--%>

Economist-Conclusion for redistribution of wealth and income

I want a good answer on the topic of normative economics. Please give me your opinion that if wealth and income both were redistributed by the richest one to the poorest five percent of the population, conclusion of an economist would be that: (w) society gains since the poor require the income more than the rich. (x) it is socially bad since somebody lost. (y) society gains since more people were helped than were made worse off. (z) assessing the consequence on social welfare needs a value judgment.

Please guys help me to solve this query.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Concept of income more to the poor than

    The concept about, on average, further income implies more to the poor than to the rich conforms most to the teachings or philosophy of: (1) Thorstein Veblen. (2) Friedrich Nietzsche. (3) Gautama Buddha. (4) Jeremy Bentham. (5) Nostradamus. (6) Adam S

  • Q : Maximization of complete value of

    Maximization of the complete value of output from a fixed amount of resources gives in: (i) Opportunity cost. (ii) Economic efficiency. (iii) Potential profitability. (iv) Comparative benefit. (v) Scarcity. How can I solve my

  • Q : Uses of a theory in economic analysis

    To be helpful in economic analysis, a theory should produce: (w) Realistic assumptions. (x) A consensus in between scientists. (y) Results which is not possible to disprove. (z) Predictions supported through real world data.

    Q : Closest to a Free Good in economic What

    What would be the closest to a "free good" in economic terms: (i) Local telephone directory assistance, (ii) Air conditioning thrown in when you buy a new car, (iii) Drinking water and (iv) Breathable air of the current atmospheric quality?

  • Q : Gains from trade and economic consensus

    While considering current events and matters, economists and the common public seem to disagree relatively the most about: (i) what to do regarding the War in Iraq. (ii) whether Democrats or Republicans must win the next election. (iii) the relative costs and advantag

  • Q : Basic economic questions NOT included

    The three basic economic questions do NOT include: (w) What?, (x) For whom?, (y) Where? and (z) How? Can someone explain me with about above problem of fundamental economic concept...

  • Q : Define much of a good as need at zero

    I need a good answer on the topic of free good in economic. Please give me your suggestion that when all people can consume as much of a good as they desire at zero cost, this is a: (w) welfare good. (x) bonus for buying something else. (y) surplus su

  • Q : Invisible hand of the marketplace The “

    The “invisible hand” of the marketplace is a term coined by Adam Smith that considers to: (w) government policies to set market prices at equilibrium levels. (x) speculative manipulations which create disequilibrium. (y) a

  • Q : Define economic assumption of

    As per the economic assumption of rationality, there people: (w) always behave with ideal rationality. (x) never behave in erratic or random ways. (y) tend to make decisions consistent along with their goals. (z) foresee completely the effects of thei

  • Q : Predictable outcome droughts in market

    The predictable outcome of the 2001 to 2002 droughts within the U.S. farm belt was to: (w) raise the price and quantity of farm goods sold. (x) stimulate exports of U.S. wheat. (y) reduce the supplies, and increase the prices of farm goods. (z) boost demands and price