--%>

Economist-Conclusion for redistribution of wealth and income

I want a good answer on the topic of normative economics. Please give me your opinion that if wealth and income both were redistributed by the richest one to the poorest five percent of the population, conclusion of an economist would be that: (w) society gains since the poor require the income more than the rich. (x) it is socially bad since somebody lost. (y) society gains since more people were helped than were made worse off. (z) assessing the consequence on social welfare needs a value judgment.

Please guys help me to solve this query.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Where is all economic resources fall

    Can anybody advise me the explanation for specified problem regarding where is all the economic resources fall within the categories: (i) Infinite, free, energy, or knowledge. (ii) land, labor, capital, or entrepreneurship. (iii) consumption, saving,

  • Q : Problem regarding the distributive

    Ted and Willy are eating lunch. Ted has a Snowball and Willy a Ding Dong for dessert. Strongly prefer both Ding Dongs. A required trade of Willy's Ding-Dong for Ted's Snowball would be likely to enhance: (w) distributive efficiency as Fred is better off. (x) allocativ

  • Q : Market adjustments change equilibrium

    A movement along the demand curve for a good would be caused through changes within: (1) preferences and tastes. (2) costs for productive resources. (3) supply which change the equilibrium price of the good. (4) expectations regarding future prices.

  • Q : Better off with less in economic

    Anything of that people would be better off with less is which from given issue: (1) economic surplus, (2) external cost, (3) economic bad and (4) adverse consequence. Hello guys I need your advice. Please recommend some idea for a

  • Q : Give an example of Production in

    By using knowledge and/or technology to apply energy to change materials, thereby making the materials more precious is: (w) production. (x) demand. (y) a total cure for scarcity. (z) economically profitable. Can someone clarify/he

  • Q : Usefulness of Positive Economics Please

    Please help me to solve the problem that is given below: Positive economics is MOST helpful within finding if: (i) Particular economic goals are good or not. (ii) A set of national goals is desirable. (iii) Specific economic t

  • Q : Savings as big investment The Economic

    The Economic growth in a proficient economy will tend to increase when: (1) Capital quickly depreciates and becomes obsolete. (2) Threats of war divert resources to the national defense. (3) People’s savings increase to permit bigger investment. (4) Funds for re

  • Q : Problem on Private ownership of property

    I have a problem in economics on Private ownership of property. Please help me in the following question. The hallmarks of ‘pure’ capitalism are illustrated by the: (1) Absence of productive and allocative efficiency. (2) Interaction of th

  • Q : Government as a trustee on nonhuman

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. Government acts as the trustee over nonhuman resources beneath: (i) Laissez-faire capitalism. (ii) Socialism. (iii) Fee-simple property rights systems. (iv) Feu

  • Q : Uses of positive economic analysis Hey

    Hey friends I need your help for given problem: Positive economic analysis would be least helpful like a guide to how a society can decrease: (w) specific criminal behavior from punishment. (x) inequality within th