. (ii) bPec. (iii) aPed. (iv) 0bcQ. (v) 0Pec.

    Q : Profit maximizing strategy Prohibition

    Prohibition Corporation would exactly break-even on its St. Valentine’s Day software when, in place of correctly identifying its profit maximizing strategy, this: (1) operated at point i, charging just $20 per copy and producing

  • Q : Median Relative Income Measurement A

    A family which has income greater than half the median incomes of other American families, although less than twice which median income, is categorized by the Department of the Census as: (1) impoverished. (2) low relative income. (3) working class. (

  • Q : Requirements for pure competition The

    The needs for pure competition are most intimately met by the market for: (i) domestic (American) steel. (ii) comic books. (iii) sugar-coated cereal within your local grocery store. (iv) stocks and bonds traded on Wall Street after they have been issu