--%>

Economist-Conclusion for redistribution of wealth and income

I want a good answer on the topic of normative economics. Please give me your opinion that if wealth and income both were redistributed by the richest one to the poorest five percent of the population, conclusion of an economist would be that: (w) society gains since the poor require the income more than the rich. (x) it is socially bad since somebody lost. (y) society gains since more people were helped than were made worse off. (z) assessing the consequence on social welfare needs a value judgment.

Please guys help me to solve this query.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Governmental allocations of non-human

    The fundamental foundations of a capitalist system do not comprise: (1) Supplies and demands. (2) Private property rights. (3) Governmental allocations of non-human resources. (4) Laissez faire policies. (5) Market-determined prices and outputs.

  • Q : Explain about the normative economics

    Please suggest me how to solve the problem of normative economics that is given below: Normative economics is: (w) a description of how the economy works. (x) based upon empirical studies. (y) concerned along with

  • Q : Define an example of a free good of

    The closest of the given to being a free good would be from below: (i) affection and support by your parents. (ii) a $100 bill you determined after a stiff breeze blew this onto your porch. (iii) health insurance given by a firm to all its workers. (iv) the second bag

  • Q : Assignments I want it tomorrow night or

    I want it tomorrow night or before, please.

  • Q : Explain TANSTAAFL TANSTAAFL is an

    TANSTAAFL is an acronym suggestive of that: (1) Tax agents never observe the awful influences from levies. (2) Tenants and needy must take all assets by landlords. (3) There ain't no all things like a free lunch. (4) Temperance and non satiety togethe

  • Q : Break-even price what is the break-even

    what is the break-even price in economics?

  • Q : High rates of saving and investment Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Production possibilities frontiers can be employed to demonstrate why maximizing economic growth needs: (1) The amount of investment goods to equivalent the quantity of consum

  • Q : Define smog as in Bads economics problem

    Smog is: (w) a good since this gives the air texture. (x) a bad because most people would pay to find rid of this. (y) a free good since you could consume all you desire without having to pay for this. (z) an inefficient utilization of resources.

    Q : Potentially allocated lower prices in

    Whose lives are potentially allocated lower prices while a drunk decides to drive home without waiting to sober up?

  • Q : Excessive production as a problem Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Governments which attempt to utilize ‘needs’ or ‘equality’ as the bases for distributing goods are NOT probable to: (1) Encounter extreme production as a problem. (2) R