--%>

Economist-Conclusion for redistribution of wealth and income

I want a good answer on the topic of normative economics. Please give me your opinion that if wealth and income both were redistributed by the richest one to the poorest five percent of the population, conclusion of an economist would be that: (w) society gains since the poor require the income more than the rich. (x) it is socially bad since somebody lost. (y) society gains since more people were helped than were made worse off. (z) assessing the consequence on social welfare needs a value judgment.

Please guys help me to solve this query.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Which aspect cannot given by Prices in

    Prices can’t give which one following aspect: (i) Incentives for efficient resource utilize. (ii) Guides for changing levels of production. (iii) Information regarding relative costs. (iv) Ideal references to cover all opportunity costs.

  • Q : Basic economic questions NOT included

    The three basic economic questions do NOT include: (w) What?, (x) For whom?, (y) Where? and (z) How? Can someone explain me with about above problem of fundamental economic concept...

  • Q : Define the normative economics in

    Hello guys I want your opinion. Please suggest your answer for following Normative-economics problem. Normative economics: (i) based upon value judgments. (ii) involves statements which are either right or wrong. (

  • Q : Explain about market buyers A buyers’

    A buyers’ market is a market in that: (w) queuing to secure goods is common. (x) the current market price is below equilibrium. (y) demand exceeds supply. (z) several sellers experience surpluses. I need a go

  • Q : Predictable outcome droughts in market

    The predictable outcome of the 2001 to 2002 droughts within the U.S. farm belt was to: (w) raise the price and quantity of farm goods sold. (x) stimulate exports of U.S. wheat. (y) reduce the supplies, and increase the prices of farm goods. (z) boost demands and price

  • Q : Who thought Murderers do more harm than

    Murderers do more harm than shoplifters; therefore they must be punished proportionally more harshly as per the school of thought developed through: (i) medieval scholar Thomas Aquinas. (ii) Chinese leader Mao Zedong. (iii) lawyer and social reformer Jeremy Bentham. (

  • Q : Define the specific explanation of

    Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem of Economic Analysis that is given below: Economic analysis: (w) focuses only on financial relations. (x) is a step-by-step guide to gaining wealth. (y) centers

  • Q : Best theory according to razor of Occam

    I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion that as per to Occam's razor, the excellent theories are: (v) The most logical and complex. (w) Ideal mirrors of each aspect of reality. (x) Simply proven by using

  • Q : Illustration of a positive scientific

    An illustration of a positive scientific statement would be which college graduates who: (i) create higher incomes than high school drop outs deserve that higher income. (ii) charge victims of hurricanes as well as other natural disasters outrageous prices must be sho

  • Q : Prohibition in illustrations of

    Illustrations of normative statements would not comprise assertions which: (1) premeditated murderers deserve the death penalty. (2) Leonardo DiCaprio is a terrible actor. (3) AIDS and HIV are transmitted through sexual contact. (4) women must be paid