--%>

Economist-Conclusion for redistribution of wealth and income

I want a good answer on the topic of normative economics. Please give me your opinion that if wealth and income both were redistributed by the richest one to the poorest five percent of the population, conclusion of an economist would be that: (w) society gains since the poor require the income more than the rich. (x) it is socially bad since somebody lost. (y) society gains since more people were helped than were made worse off. (z) assessing the consequence on social welfare needs a value judgment.

Please guys help me to solve this query.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Opportunity cost of buying a new car I

    I need a good answer upon the topic of opportunity cost problems. What is the opportunity cost of buying a new car: (i) last dollar price one pays for this. (ii) Value of the old car traded within. (iii) Sticker pr

  • Q : Explain Economics as the extensive

    Economics can be explained as the extensive study of the effects of: (w) money and why having this is good. (x) production costs and profits. (y) how people attempt to gratify their boundless needs. (z) purchases, acquisitions and mergers.

  • Q : Firm-production similar to output with

    When a firm could produce at least similar output with less of one resource and no additional of any other, mix of resources of the firm is technologically: (w) and economically efficient. (x) efficient, but economically inefficient. (y) inefficient, but economically

  • Q : Problem regarding the distributive

    Ted and Willy are eating lunch. Ted has a Snowball and Willy a Ding Dong for dessert. Strongly prefer both Ding Dongs. A required trade of Willy's Ding-Dong for Ted's Snowball would be likely to enhance: (w) distributive efficiency as Fred is better off. (x) allocativ

  • Q : Opportunity costs in alternate activity

    Why is this probably precise to believe that you can believe of nothing better to do along with your time immediately than to study economics?

  • Q : Fee-simple private property rights I

    I have a problem in economics on Resources and Products Flow Model. Please help me in the following question. “Fee-simple” private property rights permit you to: (1) Shoot trespassers who are on your land with no permission. (2) Refuse to

  • Q : When is Economics LEAST related with

    Economics like a science is LEAST related with how people: (w) try to make themselves happy. (x) utilize resources to try to satisfy their desires. (y) adjust to changes within government policies. (z) morally justify cheating upon their income taxes.

  • Q : Problem regarding Property Rights Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the following options. Fee simple rights don’t comprise the right to: (1) Demolish your property. (2) Sell your property. (3) Employ your property for your own advantage. (4) Damage another’s propert

  • Q : Purchases of recently issued bonds and

    Define one reason that the purchases of recently issued bonds and stocks: (1) just only increase the value of federal funds. (2) Are not economic investments since they are just alternative forms of people’s financial saving? (3) Reduce the prof

  • Q : Human happiness in an economic problems

    Can someone help me along with best solution about problem of economic that anything which adds to human happiness is an economic: (1) factor of production, (2) good, (3) commodity, (4) resource and (5) product? How can I solve my economics problems w