--%>

Economist-Conclusion for redistribution of wealth and income

I want a good answer on the topic of normative economics. Please give me your opinion that if wealth and income both were redistributed by the richest one to the poorest five percent of the population, conclusion of an economist would be that: (w) society gains since the poor require the income more than the rich. (x) it is socially bad since somebody lost. (y) society gains since more people were helped than were made worse off. (z) assessing the consequence on social welfare needs a value judgment.

Please guys help me to solve this query.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Example of Productive Efficiency in

    If six units of capital can be substituted for one unit of labor without changing total steel output, whereas 4 units of capital can be substituted for one unit of labor without changing the output of wheat, at that moment: (w) there is an optimal allocation of resour

  • Q : Property Rights I have a problem in

    I have a problem in economics on Property Rights. Please help me in getting the right answer from the following question. John Locke believed that the value and property rights derive from: (i) Social conventions prevailing inheritance. (ii) The helpf

  • Q : FUNDAMENTAL economic problems of

    Society's FUNDAMENTAL economic problems do NOT comprise deciding: (w) what goods to produce. (x) how to produce the goods selected. (y) what occupation each person must pursue. (z) who must find to use the goods produced.

    Q : Current situation- better off without

    When it is possible to make somebody better off without making anybody worse off, the current condition is: (w) efficient. (x) inefficient. (y) optimal. (z) simply enhanced. How can I solve my problem of Economic Efficiency

  • Q : Define subjective opportunity cost for

    Can someone explain me with excellent solution about problem of economic concept of Opportunity Cost... If you exchange your Audi for a race horse you hate, and exchange the race horse for 100 shares of gold-mine stock you believe

  • Q : With whom is Economists LEAST concerned

    Economists are LEAST related along with the: (w) gains and losses from changes in government policies. (x) adjustments people make when tax structures change. (y) causes of inflation and unemployment. (z) ethics of political campaigning.

  • Q : Explain about the Opportunity Cost in

    Opportunity cost is explained as the value of the: (w) best alternative specified for the decision made. (x) sum of all alternative choices while a decision is made. (y) monetary cost of making a decision. (z) cost incurred while one ignores alternati

  • Q : Spending money for enhancement in

    Choosing NOT to spend the additional money required to enhance the safety of a dangerous traffic intersection is an illustration of: (v) macroeconomic policy decisions. (w) positive economics. (x) how society assigns prices to human lives. (y) economic inefficiency. (

  • Q : What would illustrations of economic

    I need your answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion that illustrations of economic capital would contain a: (1) Garbage truck. (2) $10,000 ten-year United States Treasury bond. (3) College diploma. (4) Deeded right to

  • Q : Explain Economics as the extensive

    Economics can be explained as the extensive study of the effects of: (w) money and why having this is good. (x) production costs and profits. (y) how people attempt to gratify their boundless needs. (z) purchases, acquisitions and mergers.